James Bulger - 27 years...
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2020 3:49 pm
- Been Liked: 23 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
And what if we execute someone who has been wrongfully convicted?
And don't say it doesn't happen in recent times, people are wrongfully convicted all the time.
And what if we don't execute someone who has been correctly convicted, done his/her time as sentenced, been released, and then kills again?
And don't say it doesn't happen in recent times, people who have killed once and been convicted have been known to kill again after been released.
And don't say it doesn't happen in recent times, people are wrongfully convicted all the time.
And what if we don't execute someone who has been correctly convicted, done his/her time as sentenced, been released, and then kills again?
And don't say it doesn't happen in recent times, people who have killed once and been convicted have been known to kill again after been released.
-
- Posts: 17178
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6463 times
- Has Liked: 2896 times
- Location: Fife
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
That's probably Venables next step murdering someone....again,a mystery to me why this prick Is a free man,should be rotting in some top security prison somewhere.daveyclaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 12:04 pmAnd what if we execute someone who has been wrongfully convicted?
And don't say it doesn't happen in recent times, people are wrongfully convicted all the time.
And what if we don't execute someone who has been correctly convicted, done his/her time as sentenced, been released, and then kills again?
And don't say it doesn't happen in recent times, people who have killed once and been convicted have been known to kill again after been released.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
That's where the US has it right with whole life jail terms.daveyclaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 12:04 pmAnd what if we execute someone who has been wrongfully convicted?
And don't say it doesn't happen in recent times, people are wrongfully convicted all the time.
And what if we don't execute someone who has been correctly convicted, done his/her time as sentenced, been released, and then kills again?
And don't say it doesn't happen in recent times, people who have killed once and been convicted have been known to kill again after been released.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
-
- Posts: 13225
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3037 times
- Has Liked: 3759 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
How anyone can offer any form of compassion for these two individuals is beyond me.
I think there are some crimes so repulsive the individuals involved don’t deserve any second chance. This is one of those cases because they denied a life to that poor, helpless child.
Whether they’re remorseful in future, or capable of living a crime free, respectable life is an irrelevance to me; they denied that right to little James and so should lose it themselves.
These 3 users liked this post: FactualFrank Boss Hogg Steve1956
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
We'll have to send them round to eddie's house & let him look after them.NewClaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 2:06 pmHow anyone can offer any form of compassion for these two individuals is beyond me.
I think there are some crimes so repulsive the individuals involved don’t deserve any second chance. This is one of those cases because they denied a life to that poor, helpless child.
Whether they’re remorseful in future, or capable of living a crime free, respectable life is an irrelevance to me; they denied that right to little James and so should lose it themselves.
These 2 users liked this post: Boss Hogg FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
You're completely ignoring the fact they were kids themselves and their behaviour since being released.NewClaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 2:06 pmHow anyone can offer any form of compassion for these two individuals is beyond me.
I think there are some crimes so repulsive the individuals involved don’t deserve any second chance. This is one of those cases because they denied a life to that poor, helpless child.
Whether they’re remorseful in future, or capable of living a crime free, respectable life is an irrelevance to me; they denied that right to little James and so should lose it themselves.
-
- Posts: 13225
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3037 times
- Has Liked: 3759 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
I don’t care. Nobody is telling me that at 10 years old someone does not know it is wrong to lead a toddler away from his parents, torture, murder them and leave their body on a train track.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 2:11 pmYou're completely ignoring the fact they were kids themselves and their behaviour since being released.
The system in this country massively favours the perpetrators of a crime over the victims and their families.
In what world is it fair that they do that - gruesomely take a boys life - and aged 30-odd are free to get on with theirs?
Do you have kids mate?
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
It's absolutely despicable what happened to that young child & them boys were old enough to know better & furthermore they knew exactly what they were doing & should have been treat the same way as adults for that particular crime.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
I've got 3 kids.NewClaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 2:46 pmI don’t care. Nobody is telling me that at 10 years old someone does not know it is wrong to lead a toddler away from his parents, torture, murder them and leave their body on a train track.
The system in this country massively favours the perpetrators of a crime over the victims and their families.
In what world is it fair that they do that - gruesomely take a boys life - and aged 30-odd are free to get on with theirs?
Do you have kids mate?
18 and 16yr old boys
5yr old girl.
Thompson and Venables were handed sentances in accordance with the laws at the time, but what you're seemingly incapable of understanding is that it was pretty much the first time kids of that age were in court for murdering a young child.
There was no precedent.
They've got lifelong licences.
One has kept his head down and prison has done its job for him.
The other idiot will always reoffend because he doesn't care about what he did and this is where the system is failing.
He shouldn't be allowed out again.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 13225
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3037 times
- Has Liked: 3759 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
I’m not I’m debating whether the sentences levied at time we’re in accordance with the law/precedent, I am talking about what the law should have been, and should be in future (there’s a valid argument if there were no legal precedent at that time, the courts should’ve been harsher to act as a deterrent, but I won’t go there).GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 2:57 pmI've got 3 kids.
18 and 16yr old boys
5yr old girl.
Thompson and Venables were handed sentances in accordance with the laws at the time, but what you're seemingly incapable of understanding is that it was pretty much the first time kids of that age were in court for murdering a young child.
There was no precedent.
They've got lifelong licences.
One has kept his head down and prison has done its job for him.
The other idiot will always reoffend because he doesn't care about what he did and this is where the system is failing.
He shouldn't be allowed out again.
So, on that basis, if someone did that to any of your children, would you be okay with them being let 20 years later to live their life, providing they didn’t commit any further crimes?
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Many laws and punishments are based on precedents.NewClaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 3:07 pmI’m not I’m debating whether the sentences levied at time we’re in accordance with the law/precedent, I am talking about what the law should have been, and should be in future (there’s a valid argument if there were no legal precedent at that time, the courts should’ve been harsher to act as a deterrent, but I won’t go there).
So, on that basis, if someone did that to any of your children, would you be okay with them being let 20 years later to live their life, providing they didn’t commit any further crimes?
There wasn't one, so you saying you're not interested in debating what the laws at the time were etc is just stupid.
As for if it happened to me, therein lies the problem, you're using emotions instead of standing back and looking at it objectively.
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
If somebody killed 1 of my kids, I wouldn't think twice about finishing somebody off.
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Not true at all.... one example of many, google 'Mary Bell'. She was out in 12 years for equally horrible crimes. I think the James Bulger case is so emotive because of the CCTV footage.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 2:57 pmyou're seemingly incapable of understanding is that it was pretty much the first time kids of that age were in court for murdering a young child.
There was no precedent.
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
-
- Posts: 13225
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3037 times
- Has Liked: 3759 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Obviously laws and punishments are set based on precedents. It doesn't mean they are right.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 3:12 pmMany laws and punishments are based on precedents.
There wasn't one, so you saying you're not interested in debating what the laws at the time were etc is just stupid.
As for if it happened to me, therein lies the problem, you're using emotions instead of standing back and looking at it objectively.
So, lets say it never happened, there is no precedent and it happened today - what punishment would you say was fair to issue to these two individuals? If you were judge, what sentence would you pass?
I would give them full life terms. That is because, in my view, if you take deliberately someone else's life you should lose your liberty, regardless if you are later deemed to be safe, etc. You can never give the person you have murdered a second chance at life, so I see no reason why a murderer should get one. Can you explain why you think they should?
Although for me it is not just about the victim. It is about their families who endure a life of suffering after a loved one is murdered. In my view, whilst it will never bring their loved one back or fill the void, they have a right to live safe in the knowledge their loved ones murderer is behind bars.
I am not being emotive. It's not happened to me or you (thankfully), so we can discuss it without emotion. It's a debate about whether the criminal justice system served the right punishment in this case.
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 2:10 pmWe'll have to send them round to eddie's house & let him look after them.
Another of Jakub's cretinous and irrelevant efforts.
Send who round ? The one who has sorted his life out or the loser currently in jail ?
And why ?
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
And what about the scummy 1 who keeps getting let out, only to download more kiddy porn?evensteadiereddie wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 3:45 pmAnother of Jakub's cretinous and irrelevant efforts.
Send who round ? The one who has sorted his life out or the loser currently in jail ?
And why ?
-
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 651 times
- Has Liked: 2879 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Punishment is based on Sentencing Guidelines and if your overwhelming criteria is the feelings of the family then you are being emotive.NewClaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 3:44 pmObviously laws and punishments are set based on precedents. It doesn't mean they are right.
So, lets say it never happened, there is no precedent and it happened today - what punishment would you say was fair to issue to these two individuals? If you were judge, what sentence would you pass?
I would give them full life terms. That is because, in my view, if you take deliberately someone else's life you should lose your liberty, regardless if you are later deemed to be safe, etc. You can never give the person you have murdered a second chance at life, so I see no reason why a murderer should get one. Can you explain why you think they should?
Although for me it is not just about the victim. It is about their families who endure a life of suffering after a loved one is murdered. In my view, whilst it will never bring their loved one back or fill the void, they have a right to live safe in the knowledge their loved ones murderer is behind bars.
I am not being emotive. It's not happened to me or you (thankfully), so we can discuss it without emotion. It's a debate about whether the criminal justice system served the right punishment in this case.
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
As I said, Murger, the loser currently in jail.........................
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
He was released, caught with kiddy porn, jailed again. Then he's released and does it again. A no hoper who shouldn't ever see the light of day again.evensteadiereddie wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 3:52 pmAs I said, Murger, the loser currently in jail.........................
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
It speaks volumes when you've actually got people defending that kind of behavior as we are seeing today.
This user liked this post: Steve1956
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Who is defending "that kind of behaviour" ?
The bloke's back in jail, isn't he ?
The other one, to his credit, has turned his life round.
It speaks volumes that you and Steve 1956 are so desperately stupid.
The bloke's back in jail, isn't he ?
The other one, to his credit, has turned his life round.
It speaks volumes that you and Steve 1956 are so desperately stupid.
Last edited by evensteadiereddie on Wed Sep 30, 2020 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Who is defending it ?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 3:58 pmIt speaks volumes when you've actually got people defending that kind of behavior as we are seeing today.
Simple question - just post their names and the words which say they are defending that behaviour.
You may be mistaking “defending them” with not necessarily being in favour of your batshit crazy views of the public deciding to hang him in Trafalgar Square with Take That playing a gig in the background as part of a new Hanging Live Aid type event.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Cheers, I'd never heard of that case before, but it shows how often it happens.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
They were given a punishment appropriate for the time.NewClaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 3:44 pmObviously laws and punishments are set based on precedents. It doesn't mean they are right.
So, lets say it never happened, there is no precedent and it happened today - what punishment would you say was fair to issue to these two individuals? If you were judge, what sentence would you pass?
I would give them full life terms. That is because, in my view, if you take deliberately someone else's life you should lose your liberty, regardless if you are later deemed to be safe, etc. You can never give the person you have murdered a second chance at life, so I see no reason why a murderer should get one. Can you explain why you think they should?
Although for me it is not just about the victim. It is about their families who endure a life of suffering after a loved one is murdered. In my view, whilst it will never bring their loved one back or fill the void, they have a right to live safe in the knowledge their loved ones murderer is behind bars.
I am not being emotive. It's not happened to me or you (thankfully), so we can discuss it without emotion. It's a debate about whether the criminal justice system served the right punishment in this case.
It doesn't mean it was right or wrong for today, the real issue now is one of the scrotes keeps reoffending and keeps being released.
I suspect he would kill again and have no remorse for it.
As for being put in the position of a judge, sentencing kids is always difficult, but they weren't given a set time in prison.
It was at Her Majesty's Pleasure, so there is no set time.
A Parole board decided they should be release on lifetime licence.
The family would feel less tormented if the scrote who keeps reoffending was just kept behind bars now, especially as he's clearly a paedophile etc.
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:44 am
- Been Liked: 115 times
- Has Liked: 9 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
The legal aid cost over £200000
This user liked this post: Burnley Ace
-
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 651 times
- Has Liked: 2879 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
So Lee Rugby’s killers didn’t receive any money.
-
- Posts: 6571
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Legal aid needs to be overhauled, there should be a cap on costs, maybe 20k.
-
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 651 times
- Has Liked: 2879 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Perhaps the defence should be allowed to charge the same amount as the cost of the prosecution, then both sides would be equal.Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 4:59 pmLegal aid needs to be overhauled, there should be a cap on costs, maybe 20k.
Would you want to cap the amount the prosecution costs?
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2491 times
- Has Liked: 1477 times
- Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
It would be interesting to know how much it has cost so far to keep these two in custody and alias changes. Hmm.
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
It would.
Money well spent, too.
Money well spent, too.
-
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2814 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Everyone that's born that looks slightly like they will be evil should be bunged in the oven.
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/88391 ... yer-prisonconyoviejo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 5:23 pmIt would be interesting to know how much it has cost so far to keep these two in custody and alias changes. Hmm.
That's just for 1, estimated £5 million pound, see attached for breakdown in costs.
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Excellent value.
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
You could try explaining that assessment to the little boys parents & see if they share the same opinion.
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Well, you have a word with them and get back to me. I don't know either of them personally.
I think it's excellent value because one of the kids grew up into a decent human being. The other did not and is paying the price for it. Two different results that show our civilised system is working.
The added bonus is, of course, that stuff like this infuriates creeps like you.
Win, win.
I think it's excellent value because one of the kids grew up into a decent human being. The other did not and is paying the price for it. Two different results that show our civilised system is working.
The added bonus is, of course, that stuff like this infuriates creeps like you.
Win, win.
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
‘.... a decent human being ....’
An alarming post
An alarming post
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
How can something which costs over £5 million pounds with a 50% success rate be beneficial towards any civilised system, spending that kind of money in terms of rehabilitation you would expect 100%, it's only 2 people!evensteadiereddie wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:47 pmWell, you have a word with them and get back to me. I don't know either of them personally.
I think it's excellent value because one of the kids grew up into a decent human being. The other did not and is paying the price for it. Two different results that show our civilised system is working.
The added bonus is, of course, that stuff like this infuriates creeps like you.
Win, win.
-
- Posts: 13225
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3037 times
- Has Liked: 3759 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
James Bulgers mum was on TV last night and made the very relevant point that we don’t know what kind of life Thompson is living because he has a new identity and could well be getting away with other misdemeanours. All we know is he hasn’t been caught or re-imprisoned.evensteadiereddie wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:47 pmWell, you have a word with them and get back to me. I don't know either of them personally.
I think it's excellent value because one of the kids grew up into a decent human being. The other did not and is paying the price for it. Two different results that show our civilised system is working.
The added bonus is, of course, that stuff like this infuriates creeps like you.
Win, win.
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
The sex offenders register needs to be accessible by all parents not necessarily public access, the information should be available so the parents can mitigate any risk assessments.
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
People need to know if there are predators living near them. The fact remains they should never be released as they don’t get better.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 4:57 pmThe sex offenders register needs to be accessible by all parents not necessarily public access, the information should be available so the parents can mitigate any risk assessments.
This user liked this post: Jakubclaret
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Jesus wept "the buggers a child killer" ... bloody hell Eddie thats scraping the bottom of the pond ...evensteadiereddie wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:47 pmWell, you have a word with them and get back to me. I don't know either of them personally.
I think it's excellent value because one of the kids grew up into a decent human being. The other did not and is paying the price for it. Two different results that show our civilised system is working.
The added bonus is, of course, that stuff like this infuriates creeps like you.
Win, win.
Someone said "what an alarming post"
Its worse than that when you consider on other threads posts are being deleted for jokey insults....
-
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6902 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
I have no idea whether it applies in this case, but is it not possible that somebody who committed a heinous crime at the age of ten can turn into a decent human being?
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
We don't know, but the relevant authorities do.NewClaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 4:49 pmJames Bulgers mum was on TV last night and made the very relevant point that we don’t know what kind of life Thompson is living because he has a new identity and could well be getting away with other misdemeanours. All we know is he hasn’t been caught or re-imprisoned.
He's living with his fella, I've seen that reported and he's living a quiet life.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
You can get put on the list for something that genuinely wasn't your fault.
I can only assume you've forgotten about the coach Burnley employed for a while, who'd been on the list.
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
If you don’t have any idea why are you exploring that possibility, the benefit of the doubt seems to sway towards the assumption that that’s possible even though over £5 million pound as been spent & the other murderer as gone on a downwards spiral it’s reasonable to assume the other as gone the same way but on a more gradual decline & far less noticeable.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Why is it reasonable to assume that?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 6:25 pmIf you don’t have any idea why are you exploring that possibility, the benefit of the doubt seems to sway towards the assumption that that’s possible even though over £5 million pound as been spent & the other murderer as gone on a downwards spiral it’s reasonable to assume the other as gone the same way but on a more gradual decline & far less noticeable.
He's monitored, regularly.
The fact he's not seen the inside of a police station since his release must be a real disappointment to you.
-
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6902 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
I’m not exploring any possibility, I was responding to someone else who suggested that someone couldn’t be a decent person because of something they did when they were 10.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 6:25 pmIf you don’t have any idea why are you exploring that possibility, the benefit of the doubt seems to sway towards the assumption that that’s possible even though over £5 million pound as been spent & the other murderer as gone on a downwards spiral it’s reasonable to assume the other as gone the same way but on a more gradual decline & far less noticeable.
And what does the £5m have to do with anything? What would your solution have been that would have reduced that cost? I’m not sure I actually want to know but here goes...
Re: James Bulger - 27 years...
Why is it a grown man who makes mistakes leading to the deaths of tens of thousands of people is forgiven, and a ten year old boy who makes mistakes leading to one death isn’t, in your eyes?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 6:25 pmIf you don’t have any idea why are you exploring that possibility, the benefit of the doubt seems to sway towards the assumption that that’s possible even though over £5 million pound as been spent & the other murderer as gone on a downwards spiral it’s reasonable to assume the other as gone the same way but on a more gradual decline & far less noticeable.