Tark - transfer

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Locked
tim_noone
Posts: 14863
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 3822 times
Has Liked: 13195 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by tim_noone » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:09 am

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:46 pm
Tarkowski was in Spurs’s box attacking a free kick when Son collected the ball. At no point was he between Son and our goal.
I may be mistaken but Tarkowski was the nearest man to son when he started his run......he should have put him firmly on his Ars€!!

tarkys_ears
Posts: 1192
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 276 times
Has Liked: 284 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by tarkys_ears » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:10 am

UTCSte wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:14 pm
Dyche lying about Tarky being in training today?
Look on the instagram account, the same stuff they're wearing on a diff pic was posted 21 weeks ago - duno when that was - don't care.

tarkys_ears
Posts: 1192
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 276 times
Has Liked: 284 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by tarkys_ears » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:12 am

tarkys_ears wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:10 am
Look on the instagram account, the same stuff they're wearing on a diff pic was posted 21 weeks ago - duno when that was - don't care.
Either that or 21 weeks later he still hasn't had the holes in his jeans sewed up - bless him. I know what it's like, I was 7 once!

superdimitri
Posts: 1753
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 313 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by superdimitri » Wed Sep 23, 2020 1:14 am

daveisaclaret wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:50 pm
Are you searching Twitter for an Instagram account?
So I was, stupid me. Although to be fair I don't use either.

Just checked on instagram and there's no way to download the original photo to get the timestamps. Hey at least I tried :lol:

BenWickes
Posts: 1210
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:27 pm
Been Liked: 319 times
Has Liked: 311 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by BenWickes » Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:54 am

Apart from the fact there's no way Dyche would sanction such a trip during the season and a global pandemic. You have to wonder if we're lying about his injury if true. Looks like he's got an ouchie on his knee. Poor fella's torn his jeans and everything.

Rileybobs
Posts: 8564
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 3537 times
Has Liked: 812 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:46 am

tim_noone wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:09 am
I may be mistaken but Tarkowski was the nearest man to son when he started his run......he should have put him firmly on his Ars€!!
I think you may be using hindsight to your advantage claiming that Tarkowski should have taken Son down 90 yards from our goal when he had about 5 Burnley players between him and the ball.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 6918
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 2228 times
Has Liked: 1273 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:52 am

Oshkoshclaret wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:12 pm
Definite trolling. They’re both wearing exactly the same gear as a photo she posted in April.
Don’t ruin it for them!

tim_noone
Posts: 14863
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 3822 times
Has Liked: 13195 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by tim_noone » Wed Sep 23, 2020 10:23 am

Rileybobs wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:46 am
I think you may be using hindsight to your advantage claiming that Tarkowski should have taken Son down 90 yards from our goal when he had about 5 Burnley players between him and the ball.
Yes.....that's exactly what I saw on the day. I cant name the other 5....

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 7018
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 2325 times
Has Liked: 1387 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Wile E Coyote » Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:40 am

west ham sounds THE most toxic of environments to go judging by the radio this morning.
simon jordan and fans bemoaning the fact they should pay burnleys asking price for an older player who isnt worth it.
one bubbleheaded clown even added "we should be above teams like Burnley" as if that was relevant.
the owners inevitably getting tons of stick, but it doesn't seem to be a nice place in any respect.

karatekid
Posts: 2108
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 794 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by karatekid » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:05 pm

Taken from sky sports


SULLIVAN ‘DEPRESSED’ BY WEST HAM TRANSFERS

David Sullivan has defended West Ham's lack of transfer activity after all but ruling out a renewed move for James Tarkowski.

Burnley have turned down two bids for centre-half Tarkowski, who turns 28 in November, and the cash-strapped Hammers are now looking elsewhere for defensive reinforcements.

"We've got two or three bids in, but the benchmark is very high,” co-owner Sullivan told talkSPORT. "We've got limited funds.

“If we had £400m to spend and someone said spend 10 per cent of it, £40m, on a 28-year-old centre-back from a Premier League club who will remain nameless, you'd probably get the player out.

“But to spend your entire budget on a 28-year-old centre-back, you're struggling. We're going to get no gate money, possibly all season. We've got to keep the club afloat and pay the wages.

"I can't go and sign two or three players the manager (David Moyes) doesn't want or we'd have a civil war at West Ham because I don't pick the players. Our manager is a manager, not a coach.

"I cannot say for sure we are going to sign anybody, and as each day passes, I get more depressed. There's no point saying otherwise. We'll go a little bit more, but we can't pay double what you value a player at. We haven't got the money; the club would go bankrupt. These are difficult times."

Burnley Ace
Posts: 1920
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 361 times
Has Liked: 1563 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Burnley Ace » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:06 pm

Think WH might be getting old feet. Sullivan was downbeat and the increased concerns that there will be no fans, further reduction in TV payments etc could scupper some big spending

summitclaret
Posts: 2898
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 541 times
Has Liked: 909 times
Location: burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by summitclaret » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:15 pm

karatekid wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:05 pm
Taken from sky sports


SULLIVAN ‘DEPRESSED’ BY WEST HAM TRANSFERS

David Sullivan has defended West Ham's lack of transfer activity after all but ruling out a renewed move for James Tarkowski.

Burnley have turned down two bids for centre-half Tarkowski, who turns 28 in November, and the cash-strapped Hammers are now looking elsewhere for defensive reinforcements.

"We've got two or three bids in, but the benchmark is very high,” co-owner Sullivan told talkSPORT. "We've got limited funds.

“If we had £400m to spend and someone said spend 10 per cent of it, £40m, on a 28-year-old centre-back from a Premier League club who will remain nameless, you'd probably get the player out.

“But to spend your entire budget on a 28-year-old centre-back, you're struggling. We're going to get no gate money, possibly all season. We've got to keep the club afloat and pay the wages.

"I can't go and sign two or three players the manager (David Moyes) doesn't want or we'd have a civil war at West Ham because I don't pick the players. Our manager is a manager, not a coach.

"I cannot say for sure we are going to sign anybody, and as each day passes, I get more depressed. There's no point saying otherwise. We'll go a little bit more, but we can't pay double what you value a player at. We haven't got the money; the club would go bankrupt. These are difficult times."
And there we have reality setting in, now we know fans are likely to be out all season. We must keep Tarks now and we will finish above West Ham for starters. We can sell him for much more when a vaccine is available next year, fingers crossed.

dermotdermot
Posts: 2306
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 446 times
Has Liked: 181 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by dermotdermot » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:16 pm

He’s in the squad tonight irrespective of anything that might or might not happen.

Stalbansclaret
Posts: 1354
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
Been Liked: 1005 times
Has Liked: 1378 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Stalbansclaret » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:19 pm

summitclaret wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:15 pm
And there we have reality setting in, now we know fans are likely to be out all season. We must keep Tarks now and we will finish above West Ham for starters. We can sell him for much more when a vaccine is available next year, fingers crossed.
Leaving aside our own need to retain Tarks I would never sell him to West Ham purely because I could not stomach the thought of that making Sullivan happier.

Paul Waine
Posts: 6521
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 1518 times
Has Liked: 1882 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Paul Waine » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:31 pm

Chairman of a Premier League team made the following statement:

“If we had £XXm to spend and someone said spend X per cent of it, £Xm, on XXXXX from a Premier League club, you'd probably get the player out.

“But to spend your entire budget on XXXXX, you're struggling. We're going to get no gate money, possibly all season. We've got to keep the club afloat and pay the wages.


Remove the specifics about £400m, £40m and 28 years old and it could, no should, be a statement that every Chairman is making about football finances across all Premier League clubs. Maybe, Mike Garlick has already had this conversation at Burnley.

UTC
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

RingoMcCartney
Posts: 9662
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 2341 times
Has Liked: 2549 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by RingoMcCartney » Wed Sep 23, 2020 1:35 pm

One of the jewels in the crown is Tarks. Hope he stays put.

AshevilleNCClaret
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:24 pm
Been Liked: 145 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by AshevilleNCClaret » Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:56 pm

well.. west Ham just bid for Fofana....

https://sportslens.com/report-west-ham- ... na/315168/

wilks_bfc
Posts: 6221
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 1825 times
Has Liked: 928 times
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by wilks_bfc » Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:03 pm

An hour to go before we find out

If he’s “fit” I can’t see him playing tonight if a move was imminent

BenWickes
Posts: 1210
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:27 pm
Been Liked: 319 times
Has Liked: 311 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by BenWickes » Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:09 pm

As stated above. West Ham have joined Leicester in deciding to go for Fofana instead. Neither club prepared to go to what we want.

Bosscat
Posts: 10545
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3270 times
Has Liked: 8056 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Bosscat » Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:14 pm

AshevilleNCClaret wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:56 pm
well.. west Ham just bid for Fofana....

https://sportslens.com/report-west-ham- ... na/315168/
For Fofana sounds like a sneeze (or the Scottish Football results)🤔🤔🤔
This user liked this post: FactualFrank

Taffy on the wing
Posts: 1172
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
Been Liked: 274 times
Has Liked: 1019 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Taffy on the wing » Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:16 pm

That's just fine by me!...........great player to have.

Gordaleman
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 535 times
Has Liked: 434 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Gordaleman » Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:16 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:03 pm
An hour to go before we find out

If he’s “fit” I can’t see him playing tonight if a move was imminent
Well, they might play him to send a signal to a potential buyer that he's only for sale at the right price?

claret2018
Posts: 545
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 221 times
Has Liked: 6 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by claret2018 » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:01 pm

Oh well. Bye Tarks

Vegas Claret
Posts: 17234
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 5571 times
Has Liked: 2674 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:03 pm

bugger

kaptin1
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 393 times
Has Liked: 105 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by kaptin1 » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:15 pm

“Manchester United have taken an interest to Burnley’s James Tarkowksi and see him as an ideal replacement for Chris Smalling. No contact with agent or club yet but he’s on the list.“ Tweet from a Premier League ITK.

Gordaleman
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 535 times
Has Liked: 434 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Gordaleman » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:15 pm

You know, maybe he's just injured? Why do people always assume the worst?
These 2 users liked this post: Leisure Burnleyareback2

boatshed bill
Posts: 6432
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 1334 times
Has Liked: 2884 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:18 pm

BenWickes wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:09 pm
As stated above. West Ham have joined Leicester in deciding to go for Fofana instead. Neither club prepared to go to what we want.
Leicester surely the better club for this lad. They really do scout well, buy cheapish and make a fortune.

Zlatan
Posts: 2320
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 813 times
Has Liked: 2018 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Zlatan » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:18 pm

kaptin1 wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:15 pm
“Manchester United have taken an interest to Burnley’s James Tarkowksi and see him as an ideal replacement for Chris Smalling. No contact with agent or club yet but he’s on the list.“ Tweet from a Premier League ITK.
For info - thats an attention whore account, not a real one ;)

Leisure
Posts: 9961
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 1648 times
Has Liked: 5338 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Leisure » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:20 pm

Gordaleman wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:15 pm
You know, maybe he's just injured? Why do people always assume the worst?
Fingers crossed! 🤞🤞🤞

ClaretTony
Posts: 40178
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 18106 times
Has Liked: 3357 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by ClaretTony » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:20 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:18 pm
Leicester surely the better club for this lad. They really do scout well, buy cheapish and make a fortune.
I don't believe that Leicester have shown any interest

BenWickes
Posts: 1210
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:27 pm
Been Liked: 319 times
Has Liked: 311 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by BenWickes » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:21 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:18 pm
Leicester surely the better club for this lad. They really do scout well, buy cheapish and make a fortune.
They do scout well. Apparently he had a good game against PSG the other week. They're no slouches. Half the price of Tarks and sell on to Chelsea for double/triple.

Leisure
Posts: 9961
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 1648 times
Has Liked: 5338 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Leisure » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:22 pm

If he's not 100 % fit why play him?

Tall Paul
Posts: 5788
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2117 times
Has Liked: 517 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Tall Paul » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:23 pm

Pope's not in the squad either.

Does that mean he's going as well?

kaptin1
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 393 times
Has Liked: 105 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by kaptin1 » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:24 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:18 pm
For info - thats an attention whore account, not a real one ;)
I like the idea of being an attention whore
This user liked this post: Zlatan

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 3646
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1186 times
Has Liked: 508 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:25 pm

Why on earth would we risk playing him tonight?
This user liked this post: FactualFrank

Zlatan
Posts: 2320
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 813 times
Has Liked: 2018 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Zlatan » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:25 pm

kaptin1 wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:24 pm
I like the idea of being an attention whore
ask Ringo, he'll tell you all about it ;)

FactualFrank
Posts: 23220
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6270 times
Has Liked: 10605 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by FactualFrank » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:27 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:25 pm
ask Ringo, he'll tell you all about it ;)
Meow! :)
This user liked this post: Zlatan

NewClaret
Posts: 2134
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 384 times
Has Liked: 338 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by NewClaret » Wed Sep 23, 2020 10:58 pm

Dyche very coy about Tarks post-match: “Tarks not available, injured”. Nothing more.

That’s it, he’s off sadly.

ClaretTony
Posts: 40178
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 18106 times
Has Liked: 3357 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by ClaretTony » Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:06 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 10:58 pm
Dyche very coy about Tarks post-match: “Tarks not available, injured”. Nothing more.

That’s it, he’s off sadly.
Not sure where given no one has made an offer

Tall Paul
Posts: 5788
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2117 times
Has Liked: 517 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Tall Paul » Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:08 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 10:58 pm
Dyche very coy about Tarks post-match: “Tarks not available, injured”. Nothing more.

That’s it, he’s off sadly.
Either that or he's injured.

NewClaret
Posts: 2134
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 384 times
Has Liked: 338 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by NewClaret » Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:31 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:06 pm
Not sure where given no one has made an offer
West Ham?

ClaretTony
Posts: 40178
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 18106 times
Has Liked: 3357 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by ClaretTony » Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:33 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:31 pm
West Ham?
Yes they did, they made two offers some time ago, both were rejected and they haven't come back despite SSN suggesting they had.

BennyD
Posts: 3364
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 652 times
Location: Nantwich

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by BennyD » Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:57 pm

Who in their right mind would go to a rolling crash like West Ham? If he’s off, it’ll be to a Manchester club.
These 2 users liked this post: Danieljwaterhouse NewClaret

NewClaret
Posts: 2134
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 384 times
Has Liked: 338 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by NewClaret » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:54 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:33 pm
Yes they did, they made two offers some time ago, both were rejected and they haven't come back despite SSN suggesting they had.
I just find it so odd that a player who didn’t miss a game last year has got a toe injury from wearing a new pair of boots. Sounds implausible to me, even without the transfer speculation.

Zlatan
Posts: 2320
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 813 times
Has Liked: 2018 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Zlatan » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:58 am

What I don’t like is the media whoring him out to “big” clubs all the time - “surely Man Utd should make a move for Tarkowski” or “Leicester are still to make a move for him” I keep hearing snippets whilst listening to Sky Sports news etc, they have zero respect for our club as far as I can see

tiger76
Posts: 9891
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 1588 times
Has Liked: 3149 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by tiger76 » Thu Sep 24, 2020 11:06 am

It sounds more hopeful that we might be able to hold onto Tarks this window, however in the event that he goes, it's too be hoped we've got a ready-made replacement (Dawson?) in the works, we can't afford to play Kev Long for a full PL season I'm afraid, he's wholehearted but he's just not up to this level on a regular basis.

Spijed
Posts: 12093
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2080 times
Has Liked: 900 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Spijed » Thu Sep 24, 2020 1:32 pm

From Nixon:

Forest. Burnley. Worrall won’t be going anywhere in a hurry. Foot injury. 5-6 week lay off.

martin_p
Posts: 7558
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 2459 times
Has Liked: 519 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by martin_p » Thu Sep 24, 2020 1:35 pm

Spijed wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 1:32 pm
From Nixon:

Forest. Burnley. Worrall won’t be going anywhere in a hurry. Foot injury. 5-6 week lay off.
So not content with losing a player to injury every match this season even players mentioned in the same breath as Burnley are getting injured!
These 3 users liked this post: FactualFrank Red Fox Rocks Socks summitclaret

summitclaret
Posts: 2898
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 541 times
Has Liked: 909 times
Location: burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by summitclaret » Thu Sep 24, 2020 1:45 pm

martin_p wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 1:35 pm
So not content with losing a player to injury every match this season even players mentioned in the same breath as Burnley are getting injured!
We have bid for Ings. 🙂

summitclaret
Posts: 2898
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 541 times
Has Liked: 909 times
Location: burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by summitclaret » Thu Sep 24, 2020 1:46 pm

BennyD wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:57 pm
Who in their right mind would go to a rolling crash like West Ham? If he’s off, it’ll be to a Manchester club.
£40m and we get Jones for free should sort it.

Locked