The Chairman
-
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 248 times
Re: The Chairman
Absolutely 100% behind Garlick for not renewing Hart and Lennon. Never performed up to the level required for the team to thrive. Spunked a lot of cash on them two alone, Brady will have to go next if he can’t get back to pre injury level.
If the rumor of offering Hendrick less money than what he was on is true then I’m not behind that. That doesn’t make much sense.
Hope Rigg starts earning his money soon with some up and coming talent. Hope Brownhill comes good.
If the rumor of offering Hendrick less money than what he was on is true then I’m not behind that. That doesn’t make much sense.
Hope Rigg starts earning his money soon with some up and coming talent. Hope Brownhill comes good.
This user liked this post: FeedTheArf
Re: The Chairman
Maybe Dyche is unhappy with Rigg? If it's not Dyche negotiating new contracts and transfers I could see him being unhappy! Maybe the board have inclined Rigg is here to stay and Dyche is unhappy with that?
I thought this might blow over after Bardsley resigned but ClaretTonys comments are the worrying aspect, along with Bentley's "confirmation".
I actually don't think we've lost too much with the ooc players, we look to be safe so if we reinvest no issue.
Maybe Sean has been told his budget for next year i.e none.
Maybe Sean himself is making a bigger deal out of this to push a move?
Lots of maybes, it'll all come out in the wash!
I thought this might blow over after Bardsley resigned but ClaretTonys comments are the worrying aspect, along with Bentley's "confirmation".
I actually don't think we've lost too much with the ooc players, we look to be safe so if we reinvest no issue.
Maybe Sean has been told his budget for next year i.e none.
Maybe Sean himself is making a bigger deal out of this to push a move?
Lots of maybes, it'll all come out in the wash!
-
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 248 times
Re: The Chairman
We definitely need to spend some money but only on younger players not the old pros which Dyche is so fond of.
Time to invest in youth as a priority however much that costs because prices are not coming down.
Time to invest in youth as a priority however much that costs because prices are not coming down.
Re: The Chairman
Well looks like your opinions were right all along CT, so apologies for any flak caused at the weekend. I'm absolutely stunned with the speed of this now, and can only hope if he does indeed go, we dont end up being caught with our trousers down as with Coyle. I would hope some work has already gone on with regards to a suitable replacement, at least the new man will have a full transfer window and season to go at.
-
- Posts: 3922
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1330 times
- Location: burnley
Re: The Chairman
Sorry. Can't agree. There were only 2 worth making a fuss over. One had months to sign up and was most likely going anyway. The other has agreed a last minute deal and was probably always going to. Absolutely no need for Sean to be so destructive. We have to stand up to agents' demands.
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 604 times
Re: The Chairman
Not sure Sean if going anywhere to be honest. As Sean himself said. (Not an exact quote but..) "Things flare up occasionally but I like to park them quickly." That to me suggest any bust up is pretty much over.
Anyway, if Eddie Howe gets sacked, Sean would become the longest serving manager, so it would be a shame to miss out on that.
Anyway, if Eddie Howe gets sacked, Sean would become the longest serving manager, so it would be a shame to miss out on that.
Re: The Chairman
I think you will find the issue was mainly over contract extensions, to get to the end of this season (25% left).
That is why the bench is bare....chairman did nowt.
That is why the bench is bare....chairman did nowt.
Re: The Chairman
I suspect Dyche could not care less about becoming the longest serving managerGordaleman wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 3:52 pmNot sure Sean if going anywhere to be honest. As Sean himself said. (Not an exact quote but..) "Things flare up occasionally but I like to park them quickly." That to me suggest any bust up is pretty much over.
Anyway, if Eddie Howe gets sacked, Sean would become the longest serving manager, so it would be a shame to miss out on that.
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 604 times
-
- Posts: 8526
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: The Chairman
dyche can't be judged in comparison to other premier league managers, his budgets have always been restrictive.
for him to steer Burnley half way up this league by 2020 is no mean feat.
clubs elsewhere no full well how great a job he has done under these conditions.
If his abilities were matched by some serious spending by a club, and he had assurances that would be the case, he'll go.
for him to steer Burnley half way up this league by 2020 is no mean feat.
clubs elsewhere no full well how great a job he has done under these conditions.
If his abilities were matched by some serious spending by a club, and he had assurances that would be the case, he'll go.
Re: The Chairman
Ainsworth was in post as temporary manager at Wycombe in late September and the post was made permanent in November 2012 according to Wiki
I think therefore he is the longest of the three, with Eddie number two and unlikely to be sacked and Sean number 3 but likely to leave according to many not in the know.
I think therefore he is the longest of the three, with Eddie number two and unlikely to be sacked and Sean number 3 but likely to leave according to many not in the know.
Re: The Chairman
Money for a manager does not always bring success. Cotts produced poorer results and football when he had more money than when he had not a pot to p**s in.
-
- Posts: 6968
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1489 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: The Chairman
Villa and Fulham have spent over£200m on promotion and despite Villa getting up they are coming straight down and Fulham are still looking at imo at another Championship season
We need to give Sean money and can't hold the old dog signings against him
We have earned a fortune in our time up and spent very little.We do need more youngsters signed and this needs to be priority. Garlick is playing his cards close as no one knows when crowds will be able to come back
We could be months away and our transfer funds seriously weakened by the Covid 19 continuing
We need to give Sean money and can't hold the old dog signings against him
We have earned a fortune in our time up and spent very little.We do need more youngsters signed and this needs to be priority. Garlick is playing his cards close as no one knows when crowds will be able to come back
We could be months away and our transfer funds seriously weakened by the Covid 19 continuing
Re: The Chairman
Looking at the way Joe Public is behaving (beaches on the South Coast) these last 48 hours, we may be a long long way from live games with normal crowds
-
- Posts: 3319
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 700 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
Re: The Chairman
I don't know about that - Dyche likes to put down markers, that would be a very nice gold star to have alongside your name.
I suspect we will get to the end of the season with him & then a quick exit. There will be an awful long list of applicants for Garlick to interview.
-
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 248 times
Re: The Chairman
When we’ve spent nearly £20m on Hart and Lennon when you add up there transfer +signing on fees and wages over last 2-3 years you’ve definitely got to question the return on investment. If we had put that towards a younger player such as Phillips we’d still have something to show for it or a big sell on fee if he produced the goods.
-
- Posts: 19393
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: The Chairman
Would love to see you show the data on that - I think it may be around half or even less with bonusesGiftonsnoidea wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:34 pmWhen we’ve spent nearly £20m on Hart and Lennon when you add up there transfer +signing on fees and wages over last 2-3 years you’ve definitely got to question the return on investment. If we had put that towards a younger player such as Phillips we’d still have something to show for it or a big sell on fee if he produced the goods.
-
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 248 times
Re: The Chairman
Both £3m transfer fees plus 40k per week for 2 + years don’t think I’ll be far off, someone might know more than me tho happy to be corrected.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:37 pmWould love to see you show the data on that - I think it may be around half or even less with bonuses
Maybe £14m more realistic
-
- Posts: 19393
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: The Chairman
Lennon fee - club described it as nominal - transfermarket says £!.5mGiftonsnoidea wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:39 pmBoth £3m transfer fees plus 40k per week for 2 + years don’t think I’ll be far off, someone might know more than me tho happy to be corrected.
Maybe £14m more realistic
Hart fee - transfermart says 3.5m
Wages suggested here as Hart £45k (£4.6m over 2 years) Lennon £35k (£2.7m over 18 months)
https://www.spotrac.com/epl/burnley-f.c/payroll/
so roughly £12m
-
- Posts: 2544
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 311 times
Re: The Chairman
Please tell me we didn’t pay 3 million for Lennon
-
- Posts: 19393
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: The Chairman
Think I just did
Re: The Chairman
We didn't pay 3 million for Lennon
That ok Winston?
That ok Winston?
-
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 248 times
-
- Posts: 9905
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2350 times
- Has Liked: 3181 times
Re: The Chairman
I estimate Joe Hart has cost us around £10 million: £3.5 m transfer fee to City + £50k per week + 13.8% ERS NIC for 2 years = £9.6 million. (Don't forget City were paying him the second £50k/week for the final year of his original City contract).Giftonsnoidea wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:34 pmWhen we’ve spent nearly £20m on Hart and Lennon when you add up there transfer +signing on fees and wages over last 2-3 years you’ve definitely got to question the return on investment. If we had put that towards a younger player such as Phillips we’d still have something to show for it or a big sell on fee if he produced the goods.
How much did we pay to sign Aaron Lennon? How much were we paying him?
EDIT: I see you've already adjusted £20 million to £14 million. I'm OK with that figure for 2 experienced internationals, even if we haven't seen the best of either of them from earlier in their careers.
-
- Posts: 19393
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: The Chairman
for those worrying about the cost of Hart and Lennon try Ross McCormack at Villa - played a lot less than either hart or Lennon, cost twice as much for the same length of service as Hart and Kennon combined,
https://twitter.com/aidanmccartney/stat ... 5420722177
https://twitter.com/aidanmccartney/stat ... 5420722177
-
- Posts: 614
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:03 am
- Been Liked: 329 times
- Has Liked: 371 times
Re: The Chairman
Meanwhile, 10 years ahead BWFC are haggling over compensation to appoint Barrow FC's manager
This user liked this post: k90bfc
Re: The Chairman
I read reports in Malta that they were close to engaging ex-Juventus midfielder and Italian 2006 World Cup winner Mauro CamoranesiWoonderbah wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 11:14 amMeanwhile, 10 years ahead BWFC are haggling over compensation to appoint Barrow FC's manager
-
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2897 times
Re: The Chairman
+ bonuses which would significantly increase their overall pay package.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:53 pmLennon fee - club described it as nominal - transfermarket says £!.5m
Hart fee - transfermart says 3.5m
Wages suggested here as Hart £45k (£4.6m over 2 years) Lennon £35k (£2.7m over 18 months)
https://www.spotrac.com/epl/burnley-f.c/payroll/
so roughly £12m
-
- Posts: 18087
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: The Chairman
I don't know if its already been posted but Hendrick was offered an improved contract according to the Athletic.
-
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2897 times
Re: The Chairman
He’s certainly well travelled!! Not really sure Tabor Sezana (ground capacity 1,200) in the Slovenian league to the Prem is a realistic move
Re: The Chairman
Moving to BWFC is not a move to the Prem though is it?
-
- Posts: 19393
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: The Chairman
bonuses are pro rata the appearances we have been led to believe so not that muchBurnley Ace wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 4:17 pm+ bonuses which would significantly increase their overall pay package.
-
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2897 times
Re: The Chairman
Does being in the match day squad count? Seems a bit harsh on the reserve goalie. I would want my agent to be negotiating a “final league position” bonus in any event.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 4:47 pmbonuses are pro rata the appearances we have been led to believe so not that much
If it’s only being on the field that gets a Bonus- Dyche has saved us a fortune!!
-
- Posts: 19393
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: The Chairman
match day squad probably does count for a keeper as a % of actual appearance (makes sense) - I am utterly convinced (though absolutely no evidence to support it) that Hart had it in his contract that he must be in the matchday squad if fit - which is why the club were happy not to renew and let Peacock-Farrel developBurnley Ace wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 5:31 pmDoes being in the match day squad count? Seems a bit harsh on the reserve goalie. I would want my agent to be negotiating a “final league position” bonus in any event.
If it’s only being on the field that gets a Bonus- Dyche has saved us a fortune!!
-
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2307 times
- Has Liked: 2172 times
Re: The Chairman
Yes you get a bonus for being in the match day squad and a bigger bonus for getting on the field, even 5 minutes got you an extra 2-3k in the championship and that was 7-8 years agoChester Perry wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:04 pmmatch day squad probably does count for a keeper as a % of actual appearance (makes sense) - I am utterly convinced (though absolutely no evidence to support it) that Hart had it in his contract that he must be in the matchday squad if fit - which is why the club were happy not to renew and let Peacock-Farrel develop
-
- Posts: 30696
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11049 times
- Has Liked: 5658 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: The Chairman
you would hope, given that once again Dyche has kept us in the PL on a comparative shoestring budget that the board would have a little more faith to give him a little bit more to make it easier for him - they ask us to show faith......pot - kettle
-
- Posts: 19393
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: The Chairman
tell me where those funds are going to come from - the last 3 big signings i.e. £10m + (2 signed 2 years ago) probably don't have 50 appearances between them and Jay (the cheapest of the 3 signed this season) probably has more appearances than the other two - that may be part of the concernVegas Claret wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:16 pmyou would hope, given that once again Dyche has kept us in the PL on a comparative shoestring budget that the board would have a little more faith to give him a little bit more to make it easier for him - they ask us to show faith......pot - kettle
-
- Posts: 30696
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11049 times
- Has Liked: 5658 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: The Chairman
Sorry CP I'm not following your thought process here - can you explain more about what the lack of appearances of players (which players ?) has to do with funds ?Chester Perry wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:31 pmtell me where those funds are going to come from - the last 3 big signings i.e. £10m + (2 signed 2 years ago) probably don't have 50 appearances between them and Jay (the cheapest of the 3 signed this season) probably has more appearances than the other two - that may be part of the concern
-
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 248 times
Re: The Chairman
I think we have wasted too much money last two seasons on players that don’t have any impact on the team, I can see why Garlick has decided to stop funding such extravagant purchases for little return. We need to get rid of Gibson who was the worst buy of all , we’re looking at £30m wasted at the moment on those 3. As a club we just cannot make so many expensive mistakes and need every million to work exceptionally hard for us. Brownhill looks like we’re finally going in the right direction.Paul Waine wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 10:25 pmI estimate Joe Hart has cost us around £10 million: £3.5 m transfer fee to City + £50k per week + 13.8% ERS NIC for 2 years = £9.6 million. (Don't forget City were paying him the second £50k/week for the final year of his original City contract).
How much did we pay to sign Aaron Lennon? How much were we paying him?
EDIT: I see you've already adjusted £20 million to £14 million. I'm OK with that figure for 2 experienced internationals, even if we haven't seen the best of either of them from earlier in their careers.
-
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:30 am
- Been Liked: 524 times
- Has Liked: 186 times
Re: The Chairman
The thing about Gibson is that he was a decent buy at the time.
Unfortunately for him, Tarks and Ben Mee have not suffered injury, suspension or loss of form.
Unfortunately for him, Tarks and Ben Mee have not suffered injury, suspension or loss of form.
This user liked this post: Burnley Ace
Re: The Chairman
It doesn’t seem he has the character we pin so much on. We’d have been as well having a flutter in the foreign market, if our character assessments of more local players are off kilter.lakedistrictclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:52 pmThe thing about Gibson is that he was a decent buy at the time.
Unfortunately for him, Tarks and Ben Mee have not suffered injury, suspension or loss of form.
-
- Posts: 19393
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: The Chairman
Just playing Devisl Advocate about the fact the Chairman may be thinking thatVegas Claret wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:55 pmSorry CP I'm not following your thought process here - can you explain more about what the lack of appearances of players (which players ?) has to do with funds ?
Gibson - circa £15m + 2 years wages wages for 1 league appearance and now 6 months away from the club on full pay
Vydra - circa £11.5m plus 2 years wages for 7 starts (5 this year) and 11 sub appearances
was a large amount of money not being used on the field when SD was asking for extensions of all those contracts when we were struggling in November/December - opinions on Vydra may have changed now he has been brought into use
Jay has proved his worth this season - though some may feel 6 goals are not enough for his appearances
like many I thought they were good signings - but it is a lot of money for our club that was doing not very much when most, including the manager would say we need new blood in the starting 11
-
- Posts: 30696
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11049 times
- Has Liked: 5658 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: The Chairman
Agree with Gibson, he's completely ****** himself with his attitude, the Drinkwater thing was a disaster too - Vydra on the other hand has for me taken his opportunity and is now ahead of Barnes (didn't think I would ever say that).Chester Perry wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 9:12 pmJust playing Devisl Advocate about the fact the Chairman may be thinking that
Gibson - circa £15m + 2 years wages wages for 1 league appearance and now 6 months away from the club on full pay
Vydra - circa £11.5m plus 2 years wages for 7 starts (5 this year) and 11 sub appearances
was a large amount of money not being used on the field when SD was asking for extensions of all those contracts when we were struggling in November/December - opinions on Vydra may have changed now he has been brought into use
Jay has proved his worth this season - though some may feel 6 goals are not enough for his appearances
like many I thought they were good signings - but it is a lot of money for our club that was doing not very much when most, including the manager would say we need new blood in the starting 11
I don't think any of us would suggest going out and paying 30 million for a player is an option, but another couple of Brownhill types around 24 years old for 7-8 million should be well within our reach if they are someone Dyche wants - it's that type of backing that I think he deserves, he's proved time and again he's made some excellent signings - Westwood etc cost pittance. Fergie wasted millions at Utd, Liverpool have wasted hundreds of millions over the years - nobody has a 100% record on transfers
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 248 times
Re: The Chairman
The most worrying thing is the player has buggered off to train at Middlesbrough after another falling out with whoever down here. Let’s not forget Vydra was banished for around 18 months before he got a look in. A worrying trend and I can see why Garlick is reticent to release big funds again.lakedistrictclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:52 pmThe thing about Gibson is that he was a decent buy at the time.
Unfortunately for him, Tarks and Ben Mee have not suffered injury, suspension or loss of form.
Dyche has worked much better with limited funds but is frustrated now he’s spending big not hitting the jackpot, so to speak.
Time for Rigg to earn his corn and guide the manager in the right direction and I hope that doesn’t mean to the job centre.
Re: The Chairman
The Drinkwater fiasco must have raised eyebrows at the board meetings, he cannot say he wasn't backed especially when the football world to a man apart from one man, thought the drunken brawl paid for with our hard earned money should have resulted in him being sent back to Chelsea. Also signing Wells whilst recuperating from an ankle injury was bizarre in the extreme, but he was backed.
Best manager ever in my Claret lifetime but he isn't faultless with money.
Best manager ever in my Claret lifetime but he isn't faultless with money.
This user liked this post: Giftonsnoidea
-
- Posts: 19393
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: The Chairman
I don't disagree with anything you have said and the chairman would love a few players at the value and age (when we bought them) of Taylor. Westwood, JBG, TarksVegas Claret wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 9:26 pmAgree with Gibson, he's completely ****** himself with his attitude, the Drinkwater thing was a disaster too - Vydra on the other hand has for me taken his opportunity and is now ahead of Barnes (didn't think I would ever say that).
I don't think any of us would suggest going out and paying 30 million for a player is an option, but another couple of Brownhill types around 24 years old for 7-8 million should be well within our reach if they are someone Dyche wants - it's that type of backing that I think he deserves, he's proved time and again he's made some excellent signings - Westwood etc cost pittance. Fergie wasted millions at Utd, Liverpool have wasted hundreds of millions over the years - nobody has a 100% record on transfers
The one area we have done consistently well in is Goalkeepers - When you look at Heaton, Pope, Hart and Peacock-Farrell that is a hell of a selection for probably less than £10m - though I suspect having Hart caused more disruption overall than it was worth.
-
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 297 times
- Has Liked: 781 times
-
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 297 times
- Has Liked: 781 times
Re: The Chairman
Hell of a time to ask.....
-
- Posts: 3922
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1330 times
- Location: burnley
Re: The Chairman
Those comments to the BBC look a bit ominous to me. Like Woking said, his timing is odd. I can understand Sean's frustration over the last 2 years, many fans have had it about centre midfield. Maybe Sean is forgetting the costs of Hart, Gibson and Vydra that have hardly been justified. Although, Vydra is looking really good now that he is getting on the pitch.
Jeff was good for us, but surely not worth such a fuss.
Jeff was good for us, but surely not worth such a fuss.
Re: The Chairman
There is a fine line between stretching finances and doing a Bolton,Portsmouth Sunderland etc etc. If our money ran out Dyche would go but we would still be here attempting to tidy up the mess.
Perhaps it is in our DNA to be cautious after the years we spent in the fourth and third divisions which was due to living beyond our means.
Perhaps it is in our DNA to be cautious after the years we spent in the fourth and third divisions which was due to living beyond our means.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank