Okay...
We default, on billions of pounds of debt...China say okay?
China with a standing army of 2million....Britain with 190,000.
Good god, I worry that some of you might well need to read some history books, followed by economics, and then add yourself in a political book or two. Then you’ll be equipped to see how stupid it is to compare Vietnam to a hypothetical financial default.KateR wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:55 pmCan't believe I'm in total agreement with Andrew but he is right, US & Europe default on debt and appropriate assets/accounts would not be beyond reality if you're really thinking about war, Plus Vietnam Vs USA was another very good example, however it's not going to happen, is it, war I mean.
My Mutha says if they come banging on her door I've to say Shintin....Danieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:12 pmOkay...
We default, on billions of pounds of debt...China say okay?
China with a standing army of 2million....Britain with 190,000.
I'm sorry to say this but you really don't know what you're talking about plus you are clearly NOT reading or understanding what was written, Vietnam, poor country - USA very rich country, since you mentioned history, which one won in a war? Don't answer please, everyone knows.Danieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:17 pmGood god, I worry that some of you might well need to read some history books, followed by economics, and then add yourself in a political book or two. Then you’ll be equipped to see how stupid it is to compare Vietnam to a hypothetical financial default.
China own the world, they finance the world, they’re untouchable. That’s even before you consider their trade impact and ability to squash any economy in minutes.
Sir David seems to be available to be quoted being both shocked and sanguine about it today.KateR wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:43 pmI thought I was beginning to understand it a little but when I looked at this, am back to the, what, really
'Never been as shocked'
But what is not clear is what else is contributing to this spike in deaths - the coronavirus cases contributed just over half of the "extra" 6,000 deaths.
It could be that cases of coronavirus are going undetected or other factors related to the lockdown and outbreak are having an impact, such as people not seeking treatment for other conditions or mental health deaths going up.
Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter, an expert in risk at the University of Cambridge, said this needed investigating. But he said he had "never been as shocked" as when he saw the scale of the increase in deaths.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-52278825
To draw a comparison between a superpower going to war with a relative third world nation 6 decades ago and the western world going to war with a nuclear superpower In 2020 is LUDICROUS!KateR wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:30 pmI'm sorry to say this but you really don't know what you're talking about plus you are clearly NOT reading or understanding what was written, Vietnam, poor country - USA very rich country, since you mentioned history, which one won in a war? Don't answer please, everyone knows.
You really don't have to reply, it's a different discussion somewhere else, this is for C-19 so I will be stopping with this now.
What are your thoughts on why he believes we are seeing 50%/3000 deaths more not attributed to C-19 than would normally have been during this period.thatdberight wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:49 pmSir David seems to be available to be quoted being both shocked and sanguine about it today.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51979654
"Nearly 10% of people aged over 80 will die in the next year, Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter, at the University of Cambridge, points out, and the risk of them dying if infected with coronavirus is almost exactly the same.
That does not mean there will be no extra deaths - but, Sir David says, there will be "a substantial overlap"."
Danieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 11:02 pmTo draw a comparison between a superpower going to war with a relative third world nation 6 decades ago and the western world going to war with a nuclear superpower In 2020 is LUDICROUS!
I assure you I am well aware of the political/economic situations faced by governments in 2020.
You’re supporting an argument that if the western developed world can’t get reparations from China then we should default and If the worst comes to the worst create war.
War that would be funded by Governments whose debt has been bought by the Chinese.
To put it into a context you might understand: you owe Barclaycard £1000, you don’t fancy paying it so you go and throw a brick through HSBC’s window.
No idea. If it continues, it'll be material. It could be anything really.KateR wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 11:08 pmWhat are your thoughts on why he believes we are seeing 50%/3000 deaths more not attributed to C-19 than would normally have been during this period.
I think we all understand many deaths attributed to C-19 would have occurred in the 12 month period for 2020 and we have discussed needing to see the outcome in time rather than a knee jerk reaction at this time, but quite obviously some will use now as a weapon.
at the risk of the usual attacks from a few, that sort of mirrors my thoughts, am confused and will wait and see.thatdberight wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 11:18 pmNo idea. If it continues, it'll be material. It could be anything really.
I'm not putting this forward as anything other than a statistical explanation but this sort of effect of could be if there are actually many more cases in the general population than we know and some frail, much older people died as a result of it in among those relatively early in the outbreak. Or it could be important new data that resets our understanding.
I guessed you were quoting some Bard of yesteryear pray do tell.....who was it? 20century Ted?
jackmiggins wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 11:29 amI'm an Engineer, but I certainly understand economics as well as the finance glitterati who missed the 2008 crash.
jackmiggins wrote: ↑Wed Apr 08, 2020 12:53 pmBasically, these media folk believe that they have a better ‘handle’ on events than everyone else... all too happy to appear as experts in a field that is completely alien to them.
jackmiggins wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 11:29 amMy own belief is that a complete change in World banking has been required for many, many years.
jackmiggins wrote: ↑Wed Apr 08, 2020 12:53 pmReports are made ...meant to lead you to their own... point of view.
Can I add a world atlas to your reading list?Danieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:12 pmOkay...
We default, on billions of pounds of debt...China say okay?
China with a standing army of 2million....Britain with 190,000.
Very Well done to all involvedLowbankclaret wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 1:04 pmTeams efforts made the local news.
https://www.pendletoday.co.uk/news/peop ... hs-2539067
Nothing is more likely to change the world than posting about a revolution in world banking on a football message board.jackmiggins wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 12:58 pmSome on here seem to believe that ‘it is, because it is’ - we couldn’t possibly change anything - it’s never been done before. I’d question their experience in life and wonder if they have any conception of evolution. Seems to me that they will always kowtow, so to speak. That’s not my perception and never will be.
Incredible, Andrew. Do you really think that Germany refusing to pay WW1 reparations led to prosperity? Most people understand that after the economic failure of the Weimar Republic Hitler and National Socialism came to power. Very few would claim that was a period of prosperity for Germany or anywhere else in the world.AndrewJB wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 12:43 pmCan I add a world atlas to your reading list?
National defaults have historically led to prosperity. Look up Solon’s Athens. 16th Century France. Germany after they refused to pay WW1 reparations. For an opposite example, let me know how all those African nations got on trying to pay interest in crippling levels of debt.
If you're seriously quoting Germany post-WW1 as a way of getting rich, I think you may have fully taken leave of your senses. There were other, even less avoury, aspects to their new-found prosperity.AndrewJB wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 12:43 pmCan I add a world atlas to your reading list?
National defaults have historically led to prosperity. Look up Solon’s Athens. 16th Century France. Germany after they refused to pay WW1 reparations. For an opposite example, let me know how all those African nations got on trying to pay interest in crippling levels of debt.
I don't believe he was saying that at all, in the context of what was being hypothesized by someone else I "believe" he was saying when they defaulted they were not invaded and taken over by a or other countries as a result. As you point out it's a pity they weren't in regard as to what was to follow but that's a different story to what he was saying, (I believe) but am 100% sure he will come along and tell you himself.
You’re quite right to highlight these historical precedents, none are a developed nation defaulting from a AA status...AndrewJB wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 12:43 pmCan I add a world atlas to your reading list?
National defaults have historically led to prosperity. Look up Solon’s Athens. 16th Century France. Germany after they refused to pay WW1 reparations. For an opposite example, let me know how all those African nations got on trying to pay interest in crippling levels of debt.
You can't see how the clear similarities between defaulting on debt to China in 2020 and the internal reforms of serfdom, debt and indenture among a few thousand Athenians in 600BC? Keep up.Danieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:07 pmYou’re quite right to highlight these historical precedents, none are a developed nation defaulting from a AA status...
Not really? But happy to be educated....thatdberight wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:17 pmYou can't see how the clear similarities between defaulting on debt to China in 2020 and the internal reforms of serfdom, debt and indenture among a few thousand Athenians in 600BC? Keep up.
thatdberight wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:17 pmYou can't see how the clear similarities between defaulting on debt to China in 2020 and the internal reforms of serfdom, debt and indenture among a few thousand Athenians in 600BC? Keep up.
What are your thoughts on middle income Argentina and their 8 defaults and how that has impacted their economic prosperity?AndrewJB wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 12:43 pmCan I add a world atlas to your reading list?
National defaults have historically led to prosperity. Look up Solon’s Athens. 16th Century France. Germany after they refused to pay WW1 reparations. For an opposite example, let me know how all those African nations got on trying to pay interest in crippling levels of debt.
Considering the opportunities it has, Argentina is in a very poor position.
What has changed significantly about the nature of debt between now and ancient Greece? Other than the fact that the non payment of debt is treated with much greater leniency, and in fact systems and processes have been set up to facilitate it, I'd say very little.Danieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:07 pmYou’re quite right to highlight these historical precedents, none are a developed nation defaulting from a AA status...
I'm not advocating non payment of debt as a cure all, or even something to take lightly. What I'm saying is when a country gets into a position with debt where it becomes an intractable problem and causes a lot of hardship - such as many African countries experienced over the last forty years - then defaulting is a better option than debt servitude. If the cost of servicing a debt hugely inhibits the ability of a government to provide the essentials by which a country gets by, then of course that country will see greater prosperity if that debt no longer exists. If most of the money you earn goes to servicing debt, and that debt disappears, then most of the money you earn will be yours again. It's not so simple for individual people, but it's a choice that a nation state can make.
Britain is on there for several defaults during the 19th Century. Was Britain not prosperous during the 19th Century? The US - and numbers of US states - are there. What would have been the consequences of not defaulting? Germany's attempt to pay reparations caused more economic problems than occurred once Germany decided to stop paying. It's not going to be a simple black and white thing as every individual case will have different factorsPaul Waine wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 8:35 pmWikipedia has a list of sovereign debt crises and defaults since 1557. It is a very long list.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_s ... ebt_crises
It doesn't leave the impression that defaulting on sovereign debt leads to prosperity.
Did the length of the list surprise you? It did me. The lesson many draw is that defaulting on debt is not required to create prosperity, in fact being in a position where default will occur is a sign of a weak economy and it's solving the problems of weakness that will start to rebuild an economy and, if successful, can lead to future prosperity.AndrewJB wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 1:07 amBritain is on there for several defaults during the 19th Century. Was Britain not prosperous during the 19th Century? The US - and numbers of US states - are there. What would have been the consequences of not defaulting? Germany's attempt to pay reparations caused more economic problems than occurred once Germany decided to stop paying. It's not going to be a simple black and white thing as every individual case will have different factors
Just grabbing something off Wikipedia is often not sound (that article has no citations for the 19th century events).
Absolutely. I'm actually quite enjoying the peace and quiet.Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 9:42 amNo surprise I think France had extended there’s to 10th May and we were a few weeks behind them in terms of peak.
They changed measurement mid-stream so it's hard to tell when theirs was. We appear to have been at a peak / plateau of new cases for a few days.Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 9:42 amNo surprise I think France had extended there’s to 10th May and we were a few weeks behind them in terms of peak.
Same here, I'm not fussed if the lockdown never gets lifted in some ways it's a better life even if still working, people seem to show more manners in queues ect & far more consideration everywhere you look, air pollutions down, crimes down, I don't think we've ever had it so good, I'm in no way diminishing the seriousness of the virus or undermining efforts of the people trying to contain it, just appreciating a different better life.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 9:50 amAbsolutely. I'm actually quite enjoying the peace and quiet.
Prof Neil Ferguson today (16 April):Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 9:42 amNo surprise I think France had extended there’s to 10th May and we were a few weeks behind them in terms of peak.