BennyD wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 5:25 pm
The NHS, which don’t get me wrong is a fantastic institution, hasn’t evolved with the times and has become a massive sponge which will absorb as much money as you throw at it without the expected levels of improvement. It needs a root and branch overhaul to reduce the wastage that is an ever present. Too many chiefs and not enough Indians (this, for any Woke snowflakes amongst us, is an old saying, not a racial slur) is one of many expensive problems with it. However, there are too many left wingers that won’t countenance any worthwhile change without calling it a Tory plan to Privatise it.
The NHS has a number of great hospitals and many of the doctors, nurses and other staff are dedicated, hard workers, great carers and the best professionals you'd ever want to be looked after by.
The problem with the NHS is that it is "state owned" and, funded by government decisions on how to spend taxpayer money. That why it's a "massive sponge" as you describe it - and, that's not a recent issue, it's been like that from "day one." A "root and branch" overhaul will tackle the way it is funded. Change it so that "the patient pays" and immediately the health service will adjust to provide what the patient needs - and not what the government decided 12, 18 or 24 months earlier (and even longer when government decided how many doctors and nurses to train). Of course, for the patient to have the money to pay, all of us, except the very wealthy will require health insurance - so, implement compulsory health insurance, the way they do in Netherlands, Germany, France (I think) and other major EU countries - and charge a little extra to those that can afford, so that those on "no/very" low income get their health insurance provided from free.
That's why I say it's a pity the EU didn't mandate a better national health service for all members...
Oh, and yes, we might have spent more than the UK does, so better health outcomes, also. What's not to like?