Covid-19

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
RingoMcCartney
Posts: 10318
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 2636 times
Has Liked: 2798 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by RingoMcCartney » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:08 pm

TVC15 wrote:
Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:01 pm
When you stop being racist (probably never) I’ll stop calling you a racist.
That’s the best I can do.
Hopefully one day I’ll get the chance to say it to your face as it will be especially pertinent

Crystal ?
Clear as.

You Stay safe now. (Behind your keyboard)

martin_p
Posts: 10379
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3767 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by martin_p » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:13 pm

I think those expecting any significant relaxation of the current measures are going to be disappointed. Until there is some sort of vaccine or treatment normal life will not return. As it stands, for example, I’ll be surprised if I get on another football match in 2020.
This user liked this post: paulatky

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by TVC15 » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:18 pm

RingoMcCartney wrote:
Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:08 pm
Clear as.

You Stay safe now. (Behind your keyboard)
Where as you are where exactly ?
Racist crying hypocrite - and yes still behind your keyboard

Stay racist...I know you will

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by tim_noone » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:24 pm

martin_p wrote:
Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:13 pm
I think those expecting any significant relaxation of the current measures are going to be disappointed. Until there is some sort of vaccine or treatment normal life will not return. As it stands, for example, I’ll be surprised if I get on another football match in 2020.
It's one big mess.

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9600
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3148 times
Has Liked: 10248 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Covid-19

Post by evensteadiereddie » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:28 pm

martin_p wrote:
Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:13 pm
I think those expecting any significant relaxation of the current measures are going to be disappointed. Until there is some sort of vaccine or treatment normal life will not return. As it stands, for example, I’ll be surprised if I get on another football match in 2020.

Lives or livelihood ?
The potential meltdown of the economy will determine when any relaxation of the restrictions can be considered. The government aren't stupid - if a significant number of jobs and businesses continue to go, they will blink. If anybody is to face ruin or difficulty, it's going to be the people who lent their votes to the Tories. There'll come a time when public opinion will be perceived to have turned against them somewhat.
Not yet, maybe, but I think the clock's ticking.

randomclaret2
Posts: 6904
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2758 times
Has Liked: 4325 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by randomclaret2 » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:30 pm

I suspect people who lent their votes to all parties or to none will face ruin and difficulty in equal measure

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9600
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3148 times
Has Liked: 10248 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Covid-19

Post by evensteadiereddie » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:35 pm

It would be a first !

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Covid-19

Post by FactualFrank » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:30 am

Coronavirus: Social restrictions 'to remain for rest of year'

The UK will have to live with some disruptive social measures for at least the rest of the year, the government's chief medical adviser has said.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52389285

The above won't come as a surprise, but it's just a reminder that it's unlikely we'll be back to near normality before 2021.

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by paulatky » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:48 am

FactualFrank wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:30 am
Coronavirus: Social restrictions 'to remain for rest of year'

The UK will have to live with some disruptive social measures for at least the rest of the year, the government's chief medical adviser has said.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52389285

The above won't come as a surprise, but it's just a reminder that it's unlikely we'll be back to near normality before 2021.
That shouldnt come as a surprise to anyone who has been paying proper attention throughout.

The bigger question is why the game’s authorities and individual clubs wont admit it.

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10912
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5559 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by TheFamilyCat » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:51 am

paulatky wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:48 am
That shouldnt come as a surprise to anyone who has been paying proper attention throughout.

The bigger question is why the game’s authorities and individual clubs wont admit it.
Why are you connecting that report specifically to football?

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Grumps » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:51 am

paulatky wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:48 am
That shouldnt come as a surprise to anyone who has been paying proper attention throughout.

The bigger question is why the game’s authorities and individual clubs wont admit it.
Are you sure you're posting from the right account?
I have to admit it takes some nerve to return after how you were outed the other week.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10168
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:55 am

FactualFrank wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:30 am
Coronavirus: Social restrictions 'to remain for rest of year'

The UK will have to live with some disruptive social measures for at least the rest of the year, the government's chief medical adviser has said.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52389285

The above won't come as a surprise, but it's just a reminder that it's unlikely we'll be back to near normality before 2021.
Reading the usual childish carry on between the usuals in the exchanges last night you could be fooled into thinking it was all over. Hopefully action can be taken once the posts are viewed.

Some parts of the lockdown will have to be eased in the near future but it is a tough balance which parts

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Lowbankclaret » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:57 am

Elizabeth wrote:
Wed Apr 22, 2020 9:09 pm
The reasons given for the lockdown were to slow the rate that the virus was spreading and to protect the NHS.
As things stand, with talk of the peak having been reached and reports that the 'new hospitals' are being under-used, why would there not be some relaxation?

I think the public would be entitled to ask that question
In most countries the modellers have I think got it about correct. In the UK they were saying somewhere between 250,000 and 500,000 deaths if we did nothing.
By implementing lockdown our Gov said it was to try to keep the deaths below 20,000 and if they did it would be a good result.
Even ignoring the arguments about how death rates are counted , our death rate is going to go over the 20,000. I said well over a week ago our death rate would be between 20k and 40k, unfortunately that upper rate is looking like it may be under the final death toll.

On the peak, lockdown has done here what it has done in other countries, it’s turned it into a plateau. I was concerned our lockdown light would not achieve it fast enough but it appears it has been successful. What other countries have waited for is the death rate being under or around the 400 deaths per day. The issue then is it’s going to climb back up, yes within what the NHS can cope with, but what’s the ongoing balance of deaths per day against economic impact the public will accept.

It difficult to say if the modellers got it correct but it’s looks pretty close, you cannot conclude that the rates of deaths would have been correct , however you can imply it would have been in the right ball park.

So the big question is how do we relax lockdown, without then suffering a 100,000 deaths for example.

What is a little concerning from yesterday and I think needs to be understood before we can do anything was the weekly death rate graph from yesterday.

3482F1C4-8E74-499D-BF6D-723FA19F3E6F.jpeg
3482F1C4-8E74-499D-BF6D-723FA19F3E6F.jpeg (355.47 KiB) Viewed 2020 times

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by paulatky » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:57 am

Grumps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:51 am
Are you sure you're posting from the right account?
I have to admit it takes some nerve to return after how you were outed the other week.
How do you mean. I mistakenly used my wife’s account after she had logged in first thing in the morning.

That doesnt alter the validity of what I think.

Interesting that the government has now admitted that social distancing restictions will be in place until at least 2021. Wonder who has said that many times before.

By the way do you think the number of deaths may have peaked yet or do you think nobody knows

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10912
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5559 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by TheFamilyCat » Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:02 am

paulatky wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:57 am
How do you mean. I mistakenly used my wife’s account after she had logged in first thing in the morning.
Well that clears that up then.

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by paulatky » Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:05 am

Lowbank what does your graph show ?
What is the scale at the bottom.
It’s frightening how high the real UK death toll is already.
Thought to be over 30,000 now with care homes,hospices, community and lag in reporting hospital deaths taken into account

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Grumps » Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:07 am

paulatky wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:57 am
How do you mean. I mistakenly used my wife’s account after she had logged in first thing in the morning.

That doesnt alter the validity of what I think.

Interesting that the government has now admitted that social distancing restictions will be in place until at least 2021. Wonder who has said that many times before.

By the way do you think the number of deaths may have peaked yet or do you think nobody knows
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Bangers&Mash
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
Been Liked: 123 times
Has Liked: 12 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Covid-19

Post by Bangers&Mash » Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:15 am

There seems to be a big misunderstanding here - and fuelled by the press wanting a headline.

Lockdown and social distancing will not be in place until 2021. But SOME measures will remain until 2021.

It doesnt sell clicks if your website has the headline "10% of lockdown to remain".

I wouldn't be surprised if this season and next is behind closed doors, and dont expect to get to a gig any time soon. But you can look forward to seeing family and friends again if you dont get too close. And you'll be able to shop and walk again without feeling like a criminal.
These 5 users liked this post: fatboy47 evensteadiereddie Chuckypad Quicknick k90bfc

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Lowbankclaret » Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:22 am

martin_p wrote:
Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:13 pm
I think those expecting any significant relaxation of the current measures are going to be disappointed. Until there is some sort of vaccine or treatment normal life will not return. As it stands, for example, I’ll be surprised if I get on another football match in 2020.
I did say when the lock down was extended that it would continue for another 5-6 weeks , however the data has plateaued faster than the data was suggesting it would.

Therefore the downward phase is also likely to be sooner and I now think some tiny steps will be done on removal of lockdown.

No idea what they might be, but I do think there will be some relaxations in a couple of weeks.

They will be led by the data, let’s hope we see that data get below 400 deaths a day to enable that to happen.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Elizabeth » Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:43 am

Let me suggest a potential relaxation that I think could be made safely with good planning while safeguarding the social distancing.
Open up the golf courses and tennis courts so that golfers could play in twos and tennis restricted to singles.

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Lowbankclaret » Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:47 am

paulatky wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:05 am
Lowbank what does your graph show ?
What is the scale at the bottom.
It’s frightening how high the real UK death toll is already.
Thought to be over 30,000 now with care homes,hospices, community and lag in reporting hospital deaths taken into account
It weekly death registrations, simply that. No distinction of why death occurred. I think they said all the dots on each week were the deaths from 1970 something to 2019.
So along the bottom you have 52 weeks and around 40 -50 years worth of dots, number of people per week that died.

Hope that make sense.

What they said was there have only been two weeks worse in that 40 odd years. One was a very bad year for flu, I forget what the other one was.

I am not making any claims what it means , as I don’t know but it appeared on several formats, so I then thought it was credible.

This was where I saw it first.
94AC421B-C021-4DDB-AFE9-1F986614A5C4.png
94AC421B-C021-4DDB-AFE9-1F986614A5C4.png (313.29 KiB) Viewed 1936 times
These 2 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie Chuckypad

jrgbfc
Posts: 8506
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2107 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by jrgbfc » Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:52 am

Elizabeth wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:43 am
Let me suggest a potential relaxation that I think could be made safely with good planning while safeguarding the social distancing.
Open up the golf courses and tennis courts so that golfers could play in twos and tennis restricted to singles.
There's no reason why places like B and Q and garden centres can't be open already, easy to keep your distance from people in places like that.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Elizabeth » Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:57 am

Already you can see a picture where little steps could make this lockdown much easier to manage for some people

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Grumps » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:05 am

Elizabeth wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:43 am
Let me suggest a potential relaxation that I think could be made safely with good planning while safeguarding the social distancing.
Open up the golf courses and tennis courts so that golfers could play in twos and tennis restricted to singles.
It depends who the two golfers are
But I cannot see a reason if one person wanted to do a round on their own why they shouldn't be allowed to.

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by paulatky » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:08 am

Elizabeth wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:57 am
Already you can see a picture where little steps could make this lockdown much easier to manage for some people
But public gatherings are a long way off and a lot of families will not be prepared to take the risk of being together like before. Being able to wave through the window or chat from the end of the drive is no comparison ti being able to cuddle your grandchildren or sit down to Christmas lunch together.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Elizabeth » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:10 am

I think the way forward is to embrace ideas and look for ways to make it happen.

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Covid-19

Post by FactualFrank » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:11 am

Regarding golf courses, you could easily have a 4-ball and keep a distance of 2 metres. There's never a need to be near each other as even if you both hit the ball to the same spot, the one furthest back normally goes first anyway.
Last edited by FactualFrank on Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

dsr
Posts: 15236
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4577 times
Has Liked: 2268 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by dsr » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:12 am

paulatky wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:08 am
But public gatherings are a long way off and a lot of families will not be prepared to take the risk of being together like before. Being able to wave through the window or chat from the end of the drive is no comparison ti being able to cuddle your grandchildren or sit down to Christmas lunch together.
That's not relevant to whether they should be allowed to. If the law changes to allow grandparents to cuddle their grandchildren before they die, and some people choose not to take advantage, that needn't stop the rest of them from carrying on.

NottsClaret
Posts: 3602
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2624 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Covid-19

Post by NottsClaret » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:14 am

paulatky wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:08 am
But public gatherings are a long way off and a lot of families will not be prepared to take the risk of being together like before. Being able to wave through the window or chat from the end of the drive is no comparison ti being able to cuddle your grandchildren or sit down to Christmas lunch together.
That's fine, each family and individual can weigh up that risk. If anyone who feels vulnerable wants to remain isolated then they'd be free to do so - and supported - for as long as they felt it was required.

But the blanket ban on everything is particularly clumsy and now becoming very damaging. Whitty said last night, it's getting to a point where you need to look at the balance. Look at the vast numbers of cancer diagnosis going unchecked at the moment, the knock on deaths will eventually reach a point where they outstrip the Covid19 fatalities.
This user liked this post: tiger76

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Elizabeth » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:17 am

Of course they are Paul and while that is where we want to be we all realise that the sacrifices we all all making will have to continue. This is about slowly getting back to normality.
My dad is in his nineties, I haven't see him for weeks. I can no longer make him hot meals. We really are all in this together. We have to try and be positive that we will see and care for our loved ones again
This user liked this post: paulatky

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12368
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Devils_Advocate » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:18 am

Opening golf courses, Tennis Courts, DIY stores and Garden Centres is great but I think the real challenge and what will be much more important is how they manage to ease the lockdown for those at the bottom of society living on big housing estates with a real lack of disposible income

Id love to be able to go and have a game of golf but its not a struggle for me at home where I have all the mod cons, can drive to supermarkets if and when I want and buy everything I need, live by lovely woodland areas to walk in and have a peaceful communal garden area to relax in

At the moment we look at this very much through an ageist lens but this is and will even more become about socio economic status and poverty

If the country starts to open up nicely to the comfortable and well off and the poor are left locked in their concrete jungles then thats when we could really see social unrest and people just refusing to follow the lockdown rules

Its a tough one and im not suggesting keeping things closed for the fear of upsetting those who haven't got access but the govt need to keep this in mind and find a way they can offer a release to those who are likely have it the toughest
These 2 users liked this post: dsr Chuckypad

Zlatan
Posts: 5458
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2229 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Zlatan » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:23 am

A relaxation in lockdown should be accompanied with an enforcement of wearing face masks IMO. It is an altruistic approach. If we are forced to wear a face mask in public, whilst our individual protection is not increased, the populations protection as a whole is increased. However this is dependant upon availability of face masks for everyone, and the supply problems for PPE is currently dictating the governments advice.
This user liked this post: paulatky

jrgbfc
Posts: 8506
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2107 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by jrgbfc » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:33 am

Closing fishing lakes is another measure that has been way over the top. Lots of little things that could have been done to make the lockdown more bearable for people.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Elizabeth » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:38 am

Golf and tennis were suggestions only and I was also thinking of the benefits to young people and families. I think you can have a safe game of pitch and putt up Towneley for not very much money. Good fun for a father and son or two brothers getting on each others nerves under the same roof.
There are other activities as well and while I get some of the warnings expressed I don't think they should let us stop from offering our full support to anything that helps

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Lowbankclaret » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:44 am

jrgbfc wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:33 am
Closing fishing lakes is another measure that has been way over the top. Lots of little things that could have been done to make the lockdown more bearable for people.
There has been a big campaign online to reopen fisheries. I agree you are social distancing but they would be packed with everyone at home.
So agree with people .
DIY stores, outdoor activities, small shops. Give it a couple of weeks and see what the data says.

I also agree with compulsory masks in shops or in a queue , but not if your on walk outside doing social distancing.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Elizabeth » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:44 am

Sorry before I'm shot, or mother and daughter or two sisters together
This user liked this post: FactualFrank

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Covid-19

Post by FactualFrank » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:45 am

Elizabeth wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:44 am
Sorry before I'm shot, or mother and daughter or two sisters together
Or they.
These 2 users liked this post: Elizabeth Zlatan

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Lowbankclaret » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:46 am

Zlatan wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:23 am
A relaxation in lockdown should be accompanied with an enforcement of wearing face masks IMO. It is an altruistic approach. If we are forced to wear a face mask in public, whilst our individual protection is not increased, the populations protection as a whole is increased. However this is dependant upon availability of face masks for everyone, and the supply problems for PPE is currently dictating the governments advice.
There was plenty on Amazon a couple of weeks ago, I suggest get in early before it’s another toilet roll fiasco.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Elizabeth » Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:54 am

Indeed Frank.
I was questioned the other week as to why I told a joke from a male perspective.
You know this Elizabeth thing

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by tim_noone » Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:12 am

Zlatan wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:23 am
A relaxation in lockdown should be accompanied with an enforcement of wearing face masks IMO. It is an altruistic approach. If we are forced to wear a face mask in public, whilst our individual protection is not increased, the populations protection as a whole is increased. However this is dependant upon availability of face masks for everyone, and the supply problems for PPE is currently dictating the governments advice.
Apparently face masks are not going to be compulsory.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Elizabeth » Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:54 am

Oh, go on then:

A deaf mute steps up to tee off on the first hole of a golf course, when a large burly guy yells " Hey You! Nobody tees off ahead of Big Ralph"
Being deaf the poor guy continues to prepare for his shot, so Ralph runs up thinking the deaf mute is being obstinate, and knocks the poor guy to the ground, kicks his ball away , and prepares for his own shot.
After Ralph has hit the ball and proceeded down the fairway after it, the mute gets up , brushes himself off, waits a moment and again prepares his shot. He hits a beautiful shot straight up the middle of the fairway . It also goes straight at big Ralph , hitting him in the back of the head and knocking him down.
The mute then walks down the fairway , rolls the stunned man around and holds up four fingers to Ralph's face
This user liked this post: Chuckypad

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Lowbankclaret » Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:58 am

tim_noone wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:12 am
Apparently face masks are not going to be compulsory.
Probably not, but all the evidence is pointing to it being very sensible.

There was a feature on I think Sky yesterday, which a scientific study said even cloth doubled over stopped 95% of droplets from a person who sneezes being released into the air. That’s got to be a good thing in an indoor situation.

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Grumps » Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:08 am

Zlatan wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:23 am
A relaxation in lockdown should be accompanied with an enforcement of wearing face masks IMO. It is an altruistic approach. If we are forced to wear a face mask in public, whilst our individual protection is not increased, the populations protection as a whole is increased. However this is dependant upon availability of face masks for everyone, and the supply problems for PPE is currently dictating the governments advice.
Why wait to be told? If you feel its beneficial to wear one, then wear one!! Surely we don't have to wait to be told.

CombatClaret
Posts: 4388
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1826 times
Has Liked: 930 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by CombatClaret » Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:40 am

jrgbfc wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:33 am
Closing fishing lakes is another measure that has been way over the top. Lots of little things that could have been done to make the lockdown more bearable for people.
For a lockdown to be effective it needs to look and feel like a lockdown to people so they go along with the rest of society.

If we allow everyone's own specialist interest to be catered for then for then it will be hard to encourage the general populous to stay indoors when they look outside to see all the people going by and ask well why are they outside?
"Oh it's the anglers, the golfers, the rowers, the twitchers, the model aircraft enthusiasts and the extreme calligraphy team. But you, you have to stay indoors mind."

NewClaret
Posts: 13483
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3106 times
Has Liked: 3824 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by NewClaret » Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:54 am

tim_noone wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:12 am
Apparently face masks are not going to be compulsory.
Would hate it if face masks were to become compulsory (or even commonplace) in this country, even if it means being in lockdown for longer.

Compulsory wearing of gloves would be more effective, assuming social distancing remains in place.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12368
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Devils_Advocate » Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:58 am

WHO have shared a new Coronavirus First Aid video. I think everyone should watch and take note just in case you find yourself in this situation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aio3R-hIoEM
This user liked this post: Chuckypad

dushanbe
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:20 pm
Been Liked: 396 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by dushanbe » Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:12 pm

I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but its definitely busier out and about this last few days than in recent weeks. I think people are easing their own lockdown restrictions.

Zlatan
Posts: 5458
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2229 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Zlatan » Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:22 pm

Grumps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:08 am
Why wait to be told? If you feel its beneficial to wear one, then wear one!! Surely we don't have to wait to be told.
Pointless wearing it unless it’s compulsory. I wouldn’t be wearing it for my own benefit...

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by Grumps » Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:26 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:22 pm
Pointless wearing it unless it’s compulsory. I wouldn’t be wearing it for my own benefit...
Places where social distancing isn't always possible they do evidently have some benefit, so shops, buses etc. Walking round outside at a safe distance they are of no use.
This user liked this post: Zlatan

CombatClaret
Posts: 4388
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1826 times
Has Liked: 930 times

Re: Covid-19

Post by CombatClaret » Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:28 pm

dushanbe wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:12 pm
I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but its definitely busier out and about this last few days than in recent weeks. I think people are easing their own lockdown restrictions.
Weather is a huge factor I imagine, I've been cycling nearly every other day (for long term health/medical reasons!) and when it's sunny it's busy.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

Locked