Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by MACCA » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:18 am

Envy, not a nice trait to have...
These 2 users liked this post: paulatky Hibsclaret

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by paulatky » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:19 am

Could he be a ball boy.
They will be needed in the stands.

joey13
Posts: 7505
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 1230 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by joey13 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:21 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:17 am
Oh yes, to hell with the number of people who have died, to hell with restrictions placed on everyone, to hell with the fact they are behind closed doors. Get bloody real, no one should be going in our even attempting to.
Agree 100% with this

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Grumps » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:28 am

paulatky wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:19 am
Could he be a ball boy.
They will be needed in the stands.
Can I be one then? And all the other burnley fans who have has much right as he has to attend these games ( which is no right at all, by the way)

Jamesy
Posts: 2607
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 794 times
Has Liked: 526 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Jamesy » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:41 am

evensteadiereddie wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:21 am
Someone not being serious and probably hoping, due to the publicity and his incredible commitment, someone at the club will fix him up with an official invite ?
Fair enough if it works out for him.
Agreed. It is what you have said. Dave Burnley is not daft and he doesn’t shy away from publicity. He is hoping that someone can indeed fix it for him. Sadly I doubt this will happen as there will be the same issue at all 20 clubs and if the “priveleged” few managed to get into games there would be uproar.
Having said that, I wouldn’t have a problem with it if he pulled it off and managed to attend the remaining fixtures. Whether people like the guy or not, his commitment to BFC is impressive especially travelling from the Potteries for every Match for the last 46 years.
This user liked this post: paulatky

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by martin_p » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:42 am

nil_desperandum wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:16 am
That's totally fair enough, and we've already established that that's your clear position.
I was really making a more general point about who might "qualify" to attend as "media / press whatever", and it would be my view that people like yourself who report on matches and publish them online to a significant following, have a stronger case for attending and reporting than many others who - I have absolutely no doubt - will get a free pass on far more dubious grounds.
i.e. If I'm not at the game I'd much rather read your match report than anyone elses, though I suppose you could write a report based on tv footage, if it's available to you.
(I haven't anywhere - by the way - said that I support what Dave Burnley has said)
If Dave Burnley gets in there’ll be dozens, if not hundreds, of supporters looking to get in the next game. It’s not about whether anyone ‘deserves’ to go to the game, it’s about keeping people safe. Starting to let people in would open the floodgates.
These 2 users liked this post: wilks_bfc tiger76

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by paulatky » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:42 am

Grumps wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:28 am
Can I be one then? And all the other burnley fans who have has much right as he has to attend these games ( which is no right at all, by the way)
Having not missed a game in 44 years would be good if he could keep his record in tact.
Ball boys will surely be needed and this would be a good solution.
Let all those who have seen every game in last 40 years be ball boys.

NottsClaret
Posts: 3591
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2596 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by NottsClaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:44 am

If I got offered a pass to watch the games I wouldn't bother. Not for any moral reasons, it's just that watching football without a crowd is one of the more boring things you can do. If I can't find a better way to spend my time, I'll be disappointed.

Just tell me when we're all allowed back in - hopefully sooner than we first thought - not really interested in pro football until then.
This user liked this post: paulatky

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Grumps » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:45 am

paulatky wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:42 am
Having not missed a game in 44 years would be good if he could keep his record in tact.
Ball boys will surely be needed and this would be a good solution.
Let all those who have seen every game in last 40 years be ball boys.
Even if it spreads the virus?

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by martin_p » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:46 am

Jamesy wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:41 am
Agreed. It is what you have said. Dave Burnley is not daft and he doesn’t shy away from publicity. He is hoping that someone can indeed fix it for him. Sadly I doubt this will happen as there will be the same issue at all 20 clubs and if the “priveleged” few managed to get into games there would be uproar.
Having said that, I wouldn’t have a problem with it if he pulled it off and managed to attend the remaining fixtures. Whether people like the guy or not, his commitment to BFC is impressive especially travelling from the Potteries for every Match for the last 46 years.
I’ve never understood this ‘he travels from the potteries’ thing. Stoke is about a 90 minute drive from Burnley. It takes me that long to get to Burnley from where I live but I don’t make a big deal out of it.
This user liked this post: ClaretTony

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by paulatky » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:48 am

Grumps wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:45 am
Even if it spreads the virus?
Guess all those there, press ,ball boys would be tested and would social distance.

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3549
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 2894 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Burnley Ace » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:51 am

They should raffle off, with appropriate tests, the “ball retrievers” (masked, gloved and disinfected). Who carries the stretcher, are they club employees?

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10165
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4186 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:57 am

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:46 am
I’ve never understood this ‘he travels from the potteries’ thing. Stoke is about a 90 minute drive from Burnley. It takes me that long to get to Burnley from where I live but I don’t make a big deal out of it.

Takes me longer than that to walk home from the train station after a 5.30 kick off, despite the station being half a mile away

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Billy Balfour » Tue Jun 02, 2020 10:43 am

We'll end up with football being stopped before it's hardly started if others have similar ideas and act on them.

Also, the sense of entitlement is massive here: I'M A SUPERFAN AND I WILL GO TO THE MATCH AND TO HELL WITH EVERYONE ELSE.
These 2 users liked this post: Grumps tiger76

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by SalisburyClaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 10:49 am

Sat next to him once, for no reason he had a go at the Burnley fan behind him because he had a southern accent. Got quite heated.
Much as I admire his attendance record, attending these games shouldn't be an option

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 10969
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5185 times
Has Liked: 803 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:00 am

Can he pay on the gate?

Im_not_Robbie_Blake
Posts: 1867
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 383 times
Has Liked: 234 times
Location: Skipton

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Im_not_Robbie_Blake » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:03 am

DB is not the most important Burnley fan - we are all equally part of this. He must realise that he has to adhere to the same rules as the rest of us. We all wish we could go, but we can't, and one day we will. That's it. Meanwhile, we have to work at getting rid of this virus and keeping everybody well.

Football will return, but some people sadly won't be able to.

ksrclaret
Posts: 6897
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2540 times
Has Liked: 766 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by ksrclaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:05 am

What a brilliant thread. It’s got a bit of something for everyone.

He deserves his crown of no 1 Burnley fan and his dedication to the cause is admirable. He puts the rest of us so called Burnley fans to shame. Good for him I say, hope he manages to get in selling the golden gamble.
These 2 users liked this post: paulatky Jamesy

Rowls
Posts: 13249
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5096 times
Has Liked: 5162 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Rowls » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:09 am

Some real killjoys on here.

Good luck to Dave Burnley and best of luck to him getting inside.
This user liked this post: paulatky

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Grumps » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:15 am

Rowls wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:09 am
Some real killjoys on here.

Good luck to Dave Burnley and best of luck to him getting inside.
Killjoys?...... It's all about people being killed by the virus and trying to stop it, do you not get that?
The Premier league very nearly didn't get the go-ahead because of this very problem, fans turning up at grounds when games are being played, yet it is ok because he's a burnley fan?

Imagine the outrage on here if any other fans from different clubs started turning up at grounds

I thought it would only be the braindead who turned up, and here we are, people actually encouraging it.
Last edited by Grumps on Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 FactualFrank

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by MACCA » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:15 am

Theyll be plenty of people wanting him to miss one, and pribably have wanted him to do s for years.
There's lots of envious people around in this world, and more than a few who would be quite happy for his 46 year run to end regardless whether covid19 restrictions were in place or not.
Quite sad really.

Rocky gets similar grief and slurs.
These 2 users liked this post: paulatky Jamesy

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Grumps » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:17 am

ksrclaret wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:05 am
What a brilliant thread. It’s got a bit of something for everyone.

He deserves his crown of no 1 Burnley fan and his dedication to the cause is admirable. He puts the rest of us so called Burnley fans to shame. Good for him I say, hope he manages to get in selling the golden gamble.
I take it this is meant as sarcasm

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by paulatky » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:20 am

Grumps wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:17 am
I take it this is meant as sarcasm
Why do you think that ?

I read it for whats its worth.
What an achievement to go 44 years not missing a game.

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by paulatky » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:24 am

Im_not_Robbie_Blake wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:03 am
DB is not the most important Burnley fan - we are all equally part of this. He must realise that he has to adhere to the same rules as the rest of us. We all wish we could go, but we can't, and one day we will. That's it. Meanwhile, we have to work at getting rid of this virus and keeping everybody well.

Football will return, but some people sadly won't be able to.

We were not equal before civid-19.

You are judged in loyalty points for away games

lakedistrictclaret
Posts: 1497
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:30 am
Been Liked: 519 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by lakedistrictclaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:24 am

I've known Dave a long time, I used to see him on the train between Preston and Burnley Central in the late sixties. He's a good bloke.

If he can find a legal way to see the remaining games, good for him. Any attempt to gain access illegally cannot possibly be condoned.
This user liked this post: paulatky

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Billy Balfour » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:24 am

Grumps wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:17 am
I take it this is meant as sarcasm
I hope so.

Stalbansclaret
Posts: 2503
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
Been Liked: 1664 times
Has Liked: 2974 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Stalbansclaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:24 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:17 am
Oh yes, to hell with the number of people who have died, to hell with restrictions placed on everyone, to hell with the fact they are behind closed doors. Get bloody real, no one should be going in our even attempting to.
Crikey Tony...cool your jets. Obviously if he attended, with the club's support as I proposed, he would have to be tested the same as everyone else. I was proposing the club make an exception for him given the specific circumstances of his "fame" and my personal preference that we keep his record going as he regularly attracts some good-humoured publicity for our club.
These 3 users liked this post: paulatky Jamesy Hibsclaret

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10165
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4186 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:25 am

paulatky wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:24 am
We were not equal before civid-19.

You are judged in loyalty points for away games

Think you mean rewarded

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Grumps » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:25 am

paulatky wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:20 am
Why do you think that ?

I read it for whats its worth.
What an achievement to go 44 years not missing a game.
Probably because iam quite offended that he thinks Dave Burnley puts me and all other burnley fans to shame

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17935
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4068 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:26 am

paulatky wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:42 am

Let all those who have seen every game in last 40 years be ball boys.
I haven't missed a game in 50 years, League, Fa Cup, League Cup, European games, play-offs, Sherpa Van, Anglo-Scottish Cup and friendlies, home or away.

Actually, that's all lies, but who's to disprove it?

See the problem here?

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by paulatky » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:28 am

Grumps wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:25 am
Probably because iam quite offended that he thinks Dave Burnley puts me and all other burnley fans to shame
At least DB doesnt spend all his life on social media. Well not the one who’s subject of this thread.

ksrclaret
Posts: 6897
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2540 times
Has Liked: 766 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by ksrclaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:28 am

Grumps wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:17 am
I take it this is meant as sarcasm
No, deadly serious. I know there won’t be any fans to purchase a golden gamble ticket but I should think the players would quite like the opportunity to enter the prize draw with the chance of winning a meal for two at the Rose & Bowl.
This user liked this post: Leisure

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:29 am

Grumps wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:37 am
If any employee of burnley football club, does anything to help him get into a game, I hope they get fired on the spot
Just trying to work out how you came up with your username.
These 5 users liked this post: paulatky Darnhill Claret AfloatinClaret Stalbansclaret Leisure

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by paulatky » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:29 am

ElectroClaret wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:26 am
I haven't missed a game in 50 years, League, Fa Cup, League Cup, European games, play-offs, Sherpa Van, Anglo-Scottish Cup and friendlies, home or away.

Actually, that's all lies, but who's to disprove it?

See the problem here?
But Dave Burnley is not lies is it.

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4064
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1507 times
Has Liked: 580 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Swizzlestick » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:35 am

Could be a classic thread, this.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by TVC15 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:35 am

I don’t know the definition of a “superfan” but my guess would be not missing a game for 44 years would be somewhere near to it.
It’s hardly a surprise that he would like to go to the games for something that has clearly become for him this meaningful and this obsessive.

He’s clearly being tongue in cheek with some of the options and trying to get publicity for himself to see if there is a chance of the club allowing it.
I don’t see much wrong with what he is saying - and that does not mean I think he should be allowed to watch the game.

I already said on another thread that I think if we allowed a few hundred fans in the ground - if it was logistically possible and safe to do so - then that would be a positive thing for those who could attend.

If that was allowed and I was lucky enough to be selected I wouldn’t give up my seat so DB could go but if the club treated him as an exception and let him go on the games I would not be bothered either. Neither would it bother me if he was the only supporter allowed to watch the game.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16853
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:37 am

MACCA wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:15 am
Theyll be plenty of people wanting him to miss one, and pribably have wanted him to do s for years.
There's lots of envious people around in this world, and more than a few who would be quite happy for his 46 year run to end regardless whether covid19 restrictions were in place or not.
Quite sad really.

Rocky gets similar grief and slurs.
Why would anyone be envious of him? I don’t understand that. If I wanted to attend every single Burnley game I would do.

Bizarre that some people are condoning a bloke threatening to illegally gain access to football stadiums.
This user liked this post: Grumps

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17935
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4068 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:38 am

paulatky wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:29 am
But Dave Burnley is not lies is it.
And I didn't say he is lying.
I'm asking how you'd turn away everyone else who followed in his wake and claimed the same.

Think you'd have quite a few "uber-fans" on your hands.
Last edited by ElectroClaret on Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Billy Balfour » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:40 am

Pretty poor that people are defending him. The matches aren't being played behind closed doors as part of a sanction. Anyway, if you want the season to end early, along with all the serious financial implications, then go along, break the rules and maybe help spread a little C-19 to your family and everyone else.
This user liked this post: Grumps

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by tiger76 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:47 am

Just browsing this thread it throws up extremes on all sides that's rare for an UTC thread, now as i understand it DB couldn't just turn up at the Turf and be granted access, however if he was invited by the club for whatever reason he could attend.

This does throw up interesting questions as to exactly how many people will be allowed into the grounds once we restart.

So naturally you'll have the players and officials, then the backroom staff from both clubs, ballboys/ballgirls i assume,i'd guess they'll also have to be some form of ambulance type assistance available in the event of medical emergencies.

Then apparently the directors will be allowed in along with invited guests, so i imagine if DB could somehow wangle his way onto the guest list he'd be able to attend.

Going by the letter of the law he strictly shouldn't be attending, but you do wonder if his media appearances, and long time devotion will sway the club into making an exemption.

Even if BFC do give him exemption and allow him on the turf, i have to wonder how he'll manage to see the away games we have remaining.

Out of curiosity when it states Dave has never missed a game, does that include friendlies, because i'm pretty sure there's been occasions in pre-season when we've played 2 fixtures at the same time, so as devoted as Dave is even he can't have attended 2 venues at the same time.

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Grumps » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:47 am

I haven't read his books, but out of interest does he work full time along with attending all these games?

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Devils_Advocate » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:49 am

I think giving DB the opportunity to watch the games legally and within the rules that are agreed by the league seems a good and sensible idea to me.

I am guessing there will be scope for a small number of fans to be in the stadium so I would like to make the case for myself (CT if you could pass this on to the club I'd be very grateful)
  • I rarely go on Turf Moor so it would be a real treat for me to watch the team live and as a result it would feel more special and I would enjoy it more than you lot who go on regularly
  • I currently watch Burnley matches through illegal means so if the club have to do something a little underhand to make it happen I can be trusted to hold my nerve and ensure the club isn't found out. I can imagine a lot of you on here would fall to pieces under the pressure and turn into a grass to save your own skin
I know not everyone will agree with me but you have to acknowledge I have made a good case
These 3 users liked this post: Burnley1989 Darnhill Claret cricketfieldclarets

mikeS
Posts: 1750
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:21 am
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 25 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by mikeS » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:55 am

Have the League not issued instructions to the clubs on who can/ cannot, should/ should not attend close-doors games?

AfloatinClaret
Posts: 1844
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
Been Liked: 562 times
Has Liked: 1406 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by AfloatinClaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:58 am

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:50 am
...we have about 15,000 who never missed a game in the 80s...
They must've had some good camouflage gear. I watched quite a few Burnley away games in the S & SE of England during the 80's and there were midweek nights when there weren't much more than a few hundred in the away end.

Burnley1989
Posts: 7389
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2293 times
Has Liked: 2166 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Burnley1989 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:59 am

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:49 am
I think giving DB the opportunity to watch the games legally and within the rules that are agreed by the league seems a good and sensible idea to me.

I am guessing there will be scope for a small number of fans to be in the stadium so I would like to make the case for myself (CT if you could pass this on to the club I'd be very grateful)
  • I rarely go on Turf Moor so it would be a real treat for me to watch the team live and as a result it would feel more special and I would enjoy it more than you lot who go on regularly
  • I currently watch Burnley matches through illegal means so if the club have to do something a little underhand to make it happen I can be trusted to hold my nerve and ensure the club isn't found out. I can imagine a lot of you on here would fall to pieces under the pressure and turn into a grass to save your own skin
I know not everyone will agree with me but you have to acknowledge I have made a good case
You crack me up mate :lol: , but make some great points as always.

Personally I think they should just open the disabled stand just for Dave, he’d be no hazard to anybody up there or he could fork the pitch at HT etc
These 2 users liked this post: Darnhill Claret Devils_Advocate

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by martin_p » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:02 pm

Rowls wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:09 am
Some real killjoys on here.

Good luck to Dave Burnley and best of luck to him getting inside.
If people start turning up at grounds expecting to get in it’ll soon kill the joy for all of us as football will be suspended again.
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour

ClaretTony
Posts: 67808
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32415 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:04 pm

Stalbansclaret wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:24 am
Crikey Tony...cool your jets. Obviously if he attended, with the club's support as I proposed, he would have to be tested the same as everyone else. I was proposing the club make an exception for him given the specific circumstances of his "fame" and my personal preference that we keep his record going as he regularly attracts some good-humoured publicity for our club.
I’d be furious if the club supported him.
This user liked this post: Blackburn_Claret

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 2273
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 507 times
Has Liked: 1037 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Darnhill Claret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:06 pm

There will be a ‘guest list’ and some people will be invited. I would be more than happy for Dave B to be a substitute guest and could replace an original on said list, as I’m also fairly certain there would be at least one original guest who would choose to turn down the opportunity.

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by martin_p » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:07 pm

I presume people would be happy with Alastair Campbell being invited along too, he’s more famous than Dave Burnley.

Steve1956
Posts: 17249
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6488 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Fife

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Steve1956 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:08 pm

If they bend the rules for him you might as well do it for everyone else,Old Trafford would have 75,000 super fans,ok he goes to games but it still dosent make him more privileged than anyone else who supports Burnley,the run of consecutive games for DB is sadly about to end.

Post Reply