Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by paulatky » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:11 pm

AfloatinClaret wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:58 am
They must've had some good camouflage gear. I watched quite a few Burnley away games in the S & SE of England during the 80's and there were midweek nights when there weren't much more than a few hundred in the away end.

Southend away under Cotts on a Tuesday night not many were there but me and DB were.
Lost 1-0 to a late goal if I remember correctly, but that was after the 80’s

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Billy Balfour » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:12 pm

MACCA wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:15 am
There's lots of envious people around in this world, and more than a few who would be quite happy for his 46 year run to end regardless whether covid19 restrictions were in place or not.
Quite sad really.
Envious of him? I can't see it. Maybe a tiny handful of people, if that, who don't have any life outside of football.
These 2 users liked this post: Steve1956 Sausage

IanMcL
Posts: 30312
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6362 times
Has Liked: 8705 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by IanMcL » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:12 pm

I am not in favour of him 'breaking in'.

I am in favour of him being invited. He is unique.

There will be others in the ground. Behind closed doors still has to operate. There will be plenty of space for him! Give him a job for the duration. Collect the balls that go in the stands etc.

I would not begrudge him that. We can all go shopping, this is nothing like that. The rest of us do not have the same 'unique history'.

If fe tried to get in, by cheating/scamming/conning etc, then fe should be arrested and locked up for the match duration!
These 3 users liked this post: Anonymous evensteadiereddie Stalbansclaret

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 2273
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 507 times
Has Liked: 1037 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Darnhill Claret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:12 pm

Surely we aren’t going to get upset at 100 individuals if BFC chose to invite that number, or vow never to set foot inside the ground again on principle. As it is there will be a number who choose not to attend again for fear of contracting the virus even when all restraints are cancelled. To some there will never be a ‘normal’ again.
These 2 users liked this post: paulatky nil_desperandum

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by paulatky » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:14 pm

Darnhill Claret wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:06 pm
There will be a ‘guest list’ and some people will be invited. I would be more than happy for Dave B to be a substitute guest and could replace an original on said list, as I’m also fairly certain there would be at least one original guest who would choose to turn down the opportunity.
Dont think any decision has been made yet if away Directors can attend the Etihad.

Steve1956
Posts: 17246
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6485 times
Has Liked: 2910 times
Location: Fife

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Steve1956 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:18 pm

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:07 pm
I presume people would be happy with Alastair Campbell being invited along too, he’s more famous than Dave Burnley.
Going off his Twitter feed he will be sectioned before the season starts again,some extraordinary tweets coming from our other superfan ;)

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Grumps » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:23 pm

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:07 pm
I presume people would be happy with Alastair Campbell being invited along too, he’s more famous than Dave Burnley.
He was allowed to drive to ewood and park there when we played, so wouldn't be surprised if the club did do something for him...... It would still be wrong in my eyes..... No fans, should be no fans, legally or otherwise

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7310
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1827 times
Has Liked: 3964 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by nil_desperandum » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:39 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:47 am

Out of curiosity when it states Dave has never missed a game, does that include friendlies, because i'm pretty sure there's been occasions in pre-season when we've played 2 fixtures at the same time, so as devoted as Dave is even he can't have attended 2 venues at the same time.
You're most likely correct, but I do know there was at least one occasion when he watched most of the first half at one ground and then was transported rapidly to another ground to catch most of the 2nd half.

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7310
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1827 times
Has Liked: 3964 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by nil_desperandum » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:41 pm

Steve1956 wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:18 pm
Going off his Twitter feed he will be sectioned before the season starts again,some extraordinary tweets coming from our other superfan ;)
I think that's rather an unfortunate phrase to use given Campbell's well-known fight with severe mental health issues.
This user liked this post: tiger76

Loyalclaret
Posts: 2030
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 436 times
Has Liked: 370 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Loyalclaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:45 pm

He's not the only person to drive to Ewood - we had a mini bus and drove with no escort Grumps. More hoi polloi than famous

If DB finds a legal way in - good luck to him

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7310
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1827 times
Has Liked: 3964 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by nil_desperandum » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:51 pm

Wouldn't it just be ironic if he wrote to the Chairmen of all our away games stating his unique case, and they were sympathetic and all found him some official role on the day (e.g. ball boy) thus enabling him to attend, but he was banned from Turf Moor whilst Alistair Campbell was admitted!

Dyched
Posts: 5946
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:34 am
Been Liked: 1922 times
Has Liked: 446 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Dyched » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:58 pm

I think he’s selfish. Not missed a game for 40 odd years? So he’s seen far more than his fair share. If we’re allowing people in (which we’re not) then let those that can’t afford tickets go instead.

Steve1956
Posts: 17246
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6485 times
Has Liked: 2910 times
Location: Fife

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Steve1956 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:01 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:41 pm
I think that's rather an unfortunate phrase to use given Campbell's well-known fight with severe mental health issues.
No offence was meant,have you seen his tweets the last few weeks,the one with him singing a revised National anthem and showing of his medals was cringe worthy
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by TVC15 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:04 pm

Letting in a hundred or so nurses, doctors and key workers might be the best option / gesture all round.

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by MACCA » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:05 pm

Billy Balfour wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:12 pm
Envious of him? I can't see it. Maybe a tiny handful of people, if that, who don't have any life outside of football.
That's what I said, more than a few. Probably/seems a dozen on this thread alone, whether they'd admit it or not is another thing.
This user liked this post: jojomk1

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by MACCA » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:07 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:37 am
Why would anyone be envious of him? I don’t understand that. If I wanted to attend every single Burnley game I would do.

Bizarre that some people are condoning a bloke threatening to illegally gain access to football stadiums.
Firstly I'm not condoning it.

People may be envious that he goes on every single game, others maybe cant afford too, cant get time off work, would get earache of the mrs etc. The fact he does it and gets called Burnley's most loyal fan, really gets to some people

I'm sure every Burnley fan would love to go on every single game but cant for 1 reason or another, so some will be envious that he's doing something they can't.
Last edited by MACCA on Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

Rileybobs
Posts: 16844
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:08 pm

TVC15 wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:04 pm
Letting in a hundred or so nurses, doctors and key workers might be the best option / gesture all round.
How about just playing it behind closed doors and not letting in anyone as a gesture. Your suggestion would be to allow those who have been most exposed to the virus to attend? That seems to be the polar opposite of what we’re trying to achieve by playing games behind closed doors.

ChristheViking
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:30 pm
Been Liked: 84 times
Has Liked: 12 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by ChristheViking » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:10 pm

He's unique. We've got no-one else like him and I've not heard of other clubs having such a devoted fan as we have.

His streak is something to behold and I don't think it's unreasonable for him to be invited to the game in some capacity on the proviso he's got an up-to-date health check.

It's not as though it's a campaign to have dozens of fans allowed in. It's a one-off for a complete one-off. Recognize it as that.

Good luck Dave.
These 5 users liked this post: Darnhill Claret evensteadiereddie Oshkoshclaret Stalbansclaret Rodneyyouplonker

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by martin_p » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:10 pm

MACCA wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:05 pm
That's what I said, more than a few. Probably/seems a dozen on this thread alone, whether they'd admit it or not is another thing.
Wishing the same rules apply to every supporter is not jealousy. It’ll be sad his incredible run has to stop, but when thousands of people have lost their lives, livelihoods or jobs due to this pandemic it’s well down the list of things I’ll care about.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16844
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:12 pm

MACCA wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:07 pm
Firstly I'm not condoning it.

People may be envious that he goes on every single game, others maybe cant afford too, cant get time off work, would get earache of the mrs etc. The fact he does it and gets called Burnley's most loyal fan, really gets to some people

I'm sure every Burnley fan would love to go on every single game but cant for 1 reason or another, so some will be envious that he's doing something they can't.
Well you’re suggesting that people who disagree with his plans to try and enter the stadium are envious. Seems like you’re condoning it, as are others.

I definitely wouldn’t love to go on every single Burnley game. I love watching Burnley but I have far more other things to do with my time and money than to travel to every single game. So I can safely say I am not envious of someone who has attended every single game since before I was born.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12362
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Devils_Advocate » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:13 pm

TVC15 wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:04 pm
Letting in a hundred or so nurses, doctors and key workers might be the best option / gesture all round.
Sounds good in principle but you need to think about the impacts this will have on the already fragile self esteem of the St Johns Ambulance men and women who man the games

Surrounding them with real healthcare professionals could do further damage to their social skills and confidence and this worries me a little

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by MACCA » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:14 pm

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:10 pm
Wishing the same rules apply to every supporter is not jealousy. It’ll be sad his incredible run has to stop, but when thousands of people have lost their lives, livelihoods or jobs due to this pandemic it’s well down the list of things I’ll care about.

Like I said on my initial post that you've either not read, or read incorrectly ( you're making a habit if this ) I said some will be happy hes finally missed a game regardless of covid19.
Theyll be people who have been waiting years for this to happen and will no doubt have a little chuckle to themselves.
Not you personally, but theyll be some out there.

So I'm not debating why he should or shouldn't go thats a seperate issue a d debate I'm not discussing, I'm merely highlighting some people will be happy his run has come to an end.
Last edited by MACCA on Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by MACCA » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:19 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:12 pm
Well you’re suggesting that people who disagree with his plans to try and enter the stadium are envious. Seems like you’re condoning it, as are others.
No I am not, but I am glad you know what I think, means you can do my posting for me...

Like I said, and will say again they'll be some envious of what he gets to do, and his tag of Burnley's most loyal/famous supporter.

Couldnt give 2 hoots how many years it's been since he missed, if that makes him happy, then great

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12362
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Devils_Advocate » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:19 pm

ChristheViking wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:10 pm
He's unique. We've got no-one else like him and I've not heard of other clubs having such a devoted fan as we have.
Cowdenbeath in Scotland has a supporter who has been a ball boy since he was 7 in 1959. He is now 68 and is in his 60th consecutive season as a ball boy without missing a game.

From 1963 he has been on every away match apart from a trip to Raith Rovers in 1970 when he had uncontrollable diarrhoea. I would suggest this man rivals Dave Burnley

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by TVC15 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:20 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:08 pm
How about just playing it behind closed doors and not letting in anyone as a gesture. Your suggestion would be to allow those who have been most exposed to the virus to attend? That seems to be the polar opposite of what we’re trying to achieve by playing games behind closed doors.
Maybe some support Burnley just as much as anyone else and have a life they enjoy outside of work
Maybe they know how to socially distance
Maybe they have been tested more than others and many have more chance of building up the anti bodies
What’s the difference to them going to visit a park ?

Would not say it’s the polar opposite of anything but it’s fine for us to disagree on it.

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7310
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1827 times
Has Liked: 3964 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by nil_desperandum » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:21 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:19 pm
Cowdenbeath in Scotland has a supporter who has been a ball boy since he was 7 in 1959. He is now 68 and is in his 60th consecutive season as a ball boy without missing a game.

From 1963 he has been on every away match apart from a trip to Raith Rovers in 1970 when he had uncontrollable diarrhoea. I would suggest this man rivals Dave Burnley
I agree, although not attending due to diarrhoea is a bit of a s**t excuse for not turning up.
Last edited by nil_desperandum on Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: Devils_Advocate

Rileybobs
Posts: 16844
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:23 pm

TVC15 wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:20 pm
Maybe some support Burnley just as much as anyone else and have a life they enjoy outside of work
Maybe they know how to socially distance
Maybe they have been tested more than others and many have more chance of building up the anti bodies
What’s the difference to them going to visit a park ?

Would not say it’s the polar opposite of anything but it’s fine for us to disagree on it.
Letting fans attend a game is the polar opposite of playing ‘behind closed doors’.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by TVC15 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:26 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:23 pm
Letting fans attend a game is the polar opposite of playing ‘behind closed doors’.
Allowing 100 fans into a stadium of capacity of 80,000 is not the polar opposite of playing behind closed doors. Letting in 80,000 would be the polar opposite..it means the extreme opposite.
As you may have seen at other behind closed doors games in the past there is often 300 or 400 people there.

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Billy Balfour » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:34 pm

Bloke: How come you stopped watching Burnley after the Tottenham home game?

A lethal pandemic was killing thousands of people.

Bloke: You massive part-timer.
This user liked this post: box_of_frogs

Rileybobs
Posts: 16844
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:39 pm

TVC15 wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:26 pm
Allowing 100 fans into a stadium of capacity of 80,000 is not the polar opposite of playing behind closed doors. Letting in 80,000 would be the polar opposite..it means the extreme opposite.
As you may have seen at other behind closed doors games in the past there is often 300 or 400 people there.
OK, well making a token gesture by letting a hundred or so key workers attend a game that is supposedly taking part 'behind closed doors' in order to to minimise the spread of a virus is totally at odds with the reason why the game is being played behind closed doors in the first place.

Surely you don't think it's a good idea for a hundred or so doctors and nurses to attend?

This is perfectly simple for me. No fans are allowed to attend. As soon as we make exceptions, be it for our 'superfan' or a gesture to key workers we are diluting the reason for playing the game behind closed doors. We are increasing the risk of the virus being spread for no discernible benefit. Every other club will then be entitled to make the same exceptions. There will be lots of disgruntled football fans across the country and this will only lead to some of them trying extreme measures to attend the games.

It's a shame for people like Dave Burnley, but there will be other fans who have watched the vast majority of our games and some will stretch back before he started watching us. This thing is bigger than individuals and to make exceptions opens up a big ugly can of worms.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16844
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:41 pm

MACCA wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:19 pm
No I am not, but I am glad you know what I think, means you can do my posting for me...

Like I said, and will say again they'll be some envious of what he gets to do, and his tag of Burnley's most loyal/famous supporter.

Couldnt give 2 hoots how many years it's been since he missed, if that makes him happy, then great
Maybe I misunderstood your stance, in which case I apologise. But by suggesting that people who disagree with Dave Burnley's plans to illegally gain entry to a stadium are envious has left your position wide open to being misinterpreted.

Jamesy
Posts: 2602
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 791 times
Has Liked: 526 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Jamesy » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:45 pm

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:46 am
I’ve never understood this ‘he travels from the potteries’ thing. Stoke is about a 90 minute drive from Burnley. It takes me that long to get to Burnley from where I live but I don’t make a big deal out of it.
I live 110 miles from Burnley and attend all home games and most aways and have done for years. I don’t make a big deal about it. I think you are perhaps missing the point that this guys attendance record and commitment to BFC are second to none.

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Billy Balfour » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:48 pm

Jamesy wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:45 pm
I live 110 miles from Burnley and attend all home games and most aways and have done for years. I don’t make a big deal about it. I think you are perhaps missing the point that this guys attendance record and commitment to BFC are second to none.
Do you live in Telford?

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3181 times
Has Liked: 1865 times
Contact:

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by wilks_bfc » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:51 pm

TVC15 wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:04 pm
Letting in a hundred or so nurses, doctors and key workers might be the best option / gesture all round.
Speak to any nurse or doctor and as much as they have appreciated the gestures and the thanks they have received, all they really want is for people to do as they are told

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by martin_p » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:53 pm

Jamesy wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:45 pm
I live 110 miles from Burnley and attend all home games and most aways and have done for years. I don’t make a big deal about it. I think you are perhaps missing the point that this guys attendance record and commitment to BFC are second to none.
Oh I don’t doubt that, but ‘and he travels from the potteries you know’ is often tagged on to the end like it’s the other end of the country.

Jamesy
Posts: 2602
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 791 times
Has Liked: 526 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Jamesy » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:53 pm

Billy Balfour wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:48 pm
Do you live in Telford?
Shrewsbury

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Billy Balfour » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:57 pm

Jamesy wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:53 pm
Shrewsbury
Cheers. I thought it might have been the Shropshire area when you said 110 miles. This is why I guessed at Telford.

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7310
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1827 times
Has Liked: 3964 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by nil_desperandum » Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:59 pm

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:53 pm
Oh I don’t doubt that, but ‘and he travels from the potteries you know’ is often tagged on to the end like it’s the other end of the country.
It's not so easy when you don't drive though.
This user liked this post: Jamesy

Jamesy
Posts: 2602
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 791 times
Has Liked: 526 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Jamesy » Tue Jun 02, 2020 2:01 pm

Billy Balfour wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:57 pm
Cheers. I thought it might have been the Shropshire area when you said 110 miles. This is why I guessed at Telford.
You are welcome. I generally travel by train for weekend games home and away but midweeks require car travel and no beer. :x
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour

Jamesy
Posts: 2602
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 791 times
Has Liked: 526 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Jamesy » Tue Jun 02, 2020 2:15 pm

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:53 pm
Oh I don’t doubt that, but ‘and he travels from the potteries you know’ is often tagged on to the end like it’s the other end of the country.
I get that Martin, Stoke isn’t a long long way away and it is relatively easy to get to Burnley from there on public transport. However this guy has been doing this for over fifty years and only missed one game. Like the guy or not, that is an incredible achievement. I understand people’s frustration about not being able to attend when they too haven’t missed a game for many years, but let’s give the guy some recognition please.
These 2 users liked this post: paulatky conyoviejo

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by martin_p » Tue Jun 02, 2020 2:30 pm

Jamesy wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 2:15 pm
I get that Martin, Stoke isn’t a long long way away and it is relatively easy to get to Burnley from there on public transport. However this guy has been doing this for over fifty years and only missed one game. Like the guy or not, that is an incredible achievement. I understand people’s frustration about not being able to attend when they too haven’t missed a game for many years, but let’s give the guy some recognition please.
I’ve said his achievement is incredible, but it shouldn’t mean the rules don’t apply to him.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by TVC15 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 2:34 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:51 pm
Speak to any nurse or doctor and as much as they have appreciated the gestures and the thanks they have received, all they really want is for people to do as they are told
Yes I get that - I’m married to a nurse who has been on the frontline for 30 years.
The way people are talking about this is suggesting some kind of free for all, putting lives at risk, all of them being riddled with the virus etc
Is a hundred people spread across a large open air stadium any more dangerous / risky than going to the packed parks or supermarkets where people are legally socially distancing.
I am happy to respect other people’s views that they would rather not let anybody in but my view is that if this could be done safely I do not see it as an issue and I don’t think a number of NHS staff would do either.
As I said it’s fine to disagree - but I would rather not have my views twisted that I would be happy to allow this to happen even if it’s spreading the virus - I have said if it is safe to do so.
These 3 users liked this post: IanMcL paulatky Stalbansclaret

Quicknick
Posts: 5640
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1217 times
Has Liked: 7178 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Quicknick » Tue Jun 02, 2020 2:39 pm

Hello, Dave. From Wrinehill Nick.

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Grumps » Tue Jun 02, 2020 2:52 pm

It's amazing what some people think is safe on this thread, yet argue against similar, if not safer things on other threads

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9599
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3148 times
Has Liked: 10237 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by evensteadiereddie » Tue Jun 02, 2020 3:06 pm

It's amazing how some people, Grumps, defended Cummings' recent behaviour, isn't it ?

At least, DB could be let in and would pose absolutely no danger to anyone else.

IanMcL
Posts: 30312
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6362 times
Has Liked: 8705 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by IanMcL » Tue Jun 02, 2020 3:14 pm

Are you saying DB is harmless???? :o

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9599
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3148 times
Has Liked: 10237 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by evensteadiereddie » Tue Jun 02, 2020 3:18 pm

Absolutely - a great lad. ;)
This user liked this post: paulatky

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Grumps » Tue Jun 02, 2020 3:20 pm

evensteadiereddie wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 3:06 pm
It's amazing how some people, Grumps, defended Cummings' recent behaviour, isn't it ?

At least, DB could be let in and would pose absolutely no danger to anyone else.
I certainly didn't...

Oshkoshclaret
Posts: 598
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 318 times
Has Liked: 83 times
Location: Dallas, TX & Jefferson, MD
Contact:

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Oshkoshclaret » Tue Jun 02, 2020 3:37 pm

I would 100% support the club making a special case for DB to be allowed in. As others have pointed out he is utterly unique. There are other superfans but DB is in an entire category of his own. I met him in Minneapolis, MN after he'd done a 1200 mile hitch-hike there from Cary, NC. This is not, on any level, normal. Yes he can be a bit of a bell, and there's some aspects of that in the article that started this thread. But personally I give him some leeway because there is a touch of mental illness about the obsession... the way he's organised his ENTIRE LIFE around one goal. It is entirely consistent that he would be looking at every conceivable option.

jrgbfc
Posts: 8499
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2106 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by jrgbfc » Tue Jun 02, 2020 3:38 pm

ChristheViking wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:10 pm
He's unique. We've got no-one else like him and I've not heard of other clubs having such a devoted fan as we have.

His streak is something to behold and I don't think it's unreasonable for him to be invited to the game in some capacity on the proviso he's got an up-to-date health check.

It's not as though it's a campaign to have dozens of fans allowed in. It's a one-off for a complete one-off. Recognize it as that.

Good luck Dave.
I reckon virtually every club in the country will have at least one similar character. If we're treating it as some sort of competition, then the lads who follow their clubs all over Europe every season are beating Dave Burnley.

Post Reply