the art of defence in football
-
- Posts: 5500
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2319 times
- Has Liked: 1399 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
the art of defence in football
There was a time 15 or so years ago that the game was graced by amazing defenders and great goalkeepers. Guardiola came along and advocated playing out from the back which influenced a lot of sides and it was at the time a breath of fresh air. My question though is has it gone too far? We gave reached a point where a goalkeepers ability to pass a ball is brought into an equation when judging his ability to do the basics as a goalkeeper and in some cases a goalkeepers ability to distribute well masks basic weaknesses that can cost teams games. It's the same for defenders. A defenders ability to pass a ball can project a center backs career further even if he does the basics worse. We can see examples of this when we judge Keane/mee/ tarks as England international defenders. The same argument is why pope isn't head and shoulders above any England goalkeeper out there (because his distribution is questionable)
I'm sorry but I want my centre backs to keep the ball away from goal and my goalkeepers to primarily save the bloody football.
The question is has this all gone too far with regards to passing football?
I'm sorry but I want my centre backs to keep the ball away from goal and my goalkeepers to primarily save the bloody football.
The question is has this all gone too far with regards to passing football?
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
-
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6902 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: the art of defence in football
No. If your team doesn’t have centre forwards who are effective at dealing with the long ball then why would you want a goalkeeper or centre backs who are unable to accurately and effectively pass the football?
Obviously everyone wants their defenders and goalkeepers to prevent goals, and they all do - it’s not a case of either/or. Pickford has been a good shot stopper who’s distribution has been an asset. He wasn’t picked for England purely because he was deemed good at passing the ball. His form this season has dropped dramatically and I would expect him to lose his place as a result.
Obviously everyone wants their defenders and goalkeepers to prevent goals, and they all do - it’s not a case of either/or. Pickford has been a good shot stopper who’s distribution has been an asset. He wasn’t picked for England purely because he was deemed good at passing the ball. His form this season has dropped dramatically and I would expect him to lose his place as a result.
This user liked this post: KateR
-
- Posts: 19173
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3116 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: the art of defence in football
That Barcelona team had an excellent central defender in Puyol and at City he benefitted from Kompany - he didn't buy either thoughgandhisflipflop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:19 pmThere was a time 15 or so years ago that the game was graced by amazing defenders and great goalkeepers. Guardiola came along and advocated playing out from the back which influenced a lot of sides and it was at the time a breath of fresh air. My question though is has it gone too far? We gave reached a point where a goalkeepers ability to pass a ball is brought into an equation when judging his ability to do the basics as a goalkeeper and in some cases a goalkeepers ability to distribute well masks basic weaknesses that can cost teams games. It's the same for defenders. A defenders ability to pass a ball can project a center backs career further even if he does the basics worse. We can see examples of this when we judge Keane/mee/ tarks as England international defenders. The same argument is why pope isn't head and shoulders above any England goalkeeper out there (because his distribution is questionable)
I'm sorry but I want my centre backs to keep the ball away from goal and my goalkeepers to primarily save the bloody football.
The question is has this all gone too far with regards to passing football?
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2491 times
- Has Liked: 1477 times
- Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates
Re: the art of defence in football
I'm sure Pope could play out from the back if given the chance. It's just not the Burnley way of doing things.
-
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6902 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: the art of defence in football
Maybe he could - but he’s not comfortable with his feet. He generally kicks the ball first time which suggests he doesn’t trust his touch. Don’t get me wrong - he should have the England shirt on current form, but there’s no point glossing over his obvious weakness.conyoviejo wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:30 pmI'm sure Pope could play out from the back if given the chance. It's just not the Burnley way of doing things.
Re: the art of defence in football
Yes
The theory is good. The risks, often too great.
Pass yes but not all the time. The rhythm gets sussed and you are doomed.
The theory is good. The risks, often too great.
Pass yes but not all the time. The rhythm gets sussed and you are doomed.
Re: the art of defence in football
When people start to get giddy about England's prospects of winning a major tournament they need to realise that we'll have to score plenty of goals to win anything as we aren't going to be keeping clean sheets anytime soon with Maguire, Gomez & Pickford in defence.
-
- Posts: 5500
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2319 times
- Has Liked: 1399 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: the art of defence in football
2 players that were old school defenders. A breed that is dying out.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:24 pmThat Barcelona team had an excellent central defender in Puyol and at City he benefitted from Kompany - he didn't buy either though
-
- Posts: 30277
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 10917 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: the art of defence in football
I think for the most part he has done well with his distribution recently, pinged a few nice passes yesterday. I've definitely seen an improvement since last seasonRileybobs wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:35 pmMaybe he could - but he’s not comfortable with his feet. He generally kicks the ball first time which suggests he doesn’t trust his touch. Don’t get me wrong - he should have the England shirt on current form, but there’s no point glossing over his obvious weakness.
-
- Posts: 30277
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 10917 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: the art of defence in football
Puyol was hard as nails as well as being a good player !
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: the art of defence in football
What's his record like at buying CB's?Chester Perry wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:24 pmThat Barcelona team had an excellent central defender in Puyol and at City he benefitted from Kompany - he didn't buy either though
It doesn't appear that good at City, was it better at Barca?
-
- Posts: 30277
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 10917 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: the art of defence in football
didn't really need defenders at Barcelona
Xavi, Iniesta, Busquests, Messi
you need to get the ball to attack, good luck with that lol
Xavi, Iniesta, Busquests, Messi
you need to get the ball to attack, good luck with that lol
-
- Posts: 7181
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2367 times
- Has Liked: 3781 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: the art of defence in football
Pep has defended John Stones time and time again, no doubt to justify the £50m they paid for him.
Stones has repaid the faith shown in him by making outrageous cock ups trying to be a cultured footballer, time and time again.
The priority is to keep goal and defend.
Stones has repaid the faith shown in him by making outrageous cock ups trying to be a cultured footballer, time and time again.
The priority is to keep goal and defend.
Re: the art of defence in football
Football evolves overtime.
GK/CH have different roles to play these days.
Take a forward. It’s like saying his job is to put the ball in the net and nothing else. LooK at Barnes here. He couldn’t play in Liverpools system and Firmino would struggle in ours. There’s different roles and different types of GK/CH. yes their main job is to defend, but if they can do much more, they’re far more effective.
If your a manger who wants to play the passing game, it’d be daft if your defenders can’t pass, or at least aren't comfortable. Mistakes will be made, but no more so than a team that thumps it in hope. The only difference is they may lose it in a more dangerous area.
Look at Arsenals goal on Saturday. That is why teams pass it out.
But you’re on a Burnley forum, you’ll get loads who like the more “manly” hit and hope method.
GK/CH have different roles to play these days.
Take a forward. It’s like saying his job is to put the ball in the net and nothing else. LooK at Barnes here. He couldn’t play in Liverpools system and Firmino would struggle in ours. There’s different roles and different types of GK/CH. yes their main job is to defend, but if they can do much more, they’re far more effective.
If your a manger who wants to play the passing game, it’d be daft if your defenders can’t pass, or at least aren't comfortable. Mistakes will be made, but no more so than a team that thumps it in hope. The only difference is they may lose it in a more dangerous area.
Look at Arsenals goal on Saturday. That is why teams pass it out.
But you’re on a Burnley forum, you’ll get loads who like the more “manly” hit and hope method.
-
- Posts: 13225
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3037 times
- Has Liked: 3759 times
Re: the art of defence in football
I’m no football tactician, but my assumption was that City play like this to draw you forward and create space in behind/gaps in midfield that they then have the technical ability to exploit. Certainly not for us and I’m not sure I’d enjoy watching it even if we did have the quality. Far more appreciative of a towering headed clearance, which I’m sure many would say is uncultured.
-
- Posts: 4428
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1148 times
- Has Liked: 180 times
Re: the art of defence in football
Pep brought Bravo in for “ his feet” and he was full of well feet errors . Klopp has Karius for erm his feet,The likes of De-gea again for his feet the list is endless . Pope very very rarely makes errors with his feet (though ironically he almost made a mess but recovered well vs Norwich ) sure the very occasional kick might go in the stand but you have the likes of Schmechael clearing constantly into the crowd . Pope’s feet have got better and he’s confident with his left now as well , sure he purposely takes a heavy touch but he’s good enough imo
Re: the art of defence in football
It's a good tactic to mix it up. Earlier in the season at Brighton we were playing a lot of long balls up to the forwards and so the Brighton players were dropping deep to deal with that. But then we switched and played it from the back without any press from their forwards, worked it upfield and Hendrick scored. Do it both ways so the opposition is not sure what is coming. Norwich have suffered because they have an almost religious commitment to playing it from the back, like they did against us at the start of this season and lost two goals as a result.
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:30 am
- Been Liked: 296 times
- Has Liked: 28 times
Re: the art of defence in football
I’m sure Pope can play simple balls into the centre backs. England don’t play out from the back like city, so Pope doesn’t need to be able to beat a man like Ederson. Pickford is hardly brilliant.
-
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 723 times
Re: the art of defence in football
For me the ideal central defence partnership should be a limited defender and a ball playing defender (to use football manager isms).
Your limited defender should be primarily good at tackling, marking, heading, blocking and should have good anticipation, positioning, bravery and awareness. Passing and ball control are not important.
Your ball player should be good at the above but also have the ability to control the ball and make good and Intelligent passes.
I think we have that pairing in Tarks an Mee. I think there are fewer better limkited defenders jn the Prem than Mee - mainly because no team uses them and the current fashion is ball players.
Complimentary skill sets are vital, too many teams just have the latter twice and are exposed.
Your limited defender should be primarily good at tackling, marking, heading, blocking and should have good anticipation, positioning, bravery and awareness. Passing and ball control are not important.
Your ball player should be good at the above but also have the ability to control the ball and make good and Intelligent passes.
I think we have that pairing in Tarks an Mee. I think there are fewer better limkited defenders jn the Prem than Mee - mainly because no team uses them and the current fashion is ball players.
Complimentary skill sets are vital, too many teams just have the latter twice and are exposed.
Re: the art of defence in football
I think England do try and play from the back and is the preferred option, hence why Pickford and Stones are picked, which leads to errors because it is a dangerous way to play but it's what they want. I would also say most top 6/8 managers want to play that way also, but not Burnley as we play how our manager wants us to play, rarely see us with 3 at the back because the players we have are suited to the tactic. Is the tactic chosen first or do the players he has mean we play the way we do tactically because they are best suited to that. When you don't have the cash to get the players to suit your preferred tactics it becomes easier than having to juggle players abilities against tactics, as you are forced to play a particular way.
Pope is the best English GK for me but I also recognize that no top 6/8 sides have come in for him, he is not the first name on the England team sheet and you can apply that to Mee & Tarks also, for good reason, we don't play the fashionable way but would say the players are not the best at playing that was so sometimes we compare apples and pears.
Pope is the best English GK for me but I also recognize that no top 6/8 sides have come in for him, he is not the first name on the England team sheet and you can apply that to Mee & Tarks also, for good reason, we don't play the fashionable way but would say the players are not the best at playing that was so sometimes we compare apples and pears.