Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 836 times
Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
I'm reading a book about football tactics, I'm sure many of you know it, "Inverting The Pyramid".
I was wondering what tactics/formation and style of play we have under Dyche and if it has recognizable origins or influences?
I was wondering what tactics/formation and style of play we have under Dyche and if it has recognizable origins or influences?
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
I would not ask us!
This user liked this post: bfcjg
-
- Posts: 12371
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
I think Dyche was influenced heavily by Royal Shrovetide football and a lot of his tactics and style of play can be seen in this early version of the game
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
Sean Dyche has always been keen on the idea of winning games by scoring goals and not letting them in. Tactics which are often overlooked in modern football analysis.
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6760 times
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
Basically SD uses similar tactics to those employed by the originators of the game and modified by the Mongol hordes.
Pundits now call it Dinosaur football
Pundits now call it Dinosaur football
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
I havent seen our strike force on horseback throwing a dead goat to each otherboatshed bill wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 5:22 pmBasically SD uses similar tactics to those employed by the originators of the game and modified by the Mongol hordes.
Pundits now call it Dinosaur football
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6760 times
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
Or an opponent's head?
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 3784
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1831 times
- Has Liked: 2635 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
It doesn't matter how you play, what tactics you use etc., the object of the game is still the same --sore more goals than your opponent!
Brighton 14,297 passes to score 32 goals ----- 28 pts: Norwich 12,915 passes to sccore 25 goals ----21 pts:
Bournemouth 11,291 passes to score 28 goals -- 27 pts: Sheff Utd 10,718 passes to score 29 goals -----40 pts:
Palace 10,687 passes to score 25 goals ---------36 pts: Watford 10,564 passes to score 27 goals ---- 27 pts:
Clarets 9,066 passes to score 33 goals ---------38 pts: Newcastle 9.038 passes to score 24 goals -----32 pts:
Only Sheffield United above us in the table and both Norwich and Bournemouth in the bottom 3, in spite of all those passes.
It's a funny old game.
Brighton 14,297 passes to score 32 goals ----- 28 pts: Norwich 12,915 passes to sccore 25 goals ----21 pts:
Bournemouth 11,291 passes to score 28 goals -- 27 pts: Sheff Utd 10,718 passes to score 29 goals -----40 pts:
Palace 10,687 passes to score 25 goals ---------36 pts: Watford 10,564 passes to score 27 goals ---- 27 pts:
Clarets 9,066 passes to score 33 goals ---------38 pts: Newcastle 9.038 passes to score 24 goals -----32 pts:
Only Sheffield United above us in the table and both Norwich and Bournemouth in the bottom 3, in spite of all those passes.
It's a funny old game.
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
Liverpool played Dejan Lovren in the same 4-3-3 they've been playing all season and lost 3-0 to Watford. Take that in.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 836 times
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
Thanks so far, I'm still looking into it, I know we aren't famous for playing out from the back and a lot of people on here have criticized Dyche's tactics as hoofball but I also read that we press quite highly on the pitch too.
I'll keep researching.
I'll keep researching.
-
- Posts: 4970
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1009 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
Our pressing has changed a lot this season. From the onset that's been the biggest change. We also mix passes a lot more than we used to.
In our first premier league seasons we mastered the low block using the work rate of our wingers in defence. Our weakness back then was getting results vs teams around us since we created very little with such a defensive setup.
Now we press a lot faster than we used to and keep a higher line of engagement. There's a fine line in our final third where suddenly we drop the press and stand off creating that low block we have been famous for.
It's this transition that's been hard to pull off and is probably why we have shipped a lot more goals against good opposition in the first part of this season.
What famous system is this most similar too? Well you could argue it's a mix of total football in defence, gegenpress with a low defensive line and a more traditional 442 in attack. The main deviation from the classic 442 in attack seems to be the way we setup depending on our full backs and wide midfielders. Taylor overlaps more whilst McNeil creates space and when Pieters plays he usually sits deeper giving McNeil a free role.
On the right flank right now Hendrick tends to hold up the ball whilst Bardsley overlaps or sometimes even underlaps. With Lowton he sits deep and rarely gets to the byline but when Gudmundson plays too the emphasis is more on creating space on the inside so he can cut in to cross.
In our first premier league seasons we mastered the low block using the work rate of our wingers in defence. Our weakness back then was getting results vs teams around us since we created very little with such a defensive setup.
Now we press a lot faster than we used to and keep a higher line of engagement. There's a fine line in our final third where suddenly we drop the press and stand off creating that low block we have been famous for.
It's this transition that's been hard to pull off and is probably why we have shipped a lot more goals against good opposition in the first part of this season.
What famous system is this most similar too? Well you could argue it's a mix of total football in defence, gegenpress with a low defensive line and a more traditional 442 in attack. The main deviation from the classic 442 in attack seems to be the way we setup depending on our full backs and wide midfielders. Taylor overlaps more whilst McNeil creates space and when Pieters plays he usually sits deeper giving McNeil a free role.
On the right flank right now Hendrick tends to hold up the ball whilst Bardsley overlaps or sometimes even underlaps. With Lowton he sits deep and rarely gets to the byline but when Gudmundson plays too the emphasis is more on creating space on the inside so he can cut in to cross.
These 4 users liked this post: Zlatan Claret-On-A-T-Rex BFCmaj clerkenwell.claret
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 836 times
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
Excellent, thank you superdimitri
-
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2240 times
- Has Liked: 1618 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
Be patient Boss - be patient.
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 836 times
Re: Our Tactics/Style of Play/Formation (technical question)
Amazed to find a big part of the invention of tactics in football was from Burnley lad Jimmy Hogan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Hogan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Hogan
This user liked this post: boatshed bill