Sir Richard Branson

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Sir Richard Branson

Post by tiger76 » Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:33 pm

:o this thread hadn't already been started,how ironic that somebody who hasn't paid any UK income tax in 14 years,now wants the taxpayers to bail his business out.that said he has got a point about Easyjet.

Sir Richard Branson has warned that airline Virgin Atlantic needs government support to survive.

The boss of the Virgin Group said he was not asking for a handout, but a commercial loan, believed to be £500m.

In an open letter to staff, Sir Richard said: "Many airlines around the world need government support and many have already received it.

The plea comes as Virgin Australia, the country's second largest airline, faces going into administration without aid.

Sir Richard wrote in his letter that without UK government support for Virgin Atlantic "there won't be any competition left and hundreds of thousands more jobs will be lost".

Virgin Atlantic - which is owned jointly by Sir Richard and US carrier Delta - has reportedly asked for £500m in aid. However, according to an FT report last week, the request has been rejected by the Treasury.

It said the airline had not done enough to show it had explored other options to bolster cash before asking for state aid.

Government support
In his letter to staff, Sir Richard said: "We will do everything we can to keep the airline [Virgin Atlantic] going - but we will need government support to achieve that in the face of the severe uncertainty surrounding travel today and not knowing how long the planes will be grounded for.

"This would be in the form of a commercial loan - it wouldn't be free money and the airline would pay it back (as EasyJet will do for the £600m loan the government recently gave them)."

He pointed out that Virgin Atlantic started with one plane 36 years ago, before adding: "Over those years it has created real competition for British Airways, which must remain fierce for the benefit of our wonderful customers and the public at large."

Sir Richard offered to inject £250m into the Virgin Group last month, with most of that going to the airline.

Earlier this month, Rolls-Royce, Airbus, Heathrow airport and Manchester Airports Group sent letters to the government highlighting the importance of Virgin Atlantic to the UK's manufacturing supply chain.

Australia struggles
Meanwhile, it has been reported that Virgin Australia - in which Sir Richard holds a stake of around 10% - is close to going into administration after being refused help by the Australian government.

The carrier has been forced to cancel nearly all of its flights during the coronavirus crisis and been unable to restructure its debts.

The Australian government refused a request from the company for a A$1.4bn (£720m) loan.

The airline - which employs about 16,000 - is part-owned by Sir Richard along with Etihad, Singapore Airlines and China's HNA.

"The brilliant Virgin Australia team is fighting to survive and need support to get through this catastrophic global crisis," Sir Richard said.

"We are hopeful that Virgin Australia can emerge stronger than ever, as a more sustainable, financially viable airline."

He warned: "If Virgin Australia disappears, Qantas would effectively have a monopoly of the Australian skies. We all know what that would lead to."

Sir Richard also addressed the fierce criticism he has faced in recent weeks over his tax situation.

Critics have pointed out he has paid no UK income tax since moving to the tax-free British Virgin Islands 14 years ago.

Sir Richard is the 312th richest person in the world with an estimated $5.2bn fortune, according to the Bloomberg billionaires index.

"I've seen lots of comments about my net worth - but that is calculated on the value of Virgin businesses around the world before this crisis, not sitting as cash in a bank account ready to withdraw," he said.

"Over the years significant profits have never been taken out of the Virgin Group, instead they have been reinvested in building businesses that create value and opportunities."

Turning to the question of living abroad he said: "Joan and I did not leave Britain for tax reasons but for our love of the beautiful British Virgin Islands (BVI) and in particular Necker Island, which I bought when I was 29 years old, as an uninhabited island on the edges of the BVI.

"Over time, we built our family home here. The rest of the island is run as a business, which employs 175 people."

So the £500m :?: would you give him a loan.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8322
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2439 times
Has Liked: 1978 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Tricky Trevor » Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:41 pm

Not a penny. Horrible man.
This user liked this post: Taffy on the wing

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10843
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5521 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by TheFamilyCat » Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:45 pm

Go **** yourself Branston.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Blackrod » Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:48 pm

He lives there because of Necker’s beauty and nothing to do with tax. Right ok then. Plenty of airlines have gone bust before him ....Pan Am, Laker, TWA .... it’s a hard business needing lots of cash flow. Why is he any different ?

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by FactualFrank » Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:49 pm

Richard Branson. He can whistle for the Sir bit.

Heathclaret
Posts: 439
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:49 am
Been Liked: 190 times
Has Liked: 179 times
Location: Bracebridge Heath, Lincoln.

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Heathclaret » Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:50 pm

I would.

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 16618
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 3750 times
Has Liked: 7520 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Buxtonclaret » Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:50 pm

Branson's in a pickle.
These 4 users liked this post: Bosscat Hipper Corky bfcjg

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Grumps » Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:53 pm

Where do his companies pay tax?

Heathclaret
Posts: 439
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:49 am
Been Liked: 190 times
Has Liked: 179 times
Location: Bracebridge Heath, Lincoln.

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Heathclaret » Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:54 pm

Grumps wrote:
Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:53 pm
Where do his companies pay tax?
Good question.

Murger
Posts: 4206
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1235 times
Has Liked: 844 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Murger » Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:55 pm

He can go whistle. Tosspot.

RingoMcCartney
Posts: 10318
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 2636 times
Has Liked: 2798 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by RingoMcCartney » Mon Apr 20, 2020 3:01 pm

Beat you to it tiger 76!
RingoMcCartney wrote:
Mon Apr 20, 2020 1:42 pm
Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:25 pm

Tricky Dicky Branson- came cap in hand, demanding the already hard pressed, uk tax payer bail him out!

As the founder of Virgin Records and Virgin Atlantic airlines, Richard Branson is a business mogul sitting on a cool $5 billion fortune. Although he hails from the U.K., his primary residence is on Necker Island, an island in the Caribbean that he purchased for $180,000. Branson has repeatedly been accused of escaping to Necker Island as a way out of paying taxes due to the lack of income taxes there, but the Virgin mogul has denied this.

“I have not left Britain for tax reasons but for my love of the beautiful British Virgin Islands,” Branson wrote on the Virgin website in 2013, according to The Telegraph.

Yeah right!
Sorry! ;)

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by tiger76 » Mon Apr 20, 2020 3:13 pm

The response is roughly what i expected,maybe i'm misunderstanding but why can't he make use of the government's furlough scheme,and then resume operations when circumstances allow,like many any employers will be doing,he's absolutely the kind of individual who gives capitalism a bad name,live by the sword,die by the sword i'm afraid,i do hope all the staff he employs manage to find alternative employment if he does pull the plug,but at face value it looks to me as if he's using them as a bargaining chip to hold a gun to the government's head,and if they don't give in to his demands,he'll just shut up shop.

Paul Waine
Posts: 9845
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2344 times
Has Liked: 3164 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Paul Waine » Mon Apr 20, 2020 3:13 pm

Hmm, does Virgin Atlantic make money, will it be able to pay back a UK taxpayer loan? What are the prospects for airlines when covid-19 is "sorted?"
Key credit question: if VA didn't exist would someone want to compete in that market? Is it time for "Phoenix Atlantic" (or another low cost new entrant)?

Thinking about it I can see why "Phoenix Atlantic" might not be a popular name for an airline. Strangely, "Phoenix Air" exists. ;)

FCBurnley
Posts: 9697
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 1967 times
Has Liked: 1132 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by FCBurnley » Mon Apr 20, 2020 3:22 pm

Didn’t pick the best time to launch his cruise line either. Maybe his magic touch has disappeared

Hipper
Posts: 5682
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 1175 times
Has Liked: 918 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Hipper » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:02 am

If he needs a commercial loan and it is a good risk then I would guess banks or other investors will come forward.

I can't see the airline business going back to 'as it was before' after this virus epidemic subsides. There will surely be a review of the industry including particularly its impact on global warming so I think there will be a lot of challenges for that industry.

Indeed, I hope there will be a wide scale review of our way of living - reliance on super markets, transport etc. - so that we can find a good way forward.
This user liked this post: Taffy on the wing

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by tim_noone » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:11 am

He wasn't concerned when flybe folded.been feathering his own nest for years...one of the smarmy touchy feely types.

fatboy47
Posts: 4179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2316 times
Has Liked: 2692 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by fatboy47 » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:15 am

He will get pretty much what he wants.

He p1sses in the same pot as the Bullngdon elite who are now firmly in charge of divvying up the national pie.

The plebs will get a few crumbs to keep them alive and working.

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9585
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3146 times
Has Liked: 10202 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by evensteadiereddie » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:18 am

How is Branson different to any other businessman ? He's seen a problem with his business(es) and is trying to solve them.
You don't like him or the way he works - don't use his companies.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by tim_noone » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:24 am

evensteadiereddie wrote:
Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:18 am
How is Branson different to any other businessman ? He's seen a problem with his business(es) and is trying to solve them.
You don't like him or the way he works - don't use his companies.
But isn't he worth 5 billion and a tax exile.

Corky
Posts: 1431
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:37 pm
Been Liked: 535 times
Has Liked: 414 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Corky » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:24 am

I don't have a problem with him asking for a commercial loan. If his company meet the criteria set by the government then he gets it. If I was setting that criteria one of those stipulations would be along the lines of; I understand why you would want to live in the BVI but your Airline is based in the UK so therefore you should pay tax in the UK. In short companies that pay tax in the UK and don't use havens to dodge tax can have a loan. The choice is his.
These 2 users liked this post: tim_noone tiger76

Funkydrummer
Posts: 8310
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 2949 times
Has Liked: 2063 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Funkydrummer » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:28 am

If his reported personal wealth is any way near, then he can help it out with a personal loan
on a commercial basis. He won't miss that sort of money.

Slimey little toad.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by tim_noone » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:31 am

Funkydrummer wrote:
Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:28 am
If his reported personal wealth is any way near, then he can help it out with a personal loan
on a commercial basis. He won't miss that sort of money.

Slimey little toad.
Exactly...pump £500 million of his own cash in.

Greenmile
Posts: 3164
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1081 times
Has Liked: 4241 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Greenmile » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:32 am

I read somewhere that the Danish govt is refusing to provide any assistance to any company registered in an offshore tax haven, or which is continuing to pay dividends to shareholders or buy back shares.

We should be doing the same, but I’m sure we won’t.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8322
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2439 times
Has Liked: 1978 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Tricky Trevor » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:33 am

Woke up to find Virgin Australia now in administration after Oz government refused their loan request. In debt for A$5bn, How does he expect to repay loans?

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by TVC15 » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:42 am

If he has got a viable business he can go to his own bank for the loan - in the Cayman Islands presumably ?
Seriously why can’t he approach his own bank ? Why burden the British taxpayer with this risk ?

The probable answer to this is that his own bank would not touch it.

He has however got the same rights as other companies which is to furlough his staff which they have no doubt already done. As far as I am aware going directly to the British government for a commercial loan is not one of the measures of support announced by the government and is not available to any other company.
The business interruption loan is available via his bank - he can go online and fill in the application form like everyone else - he’s just got a few more zeros he needs to put in.

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Blackrod » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:53 am

He wants to use Necker (worth £80 million) as security for a £500 million loan. And you wonder why he doesn’t approach the banks ? Airlines haemorrhage money and I hope this money is directed elsewhere and the Govt show some backbone. He is being slated for this by the British taxpayer. One has posted on on social media how he has gone from being Britain’s favourite businessman to having the status of a leper.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8322
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2439 times
Has Liked: 1978 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Tricky Trevor » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:55 am

Can’t argue with this.
C75B2160-6167-4032-B6FB-1AE0FC46D052.jpeg
C75B2160-6167-4032-B6FB-1AE0FC46D052.jpeg (214.63 KiB) Viewed 4714 times
These 7 users liked this post: TVC15 Bosscat fatboy47 Buxtonclaret LeadBelly Lord Beamish dougcollins

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by tim_noone » Tue Apr 21, 2020 10:55 am

Alongside Greedy Green and others, He wont go hungry..that's for sure.

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9585
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3146 times
Has Liked: 10202 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by evensteadiereddie » Tue Apr 21, 2020 11:00 am

Absolutely not. He's playing the game the wealthy have been able to for years. I don't blame the guy for using the system to his own advantage.
Let's see the government follow Denmark's example if we're so upset about Branson's - and many others' - behaviour.

randomclaret2
Posts: 6880
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2742 times
Has Liked: 4314 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by randomclaret2 » Tue Apr 21, 2020 11:10 am

Nothing worse than people rubbing their wealth in other peoples noses, especially at a time when so many are suffering

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by TVC15 » Tue Apr 21, 2020 11:34 am

He’s possibly asking for as much now in a loan from the government as he should have paid in taxes to them.

Karma ?....if he’s refused yes.

But main point is why burden the country with such a big risky loan for an industry that is going through turmoil. With a reported person wealth of £5bn why can’t he lend the money to them himself ?

AlargeClaret
Posts: 4428
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 1148 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by AlargeClaret » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:22 pm

The old bottom pincher is no stranger to proffering the begging bowl . Perhaps he could sell a couple of islands ? A throw a cheeky billion at his ego trip ( erm I mean airline )

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Top Claret » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:23 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:
Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:45 pm
Go **** yourself Branston.
Don't you mean go Pickle yourself Branston?

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Top Claret » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:27 pm

No way should the government be bailing out billionaires who have the money to bail themselves out

If Virgin airlines goes bust another billionaire will step up and takeover the airline, or another airline will take over its slots

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10843
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5521 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by TheFamilyCat » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:51 pm

Top Claret wrote:
Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:23 pm
Don't you mean go Pickle yourself Branston?
No, definitely **** himself.

CombatClaret
Posts: 4381
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1825 times
Has Liked: 929 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by CombatClaret » Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:00 pm

The government will have to consider if Virgin goes kaput so does it's order of over 330 Airbus aircraft which will have huge impact on Airbus and Rolls Royce, companies they love to tout as great examples of advanced British engineering. Could have a bigger knock on effect in jobs lost than just at Virgin.

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3525
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 651 times
Has Liked: 2879 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Burnley Ace » Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:11 pm

Let the jealousy over one man cloud your judgment and ignore the impact. Bet none of the spiteful comments are from anyone working for Virgin

Taffy on the wing
Posts: 4600
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
Been Liked: 1020 times
Has Liked: 3163 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Taffy on the wing » Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:37 pm

Tricky Trevor wrote:
Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:41 pm
Not a penny. Horrible man.
He's a Parasite!

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 927 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by thatdberight » Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:45 pm

tim_noone wrote:
Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:31 am
Exactly...pump £500 million of his own cash in.
Most of his value is in the ownership of the very companies that are in danger of going bust. Not a brilliant bit of collateral to offer...

Taffy on the wing
Posts: 4600
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
Been Liked: 1020 times
Has Liked: 3163 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Taffy on the wing » Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:47 pm

TVC15 wrote:
Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:42 am
If he has got a viable business he can go to his own bank for the loan - in the Cayman Islands presumably ?
Seriously why can’t he approach his own bank ? Why burden the British taxpayer with this risk ?

The probable answer to this is that his own bank would not touch it.

He has however got the same rights as other companies which is to furlough his staff which they have no doubt already done. As far as I am aware going directly to the British government for a commercial loan is not one of the measures of support announced by the government and is not available to any other company.
The business interruption loan is available via his bank - he can go online and fill in the application form like everyone else - he’s just got a few more zeros he needs to put in.
He was one of the first in line with his hand out, he initially asked his airline staff to take 8 weeks unpaid leave!.....Tapeworm.

nonayclaret
Posts: 328
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 53 times
Has Liked: 64 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by nonayclaret » Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:53 pm

If he is in partnership with Etihad and Delta why is he alone coming to the UK tax paye/ banks for loan. Where are these other partners in this big money ask? I also totally agree with the Danish approach. The government are often being pressed to say how they will restrict greed mongers from playing the system. This should be the answer. Good bacon too!

SussexDon1inIreland
Posts: 6217
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:23 pm
Been Liked: 1277 times
Has Liked: 8528 times
Location: Greystones Ireland

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by SussexDon1inIreland » Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:27 pm

Virgin Atlantic is owned by the Virgin Group (20%), Air France-KLM (31%) and Delta Air Lines (49%). Why should the UK Govt (UK taxpayer) support them? Maybe in conjunction with Delta and Air France but surely not the UK on its own.
He could also pledge his assets to get loans from Banks to support VA.
This user liked this post: nonayclaret

bfcjg
Posts: 13156
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5003 times
Has Liked: 6721 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by bfcjg » Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:25 pm

Nationalise it.
This user liked this post: Taffy on the wing

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by FactualFrank » Wed Apr 22, 2020 9:19 am

Taking the 'T' out of being in a pickle.

And the 'P' out of the rest of us.

Stayingup
Posts: 5551
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 914 times
Has Liked: 2726 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Stayingup » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:38 am

TheFamilyCat wrote:
Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:45 pm
Go **** yourself Branston.
Yeah he often looks pickled.

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4237
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1016 times
Has Liked: 1484 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by tarkys_ears » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:59 am

He's asking for a loan against his property. If he didn't give a ****, he'd let it fold and count his money on his island.

You're all embarrassingly pathetically envious - he's richer than you, get over it.

Funny how you're all quick to go on about peoples jobs at stake, but here you don't give a **** because you "don't like him".

Pathetic.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10273
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3327 times
Has Liked: 1942 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:14 am

I think most people are envious of billionaires. I’d certainly like to give it a go.

The reason sympathy is running low is because he’s chosen not to pay tax in this country and is now begging for help.

Personally I think they should be giving the loan, but only under very strict conditions.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by TVC15 » Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:20 am

tarkys_ears wrote:
Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:59 am
He's asking for a loan against his property. If he didn't give a ****, he'd let it fold and count his money on his island.

You're all embarrassingly pathetically envious - he's richer than you, get over it.

Funny how you're all quick to go on about peoples jobs at stake, but here you don't give a **** because you "don't like him".

Pathetic.
Pretty embarrassing and pathetic post.

Why does he not ask the government where he lives and where he registers his companies to avoid tax for a loan ?

Or why does he not ask his Bank for a loan - as you secured on his property (!!!). Going to your bank for a business interruption loan is what all the other companies in the UK have to do - and these other companies actually pay tax.

Why burden the tax payer with the risk of a £500m loan with no idea whether his business is viable. Virgin Australia has just gone bust - it’s hardly a risk free sector.

If he is that confident he can repay it with his personal assets / wealth and all this security why is he going to the British taxpayer for the money - the same taxpayer he has managed to avoid paying hundreds of millions of tax ?

It’s got f-uck all to do with envy - that’s just a lazy argument often thrown out.
If you genuinely think that he deserves to be provided with a loan from the government and that is his only option then put together a reasonable argument as to why.
These 6 users liked this post: Buxtonclaret keith1879 THEWELLERNUT70 Top Claret Funkydrummer Lord Beamish

keith1879
Posts: 865
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:28 pm
Been Liked: 262 times
Has Liked: 363 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by keith1879 » Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:25 am

CombatClaret wrote:
Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:00 pm
The government will have to consider if Virgin goes kaput so does it's order of over 330 Airbus aircraft which will have huge impact on Airbus and Rolls Royce, companies they love to tout as great examples of advanced British engineering. Could have a bigger knock on effect in jobs lost than just at Virgin.
Virgin Atlantic only have about 40 aircraft in total....they may have a few "Airbus A330" on order but it will be a trivial number. The effect of Covid19 on the world airline industry may turn out to be massive and when you consider that Boeing and Airbus both have thousands of aircraft orders at risk from substantial airlines all over the world then VA are very tiny pebbles on a very big beach.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Sir Richard Branson

Post by TVC15 » Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:26 am

Bordeauxclaret wrote:
Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:14 am
I think most people are envious of billionaires. I’d certainly like to give it a go.

The reason sympathy is running low is because he’s chosen not to pay tax in this country and is now begging for help.

Personally I think they should be giving the loan, but only under very strict conditions.
Why do you think they should be given the loan ?
I get the debate about protecting jobs etc but look at what they did to their employees as soon as the crisis broke. Why should Virgin be given special privileges when many multi national companies (who pay tax here) are not offered the same and having to do what all other companies are doing - go to their bank, cut costs etc.

I know we bailed out the banks but that was more to save the economy collapsing - nothing is going to collapse if Virgin go bust...but if their business is viable then they should go to their banks or approach his own government or the governments of the major shareholders who own the business - none of which are the UK.

Post Reply