James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
-
- Posts: 2273
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 507 times
- Has Liked: 1037 times
James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Discuss. As I’m now on my way to work, I’ll just give you my take. Elementary mistake, rooted to the spot when everyone else stepped out. Tarks played Egan onside. There was a big gap between Tarks and the nearest other Burnley player.
-
- Posts: 15228
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3155 times
- Has Liked: 6742 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
I think it's something we do quite often, which may be why we see so many blocks in the 6yd box? Just a thought.
-
- Posts: 6950
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1485 times
- Has Liked: 1846 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Bardsley had gone walkabout so leaving space at the back post and Kev Long also failed to block off Egan
A soft goal to give away but its wasnt Tarks fault
A soft goal to give away but its wasnt Tarks fault
-
- Posts: 7389
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2293 times
- Has Liked: 2166 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Probably my player of the season, won us far more points than he has lost us so for me I think we can let him off if he was at fault.
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 984
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:44 am
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 45 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Was a hell of a finish to be fair and Sheffield utd deserved a point....
These 3 users liked this post: Funkydrummer Buxtonclaret Bosscat
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
if ands and buts, things happen, if some people had scored we would have won, lets not start trying to lame blame and fault after every game. We are doing very well thank you very much.
This user liked this post: Funkydrummer
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Sheffield U scored 3 v Spurs yet we restricted them to half chances one of which they converted with a great strike. Tarks was playing with Long and while I am not blaming him at all he is not Ben Mee. A good point won considering our injuries and would have been 3 but for 2 bad misses. A HUGE and very SHORT close season coming up
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2491 times
- Has Liked: 1477 times
- Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Maybe we should concentrate on our missed Chances instead of knocking most probably our best player and goal scorer. If the attackers did their job as good as the defence does we would be in the top four.
These 4 users liked this post: Funkydrummer ElectroClaret Bosscat evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:12 pm
- Been Liked: 472 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Not Tarkowski. He was taken out by the flick header. If anyone Bardsley or even Pieters should have been keeping an eye on the acres of space occupied by Egan. The sort of situation you would normally expect us to get a block in. All that said it was a great finish.
-
- Posts: 17935
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4068 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Spot on.conyoviejo wrote: ↑Mon Jul 06, 2020 3:16 pmMaybe we should concentrate on our missed Chances instead of knocking most probably our best player and goal scorer. If the attackers did their job as good as the defence does we would be in the top four.
Both Vydra and McNeil should have been on the scoresheet.
-
- Posts: 18048
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3861 times
- Has Liked: 2070 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
https://youtu.be/xR8i7QMSVSE?t=99
The flick on is the hardest thing to defend. Everyone gets attracted to the ball and space opens up in the area.
If you want someone to blame it's who sets us up for corners, we don't follow players out of position. We try and block the ball when they have it. It works most of the time.
Have we got to used to Pope dealing with them? Probably yes.
The link to the video shows a still of the goal just before the flick on to show positioning.
They have done their homework on us. Short corner so Pope can't collect, dink into the middle where they have more players. (We have 5 between the ball and the unmarked player who flicks on) and then the goalscorer peels off at the back where he knows he won't get followed out. Perfect routine against us but takes some pulling off.
The flick on is the hardest thing to defend. Everyone gets attracted to the ball and space opens up in the area.
If you want someone to blame it's who sets us up for corners, we don't follow players out of position. We try and block the ball when they have it. It works most of the time.
Have we got to used to Pope dealing with them? Probably yes.
The link to the video shows a still of the goal just before the flick on to show positioning.
They have done their homework on us. Short corner so Pope can't collect, dink into the middle where they have more players. (We have 5 between the ball and the unmarked player who flicks on) and then the goalscorer peels off at the back where he knows he won't get followed out. Perfect routine against us but takes some pulling off.
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:12 pm
- Been Liked: 472 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Quicken is actually right. It is how we set up. Over a season on percentages it works for us
This user liked this post: Quickenthetempo
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
I thought Long was to blame as he was playing on the right side
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Whichever way you slice it. The law of averages suggests that with the number of crosses they were whipping in and it was a lot. They were bound to make something of one of them.
-
- Posts: 30618
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11033 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Sheff Utd have some of the most inventive set pieces in the PL, newly promoted side or not - they are a very good side, given the depth of our squad I'm happy with the point considering they battered Spurs a few days earlier.
Personally I blame the virus for slowing down our momentum
Personally I blame the virus for slowing down our momentum
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:12 pm
- Been Liked: 472 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Ben Wickes is also right. However well you defend, if there are that many crosses coming there is likely to be at least one very good chance created.
-
- Posts: 8128
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3078 times
- Has Liked: 5042 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
I thought Tarks at the time.
He was obviously marking Egan, but got sucked in towards Sharp when they dinked the ball in. The back header just took him out of the picture.
S*^t appens, as they say. Tarks owes us nothing after his season.
He was obviously marking Egan, but got sucked in towards Sharp when they dinked the ball in. The back header just took him out of the picture.
S*^t appens, as they say. Tarks owes us nothing after his season.
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
We switched off for a second and allowed a short corner to be taken, this meant a defender had to come out to try to close the ball
down which in turn left an attacker free .. Can't say any 1 person at fault maybe a combination of all the defence although it was a well worked
routine .. Possibly Ben Mee would of been more vocal in re-organisimg to deal with the danger ..
down which in turn left an attacker free .. Can't say any 1 person at fault maybe a combination of all the defence although it was a well worked
routine .. Possibly Ben Mee would of been more vocal in re-organisimg to deal with the danger ..
-
- Posts: 8128
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3078 times
- Has Liked: 5042 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Take it back, Wood was marking Sharp and just stood watching while Sharp attacked the ball. Chris looked really wooden when he came on, not surprisingly, but he needs these games to get match fit, there being no friendlies available.Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 06, 2020 5:19 pmI thought Tarks at the time.
He was obviously marking Egan, but got sucked in towards Sharp when they dinked the ball in. The back header just took him out of the picture.
S*^t appens, as they say. Tarks owes us nothing after his season.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Outstanding finish from a centre half. Credit where it’s due.
As for Tarkowski. A player who has saved us many more points than he has lost us. Don’t think he was at fault. But even if he was. So what. Same for McNeils miss.
Incredible that we would want to get on Tarks back. Who was playing on his less favoured side alongside a defender he rarely if ever plays alongside.
As for Tarkowski. A player who has saved us many more points than he has lost us. Don’t think he was at fault. But even if he was. So what. Same for McNeils miss.
Incredible that we would want to get on Tarks back. Who was playing on his less favoured side alongside a defender he rarely if ever plays alongside.
-
- Posts: 5084
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 636 times
- Location: Tibet
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
How many times have we only put one player out to cover when there is a short corner ?
How many times has the other side scored also ?
How many times has the other side scored also ?
-
- Posts: 2273
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 507 times
- Has Liked: 1037 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Thanks for your comments guys. Just wanted to see what other folk thought. I’m not into the blame game myself and Tarks is my favourite player. So agree with the mood of the majority, certainly owes us nothing and to my mind is often our top man. Went to watch him a couple of times at Oldham when we were first linked with him. Just thought our back line is usually more ‘in line’ in most similar settings.
-
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 429 times
- Has Liked: 4555 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Not sure what Bards was doing 2 yards outside the box unless he was under instructions. Had he been in a natural right back position he would have prevented the goal. Easily said than done.
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1004 times
- Has Liked: 905 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
I blamed Tarks. He dropped back when everyone else came out together. He was never marking Egan who was onside by two or three players. The one who might have been offside was Sharp, if they had all stayed out but these things happen.
I’d just love to know why he felt he had to drop. A mis-communication or a hunch?
I’d just love to know why he felt he had to drop. A mis-communication or a hunch?
-
- Posts: 10969
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5185 times
- Has Liked: 803 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
No, if you go back far enough I think it was Charlie Taylor's fault which led to a needless corner.
Actually, if you go back far enough you will find that it is Sean Dyche's fault for getting us into the Premier League in the first place.
Actually, if you go back far enough you will find that it is Sean Dyche's fault for getting us into the Premier League in the first place.
These 2 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets tiger76
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
I'm going back as far as December....Tarkowski..go on Son!!Bin Ont Turf wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 12:04 amNo, if you go back far enough I think it was Charlie Taylor's fault which led to a needless corner.
Actually, if you go back far enough you will find that it is Sean Dyche's fault for getting us into the Premier League in the first place.
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
The flicked gender could have gone anywhere, as it was flicked backwards, a la Seeler. Defenders unable to read that.
-
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1030 times
- Has Liked: 3187 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
How will we punish him?......Forget all the goals he's saved... damn it!.........It's HIS fault.Darnhill Claret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 06, 2020 2:41 pmDiscuss. As I’m now on my way to work, I’ll just give you my take. Elementary mistake, rooted to the spot when everyone else stepped out. Tarks played Egan onside. There was a big gap between Tarks and the nearest other Burnley player.
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
No they didn't. We created the better chances. Looked like another 1-0. Apart from 1st minute Pope had little to do. Their keeper was much busier and of course we had those 2 great chances we didn't take. But it's a game we deserved to win.Sheedyclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 06, 2020 2:57 pmWas a hell of a finish to be fair and Sheffield utd deserved a point....
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
You weren't watching the same game as me then. The number of balls they were pumping into the box was a worry even before half time. As I said above. The law of averages suggests one was going to come off and it did. We were sitting deeper and deeper and allowing them to do it rather than being proactive. You could see an equaliser coming and it's no more than they deserved.
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
I fully agree. The camera angle was great and you could see what was going to happen. It was an excellent flick on by Sharp. I think he knew what he was doing - an excellent goal.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Mon Jul 06, 2020 3:28 pmhttps://youtu.be/xR8i7QMSVSE?t=99
The flick on is the hardest thing to defend. Everyone gets attracted to the ball and space opens up in the area.
If you want someone to blame it's who sets us up for corners, we don't follow players out of position. We try and block the ball when they have it. It works most of the time.
Have we got to used to Pope dealing with them? Probably yes.
The link to the video shows a still of the goal just before the flick on to show positioning.
They have done their homework on us. Short corner so Pope can't collect, dink into the middle where they have more players. (We have 5 between the ball and the unmarked player who flicks on) and then the goalscorer peels off at the back where he knows he won't get followed out. Perfect routine against us but takes some pulling off.
Our goal was also excellent and also a flick on. What was interesting was the half-time debate in the studio where McBurnie was blamed for not marking Tarkowski well enough. I thought that was harsh as he had his work cut out.
Souness said McBurnie should have positioned himself so that he could see Tarkowski and the ball. Tough enough to do in any case as Tarks was obviously going to move about and be a bit physical. However on top of that, and Souness never pointed this out, was that United kept a line for offside, and furthermore, our normal free kick is, in this case, for Tarkowski to peel away at the back and then head the ball accross to the danger zone. Instead and unusually we employed the flick on.
An intriguing game between two differently set up but very competent sides. I thought Sheffield United looked just a bit more capable but that was probably due to the absence of Ben Mee who we missed greatly all over the pitch. He'll be a big miss for the rest of the season and as he seems to be the foundation of the team.
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
I'm sure Dyche will have something to say. His comments to the team will mean more than all ours put together.
-
- Posts: 6689
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1813 times
- Has Liked: 1794 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
We've always been bobbins at short corners. If I was an opposing scout it would be the first thing I would recommend.
-
- Posts: 15228
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3155 times
- Has Liked: 6742 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
You are not wrong. We don't break our shape to mark the receiver near the corner.dougcollins wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 9:36 pmWe've always been bobbins at short corners. If I was an opposing scout it would be the first thing I would recommend.
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
It was used against us a lot last season with the ball reversed back and then whipped in for example Newcastle's second at the Turf.
-
- Posts: 15228
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3155 times
- Has Liked: 6742 times
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
If Tarks was at fault for the goal, and that's debatable, it was the only thing he did wrong in the whole game, sometimes you have to give credit to the opposition, and they'd clearly worked on that corner routine, and it showed, they executed it brilliantly.
How anyone can say they didn't deserve a point beats me, they were probably the better team 1st half, and 2nd half they kept pushing and probing, our only real chance of note was Dwight's, and if he buries that, then it's game over, but these things happen in football, i sensed when he blazed wide, that they'd go up the other end and equalise, we've done the same to many teams down the years, so we can't complain, when it happens to us.
How anyone can say they didn't deserve a point beats me, they were probably the better team 1st half, and 2nd half they kept pushing and probing, our only real chance of note was Dwight's, and if he buries that, then it's game over, but these things happen in football, i sensed when he blazed wide, that they'd go up the other end and equalise, we've done the same to many teams down the years, so we can't complain, when it happens to us.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 15228
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3155 times
- Has Liked: 6742 times
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
They should have had that early penalty, and had they scored I don't think we'd have got back level. Sheffield Utd are a very good, well organised team. All credit to them.tiger76 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 10:45 pmIf Tarks was at fault for the goal, and that's debatable, it was the only thing he did wrong in the whole game, sometimes you have to give credit to the opposition, and they'd clearly worked on that corner routine, and it showed, they executed it brilliantly.
How anyone can say they didn't deserve a point beats me, they were probably the better team 1st half, and 2nd half they kept pushing and probing, our only real chance of note was Dwight's, and if he buries that, then it's game over, but these things happen in football, i sensed when he blazed wide, that they'd go up the other end and equalise, we've done the same to many teams down the years, so we can't complain, when it happens to us.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: James Tarkowski, at fault for the equaliser!!
Forgot about the penalty shout, yes we got away with one there, equally we could point to Vydra's chance early on as well, so on balance a point each was fair i'd say, two well-matched teams, as you'd expect when 10th meets 8th, it was always going to be nip and tuck, and so it proved.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 10:51 pmThey should have had that early penalty, and had they scored I don't think we'd have got back level. Sheffield Utd are a very good, well organised team. All credit to them.