Burnley v Lowerhouse
-
- Posts: 18095
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3874 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
A lot of abuse aimed at Burnley CC on here.
If they are still paying a pro I don't see what's wrong with charging. If there's no pro's on show then no entry fee.
They're a very quiet club. Just get on with winning stuff and not saying much on social media.
If they are still paying a pro I don't see what's wrong with charging. If there's no pro's on show then no entry fee.
They're a very quiet club. Just get on with winning stuff and not saying much on social media.
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Each to their own I suppose but to my knowledge they are the only club to charge anything this year. I think they charged reduced entry in their game against Rammy but full price today. Wonder why?
Also in my opinion it’s counter productive for a game like today. Get folk in the door then worry about that you can take off them.
Also in my opinion it’s counter productive for a game like today. Get folk in the door then worry about that you can take off them.
This user liked this post: Somethingfishy
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 515 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Fair comment on the pro situation. The club itself is quiet..not so sure about their few supporters.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:32 pmA lot of abuse aimed at Burnley CC on here.
If they are still paying a pro I don't see what's wrong with charging. If there's no pro's on show then no entry fee.
They're a very quiet club. Just get on with winning stuff and not saying much on social media.
-
- Posts: 18095
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3874 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
The charging on the door has always been to get away fans as home fans generally are members.arise_sir_charge wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:36 pmEach to their own I suppose but to my knowledge they are the only club to charge anything this year. I think they charged reduced entry in their game against Rammy but full price today. Wonder why?
Also in my opinion it’s counter productive for a game like today. Get folk in the door then worry about that you can take off them.
We hardly ever charge at Padiham but you get a lot more people in that use the bar facilities.
-
- Posts: 4486
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
- Been Liked: 990 times
- Has Liked: 3266 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
I am not complaining as a pint of bitter was only a quid today.
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
It’s strange how people always hate on successful sports teams ! Campiones
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:32 pmA lot of abuse aimed at Burnley CC on here.
If they are still paying a pro I don't see what's wrong with charging. If there's no pro's on show then no entry fee.
They're a very quiet club. Just get on with winning stuff and not saying much on social media.
Probably a good job, town isn't big enough for 2 lairy clubs
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
"Hate On" one of the Americanisms that has crept into everyday use in this country. To be honest there has never been much love lost between the two clubs be they successful, good, bad or indifferent.
As for lairy, if promoting your club and seeking to maximise every opportunity to generate interest and support is considered lairy, then I'm all for it.
After all, people always 'hate on' successful sports teams.
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
As proven with the dummies being spat out after this weekends results. Again.
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Are you serious?Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:44 amAs proven with the dummies being spat out after this weekends results. Again.
A valid complaint about charging for a friendly, which had manifested well before the result was known either way, is classed as "dummy spitting".
The complaint would have been equally valid whether the game was won or lost.
-
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 5:46 pm
- Been Liked: 412 times
- Has Liked: 87 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Always a excuse. Yesterday it was oh you've got a pro etc. The same pro you let go. Now its the gate mans fault for daring to charge you to get on
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Let's be honest, the reigning champs, armed with a pro, should beat a team of amateurs. That's not sour grapes in anyway, it's a simple fact. I'd be very disappointed if the boot was on the other foot and Lowerhouse armed with a pro had not beaten a team of amateurs.
By the way Lowerhouse had the option to go and get a sub pro for yesterday if they wished but they chose not to.
Maybe people should give some credit to Lowerhouse for entering a T20 comp in which they exclusively played teams with pro's. There weren't any other takers I notice.
Also, for the sake of clarity, I am fairly certain that the gate man had no affect on the result.
By the way Lowerhouse had the option to go and get a sub pro for yesterday if they wished but they chose not to.
Maybe people should give some credit to Lowerhouse for entering a T20 comp in which they exclusively played teams with pro's. There weren't any other takers I notice.
Also, for the sake of clarity, I am fairly certain that the gate man had no affect on the result.
This user liked this post: Somethingfishy
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 515 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Can only be Burnley. Bring up genuine complaints...which have still to be explained..and all we get back is we are dummy spitting. Classless as usual from the Burnley lot.
Interesting to see how they cope with little to no car park receipts this season. Maybe that's why they charged. Doubt the paltry crowd will get them by..even when charging.
Interesting to see how they cope with little to no car park receipts this season. Maybe that's why they charged. Doubt the paltry crowd will get them by..even when charging.
-
- Posts: 18095
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3874 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Genuine question- Are you still paying annual subs at Lowerhouse?Somethingfishy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:20 amCan only be Burnley. Bring up genuine complaints...which have still to be explained..and all we get back is we are dummy spitting. Classless as usual from the Burnley lot.
Interesting to see how they cope with little to no car park receipts this season. Maybe that's why they charged. Doubt the paltry crowd will get them by..even when charging.
Just asking, as if your not, how do our local clubs survive? If gates aren't being charged?
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
-
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2020 5:26 pm
- Been Liked: 193 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Who cares about burnley and winginghouse upthecolne
-
- Posts: 7406
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2310 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Obviously yourself as you've clicked on a thread with both their names in the title.Longsidelenny1882 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:47 amWho cares about burnley and winginghouse upthecolne
-
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 5:46 pm
- Been Liked: 412 times
- Has Liked: 87 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Who would have thought a freindly could descend into this.
Looking forward to next season already
Looking forward to next season already
-
- Posts: 7070
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2176 times
- Has Liked: 3110 times
- Location: Praha
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Best hope your lot don't need to bring out the begging buckets again I wouldn't be contributing this timeLongsidelenny1882 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:47 amWho cares about burnley and winginghouse upthecolne
-
- Posts: 3563
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 2604 times
- Has Liked: 301 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
They’re worse than Yorkshire for whinging aren’t they?
-
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
- Been Liked: 247 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
I hear bigredrose is 3 times the size of this localcricketerQuickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 12:21 pmToday's the day that Big Redrose finally meets local cricketer.
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Not half
-
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 5:46 pm
- Been Liked: 412 times
- Has Liked: 87 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
To be fair I dont think they win with class either so its a lot to expect them to take defeat with any class
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:02 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
I tend to find the people who have actually played against each other from the two clubs get on just fine. It’s the spectators who cause issues.
-
- Posts: 18095
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3874 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
The same accross all sports.Red Fox Rocks Socks wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:42 pmI tend to find the people who have actually played against each other from the two clubs get on just fine. It’s the spectators who cause issues.