Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
-
- Posts: 6594
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1676 times
- Has Liked: 754 times
Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
Have a good friend who was gutted by the late penalty tonight. It absolutely makes up for the one given I think against Pieters for a challenge in the dying moments when we played them away. That one was a very debatable one
These 12 users liked this post: Leisure Bosscat scouseclaret MT03ALG Taffy on the wing Jamesy Zlatan JohnDearyMe superdimitri HB Claret BOYSIE31 ecc
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
At least ours today was not a dive. Clear handball according to the current rules. NES was fuming tonight unlike when he was dancing at Molineux when he knew his team had cheated their way to a point. Bad loser just like Klopp
These 5 users liked this post: Bosscat MT03ALG Jamesy Foulthrow Kreuzberg
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
Agreed. NES did look a sore loser when Dyche spoke to him at full time. What goes around comes around.
These 4 users liked this post: Bosscat warksclaret tiger76 Kreuzberg
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
I think both teams should appeal against both penalties together - 1 more point each if we do and are successful
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 6603
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1780 times
- Has Liked: 1778 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
Just unfortunate the Wolves fans didn't have to travel to TM to see it, like we did to Mollyknow.
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
There are people on the Wolves message board swearing blind that it is corruption by the league. Have they no memory or thought process at all?
-
- Posts: 30280
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 10917 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
it's the main thing I hate about footy fans, short memories.
-
- Posts: 30280
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 10917 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
what were we talking about ?
These 2 users liked this post: longsidepies SlidingTackle
-
- Posts: 3647
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1402 times
- Has Liked: 2687 times
- Location: varied
-
- Posts: 3594
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
- Been Liked: 891 times
- Has Liked: 1100 times
- Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
Why would it not be a penalty? The ball clearly hits his elbow without any contact with Wood. He is 3 feet away from Wood's foot and his arm is in an unnatural position (defined as not being his normal body profile) .
Or have they secretly brought in a rule to ban overhead kicks in the penalty area. There were several overhead kicks outside the area during the game. And Barnes dcored that cracking overhead at West Brom last time we played there.
Or have they secretly brought in a rule to ban overhead kicks in the penalty area. There were several overhead kicks outside the area during the game. And Barnes dcored that cracking overhead at West Brom last time we played there.
-
- Posts: 4600
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1020 times
- Has Liked: 3163 times
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
Just to add........Wood took a pretty good foot to the nose from Doherty after the handball.
He just got up and put it away. He never complains about decisions, no drama, he just gets on with it.......Big asset!
The more i see of him the more i like.
He just got up and put it away. He never complains about decisions, no drama, he just gets on with it.......Big asset!
The more i see of him the more i like.
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
No, you would each lose a point for the game that you lose.
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
To be fair, some of the Wolves supporters agree it was a penalty, they're not all numpties. It had nothing to do with Wood's attempted overhead kick, he was about 6 ft away when Wood tried it and he jumped into Wood so no foul or dangerous play and by the current laws of the game it was handball.
Like many other penalties these days the punishment doesn't fit the crime but unitl they change the rules it will carry on and there will be decisions that go for and against you. Have to admit though, it did seem like justice after what happened to us at Molineux
Like many other penalties these days the punishment doesn't fit the crime but unitl they change the rules it will carry on and there will be decisions that go for and against you. Have to admit though, it did seem like justice after what happened to us at Molineux
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
I can see that you're the brains of the outfit.
-
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 827 times
- Has Liked: 1307 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
Fair play to Doherty. He managed to get his feet apart quickly before landing, if not he could have done serious damage to Woody's head.
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
It was clearly dangerous play by Wood, a flailing foot at head level. What was Doherty supposed to do except protect his face. It was not a penalty.
I suppose we just have to accept the decision and get on with it.
I got the impression there was a bit of 'banter' going on with Dyche and co and Nunes. When Tarkowski outrageously 'fell over' and got a free kick the cameras showed Dyche laughing in the direction of the Wolves bench. My only problem with that was that the referee will know he's been conned by Burnley and if we had any sort of decent reputation on diving it will have evaporated.
I suppose we just have to accept the decision and get on with it.
I got the impression there was a bit of 'banter' going on with Dyche and co and Nunes. When Tarkowski outrageously 'fell over' and got a free kick the cameras showed Dyche laughing in the direction of the Wolves bench. My only problem with that was that the referee will know he's been conned by Burnley and if we had any sort of decent reputation on diving it will have evaporated.
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
Disagree on both points. Especially Tarks. He clearly tripped over his own feetHipper wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:58 amIt was clearly dangerous play by Wood, a flailing foot at head level. What was Doherty supposed to do except protect his face. It was not a penalty.
I suppose we just have to accept the decision and get on with it.
I got the impression there was a bit of 'banter' going on with Dyche and co and Nunes. When Tarkowski outrageously 'fell over' and got a free kick the cameras showed Dyche laughing in the direction of the Wolves bench. My only problem with that was that the referee will know he's been conned by Burnley and if we had any sort of decent reputation on diving it will have evaporated.
These 2 users liked this post: Burnley1989 JohnMac
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
when i heard the whistle i assumed he had given Wolves a freekick for high feet.
Surely im not the only on on here who thought that?
Surely im not the only on on here who thought that?
These 2 users liked this post: Burnley1989 Zlatan
-
- Posts: 7347
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2275 times
- Has Liked: 2155 times
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
- Attachments
-
- C77BA22A-D1E3-4644-A581-360FEB0DB6AC.jpeg (135.77 KiB) Viewed 2145 times
These 6 users liked this post: Claret Down_Rover Stalbansclaret Stacky_claret HunterST_BFC tim_noone
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
I had the sound off and was not expecting a penalty from that melee. On the replays I don’t think it was dangerous play by Wood but I also don’t think it was a handball offence
This user liked this post: Shappie
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
I think 50%of handballs are not handballs. Its become a farce.
-
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:38 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
I think the photo may have been altered or wood has one leg a foot longer than the other (may be thats why he headed wide) but when you watch defender runs into the position with arm raised , not saying I would not raise mine but if you run into where some one is kicking it may then not be dangerous to kicking player but run the risk of hand ball. Which was given, whilst possibly two wrongs not making a right the one against us when Pieters was clearing a ball when attacker put his foot into him and got contact imo.
I noticed that one of the posters above said about both appealing to get penalties removed that would mean extra 2 points puts us level with Arsenal .
I noticed that one of the posters above said about both appealing to get penalties removed that would mean extra 2 points puts us level with Arsenal .
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:23 pm
- Been Liked: 76 times
- Has Liked: 224 times
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
Whether it was debatable or not it's about time we got a decision going in our favour, and the bleating from the Wolves fans is hilarious, they conned the ref at Molineux, we put the ball into the mixer and they couldn't deal with it, hence the handball and the spot-kick.
-
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:03 am
- Been Liked: 323 times
- Has Liked: 363 times
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
I read a report that described it as a 'VAR penalty '.
It wasn't. It was a penalty awarded by the referee.
It would've been easy to not make the decision and let VAR get involved so I applaud Mike Dean for that.
It wasn't. It was a penalty awarded by the referee.
It would've been easy to not make the decision and let VAR get involved so I applaud Mike Dean for that.
-
- Posts: 7347
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2275 times
- Has Liked: 2155 times
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
Nahhhh not a chancepureclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:12 pmI think the photo may have been altered or wood has one leg a foot longer than the other
-
- Posts: 7181
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2367 times
- Has Liked: 3781 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
We would both have an additional 1 point to our current totals, 1 win minus 2 draws equals 1 point
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Sweet Revenge For The Penalty At Molineux
Tbh Wood Looks offside to me.