Hows that not a penalty
Hows that not a penalty
Anywhere else on the pitch and its given
Last edited by paulatky on Sun Jul 26, 2020 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 12:18 pm
- Been Liked: 28 times
- Has Liked: 16 times
Re: Norwich score
Offside lol
-
- Posts: 6880
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2742 times
- Has Liked: 4314 times
Re: Norwich score
Ruled out
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 12:18 pm
- Been Liked: 28 times
- Has Liked: 16 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Edited the header and post because you made yourself look a d1ck hahaha
And it wasn't a penalty Jay created the contact....
And it wasn't a penalty Jay created the contact....
-
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 495 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Jay puts his body inbetween ball and man and takes the contact. Aguero does that they talk about clever play and it's a guaranteed free kick of a midfielder does it. I'm not sure I agree it should be a foul but the norm these days is to give those. No consistency.
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG ClaretnGreen
-
- Posts: 16684
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6894 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Stonewall penalty. The top players win these penalties week in, week out. Tragic that a decision like that is reviewed and still not overturned.
-
- Posts: 6888
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1468 times
- Has Liked: 1839 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Stonewall penalty but it's SuperJonny Moss so its disallowed
-
- Posts: 5345
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1898 times
- Has Liked: 1965 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
If fatty Moss saw that at Old Trafford, Anfield, Emirates, Etihad etc, it's a penalty for the home team, no doubt about it.
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG Stalbansclaret
-
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 825 times
- Has Liked: 1608 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: Hows that not a penalty
He should have looked at pitch side TV
Again it would have taken him 20 minutes to get there.
Again it would have taken him 20 minutes to get there.
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG CharlieinNewMexico
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Penalty for me.
-
- Posts: 12345
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5202 times
- Has Liked: 920 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
"People who frequently see bias against their team are biased." - FACT
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 13223
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3037 times
- Has Liked: 3759 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Penalty.
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Jamie Vardy gets them for the same trick (and it is a trick)
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Might have been his wife protecting himTommyJohnson wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 4:33 pmEdited the header and post because you made yourself look a d1ck hahaha
And it wasn't a penalty Jay created the contact....
-
- Posts: 16684
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6894 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Hows that not a penalty
To be fair, Vardy actually sticks his leg out to initiate the contact. Rodriguez just got his body between man and ball to get a shot away without the defender being able to put a tackle in. Clumsy defending, took him out from behind, blatant penalty and as no attempt was made to play the ball there would have been a case for a red card, although that would have been harsh.
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG ngsobob
-
- Posts: 4936
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1005 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Jay played for the penalty and in my eyes that immediately means it shouldn't be a pen. Just needs some consistency when against us too.
-
- Posts: 2050
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 422 times
- Has Liked: 4481 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Blatant penalty but it was Burnley not Man U. I assume the VAR Man was junior to Moss...
-
- Posts: 2050
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 422 times
- Has Liked: 4481 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: Hows that not a penalty
VAR Official was Darren Bond !! He dare NOT overrule Jon Moss !! And the assistant VAR Official was Dan Robathan! Who the hell is he?!
-
- Posts: 3771
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1828 times
- Has Liked: 2613 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Hows that not a penalty
He did exactly what Murray did for them a couple of seasons ago ---guess what ----he got a penalty!superdimitri wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 6:51 pmJay played for the penalty and in my eyes that immediately means it shouldn't be a pen. Just needs some consistency when against us too.
-
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 495 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
-
- Posts: 4936
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1005 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Oh yeah, no denying. But if the consistency starts with this I won't have any complaint.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 8:52 pmHe did exactly what Murray did for them a couple of seasons ago ---guess what ----he got a penalty!
Of course it won't, but I can see why it wasn't given.
-
- Posts: 5229
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1623 times
- Has Liked: 397 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
A definate penalty but with Moss you never know. The VAR ref didn’t overturn it because the ref didn’t miss anything obvious. If Moss had called it, VAR would have allowed the pen.
The Gudmundsson one I can see why it was disallowed even if the keeper wasn’t getting there.
A real shame, especially given the penalty claim today, that the one was given in added time against Wolves back in August (a far less likely pen), without which today would have been to win to get into Europe (if Arsenal lose the cup final). It shows how seasons change based on one or two dubious penalty decisions.
The Gudmundsson one I can see why it was disallowed even if the keeper wasn’t getting there.
A real shame, especially given the penalty claim today, that the one was given in added time against Wolves back in August (a far less likely pen), without which today would have been to win to get into Europe (if Arsenal lose the cup final). It shows how seasons change based on one or two dubious penalty decisions.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 826 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
VAR is spoiling the game. I think it was invented by the Daleks to exterminate the pleasure of watching football.
One of the great highlights of a football game is to cheer a goal going in. Now, when the goal goes in the back of the net, you don't know whether to cheer or wait for VAR - and then cheer the VAR result. I've even heard fans chanting VAR VAR.
I would prefer it to be that the referees initial decision (unless the linesman is flagging) is final. In that way, if he gets it wrong we can all take pleasure in booing the referee.
One of the great highlights of a football game is to cheer a goal going in. Now, when the goal goes in the back of the net, you don't know whether to cheer or wait for VAR - and then cheer the VAR result. I've even heard fans chanting VAR VAR.
I would prefer it to be that the referees initial decision (unless the linesman is flagging) is final. In that way, if he gets it wrong we can all take pleasure in booing the referee.
-
- Posts: 30275
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 10917 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Dyche thought is was a pen, Dyche thought the ball was out of play for the Brighton winner
**** VAR
**** VAR
-
- Posts: 12345
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5202 times
- Has Liked: 920 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
It was invented because most football fans have a natural bias that leads them to think the decisions that go against them are because the refs were either incompetent or favour the other teams
As fans are still biased then the introduction of VAR has just increased peoples unhinged view that the refs (plus a new additional one) are even more incompetent and more favouring of the other teams than before.
Not only that but the cost to this is that our game has been slowed down and made a lot more robotic removing some of the great spontaneity and excitement.
If people would have just accepted that refs have an impossible job and are honest people doing their best and also had some self awareness of their own bias we could have carried on withou the need for VAR
I said before that all VAR would do is shift peoples blame from the ref to the VAR official and that is what has happened.
All of you on here who constantly whinge about refs, think all the decisions are against us and also hate VAR then im afraid you are the problem and only have yourselves to blame
"People who frequently see bias against their team are biased."
As fans are still biased then the introduction of VAR has just increased peoples unhinged view that the refs (plus a new additional one) are even more incompetent and more favouring of the other teams than before.
Not only that but the cost to this is that our game has been slowed down and made a lot more robotic removing some of the great spontaneity and excitement.
If people would have just accepted that refs have an impossible job and are honest people doing their best and also had some self awareness of their own bias we could have carried on withou the need for VAR
I said before that all VAR would do is shift peoples blame from the ref to the VAR official and that is what has happened.
All of you on here who constantly whinge about refs, think all the decisions are against us and also hate VAR then im afraid you are the problem and only have yourselves to blame
"People who frequently see bias against their team are biased."
-
- Posts: 16684
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6894 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Hows that not a penalty
No complaints with our disallowed goal. 100% the correct decision even if the keeper wouldn’t have made the save.
I’m convinced that VAR reviews are eating into playing time though. 5 minutes added at the end of the second half. I reckon there would have been 4 minutes anyway due to the goal celebration, injuries and substitution. When you add a minute on for the drinks break there doesn’t seem to be any time added on for the two VAR reviews which took around a minute each.
I’m convinced that VAR reviews are eating into playing time though. 5 minutes added at the end of the second half. I reckon there would have been 4 minutes anyway due to the goal celebration, injuries and substitution. When you add a minute on for the drinks break there doesn’t seem to be any time added on for the two VAR reviews which took around a minute each.
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Was an interesting decision.
My gut instinct was to point to the spot from the camera angle I had. There was contact, Jay was clever and made sure body in the way. Smart attacking play.
The question is, how much contact, did that contact make him fall to the ground.
Would I as a burnley fan expect the decision- yes
Would I, should I be an oppo fan expect decision- would be gutted.
If i was refereeing the game I would want to be absolutely clear cut that it was significant contact and not sure I would be absolutely convinced in this incident.
I appreciate this would create negative opinion from one side and positive from the other.
This really is a marmite decision from a referees perspective
My gut instinct was to point to the spot from the camera angle I had. There was contact, Jay was clever and made sure body in the way. Smart attacking play.
The question is, how much contact, did that contact make him fall to the ground.
Would I as a burnley fan expect the decision- yes
Would I, should I be an oppo fan expect decision- would be gutted.
If i was refereeing the game I would want to be absolutely clear cut that it was significant contact and not sure I would be absolutely convinced in this incident.
I appreciate this would create negative opinion from one side and positive from the other.
This really is a marmite decision from a referees perspective
-
- Posts: 16684
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6894 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Hows that not a penalty
That’s fair enough, but Rodriguez loves a shot. He doesn’t take our penalties. He got his body in the way to make sure that the only way the defender could get the ball would be to foul him, which he did. He had no reason to go down when presented with a very score-able opportunity.dpinsussex wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:51 pmWas an interesting decision.
My gut instinct was to point to the spot from the camera angle I had. There was contact, Jay was clever and made sure body in the way. Smart attacking play.
The question is, how much contact, did that contact make him fall to the ground.
Would I as a burnley fan expect the decision- yes
Would I, should I be an oppo fan expect decision- would be gutted.
If i was refereeing the game I would want to be absolutely clear cut that it was significant contact and not sure I would be absolutely convinced in this incident.
I appreciate this would create negative opinion from one side and positive from the other.
This really is a marmite decision from a referees perspective
I’d like to say I was amazed that it wasn’t given when reviewed, but to be honest I wasn’t.
-
- Posts: 4600
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1020 times
- Has Liked: 3163 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
You should change your user name to Mary Contrary!superdimitri wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 6:51 pmJay played for the penalty and in my eyes that immediately means it shouldn't be a pen. Just needs some consistency when against us too.
Definite Penalty.
-
- Posts: 67428
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32238 times
- Has Liked: 5254 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Can't agree with you on that, if he saw that for the home team at those grounds he'd give them a second penalty to add to itVino blanco wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 6:31 pmIf fatty Moss saw that at Old Trafford, Anfield, Emirates, Etihad etc, it's a penalty for the home team, no doubt about it.
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG CharlieinNewMexico
-
- Posts: 3771
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1828 times
- Has Liked: 2613 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Don't put the blame on British fans, PL, FA or even the British media ----VAR was introduced by FIFA because they consider that it is the way forward to ensure that every decision is 100% correct. These are the people responsible for Wolrd football ---- quite frightening isn't it?Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:45 pmIt was invented because most football fans have a natural bias that leads them to think the decisions that go against them are because the refs were either incompetent or favour the other teams
As fans are still biased then the introduction of VAR has just increased peoples unhinged view that the refs (plus a new additional one) are even more incompetent and more favouring of the other teams than before.
Not only that but the cost to this is that our game has been slowed down and made a lot more robotic removing some of the great spontaneity and excitement.
If people would have just accepted that refs have an impossible job and are honest people doing their best and also had some self awareness of their own bias we could have carried on withou the need for VAR
I said before that all VAR would do is shift peoples blame from the ref to the VAR official and that is what has happened.
All of you on here who constantly whinge about refs, think all the decisions are against us and also hate VAR then im afraid you are the problem and only have yourselves to blame
"People who frequently see bias against their team are biased."
Never mind, there will be plenty more things to come to spoil the enjoyment of what was once a smashing game.
Last edited by Ashingtonclaret46 on Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:40 am
- Been Liked: 428 times
- Has Liked: 1460 times
- Location: Leicestershire
- Contact:
Re: Hows that not a penalty
John Moss LUFC hates:
1. Man Utd;
2. Burnley;
3. Sheff Wed;
4. HTFC;
5. Sheff Utd
1. Man Utd;
2. Burnley;
3. Sheff Wed;
4. HTFC;
5. Sheff Utd
-
- Posts: 8049
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2415 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
When the penalty was awarded for Lacazette (Arsenal) it was obvious that the foul on Jay Rod was almost identical.
PENALTY all day long.
Fatty Moss does it again!
PENALTY all day long.
Fatty Moss does it again!
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Look at Brighton's first goal and at the top of the screen when the replay is shown on mot and a Brighton player is off side
-
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 815 times
- Has Liked: 527 times
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Is the player on the line interfering?
I can absolutely see why the goal was chalked off. The interesting bit was there appeared to be no reaction at all from Brighton players and most notably the Brighton keeper.
I know as part of my prematch instruction (which obviously VAR wouldn't be proxy to) is explaining what I want in exactly that situation.
If the ball hits the back of the net and nobody complains get on with it. Its what the game expects.
If the keeper goes mental, I want my AR to raise his flag. I can then go over and provide him with the other piece of information in order to get the correct decision. Easy sell for an offside at that point.
The lack of reaction and the awarding of the goal suggests that was also in the referees pre.match instruction. The game expected the goal to be given.
I can absolutely see why the goal was chalked off. The interesting bit was there appeared to be no reaction at all from Brighton players and most notably the Brighton keeper.
I know as part of my prematch instruction (which obviously VAR wouldn't be proxy to) is explaining what I want in exactly that situation.
If the ball hits the back of the net and nobody complains get on with it. Its what the game expects.
If the keeper goes mental, I want my AR to raise his flag. I can then go over and provide him with the other piece of information in order to get the correct decision. Easy sell for an offside at that point.
The lack of reaction and the awarding of the goal suggests that was also in the referees pre.match instruction. The game expected the goal to be given.
This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46
-
- Posts: 15108
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3137 times
- Has Liked: 6682 times
Re: Hows that not a penalty
For our disallowed headed goal, their keeper is holding JBG. Goal or penalty for me.
Re: Hows that not a penalty
Surely the fact the keeper had NO chance of ever saving that shot should be a factor on whether JBG was interfering. He was basically stopping the keeper from picking the ball out of the net three seconds earlier. A terrible terrible decision.
Also for the Jay Rod penalty shout, you just KNOW, that if that's Martial at Old Trafford or Lacazette at the Emirates, or Aguero at the Ethihad, he just points to the spot, with a little shake of the head to say "cmon I had no choice!"
Also for the Jay Rod penalty shout, you just KNOW, that if that's Martial at Old Trafford or Lacazette at the Emirates, or Aguero at the Ethihad, he just points to the spot, with a little shake of the head to say "cmon I had no choice!"
Re: Hows that not a penalty
There's quite a lot of truth in this, but long before Burnley got back into the top flight, it was apparent to me that there was a very clear (probably unconscious) trend of decisions going against Barnsley, Bradford, Bolton, even them down the road (and I certainly have no innate bias in their favour!).Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:45 pmIt was invented because most football fans have a natural bias that leads them to think the decisions that go against them are because the refs were either incompetent or favour the other teams
As fans are still biased then the introduction of VAR has just increased peoples unhinged view that the refs (plus a new additional one) are even more incompetent and more favouring of the other teams than before.
Not only that but the cost to this is that our game has been slowed down and made a lot more robotic removing some of the great spontaneity and excitement.
If people would have just accepted that refs have an impossible job and are honest people doing their best and also had some self awareness of their own bias we could have carried on withou the need for VAR
I said before that all VAR would do is shift peoples blame from the ref to the VAR official and that is what has happened.
All of you on here who constantly whinge about refs, think all the decisions are against us and also hate VAR then im afraid you are the problem and only have yourselves to blame
"People who frequently see bias against their team are biased."
And one of the things that was very noticeable in the 09/10 season from my seat (where you can hear some of what's said on the pitch) was that referees would address the players they knew (presumably from reffing their games for years) by their first names whilst BFC players were addressed as 'Hey - number four!'
I don't think that refs hate Burnley (though as a crowd, we probably don't foster warm relations with refs!), but I do believe that, if that had been Martial,Aguerro, Lacazette - or even Vardy - it actually LOOKS different to the ref. I don't think it's a deliberate thing at all. But that's where VAR should help, and it doesn't appear to!!