Nixon again
Nixon again
Nixon
The budget is clearly limited. Common theme is low offers at home and abroad. First team group is strong. Not much underneath. It is what it is. He would have gone if a big move came on. Once again that hasn’t happened. May have hit own glass ceiling. Mind you he gets paid well
The big six or seven always want a glamour name. It’s a shame. But Dyche on fantastic money so it’s a gold plated fur lined coffin for him
I do wonder where he gets all this
The budget is clearly limited. Common theme is low offers at home and abroad. First team group is strong. Not much underneath. It is what it is. He would have gone if a big move came on. Once again that hasn’t happened. May have hit own glass ceiling. Mind you he gets paid well
The big six or seven always want a glamour name. It’s a shame. But Dyche on fantastic money so it’s a gold plated fur lined coffin for him
I do wonder where he gets all this
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
-
- Posts: 67808
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32415 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Nixon again
Nothing we don’t know there. I have been consistent in believing that we would have been looking for a new manager had a decent vacancy come up for Dyche. Simple fact is there have been no vacancies.ewanrob wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:37 pmNixon
The budget is clearly limited. Common theme is low offers at home and abroad. First team group is strong. Not much underneath. It is what it is. He would have gone if a big move came on. Once again that hasn’t happened. May have hit own glass ceiling. Mind you he gets paid well
The big six or seven always want a glamour name. It’s a shame. But Dyche on fantastic money so it’s a gold plated fur lined coffin for him
I do wonder where he gets all this
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Nixon again
Reckon the board are planning ahead and looking for the next manager? It's surely the sensible thing to do, so that we're sorted when he does move.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:40 pmNothing we don’t know there. I have been consistent in believing that we would have been looking for a new manager had a decent vacancy come up for Dyche. Simple fact is there have been no vacancies.
-
- Posts: 6902
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Nixon again
Its hard to disagree with much of what Nixon says here.
-
- Posts: 15236
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3156 times
- Has Liked: 6744 times
Re: Nixon again
Totally agree. He was hoping for better.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:40 pmNothing we don’t know there. I have been consistent in believing that we would have been looking for a new manager had a decent vacancy come up for Dyche. Simple fact is there have been no vacancies.
He will be lucky if he gets a better job than BFC
This user liked this post: MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 67808
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32415 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Nixon again
Remember having a meeting with Hoos a couple of weeks after the Dyche appointment and he said to us that you always have to be looking for your next manager. You would think all clubs do but then you see clubs sack a manager and then have no idea which way to turn.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:42 pmReckon the board are planning ahead and looking for the next manager? It's surely the sensible thing to do, so that we're sorted when he does move.
-
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 584 times
- Has Liked: 115 times
Re: Nixon again
Shame for Dyche in that he won’t be given the chance to progress his career. It’s perfect for us though. The snobbery of the big clubs has helped us greatly these last few years.
You never know, the dream scenario could unfold where we get some serious investment and then we will see if Dyche can create something truly special at Burnley (he already has in my eyes but you get the idea).
You never know, the dream scenario could unfold where we get some serious investment and then we will see if Dyche can create something truly special at Burnley (he already has in my eyes but you get the idea).
This user liked this post: k90bfc
Re: Nixon again
I remember Lee Hoos saying that he had a huge dossier on managers, this will be in place at all serious clubs, so should SD depart then they should already have the criteria in place for a replacement and a preferred list of candidates.
Let's hope we don't need to use it soon.
Let's hope we don't need to use it soon.
-
- Posts: 67808
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32415 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Nixon again
Strange man at times was Hoos but overall I got on with him quite well, you just needed to take cover when he lost his temper. He’s been working at chief exec level now in football for a lot of years too so hugely experienced.bodge wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:50 pmI remember Lee Hoos saying that he had a huge dossier on managers, this will be in place at all serious clubs, so should SD depart then they should already have the criteria in place for a replacement and a preferred list of candidates.
Let's hope we don't need to use it soon.
Re: Nixon again
Yes been at QPR for some time, done well to survive really as a lot of players have gone recently including the family silver Hugill and Eze.
-
- Posts: 67808
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32415 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 308 times
- Has Liked: 350 times
Re: Nixon again
Dyche as said would’ve gone had the right job come up.
I think this is when more info came out about the sale/investment to keep his head focused and placated.
I still think we could lose him to an Aston Villa, Newcastle, Southampton, type role if we don’t get the right package round him soon.
He (rightly) believes he can coach at the top table and will be plotting a way to that table with the path of least resistance.
He is close to getting dubbed the new fat sam and then his path is over. The recent England Squad announcement and the rumours that Southgate doesn’t see the way our players play as compatible with his squad are damaging.
We all know this is pragmatic and in no way limits his practices but to the outside world it’s becoming stereotypical
I think this is when more info came out about the sale/investment to keep his head focused and placated.
I still think we could lose him to an Aston Villa, Newcastle, Southampton, type role if we don’t get the right package round him soon.
He (rightly) believes he can coach at the top table and will be plotting a way to that table with the path of least resistance.
He is close to getting dubbed the new fat sam and then his path is over. The recent England Squad announcement and the rumours that Southgate doesn’t see the way our players play as compatible with his squad are damaging.
We all know this is pragmatic and in no way limits his practices but to the outside world it’s becoming stereotypical
Re: Nixon again
Any more info on the sale/investment Daniel ?
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 13444
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3087 times
- Has Liked: 3808 times
Re: Nixon again
Nixon’s a d***, I’ve decided.
-
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1183 times
- Has Liked: 418 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Nixon again
Only way Dyche will move up the food chain is a move to Spain, Italy or (more likely) Germany.
I fear the ‘team spirit’ employed here won’t work on the continent, though.
I fear the ‘team spirit’ employed here won’t work on the continent, though.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Nixon again
I think that was all agreed and rubber stamped a long time ago.
This user liked this post: Boss Hogg
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
-
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:35 am
- Been Liked: 286 times
- Has Liked: 139 times
Re: Nixon again
With respect, Nixon’s words here succinctly nails our situation to a tee. They could have been uttered by many a contributor of this Board, but we look to him and others in the journalism world to bring us something we don’t know....rather than something we do. The thing about pay is bang on. At few clubs (if any) is the manager better Paid than the top players. And that’s why he should always ‘park’ any frustrations pretty quickly and get on with the job he gets Extremely well paid for.
-
- Posts: 13444
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3087 times
- Has Liked: 3808 times
Re: Nixon again
FactualFrank wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:20 pmI think that was all agreed and rubber stamped a long time ago.
Ignoring him from now on.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 308 times
- Has Liked: 350 times
Re: Nixon again
Nope, not that I would be made aware of. The balls moving/been moved and I think the next we will know in the public domain will be a statement to the markets announcing the investment/sale and the controlling stake details.
How long that takes is a guessing game now...
Did hear we’ve made contact about Phil Jones for a nominal fee...
-
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 514 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Nixon again
He is just massively narcissistic.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:38 pmTony knows him better than I, but adding both his comments and what I've seen of his tweets, he's clearly very much someone who tweets for an ego boost.
This user liked this post: keith1879
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 308 times
- Has Liked: 350 times
Re: Nixon again
Interesting move, I can’t see him stepping out of the safety of the UK with his family etc
-
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 514 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Nixon again
Jesus wept. I really hope that isn't true.Danieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:49 pmNope, not that I would be made aware of. The balls moving/been moved and I think the next we will know in the public domain will be a statement to the markets announcing the investment/sale and the controlling stake details.
How long that takes is a guessing game now...
Did hear we’ve made contact about Phil Jones for a nominal fee...
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 308 times
- Has Liked: 350 times
Re: Nixon again
I don’t think it’s the worst news we’ve had this summer, and not the worst player to be linked to. He’s exposed at United, but in the low block, he would be a wall.
-
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 514 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Nixon again
I really hope this investment that is ongoing will allow us to buy some younger talent.Danieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:53 pmI don’t think it’s the worst news we’ve had this summer, and not the worst player to be linked to. He’s exposed at United, but in the low block, he would be a wall.
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 308 times
- Has Liked: 350 times
Re: Nixon again
We don’t know the investment model yet. I’d think it’d be success in the pitch and THEN build on the already outstanding infrastructure.
I’d take Lingard, Jones and whoever else United are throwing out of their first team squad.
No need to move house, schools, etc, we’re an attractive proposal for players out the back door in the top six!
I’d take Lingard, Jones and whoever else United are throwing out of their first team squad.
No need to move house, schools, etc, we’re an attractive proposal for players out the back door in the top six!
-
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 514 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Nixon again
Surely that depends on the amount of money they would be willing to chuck at it? Is it steady growth just allowing us to buy the regular players that we struggle with at the moment or are we talking big money to radically change the stature of the club?Danieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:02 pmWe don’t know the investment model yet. I’d think it’d be success in the pitch and THEN build on the already outstanding infrastructure.
I’d take Lingard, Jones and whoever else United are throwing out of their first team squad.
No need to move house, schools, etc, we’re an attractive proposal for players out the back door in the top six!
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 308 times
- Has Liked: 350 times
Re: Nixon again
In context: Big MoneySomethingfishy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:05 pmSurely that depends on the amount of money they would be willing to chuck at it? Is it steady growth just allowing us to buy the regular players that we struggle with at the moment or are we talking big money to radically change the stature of the club?
-
- Posts: 7311
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3964 times
Re: Nixon again
I'm not a huge fan of Jones, but I think he would be a good squad player assuming Tarkowski is staying. Jones and Long as cover for Tarks and Mee would make sense. It didn't work bringing a quality younger player in to sit on the bench (Gibson) and we don't really want to be spending another 15 or 20 million on a quality CB who will be sitting on the bench, (unless Mee or Tarks get injured or suspended). A good young CB will expect game time as Gibson - rightly - did, so I wouldn't be opposed to JOnes on a short term deal, and as I recall he has some PL experience as a right back and defensive midfielder too, so he ticks quite a few boxes as a bench player.Danieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:02 pmWe don’t know the investment model yet. I’d think it’d be success in the pitch and THEN build on the already outstanding infrastructure.
I’d take Lingard, Jones and whoever else United are throwing out of their first team squad.
No need to move house, schools, etc, we’re an attractive proposal for players out the back door in the top six!
Re: Nixon again
'Jesus wept. I really hope that isn't true.'
Jesus wept at the death of a friend. Nothing to do with sport.
Jesus wept at the death of a friend. Nothing to do with sport.
This user liked this post: dsr
-
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 514 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Nixon again
Good arguments. I see the merits of signing him a little more but he is quite slow and error prone. Like you say though if it is a short term deal he is experienced back up in a few positions.nil_desperandum wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:13 pmI'm not a huge fan of Jones, but I think he would be a good squad player assuming Tarkowski is staying. Jones and Long as cover for Tarks and Mee would make sense. It didn't work bringing a quality younger player in to sit on the bench (Gibson) and we don't really want to be spending another 15 or 20 million on a quality CB who will be sitting on the bench, (unless Mee or Tarks get injured or suspended). A good young CB will expect game time as Gibson - rightly - did, so I wouldn't be opposed to JOnes on a short term deal, and as I recall he has some PL experience as a right back and defensive midfielder too, so he ticks quite a few boxes as a bench player.
-
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 514 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Nixon again
Jones turns like the QE2,No thanks,not good enough for us!
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 13444
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3087 times
- Has Liked: 3808 times
Re: Nixon again
Think it would be Dyche’s best work to salvage Jones’ career. Not sure if it can be done.
Wouldn’t mind Andreas Pereira, was impressed with his work rate against us. Dalot might be worth a look too.
Wouldn’t mind Andreas Pereira, was impressed with his work rate against us. Dalot might be worth a look too.
Re: Nixon again
You mean this handsome chappieDanieljwaterhouse wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:49 pmNope, not that I would be made aware of. The balls moving/been moved and I think the next we will know in the public domain will be a statement to the markets announcing the investment/sale and the controlling stake details.
How long that takes is a guessing game now...
Did hear we’ve made contact about Phil Jones for a nominal fee...
-
- Posts: 6954
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1487 times
- Has Liked: 1847 times
Re: Nixon again
Jones is complete shite and as for the Lee Hoos love in this is the guy behind the £3.5m fiasco with Kieran Trippiers contract.
Re: Nixon again
Sometimes I see good sense on here ; note sometimes. However.........
-
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1183 times
- Has Liked: 418 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Nixon again
Several? I count 3 One of which who will probably give him a go.
None of Man City, Man U, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool or Tottenham will go near. You can probably throw Everton Wolves And Leeds into that too, with their ownership.
I think we can rule out Brighton, Fulham and West Brom as making a step forwards. Sheffield United too, as they seem to be similar to us. Palace and West Ham are negligible as a forward move and would he risk total control he has here for the potential for a P45 within a year? Flip a coin for Southampton.
Leicester maybe, Newcastle possibly but the fans of both won’t be keen on his football. Villa as a possible sleeping giant but potential for a step backwards.
Re: Nixon again
On Dyche I think he should look at the career of Big Sam. Moved to nominally bigger clubs but soon moved on. Will be best for all concerned if he looks to build his legacy with us.
As for Phil Jones I think he could be an excellent shout. There is a player there... he needs to shift some timber and get away from the glare of Man Utd. Fergie once famously said he could be Utds best ever player. Which has been rightly ridiculed but shows there is something about him.
As for Phil Jones I think he could be an excellent shout. There is a player there... he needs to shift some timber and get away from the glare of Man Utd. Fergie once famously said he could be Utds best ever player. Which has been rightly ridiculed but shows there is something about him.
Re: Nixon again
I’m convinced he’ll be England manager one day. He certainly deserves it more than the goofy, waistcoat wearing idiot currently in charge.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG
Re: Nixon again
Nominal fee for Jones? Not OOC until 2023 so if it is a nominal fee United must want him out. Doubt he would want to move for less money to sit on the bench when he could do that at OT.
Re: Nixon again
You get the feeling Dyche will wake up on the morning of his 65th birthday and think "right, this must be the year I get offered another job". He's great for us but I find it hard to see how another club takes him from us. He'll probably have to leave first and then he'll become a little more attractive as an out of work manager for Prem clubs. At the moment it's all very "you first".
As for Nixon, I'm surprised he's still alive to be honest. Mind you, he's been self isolating since well before it was fashionable.
As for Nixon, I'm surprised he's still alive to be honest. Mind you, he's been self isolating since well before it was fashionable.
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Nixon again
Jones is to defending what Nixon is to accurate journalism
-
- Posts: 14567
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3436 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Nixon again
Lingard is on £100k a week and Jones on a little less.
I'm surprised anyone thinks we'd take them on those wages, unless they willingly took a pay cut and we already know there are other clubs who could easily match those wages.
Jones would probably do well in our set up tbh.
I'm surprised anyone thinks we'd take them on those wages, unless they willingly took a pay cut and we already know there are other clubs who could easily match those wages.
Jones would probably do well in our set up tbh.
Re: Nixon again
What “fiasco” is this then ?Woodleyclaret wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:54 pmJones is complete shite and as for the Lee Hoos love in this is the guy behind the £3.5m fiasco with Kieran Trippiers contract.
You do realise that Trippier was ready to leave for nothing but agreed to stay for another year.
And in addition to getting the significant benefit of another season from what many fans regard as one of the best players to ever put on a Burnley shirt he was also kind enough to put in a buy out clause of £3.5m which meant we sold him for 7 times what we paid for him.
If that’s a Lee Hoos “fiasco” we should be moving heaven and earth to get him back at Burnley !
Re: Nixon again
Nixon also says allardyce hit the same wall 10 years ago and he's rightewanrob wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:37 pmNixon
The budget is clearly limited. Common theme is low offers at home and abroad. First team group is strong. Not much underneath. It is what it is. He would have gone if a big move came on. Once again that hasn’t happened. May have hit own glass ceiling. Mind you he gets paid well
The big six or seven always want a glamour name. It’s a shame. But Dyche on fantastic money so it’s a gold plated fur lined coffin for him
I do wonder where he gets all this
No probs for me though
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:02 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Nixon again
I’d be more than happy for Jones to come here. He’s been a joke figure at Utd for a good while but I think as said above in our solid non expansive back 4 setup he has a chance of looking like a player again.
Is he local? I know he came through at the horse lovers down the road
Is he local? I know he came through at the horse lovers down the road
-
- Posts: 15236
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3156 times
- Has Liked: 6744 times
Re: Nixon again
I can't think of any situation, or tactic,in which we would employ LingardGodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 8:38 pmLingard is on £100k a week and Jones on a little less.
I'm surprised anyone thinks we'd take them on those wages, unless they willingly took a pay cut and we already know there are other clubs who could easily match those wages.
Jones would probably do well in our set up tbh.