aggi wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 11:58 pm
Well if we're still banning mass gatherings and living in fear of people catching coronavirus in a few years time then there will probably be other things to worry about.
Doing it properly doesn't necessarily mean what we had for most of this season. It can also be having solid contingency plans that clubs are aware of and can factor into their planning.
Solid contingency plans would be lovely. But I don't think you can have a solid contingency plan for a situation where you don't know whether you can have 12 months' football in the year or no months, or any number in between, and you never get more than a month's notice (and that only provisional) of whether you can play next month.
You need a solid plan, for example, for if you get to January and there is a second lockdown which is said to be only for three weeks but turns out to be 8. Another sold plan if this happens in November but is clear by Christmas. Another one for a lockdown said to be 2 months but is actually only 3 weeks. Another for if they allow limited number of fans in the grounds. Another for if the government says we can start in July but puts it off for a month, then another month, then another month, then another month, then another month ...
Basically, you can't have any solid contingency plans for more than a month in these circumstances.
There's bits of things they could do. Specifically, it comes to mind, they could establish that if they do have to decide the league on points per game, whether they will do it on total games or home-and-away weighting. At present it's a popularity contest between West Ham (1 vote for total ppg) and Bournemouth (1 vote for weighted average ppg) with the other 18 teams deciding who they like least. That could be fun!