VAR at it again

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Vegas Claret
Posts: 30683
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11048 times
Has Liked: 5657 times
Location: clue is in the title

VAR at it again

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:44 pm

how the **** was Raheem Sterling not sent off then ?
This user liked this post: Taffy on the wing

FCBurnley
Posts: 9845
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2000 times
Has Liked: 1145 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by FCBurnley » Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:46 pm

Clear Red

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 892 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by BurnleyFC » Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:48 pm

I don’t even know what the actual rules are nowadays but I don’t think he went in maliciously.

Plus, it was only on Dele Alli.

Steve1956
Posts: 17265
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6489 times
Has Liked: 2916 times
Location: Fife

VAR Today

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:50 pm

Favouring the big clubs again Sterling just did a shin breaker on Dele ....got off with it :(

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 927 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by thatdberight » Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:52 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:48 pm
I don’t even know what the actual rules are nowadays but I don’t think he went in maliciously.

Plus, it was only on Dele Alli.
Like you, I don't know what the law is any more. I don't think that's a red though. He gets the ball, doesn't quite catch it cleanly, ends up standing on Alli's leg. It's a nasty collision but neither malicious nor reckless.

I'm not partial to either player so I think I'm unbiased.

conyoviejo
Posts: 5829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
Been Liked: 2491 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates

Re: VAR at it again

Post by conyoviejo » Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:53 pm

Should have stood on his Phookin head ..Alli is a dirty Cnut..

Steve1956
Posts: 17265
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6489 times
Has Liked: 2916 times
Location: Fife

Re: VAR Today

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:54 pm

He plays for City not Burnley we would be playing with 10 now

conyoviejo
Posts: 5829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
Been Liked: 2491 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates

Re: VAR Today

Post by conyoviejo » Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:54 pm

Pity he missed him,..

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30683
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11048 times
Has Liked: 5657 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: VAR at it again

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:54 pm

even pre VAR that's a straight red

Steve1956
Posts: 17265
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6489 times
Has Liked: 2916 times
Location: Fife

Re: VAR Today

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:56 pm

conyoviejo wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:54 pm
Pity he missed him,..
He didn't :lol:

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30683
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11048 times
Has Liked: 5657 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: VAR at it again

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun Feb 02, 2020 5:10 pm

and City get a pen awarded minutes after the incident, FCUK VAR

Taffy on the wing
Posts: 4642
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
Been Liked: 1031 times
Has Liked: 3190 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by Taffy on the wing » Sun Feb 02, 2020 5:20 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:44 pm
how the **** was Raheem Sterling not sent off then ?
Thought he'd broken Ali's leg!........Definite red, then the non-penalty FFS.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30683
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11048 times
Has Liked: 5657 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: VAR at it again

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun Feb 02, 2020 5:26 pm

Taffy on the wing wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 5:20 pm
Thought he'd broken Ali's leg!........Definite red, then the non-penalty FFS.
and the fact that Loris is a yard off the line when he saves the first one

Kevin Friend is a shambles on and off the pitch

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17978
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4071 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by ElectroClaret » Sun Feb 02, 2020 5:54 pm

1-0 Spurs.
City down to ten men.

elwaclaret
Posts: 8991
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2010 times
Has Liked: 2910 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by elwaclaret » Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:16 pm

Why was the city player sent off, are shoulder charges banned now. It was clearly shoulder to shoulder,I’d have been really pleased with myself if I’d been the defender.

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 927 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by thatdberight » Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:19 pm

elwaclaret wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:16 pm
Why was the city player sent off, are shoulder charges banned now. It was clearly shoulder to shoulder,I’d have been really pleased with myself if I’d been the defender.
You can't just barge into someone, even with your shoulder, in an action unrelated to chasing the ball. Never have been allowed to.

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 927 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by thatdberight » Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:20 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 5:26 pm
and the fact that Loris is a yard off the line when he saves the first one

Kevin Friend is a shambles on and off the pitch
Keeper on the line at a penalty is not VAR reviewable.

I suggest it would be more shambolic if Friend starting making up the regulations as he went along.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30683
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11048 times
Has Liked: 5657 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: VAR at it again

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:26 pm

thatdberight wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:20 pm
Keeper on the line at a penalty is not VAR reviewable.

I suggest it would be more shambolic if Friend starting making up the regulations as he went along.
That must be a PL thing as it is in every other competition it's used in

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 927 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by thatdberight » Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:46 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:26 pm
That must be a PL thing as it is in every other competition it's used in
Bundesliga as well. IFAB weren't impressed but it hasn't changed yet.

dsr
Posts: 15236
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4577 times
Has Liked: 2268 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by dsr » Sun Feb 02, 2020 7:48 pm

elwaclaret wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:16 pm
Why was the city player sent off, are shoulder charges banned now. It was clearly shoulder to shoulder,I’d have been really pleased with myself if I’d been the defender.
No, shoulder charges are still legal - and just as it always has been, you need to be within playing distance of the ball when it happens. If the ball is five yards up the field, then only players with legs 15 feet long may do it!

If it wasn't for this "playing distance of the ball" rule, then the chaos at corners would be even worse as a phalanx of attackers shoulder charged the defenders to allow their man a free header. Might suit Burnley! ;)
This user liked this post: elwaclaret

elwaclaret
Posts: 8991
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2010 times
Has Liked: 2910 times

Re: VAR at it again

Post by elwaclaret » Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:08 pm

dsr wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 7:48 pm
No, shoulder charges are still legal - and just as it always has been, you need to be within playing distance of the ball when it happens. If the ball is five yards up the field, then only players with legs 15 feet long may do it!

If it wasn't for this "playing distance of the ball" rule, then the chaos at corners would be even worse as a phalanx of attackers shoulder charged the defenders to allow their man a free header. Might suit Burnley! ;)
Thought the ball was in playing distance... thank God it didn’t matter so much when Billy Hamilton was carrying three defenders and barging through the rest of the team on one of his rampages. But fair enough.

Post Reply