Burnley v Lowerhouse

Quickenthetempo · Post by **Quickenthetempo** » Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:32 pm

A lot of abuse aimed at Burnley CC on here.

If they are still paying a pro I don't see what's wrong with charging. If there's no pro's on show then no entry fee.

They're a very quiet club. Just get on with winning stuff and not saying much on social media.

arise_sir_charge · Post by **arise_sir_charge** » Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:36 pm

Each to their own I suppose but to my knowledge they are the only club to charge anything this year. I think they charged reduced entry in their game against Rammy but full price today. Wonder why?

Also in my opinion it’s counter productive for a game like today. Get folk in the door then worry about that you can take off them.

Somethingfishy · Post by **Somethingfishy** » Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:37 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑
Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:32 pm
A lot of abuse aimed at Burnley CC on here.

If they are still paying a pro I don't see what's wrong with charging. If there's no pro's on show then no entry fee.

They're a very quiet club. Just get on with winning stuff and not saying much on social media.

Fair comment on the pro situation. The club itself is quiet..not so sure about their few supporters.

Quickenthetempo · Post by **Quickenthetempo** » Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:43 pm

arise_sir_charge wrote: ↑
Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:36 pm
Each to their own I suppose but to my knowledge they are the only club to charge anything this year. I think they charged reduced entry in their game against Rammy but full price today. Wonder why?

Also in my opinion it’s counter productive for a game like today. Get folk in the door then worry about that you can take off them.

The charging on the door has always been to get away fans as home fans generally are members.

We hardly ever charge at Padiham but you get a lot more people in that use the bar facilities.

The Enclosure · Post by **The Enclosure** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:38 am

I am not complaining as a pint of bitter was only a quid today.

FCBurnley · Post by **FCBurnley** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:27 am

It’s strange how people always hate on successful sports teams ! Campiones

claretonthecoast1882 · Post by **claretonthecoast1882** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:48 am

Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑
Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:32 pm
A lot of abuse aimed at Burnley CC on here.

If they are still paying a pro I don't see what's wrong with charging. If there's no pro's on show then no entry fee.

They're a very quiet club. Just get on with winning stuff and not saying much on social media.

Probably a good job, town isn't big enough for 2 lairy clubs

arise_sir_charge · Post by **arise_sir_charge** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:13 am

FCBurnley wrote: ↑
Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:27 am
It’s strange how people always hate on successful sports teams ! Campiones

"Hate On" one of the Americanisms that has crept into everyday use in this country. To be honest there has never been much love lost between the two clubs be they successful, good, bad or indifferent.

As for lairy, if promoting your club and seeking to maximise every opportunity to generate interest and support is considered lairy, then I'm all for it.

After all, people always 'hate on' successful sports teams.

Bordeauxclaret · Post by **Bordeauxclaret** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:44 am

As proven with the dummies being spat out after this weekends results. Again.

arise_sir_charge · Post by **arise_sir_charge** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:59 am

Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑
Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:44 am
As proven with the dummies being spat out after this weekends results. Again.

Are you serious?

A valid complaint about charging for a friendly, which had manifested well before the result was known either way, is classed as "dummy spitting".

The complaint would have been equally valid whether the game was won or lost.

Local cricketer · Post by **Local cricketer** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:03 am

Always a excuse. Yesterday it was oh you've got a pro etc. The same pro you let go. Now its the gate mans fault for daring to charge you to get on

arise_sir_charge · Post by **arise_sir_charge** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:15 am

Let's be honest, the reigning champs, armed with a pro, should beat a team of amateurs. That's not sour grapes in anyway, it's a simple fact. I'd be very disappointed if the boot was on the other foot and Lowerhouse armed with a pro had not beaten a team of amateurs.

By the way Lowerhouse had the option to go and get a sub pro for yesterday if they wished but they chose not to.

Maybe people should give some credit to Lowerhouse for entering a T20 comp in which they exclusively played teams with pro's. There weren't any other takers I notice.

Also, for the sake of clarity, I am fairly certain that the gate man had no affect on the result.

Somethingfishy · Post by **Somethingfishy** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:20 am

Can only be Burnley. Bring up genuine complaints...which have still to be explained..and all we get back is we are dummy spitting. Classless as usual from the Burnley lot.
Interesting to see how they cope with little to no car park receipts this season. Maybe that's why they charged. Doubt the paltry crowd will get them by..even when charging.

Quickenthetempo · Post by **Quickenthetempo** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:32 am

Somethingfishy wrote: ↑
Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:20 am
Can only be Burnley. Bring up genuine complaints...which have still to be explained..and all we get back is we are dummy spitting. Classless as usual from the Burnley lot.
Interesting to see how they cope with little to no car park receipts this season. Maybe that's why they charged. Doubt the paltry crowd will get them by..even when charging.

Genuine question- Are you still paying annual subs at Lowerhouse?

Just asking, as if your not, how do our local clubs survive? If gates aren't being charged?

arise_sir_charge · Post by **arise_sir_charge** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:45 am

Yes, subs being paid.

Longsidelenny1882 · Post by **Longsidelenny1882** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:47 am

Who cares about burnley and winginghouse upthecolne

Burnley1989 · Post by **Burnley1989** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:23 pm

Longsidelenny1882 wrote: ↑
Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:47 am
Who cares about burnley and winginghouse upthecolne

Obviously yourself as you've clicked on a thread with both their names in the title.

Local cricketer · Post by **Local cricketer** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:34 pm

Who would have thought a freindly could descend into this.

Looking forward to next season already

ŽižkovClaret · Post by **ŽižkovClaret** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:45 pm

Longsidelenny1882 wrote: ↑
Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:47 am
Who cares about burnley and winginghouse upthecolne

Best hope your lot don't need to bring out the begging buckets again

I wouldn't be contributing this time

dandeclaret · Post by **dandeclaret** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:06 pm

They’re worse than Yorkshire for whinging aren’t they?

Wellsy1882 · Post by **Wellsy1882** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:14 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑
Sun Sep 06, 2020 12:21 pm
Today's the day that Big Redrose finally meets local cricketer.

I hear bigredrose is 3 times the size of this localcricketer

claretonthecoast1882 · Post by **claretonthecoast1882** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:04 pm

dandeclaret wrote: ↑
Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:06 pm
They’re worse than Yorkshire for whinging aren’t they?

Not half

Local cricketer · Post by **Local cricketer** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:10 pm

To be fair I dont think they win with class either so its a lot to expect them to take defeat with any class

Red Fox Rocks Socks · Post by **Red Fox Rocks Socks** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:42 pm

I tend to find the people who have actually played against each other from the two clubs get on just fine. It’s the spectators who cause issues.

Quickenthetempo · Post by **Quickenthetempo** » Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:11 pm

Red Fox Rocks Socks wrote: ↑
Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:42 pm
I tend to find the people who have actually played against each other from the two clubs get on just fine. It’s the spectators who cause issues.

The same accross all sports.

Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse

Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse