Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:54 am
- Been Liked: 29 times
Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Quote from Dyche that seems to be getting overlooked.
Not a good look for the players refusing to play whilst still under contract.
Not a good look for the players refusing to play whilst still under contract.
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1712 times
- Has Liked: 269 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Are they refusing to play or just not being selected?
Even if it’s the former, it’s not different to any other job. How much work do you get out of the employee who’s contract you aren’t renewing in their last week? What meaningful options do you have if they decide they can’t be arsed?
Even if it’s the former, it’s not different to any other job. How much work do you get out of the employee who’s contract you aren’t renewing in their last week? What meaningful options do you have if they decide they can’t be arsed?
-
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:38 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
how much work do you get from staff who are leaving? well they should have pride in there work/job.
for me I feel that over the years people dont in a lot of cases have this pride / need to do a job well. 9 NHS not included as they seem to work from first to last min.) It seems now that when leaving in the last week employers cant give you a bad reference for poor production, so quite often when you hand in your notice or say you are leaving you get put on garden leave (given most of our players have been on that for 3 months) For me that means no trust both ways, shame but thats life.
for me I feel that over the years people dont in a lot of cases have this pride / need to do a job well. 9 NHS not included as they seem to work from first to last min.) It seems now that when leaving in the last week employers cant give you a bad reference for poor production, so quite often when you hand in your notice or say you are leaving you get put on garden leave (given most of our players have been on that for 3 months) For me that means no trust both ways, shame but thats life.
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
So they are staying according to the title?
This user liked this post: pureclaret
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:54 am
- Been Liked: 29 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
I read it as the players have decided not to see their contracts through to 31st June and have either left or made themselves unavailable for selection
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:54 am
- Been Liked: 29 times
-
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:39 am
- Been Liked: 690 times
- Has Liked: 406 times
- Location: Chalfont St. Giles
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Depends if you are professional and take pride in your work and your work ethic.agreenwood wrote: ↑Tue Jun 23, 2020 7:51 amAre they refusing to play or just not being selected?
Even if it’s the former, it’s not different to any other job. How much work do you get out of the employee who’s contract you aren’t renewing in their last week? What meaningful options do you have if they decide they can’t be arsed?
I worked all of my notice period (of 3 months) right up until the very last minute for my previous employer. Sometimes I wish I hadn’t bothered but my reputation amongst my colleagues and peers means a lot to me.
Footballers shouldn’t be any different, one would have thought they’d want a good send off and to maybe play with a bit more freedom.
Instead we’re in a situation where we can’t even name a full bench...!
These 2 users liked this post: Blackrod Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1712 times
- Has Liked: 269 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Guess it depends on the profession and the likelihood of injury. We’ve had 4 short-medium injuries since training resumed a few weeks ago. I can understand a footballer not wanting to jeopardise their future employment prospects for the sake of a week or two.ClaretEngineer wrote: ↑Tue Jun 23, 2020 8:21 amDepends if you are professional and take pride in your work and your work ethic.
I worked all of my notice period (of 3 months) right up until the very last minute for my previous employer. Sometimes I wish I hadn’t bothered but my reputation amongst my colleagues and peers means a lot to me.
Footballers shouldn’t be any different, one would have thought they’d want a good send off and to maybe play with a bit more freedom.
Instead we’re in a situation where we can’t even name a full bench...!
-
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:39 am
- Been Liked: 690 times
- Has Liked: 406 times
- Location: Chalfont St. Giles
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
I don’t begrudge anyone wishing to better themselves by moving jobs (even footballers, an emotive subject for some?!).agreenwood wrote: ↑Tue Jun 23, 2020 8:23 amGuess it depends on the profession and the likelihood of injury. We’ve had 4 short-medium injuries since training resumed a few weeks ago. I can understand a footballer not wanting to jeopardise their future employment prospects for the sake of a week or two.
I guarantee that if we were in the latter stages of the Europa or CL none of these OOC players would be angling for a move.
On the face it these situations are money motivated.
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Reflects poorly on the footballers imo and proves my about the money for them. They’ve been well looked after and when injured. Prefer we get players on lesser money who are committed and with a point to prove.
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2017 5:55 pm
- Been Liked: 25 times
- Has Liked: 6 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
I have no problems with someone wanting to leave their place of employment provided they do so properly. You never know they may want to return some day.agreenwood wrote: ↑Tue Jun 23, 2020 7:51 amAre they refusing to play or just not being selected?
Even if it’s the former, it’s not different to any other job. How much work do you get out of the employee who’s contract you aren’t renewing in their last week? What meaningful options do you have if they decide they can’t be arsed?
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Is it going to be the norm from now on that when players' contracts are finishing, they refuse to play the last few games of the season? It'll be a nightmare for clubs in relegation difficulty if they find themselves with a few players who won't play.
-
- Posts: 13224
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3037 times
- Has Liked: 3759 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
I read it to mean that without a longer term commitment, players are not going to commit to the short-term and possible injuries this could risk. Fair enough. I'd still make myself available whilst under contract, even if only on the bench and to be used on a strictly as needed basis.lancastrian wrote: ↑Tue Jun 23, 2020 8:51 amI have no problems with someone wanting to leave their place of employment provided they do so properly. You never know they may want to return some day.
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Hope that they're not being paid for the days they've downed tools!
-
- Posts: 3771
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1828 times
- Has Liked: 2613 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Coming back from this long lockdown and having 3 games to play before the end of June it makes sense to play the players whose contracts still have time to run rather than play those who will be out of contract and have to get other players up to speed to replace them.
We have known that Hendrick was going for quite some time, however, I have a feeling that SD is disappointed that Bardsley has not been offered another year because he is a good professional and would still do a job next season. This season has to be a very strange one for the players, just as it has been for the fans, however, it is what it is after a 3 month lay off.
We have known that Hendrick was going for quite some time, however, I have a feeling that SD is disappointed that Bardsley has not been offered another year because he is a good professional and would still do a job next season. This season has to be a very strange one for the players, just as it has been for the fans, however, it is what it is after a 3 month lay off.
-
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 62 times
- Has Liked: 36 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
If I am Aaron Lennon hoping for a final 3 year deal somewhere, I am certainly not playing and risking scuppering it all now.
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2017 5:55 pm
- Been Liked: 25 times
- Has Liked: 6 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Sorry if I have misled you. What I meant by "properly" players or anyone else for that matter should commit themselves to their employer until their last day of their contract. After all they are still being paid.NewClaret wrote: ↑Tue Jun 23, 2020 9:14 amI read it to mean that without a longer term commitment, players are not going to commit to the short-term and possible injuries this could risk. Fair enough. I'd still make myself available whilst under contract, even if only on the bench and to be used on a strictly as needed basis.
-
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 8:35 pm
- Been Liked: 77 times
- Has Liked: 326 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
It's because they don't want to blow their knee out and be unpaid for a year. I would do the same, honestly. If you ran the risk of something happening during your notice which would leave you unemployed for a year, I wouldn't serve my notice either.
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1004 times
- Has Liked: 905 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Is this an extra leap year day because of the virus?KellyClaret wrote: ↑Tue Jun 23, 2020 8:18 amI read it as the players have decided not to see their contracts through to 31st June and have either left or made themselves unavailable for selection
-
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
- Been Liked: 307 times
- Has Liked: 195 times
Re: Players who haven't been offered things have decided not to finish their contracts.
Dyche mentioned earlier that he was hoping that the players would show some goodwill. I think it’s disgusting that none of them have so far.
Every season virtually all players play to the last match when their contracts expire.
They have been paid their full money over the last 3 months for doing nothing and when the club needs them it’s f@ck you.
One example is say Joe Hart , what’s his problem on sitting on the bench at City, when he is getting paid and would only be needed in an emergency?
Every season virtually all players play to the last match when their contracts expire.
They have been paid their full money over the last 3 months for doing nothing and when the club needs them it’s f@ck you.
One example is say Joe Hart , what’s his problem on sitting on the bench at City, when he is getting paid and would only be needed in an emergency?