100 days of lockdown?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
NewClaret
Posts: 13222
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3037 times
Has Liked: 3759 times

100 days of lockdown?

Post by NewClaret » Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:19 pm

What did Dyche say there? Missed it slightly. Didn’t sound good.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:20 pm

The dynamic of the group has changed.

I read it as not having hart, Lennon and Hendrick available along with injuries.

It’s a slight dig. But he’s just won another tough game and he’s playing poker with the board.
This user liked this post: HunterST_BFC

joey13
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 1230 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by joey13 » Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:20 pm

New dynamic? Rigg?

NewClaret
Posts: 13222
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3037 times
Has Liked: 3759 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by NewClaret » Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:21 pm

joey13 wrote:
Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:20 pm
New dynamic? Rigg?
I f***ing hope not 😡😡

aclaretinstevenage
Posts: 1213
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:55 pm
Been Liked: 300 times
Has Liked: 728 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by aclaretinstevenage » Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:23 pm

"The dynamic of the group has changed".

He actually said the dynamic of the CLUB has changed a very different statement in my view.

ksrclaret
Posts: 6804
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2488 times
Has Liked: 760 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by ksrclaret » Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:23 pm

Worrying words from Dyche again after a magnificent performance where his lads gave him every ounce of effort they could.

If Garlick lets Dyche walk out, I don't think he'll ever be forgiven.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:27 pm

aclaretinstevenage wrote:
Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:23 pm
"The dynamic of the group has changed".

He actually said the dynamic of the CLUB has changed a very different statement in my view.
Either way. I think it’s a typical Dyche interview and just Dyche being naughty. (Cheeky).

gtclaret
Posts: 1344
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 338 times
Has Liked: 118 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by gtclaret » Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:54 pm

He's doing a lot recently, I think we all know how he feels by now, so if he wants out he doesn't need to say anymore, only if he wants to stay, but telling the chairman what needs to be done. It's a shame, I think we are a couple of players short of being a very good side

kentonclaret
Posts: 6434
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 969 times
Has Liked: 204 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by kentonclaret » Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:02 am

What Dyche actually said was:

"The fabric of the club has changed somewhat in the last 100 days so that has been interesting to compute and make sense of"

By saying the fabric of the club has changed he was referring to the structure.

Make of that what you will.

Paul Waine
Posts: 9845
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2344 times
Has Liked: 3164 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by Paul Waine » Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:04 am

100 days, that's roughly the length of time from when PL was suspended until re-start (maybe even exact count). So, instead of the Premier League season completing in mid-May, it has been extended until 26 July. No issue, except that player contracts end on 30-June, and some of our squad have not extended to see out the season. Alongside that, the club have paid out for wages for the 100 days of the lockdown, and, covid-19 means there isn't as much money coming into the club.

I don't think Sean had got his head around those facts, hence his "toys out of the pram" interview(s). Sean's a smart guy, he will work it out and he will sort things out with Mike Garlick.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

Chester Perry
Posts: 19167
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by Chester Perry » Tue Jun 30, 2020 1:09 am

Just as easily means that there is a new financial reality - I said last week that I thought Sean was still in the mindset of our finances in February not of the now and the world of right's holders/sponsor's rebates, of not being certain what next years central income will be, of a global economy in downturn and right's holders collapsing. Finances are far more unpredictable
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

jojomk1
Posts: 4735
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 836 times
Has Liked: 574 times

Re: 100 days of lockdown?

Post by jojomk1 » Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:58 am

kentonclaret wrote:
Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:02 am
What Dyche actually said was:

"The fabric of the club has changed somewhat in the last 100 days so that has been interesting to compute and make sense of"

By saying the fabric of the club has changed he was referring to the structure.

Make of that what you will.
It was quite funny that Logan, Dixon and Morrison referred to those words in their after match drawl and laughed it off saying they were all failing to understand what he was talking about

Honestly, he loses me sometimes with the bull, but my take on this is just another sly dig at Garlick and their personal relationship.

There has been no change to the structure as far as I am aware other than the change in title of MG to "Executive Chairman" for which he may be now be taking a salary

Maybe, if true, Dyche does not like the idea of wages (no matter how relatively small) being spent on MG himself rather than on players with whom he could not agree new/extended contracts

Post Reply