Tark - transfer

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Aclaret
Posts: 4141
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:16 pm
Been Liked: 1306 times
Has Liked: 1402 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Aclaret » Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:49 pm

bfccrazy wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:42 pm
The other bit of info I got would send this board and our fan base into meltdown so will keep that away - I don’t know how legit that is though so keeping that quiet for now :lol:
Aww come on BFC, you know this board loves a good old meltdown. :D

bfccrazy
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2103 times
Has Liked: 416 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by bfccrazy » Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:51 pm

Aclaret wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:49 pm
Aww come on BFC, you know this board loves a good old meltdown. :D
Could be nothing but one of our players is telling his cleaners etc to stop popping round as he’s moving out soon.

Don’t know if that’s away somewhere else or still “local”

ClaretTony
Posts: 67783
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32405 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:51 pm

bfccrazy wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:37 pm
He was Sean Dyches man ....
And he spoke about coming back last week in an interview
This user liked this post: Zlatan

Whitgord
Posts: 983
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 250 times
Has Liked: 679 times
Location: Clitheroe

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Whitgord » Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:53 pm

Ooh you tease you bfcc.

bfccrazy
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2103 times
Has Liked: 416 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by bfccrazy » Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:54 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:51 pm
And he spoke about coming back last week in an interview
Aye, but moving forward behind the scenes apparently.

Aclaret
Posts: 4141
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:16 pm
Been Liked: 1306 times
Has Liked: 1402 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Aclaret » Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:55 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:51 pm
And he spoke about coming back last week in an interview
Coaching role or playing ?
Surely could only offer a pay as you play role if he intends to carry on playing.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67783
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32405 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:55 pm

bfccrazy wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:54 pm
Aye, but moving forward behind the scenes apparently.
Only about his badges though - not even considered fit enough to play Belgian football now unfortunately

bfccrazy
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2103 times
Has Liked: 416 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by bfccrazy » Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:56 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:55 pm
Only about his badges though - not even considered fit enough to play Belgian football now unfortunately
That’s good and bad news. I think adding him onto the books on a minimal wage whilst getting his badges could be a good move even if he can pop up to lift the crowd for the last 10/15 mins if needed.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67783
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32405 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:00 pm

bfccrazy wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:56 pm
That’s good and bad news. I think adding him onto the books on a minimal wage whilst getting his badges could be a good move even if he can pop up to lift the crowd for the last 10/15 mins if needed.
Given he’s suffered more injuries since he left, and given how far away he was the last time he played, I would hope not.

He’s not been fit now in over two years. I’d love to see the Defour back who played August 2017 to January 2018 but that’s not going to happen. Don’t think he’s ever been a player either to influence a game as a sub.

MDWat
Posts: 2527
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
Been Liked: 878 times
Has Liked: 271 times
Location: Bradford
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by MDWat » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:01 pm

If we sign Defour back, we’ve completely lost the plot (and I loved him more than anyone). As CT says, he’s been injured for about 2 years.
These 2 users liked this post: BurnleyFC bfccrazy

bfccrazy
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2103 times
Has Liked: 416 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by bfccrazy » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:02 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:00 pm
Given he’s suffered more injuries since he left, and given how far away he was the last time he played, I would hope not.

He’s not been fit now in over two years. I’d love to see the Defour back who played August 2017 to January 2018 but that’s not going to happen. Don’t think he’s ever been a player either to influence a game as a sub.
Fair points, surely it’d be better to have him on the bench though instead of a 17 year old who has no chance of coming on.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5119
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1619 times
Has Liked: 890 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by BurnleyFC » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:03 pm

MDWat wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:01 pm
If we sign Defour back, we’ve completely lost the plot (and I loved him more than anyone). As CT says, he’s been injured for about 2 years.
If we’re relying on Defour from a playing perspective, then our whole scouting network should be sent to the job centre.
These 2 users liked this post: bfccrazy Woodleyclaret

ashtonlongsider
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 162 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by ashtonlongsider » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:05 pm

Don't normally like commenting on transfer activity. However if the story comes via John Percy it's usually got 'legs'. It wouldn't surprise me if Tarks went but I'd be very surprised if it's to East London.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67783
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32405 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:06 pm

bfccrazy wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:02 pm
Fair points, surely it’d be better to have him on the bench though instead of a 17 year old who has no chance of coming on.
No. Because he’s not fit to play.

NewClaret
Posts: 13438
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 3808 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by NewClaret » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:06 pm

ashtonlongsider wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:05 pm
Don't normally like commenting on transfer activity. However if the story comes via John Percy it's usually got 'legs'. It wouldn't surprise me if Tarks went but I'd be very surprised if it's to East London.
Bidding war incoming, sadly. :(

agreenwood
Posts: 3145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1739 times
Has Liked: 271 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by agreenwood » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:14 pm

Two things.

Losing key players before we’ve even plugged any of the serious gaps in the squad would be horrendous.

Tarkowski is the only senior centre half we have who looks likely to be fit for the early games of the season.

In short, losing him would be a disaster.
These 2 users liked this post: NewClaret burnleymik

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10310
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3337 times
Has Liked: 1954 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:16 pm

I’ll be worried if he doesn’t play tomorrow.

burnleymik
Posts: 5117
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1171 times
Has Liked: 2916 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by burnleymik » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:19 pm

20 Mill? Surely that doesn't buy one of Tarky's legs! Consider the value of Maguire and Tarky is a far better player all round. The add must have been huge.

NewClaret
Posts: 13438
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 3808 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by NewClaret » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:19 pm

agreenwood wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:14 pm
Two things.

Losing key players before we’ve even plugged any of the serious gaps in the squad would be horrendous.

Tarkowski is the only senior centre half we have who looks likely to be fit for the early games of the season.

In short, losing him would be a disaster.
This transfer window is becoming a joke.

Only serious speculation for weeks has been around Gibson. We’ve lost 3 players in an arguably understrength squad and clearly have no replacements lined up. Our only link is a Championship centre back & now our best centre back is subject to a bid from a direct rival/club below us.

TsarBomba
Posts: 1631
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1142 times
Has Liked: 292 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by TsarBomba » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:28 pm

Would we let Gibson leave knowing that there’s a chance Tarks is off too?

Or was the Gibson situation so far down the road that he was getting moved on regardless?

joey13
Posts: 7505
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 1230 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by joey13 » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:57 pm

Tarks and Pope leave ,we get relegated simple as that ,and why would they want to stay when their manager made it clear he didn’t want to

bfccrazy
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2103 times
Has Liked: 416 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by bfccrazy » Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:58 pm

joey13 wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:57 pm
Tarks and Pope leave ,we get relegated simple as that ,and why would they want to stay when their manager made it clear he didn’t want to
Was apparently Pope who told some of his “staff” that he’s moving. Not sure how true it is though or if he is moving to a different house in same area.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5787
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1882 times
Has Liked: 840 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:03 pm

bfccrazy wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:58 pm
Was apparently Pope who told some of his “staff” that he’s moving. Not sure how true it is though or if he is moving to a different house in same area.
You have a lot of inside info! Nick Pope and his bloody ‘staff’!

bfccrazy
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2103 times
Has Liked: 416 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by bfccrazy » Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:07 pm

Steve-Harpers-perm wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:03 pm
You have a lot of inside info! Nick Pope and his bloody ‘staff’!
I just guess a lot mate apparently :? :?

Guess correctly quite a bit, but it’s all just guesses......... honestly :lol:

bfccrazy
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2103 times
Has Liked: 416 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by bfccrazy » Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:30 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:29 pm
Maybe not then, my lad is older - and doesn’t play anymore
Fulledge, Turf Tigers/Belvedere and Barrowford he’s played for over the years.

Zlatan
Posts: 5458
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2229 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Zlatan » Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:35 pm

bfccrazy wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:30 pm
Fulledge, Turf Tigers/Belvedere and Barrowford he’s played for over the years.
Brierfield Celtic and Barrowford for my lad, he’s 20 now though, and it was 10 years back

jurek
Posts: 1793
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:38 pm
Been Liked: 309 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by jurek » Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:40 pm

Apparently West HAm have tabled a bid of 20m + add ons for Tarks.
I think we've turned it down but they may come back with another offer?

https://sportslens.com/report-west-ham- ... ki/311751/

As others have said we can't afford to lose .
Even if the offer was up to 40m.

superdimitri
Posts: 4955
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1007 times
Has Liked: 725 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by superdimitri » Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:43 pm

jurek wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:40 pm
Apparently West HAm have tabled a bid of 20m + add ons for Tarks.
I think we've turned it down but they may come back with another offer?

https://sportslens.com/report-west-ham- ... ki/311751/

As others have said we can't afford to lose .
Even if the offer was up to 40m.
Already posted in this thread:
claretandy wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:11 pm
West Ham taking the pi$$ with a 20m bid rejected.

https://twitter.com/JPercyTelegraph/sta ... 1423267840

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by MACCA » Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:44 pm

Alfie Mawson is linked with Bristol city
We were after him 2 years ago, cheap and has some PL experience.
Certainly an age where he can develope

Paul Waine
Posts: 9902
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2350 times
Has Liked: 3178 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Paul Waine » Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:11 pm

Wembley09 wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 8:22 pm
Was reading an article just last month about Gray, and how we got a great deal selling him to Watford.

Burnley got tremendous value from Andre Gray and made a huge profit on selling him

Burnley signed Gray for what was then a club record £9m from Brentford back in 2015 (as per BBC), a move which worked wonders for him and the Clarets. They more than doubled their money on him with the sale to Watford, for whom he has scored just 16 times in 94 appearances – less than half of his 33-goal tally at Turf Moor inside 78 games at the Lancashire club.


https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/ ... fit-value/
Whoever wrote that report missed all the stuff put into the public domain by Luton. They were the club that sold Gray to Brentford. Luton reported both their cut of the transfer fee that Brentford received when Gray moved to Burnley and their share of the transfer fee received by Burnley when Gray moved to Watford. So, the "tremendous value" and "huge profit" was I think 25% lower than claimed.

Still decent business.

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4293
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1600 times
Has Liked: 679 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by LoveCurryPies » Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:31 pm

Why would Tarkowski want to join West Ham? 🤔

If the club sell him for £20m they are crazy.

COBBLE
Posts: 1382
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:04 am
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 472 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by COBBLE » Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:40 pm

The club will sell him if the income covers a replacement and generates a surplus to balance the books. Tarks may have moved to the point where he has reached max value. He should be sold. That's the only business model that works for BFC if we want to remain effectively a community club. In this case it should be easy to slot a replacement in to our defensive model.

Alternative we sell the club to investors.

Same with Pope and Dwight.

Life doesn't stop moving on.

CFS
Posts: 1848
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:46 am
Been Liked: 231 times
Has Liked: 113 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by CFS » Sat Sep 05, 2020 12:15 am

But we have a month left in the window everyone says........

CFS
Posts: 1848
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:46 am
Been Liked: 231 times
Has Liked: 113 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by CFS » Sat Sep 05, 2020 12:19 am

bfccrazy wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:58 pm
Was apparently Pope who told some of his “staff” that he’s moving. Not sure how true it is though or if he is moving to a different house in same area.
It's ok according to some because we've got northern Ireland's no.1 ready to break PL records.

ecc
Posts: 4234
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 1407 times
Has Liked: 1278 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by ecc » Sat Sep 05, 2020 12:19 am

£20 million is a bloody huge insult.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30626
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11034 times
Has Liked: 5645 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Sep 05, 2020 12:44 am

ecc wrote:
Sat Sep 05, 2020 12:19 am
£20 million is a bloody huge insult.
it's the exact same thing that we do when bidding for players.

Chester Perry
Posts: 19370
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3153 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Chester Perry » Sat Sep 05, 2020 1:15 am

ecc wrote:
Sat Sep 05, 2020 12:19 am
£20 million is a bloody huge insult.
It goes back to the repeated misunderstanding of what Garlick said in April, which is still widely shared by Burnley fans never mind anyone else. People think we are broke, we are most definitely not broke.

Garlick's nightmare scenario was based on no more football through to now and no sign of when football would start again from now, it was forged on the understanding of what our contractual/obligated outgoings were in that timeframe and where our financial situation would be if no monies were coming in because on no football being played and no sign of it being played in the near future - that has very clearly not happened. It also quite clearly indicated that we had £50m in cash at the point of lockdown.

If the reports are to be believed that the Premier League are to pay in full last season's distribution then we have just come off the back of a season were we likely recorded record revenues, due to increased TV monies - if that is the case then the season itself will likely have generated a profit and a cash uplift - the news of the PPTV deal may change that.

Many will read this and think we have money to spend, we will have some, but our board will be looking down the track at reduced TV monies over multiple seasons whether in the Premier League or on Parachute payments (a result of rebates etc), likely challenges on the commercial front with probable reductions in a number of areas, and minimal income from matchday - our traditional compact ground is not well equipped for social distancing.

The board will oversee the necessary adjustments to ensure our club withstands the financial hazards of the coming seasons and seek to keep us free from debt and in robust health. Unfortunately the reward for being the only club in the country not needing to ask the owners or lenders for money during this crisis is continued prudence and of course the existence of our treasured club
These 3 users liked this post: Vegas Claret longsidepies Paul Waine

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6952
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1486 times
Has Liked: 1847 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:58 am

BPF mom for Northern Ireland last night v Romania, with string of superb saves
Clearly a keeper on the up.
I dont understand while some feel because hes our player he cant be very good.
This user liked this post: JohnMac

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30626
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11034 times
Has Liked: 5645 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Sep 05, 2020 4:29 am

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:58 am
BPF mom for Northern Ireland last night v Romania, with string of superb saves
Clearly a keeper on the up.
I dont understand while some feel because hes our player he cant be very good.
some of us are still haunted by Joe Neenan and Mark Kendall, we need time :D
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

BenWickes
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:27 pm
Been Liked: 645 times
Has Liked: 470 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by BenWickes » Sat Sep 05, 2020 5:44 am

Even if West Ham met the release clause. Tarkowski would be mad to go to West Ham. Car crash of a club on and off the pitch. He'd not be enhancing his chances of an England call up in a team who regularly bobs along towards the bottom end of the table and just don't seem capable of building a team capable of any consistency. They've long been a group of individuals on the field as opposed to a 'team' with no real identity, cohesion or solid plan. He'll have been poorly advised or just plain blinkered if he chose to go there. More chance of a Europa League spot with us than them.
This user liked this post: Quicknick

scouseclaret
Posts: 2601
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by scouseclaret » Sat Sep 05, 2020 6:20 am

bfccrazy wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2020 9:58 pm
Was apparently Pope who told some of his “staff” that he’s moving. Not sure how true it is though or if he is moving to a different house in same area.
With BPF looking decent, Norris just signed and Jensen in reserve, if we are going to sell one of the Crown Jewels it would make far more sense for it to be Pope than Tarkowski.

BenWickes
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:27 pm
Been Liked: 645 times
Has Liked: 470 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by BenWickes » Sat Sep 05, 2020 6:41 am

CFS wrote:
Sat Sep 05, 2020 12:19 am
It's ok according to some because we've got northern Ireland's no.1 ready to break PL records.
Yet another MOM performance last night. You'd do well to remember Heaton and Pope both joined us from clubs relegated from the Championship and both went on to play for England.
These 2 users liked this post: wilks_bfc bobinho

JohnDearyMe
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
Been Liked: 667 times
Has Liked: 2048 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by JohnDearyMe » Sat Sep 05, 2020 7:21 am

BenWickes wrote:
Sat Sep 05, 2020 5:44 am
Even if West Ham met the release clause. Tarkowski would be mad to go to West Ham. Car crash of a club on and off the pitch. He'd not be enhancing his chances of an England call up in a team who regularly bobs along towards the bottom end of the table and just don't seem capable of building a team capable of any consistency. They've long been a group of individuals on the field as opposed to a 'team' with no real identity, cohesion or solid plan. He'll have been poorly advised or just plain blinkered if he chose to go there. More chance of a Europa League spot with us than them.
Not quite sure of the backstory to it but Mark Noble has just publicly criticised the club for selling a young player to West Brom. As you say they are a club in turmoil

FeedTheArf
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 348 times
Has Liked: 150 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by FeedTheArf » Sat Sep 05, 2020 7:26 am

JohnDearyMe wrote:
Sat Sep 05, 2020 7:21 am
Not quite sure of the backstory to it but Mark Noble has just publicly criticised the club for selling a young player to West Brom. As you say they are a club in turmoil
And more than that, it wouldn’t surprise me if this low ball Tarky bid was just to distract from them selling one of their upcoming stars. A “show of ambition” to demonstrate they are trying to bring players in when realistically there’s no way that it’ll be accepted.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6952
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1486 times
Has Liked: 1847 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sat Sep 05, 2020 8:15 am

Tarks moved North to be nearer to family
Why join one of the relegation candidates which is further away than his previous club
Brentford
£50m minimum price and we needs a hands off statement from Mike on Monday to reiterate hes not for sale.

Firthy
Posts: 4978
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 1613 times
Has Liked: 275 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Firthy » Sat Sep 05, 2020 8:20 am

Still not convinced the bid was actually made especially with it being common knowledge about Tarks £50m release clause. Anyway why would he want to join a struggling club who almost got relegated and lost twice to us last season.

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3181 times
Has Liked: 1865 times
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by wilks_bfc » Sat Sep 05, 2020 8:26 am

Firthy wrote:
Sat Sep 05, 2020 8:20 am
Still not convinced the bid was actually made especially with it being common knowledge about Tarks £50m release clause. Anyway why would he want to join a struggling club who almost got relegated and lost twice to us last season.
I think the £50m release was only for any north west clubs making an offer

bobinho
Posts: 9296
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4094 times
Has Liked: 6570 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by bobinho » Sat Sep 05, 2020 8:36 am

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sat Sep 05, 2020 12:44 am
it's the exact same thing that we do when bidding for players.
Exactly. And if we value outgoing players using the same formula as for our targets, then that figure would be damn close to getting accepted. :shock:

bobinho
Posts: 9296
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4094 times
Has Liked: 6570 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by bobinho » Sat Sep 05, 2020 8:38 am

Firthy wrote:
Sat Sep 05, 2020 8:20 am
Still not convinced the bid was actually made especially with it being common knowledge about Tarks £50m release clause. Anyway why would he want to join a struggling club who almost got relegated and lost twice to us last season.
Because despite the fact we were better than them last season, they are by far a bigger club with a better chance of long term PL success than us.

Zlatan
Posts: 5458
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2229 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Zlatan » Sat Sep 05, 2020 8:49 am

bobinho wrote:
Sat Sep 05, 2020 8:38 am
Because despite the fact we were better than them last season, they are by far a bigger club with a better chance of long term PL success than us.
Not that old chestnut...

Oh I forget West Ham won the World Cup...

Locked