Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Billy Balfour » Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:33 pm

Anyway, it doesn't matter what anyone says on here or elsewhere because there's no way the club (and the EPL) will make an exception for Mr Burnley and neither should they.

Spijed
Posts: 17125
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Spijed » Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:42 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:24 pm
They shouldn't, but we're constantly told we're all part of the footballing community, and with the size of the venues we're playing in, with our remaining away fixtures it should be perfectly possible for 1 lone diehard Claret to safely socially distance himself.

The smallest grounds we've still got to visit this season are Selhurst Park 25k, and Carrow Road 27k capacities, so there would be plenty of room to accommodate DB.

You'd think a forum such as this would celebrate fans like Dave , instead of lambasting him.
But it's not just Burnley, but every other club will have die hard fans. Should the FA draw up a list of supporters who are worthy of seeing games behind closed doors?

Imagine out next home game against Watford we receive a list with the names of two supporters from Watford who they class as die hard fans.

Should we go out of our way to give them tickets for the match?

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by tiger76 » Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:00 pm

martin_p wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:30 pm
I don’t think many are lambasting him, just wanting the same rules to apply to everyone. You could easily fit 5k in the Etihad with full social distancing, but they aren’t because the game is behind closed doors.
That's fair enough, but equally if the games are strictly behind closed doors, then do club directors really need to be in attendance, if the aim is to have the least amount of people necessary on site, then the only people who absolutely have to be there are the players, managers and physio's on both sides, and i'd guess some form of first aiders/emergency support, and then at a push you'd probably have to have a certain number of ball collectors, whether that be staff from the home club, or the usual children who do that task would be decided between each club beforehand.

Yes you probably could easily fit 5k into most PL grounds, certainly the bigger stadiums, and still adhere to social distancing , and that's what may well occur at the start of next season, if this virus continues to abate.

If the games are behind closed doors then yes i agree there should be no exemptions, but behind closed doors doesn't automatically mean totally empty stands, usually you'll find a scattering of 200-300 people in the stadiums, if for whatever reason the games deemed to have to be played behind closed doors.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by tiger76 » Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:11 pm

Spijed wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:42 pm
But it's not just Burnley, but every other club will have die hard fans. Should the FA draw up a list of supporters who are worthy of seeing games behind closed doors?

Imagine out next home game against Watford we receive a list with the names of two supporters from Watford who they class as die hard fans.

Should we go out of our way to give them tickets for the match?
I personally wouldn't be against each club submitting one fan to attend each game, how the clubs come to that decision is up to them, but i'd imagine they'd be able to determine the criteria based on the amount of games attended over the years, and length of season ticket history, that type of thing.

As it happens i'm more concerned about fans gathering outwith stadiums to celebrate the title in Liverpool's case, and promotion in Leeds United's case,
that's got much more potential to lead to a spread in infections, than one lone fan nominated by each club attending the games has.

jojomk1
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 850 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by jojomk1 » Wed Jun 03, 2020 2:40 pm

thelaughingclaret wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:06 am
Why don’t we give Dave the club. Why don’t we make him chairman? Make him supreme ruler of the town?
He is not above the law. He doesn't work for the club and does not work for any media outlet. He is a fan. Yes a loyal fan, but just a fan. No way on earth should he be given any special status and allowed in to the grounds when no other fan is allowed in. Its a daft and stupid idea. It is about as daft and stupid as he is.
If we allow the biggest fan in then why not allow the second? Then why not the third? Surly the fourth cant be far behind them so they can go too, and the fifth, sixth is a good lad and wears army pants too and called his kid a daft name so he can go too, and the seventh, and so on...
stupid. It is not one rule for one individual and a different for everyone else.
If the people saying Dave can do as he wishes, break all laws and defy all lockdown laws were also having a go at Cummings from breaking lockdown then you are hypocrites. You all need to get your head out of Dave’s arse. If he can go on the grounds then so can Cummings. Give your heads a wobble.
A bit OTT above

Something as simple as a statue outside the Bob Lord Stand would suffice

His disciples could then congregate at the spot, kissing his feet for good luck before entering the ground :roll:

Tribesmen
Posts: 5092
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1181 times
Has Liked: 637 times
Location: Tibet

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Tribesmen » Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:13 pm

If you had to pick one fan to attend by the looks of it on here Dave would get at least 50% of the vote

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Grumps » Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:16 pm

Tribesmen wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:13 pm
If you had to pick one fan to attend by the looks of it on here Dave would get at least 50% of the vote
50% is easy when there's nobody else to vote for

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12370
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5210 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Devils_Advocate » Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:58 pm

Grumps wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:16 pm
50% is easy when there's nobody else to vote for
cough...cough...cough

Blackburn_Claret
Posts: 375
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:16 pm
Been Liked: 85 times
Has Liked: 267 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Blackburn_Claret » Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:05 pm

Grumps wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:16 pm
50% is easy when there's nobody else to vote for
What about Tony? The things he does for the club and the food banks exceed anything that moron as ever done

Jamesy
Posts: 2630
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 805 times
Has Liked: 528 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Jamesy » Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:05 pm

Tribesmen wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:13 pm
If you had to pick one fan to attend by the looks of it on here Dave would get at least 50% of the vote
And if you picked one fan to be publicly flogged, by the looks of it on here he would also get 50% of the vote :lol:

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by tiger76 » Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:20 pm

Blackburn_Claret wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:05 pm
What about Tony? The things he does for the club and the food banks exceed anything that moron as ever done
CT has already stated he wouldn't attend even if invited, anyway according to the other thread which has now been locked only players, coaching staff, officials, medical staff, and directors will be eligible to attend these games, and naturally the various media outlets.

So it looks like DB is out of luck on this one. Unless he becomes a scout for the day, because bizarrely they're allowed also.
This user liked this post: Blackburn_Claret

Jamesy
Posts: 2630
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 805 times
Has Liked: 528 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Jamesy » Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:31 pm

Blackburn_Claret wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:05 pm
What about Tony? The things he does for the club and the food banks exceed anything that moron as ever done
Moron? Bit excessive. Dave Burnley can be hard work at times but a moron he certainly isn’t. Think you too have jumped on the anti Dave Burnley bandwagon. You and several others need to lighten up a bit, as a lot of this thread is just tongue in cheek.

Blackburn_Claret
Posts: 375
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:16 pm
Been Liked: 85 times
Has Liked: 267 times

Re: Dave Burnley '2 options legal, 2 illegal'

Post by Blackburn_Claret » Thu Jun 04, 2020 6:05 am

tiger76 wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:20 pm
CT has already stated he wouldn't attend even if invited, anyway according to the other thread which has now been locked only players, coaching staff, officials, medical staff, and directors will be eligible to attend these games, and naturally the various media outlets.

So it looks like DB is out of luck on this one. Unless he becomes a scout for the day, because bizarrely they're allowed also.
I seen Tony Post saying he wouldn't be attending and quite right, I was just stating there's more deserving supporters than this prat!

Post Reply