Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
HUMPHREY: All right, settle down. Settle down.
[clunk]
Now, before I begin the lesson, will those of you who are playing in the match this afternoon move your clothes down onto the lower peg immediately after lunch, before you write your letter home, if you're not getting your hair cut, unless you've got a younger brother who is going out this weekend as the guest of another boy, in which case, collect his note before lunch, put it in your letter after you've had your hair cut, and make sure he moves your clothes down onto the lower peg for you. Now,--
WYMER: Sir?
HUMPHREY: Yes, Wymer?
WYMER: My younger brother's going out with Dibble this weekend, sir, but I'm not having my hair cut today, sir.
PUPILS: [chuckling]
WYMER: So, do I move my clothes down, or--
HUMPHREY: I do wish you'd listen, Wymer. It's perfectly simple. If you're not getting your hair cut, you don't have to move your brother's clothes down to the lower peg. You simply collect his note before lunch, after you've done your scripture prep, when you've written your letter home, before rest, move your own clothes onto the lower peg, greet the visitors, and report to Mr. Viney that you've had your chit signed. Now, sex. Sex, sex, sex. Where were we? [sniff] Well, had I got as far as the penis entering the vagina? [sniff]
PUPILS: Umm. Mmmm.
[clunk]
Now, before I begin the lesson, will those of you who are playing in the match this afternoon move your clothes down onto the lower peg immediately after lunch, before you write your letter home, if you're not getting your hair cut, unless you've got a younger brother who is going out this weekend as the guest of another boy, in which case, collect his note before lunch, put it in your letter after you've had your hair cut, and make sure he moves your clothes down onto the lower peg for you. Now,--
WYMER: Sir?
HUMPHREY: Yes, Wymer?
WYMER: My younger brother's going out with Dibble this weekend, sir, but I'm not having my hair cut today, sir.
PUPILS: [chuckling]
WYMER: So, do I move my clothes down, or--
HUMPHREY: I do wish you'd listen, Wymer. It's perfectly simple. If you're not getting your hair cut, you don't have to move your brother's clothes down to the lower peg. You simply collect his note before lunch, after you've done your scripture prep, when you've written your letter home, before rest, move your own clothes onto the lower peg, greet the visitors, and report to Mr. Viney that you've had your chit signed. Now, sex. Sex, sex, sex. Where were we? [sniff] Well, had I got as far as the penis entering the vagina? [sniff]
PUPILS: Umm. Mmmm.
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Awayfromburnley wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 11:23 pmNot one for using WW2 analogies, but it's the best I can do at this time of night. For 6 years the country and most of Europe was turned in its head. Nothing was normal. It was bad. Very bad.
For 6 months we have had some inconveniences, and if you are really unfortunate you or relatives have been affected. It's been unpleasant.
Dad, what did our great granddad do during the war?
Son, he fought in North Africa against Rommel. Later on in the war he stormed a Normandy beach while a German battalion fired 1800 rounds per minute at his general direction. Many of his friends were shot to bits or drowned. When he came home the house had been bombed.
….
Sometime in the future.
Dad, what did you do during the Covid pandemic?
Son, I had to wear a face mask in the shops. Oh, and sometimes the pubs and restaurants were told to shut. I still suffer the nightmares to this day.
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
taio wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 8:22 amHospitals are in a great position right now in terms of Covid admissions, bed occupancy, ventilation capacity and deaths. But that could quickly change if a perfect storm emerges (i.e. normal winter pressures + seasonal flu + Covid second wave) as we head into winter. Other factors could also add to this such as reduced bad capacity caused by distancing and cohorting patients, and restoration of elective care e.g. cancer treatment which is crucial. That said I think we've already seen the worst of it and there are of course now more effective treatments.
I don’t think we will have much flu this year because everyone is wearing masks, some people are still social distancing, and those vulnerable to flu are (should be) shielding
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Leaves everyone in the position that hopefully those who were too dumb to follow the social distancing guidelines or thought they were irrelevant to them can count to 6
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Same here. I've always been a bit of a patriot, but I think that's now gone. Thick and uncaring is bang on the money.Wile E Coyote wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 11:58 pmthe science was right, we could have contained this virus effectively, but the vapid public continually ignore the advice and do whatever they please. its genuinely put me right off British people. by and large they are thick and uncaring.
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 9:28 amLeaves everyone in the position that hopefully those who were too dumb to follow the social distancing guidelines or thought they were irrelevant to them can count to 6
I don’t think people are ignoring the rules because they are dumb. They are not following the rules because of the lack of intelligence from the government
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Do you genuinely believe that those arrogant enough to feel they're a law unto themselves, so far. Are going to take blind bit of notice now!? Good luck wi' that.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 9:28 amLeaves everyone in the position that hopefully those who were too dumb to follow the social distancing guidelines or thought they were irrelevant to them can count to 6
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
I would forced all large shopping centres and supermarkets to have security on their doors and stop anyone who doesn't wear a face mask from entering. They stepped up security during the panic buying and the March lockdown so there's no reason why they can't afford to hire door security. The supermarkets have done well out of Covid so there are no excuses.
Last edited by Billy Balfour on Wed Sep 09, 2020 9:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Here we go. Thread ruined.
These 3 users liked this post: nil_desperandum Greenmile Swizzlestick
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 9:49 amI would forced all large shopping centres and supermarkets to have security on their doors and stop anyone who doesn't wear a face mask from entering. They stepped up security during the panic buying and the March lockdown so there's no reason why they can't afford to hire door security. The supermarkets have done well out of Covid so there are no excuses.
Agreed, and for those who can't wear a mask they have the option of home delivery.
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 711 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Let’s be honest, we are screwed with regards to getting people to follow the rules. Shocking how many people in the supermarkets for example aren’t wearing masks.
People are just di*ks.
People are just di*ks.
This user liked this post: Wile E Coyote
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Granny WeatherWax wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 9:53 amLet’s be honest, we are screwed with regards to getting people to follow the rules. Shocking how many people in the supermarkets for example aren’t wearing masks.
People are just di*ks.
Caught a couple of trams last Saturday in Manchester didn't see anybody in the section I was in without a mask on. Got a train from Piccadilly someone was being removed by the time we had got to Deansgate for refusing to stop eating a Pizza despite a sign next to him saying no food or drink on the train.
-
- Posts: 8527
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
if i go in local shops I wear a mask, Im struggling to think when I last saw another customer wearing one.
What is going on with these people ? might help if the shop staff refused to serve them, but not a cat in hells chance of that happening.
What is going on with these people ? might help if the shop staff refused to serve them, but not a cat in hells chance of that happening.
-
- Posts: 7312
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3964 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
So to clarify:
(Hypothetical) My family of 6 can't visit my dad indoors or out (6+1=7), or if I'm family of 5 my son couldn't visit us with his wife. (5 +2 =7)
But: A family of 2 (husband and wife) can host 4 people for lunch every day of the week and then have 4 different people round in the evening.
So after 7 days they've had relatively close contact with 56 people.
But the family of 6 who choose to stay in all week, can't celebrate the grandad's birthday on the Sunday???
{It's just been clarified on a news programme that that is the new "law"}
(Hypothetical) My family of 6 can't visit my dad indoors or out (6+1=7), or if I'm family of 5 my son couldn't visit us with his wife. (5 +2 =7)
But: A family of 2 (husband and wife) can host 4 people for lunch every day of the week and then have 4 different people round in the evening.
So after 7 days they've had relatively close contact with 56 people.
But the family of 6 who choose to stay in all week, can't celebrate the grandad's birthday on the Sunday???
{It's just been clarified on a news programme that that is the new "law"}
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
I think government makes a huge difference to people’s attitude. I spent a week in Scotland at the end of last month and it was noticeable how many more people were following the guidance and how shop staff were asking those not wearing a mask to put one on. Yes, there were still a number of idiots doing what they wanted but far fewer than I’ve seen in the uk. I don’t think it’s any coincidence that Nicola Sturgeon’s performance has been far more open, honest and visible than Boris Johnson’s. These things do make a difference.
-
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:12 pm
- Been Liked: 141 times
- Has Liked: 81 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Blame lies with the government. Not locking down strictly or soon enough when the evidence in Europe and the world was clear months prior. PM missing vital cobra meetings, and MPs flaunting their own rules. Massive mistakes regarding PPE costing lives and millions of pounds. Latest of course everyone being encouraged to eat out on MASS Mon-Weds, everyone encouraged to commute and get back to work.Wile E Coyote wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 11:58 pmthe science was right, we could have contained this virus effectively, but the vapid public continually ignore the advice and do whatever they please. its genuinely put me right off British people. by and large they are thick and uncaring.
They want you to blame young people who had a couple of raves etc to deflect from their huge short comings as a government.
To add: The gove have still not made a credible track and trace system, and It is close to collapsing. Nearly 6 months into this pandemic.
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:02 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
The problem with this is if people say they have asthma or anything else on the list that was released they don’t have to. My favourite of the woolly excuses is ‘would cause distress to wear a mask’Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 9:49 amI would forced all large shopping centres and supermarkets to have security on their doors and stop anyone who doesn't wear a face mask from entering. They stepped up security during the panic buying and the March lockdown so there's no reason why they can't afford to hire door security. The supermarkets have done well out of Covid so there are no excuses.
It makes enforcing it impossible
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 711 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
I agree the government have mismanaged the situation beyond any comprehension, however it doesn’t get away from the fact, like I said above, that people are just di*ks.
Wear a mask you selfish arrogant two hats.
Wear a mask you selfish arrogant two hats.
-
- Posts: 9471
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1184 times
- Has Liked: 779 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
I think he means in terms of unity & pulling together to defeat the common enemy, some of what you say above is correct in the wartime era & people still enjoyed life, if the siren sounded you certainly broke off in the open & headed for the nearest air raid shelter to avoid being trapped under rubble, people from that generation just got on with it & made the best of it, times were harder & very different, I don't think this generation could cope without being able to tweet or update the social media status every 2 mins, you can't really compare WW2 to today with what's happening things have changed so much in terms of everything.nil_desperandum wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:04 amBut this is really nothing like WW2. Obviously war is horrible and the tragedy of death and suffering is inevitable along with rationing etc., but pretty much everything went on as usual, in fact between 1939 and 45 people were busier and more active than ever.
People went to work as normal, (often did overtime), they socialised together, children went to school as normal, they played team sports, they watched football etc., they went to scouts, cubs, swimming clubs, etc., they went to choirs and music clubs, they went to the library. They could unwind in the pubs with no social distancing. Young people partied, young people danced, young people sh**ed, etc. All these things were good for morale, in fact morale was generally good.
This is much different in the inevitable impact it's having on people's well-being and mental health.
-
- Posts: 18087
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Stop whinging.
If any of us had more than 6 friends we wouldn't be on here all the time.
If any of us had more than 6 friends we wouldn't be on here all the time.
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
I'd make them carry an exemption note from their GP. No mask + no note = no entry.Red Fox Rocks Socks wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:11 amThe problem with this is if people say they have asthma or anything else on the list that was released they don’t have to. My favourite of the woolly excuses is ‘would cause distress to wear a mask’
It makes enforcing it impossible
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Heh. Good one.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:26 amStop whinging.
If any of us had more than 6 friends we wouldn't be on here all the time.
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
I don't understand why shops just don't refuse to serve people who aren't wearing a mask until the exemption is provided.Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:30 amI'd make them carry an exemption note from their GP. No mask + no note = no entry.
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:02 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
That’s a simple and easy solution that you and I can come up with in 30 seconds and agree on. The question is why can’t the powers that be as this would instantly make it the easiest thing in the world to enforce??????Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:30 amI'd make them carry an exemption note from their GP. No mask + no note = no entry.
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:02 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Interesting goings on in the US at the moment re: vaccines. Lots of federal instructions that the states have to have their vaccination plans in place before the election with fears that they may try to rush out something with minimal testing prior to the election to win votes.
You can see why people would be wary about an unproven vaccine with no track record and no proven history that has been potentially rushed out.
-
- Posts: 2067
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
- Been Liked: 810 times
- Has Liked: 26 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Winfields in Haslingden won't let you in the door without a mask. Some chancers tried it on when I was there, saying they had asthma, but the security guard told them where to go. At the end of the day a business has a right to not let someone in if they choose not to.
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Good on them - shops, bars, restaurants etc. have a responsibility to enforce, I know alot was made of the police not being able to, but it can be self-policed through policies as per the above.claret2018 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:41 amWinfields in Haslingden won't let you in the door without a mask. Some chancers tried it on when I was there, saying they had asthma, but the security guard told them where to go. At the end of the day a business has a right to not let someone in if they choose not to.
I've been in a few pubs that are taking it seriously and ensuring everyone scanned the QR code for track and trace before being able to enter. Others have put the posters up but place responsibility on the individual to find and scan it themselves; inevitably some will and lots won't.
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
The thing is, anyone with a genuine health issue is most likely to be concerned about their health and actually won’t try and go to a shop. The advice being given is to get someone else to do your shopping. Granted, there will be a small minority who are unable to do that, but the local Covid support groups are still running and doing errands for people with health issues.
Bottom line. Wear a mask when asked to and wear it properly.
Bottom line. Wear a mask when asked to and wear it properly.
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
So no gatherings outside of more than 6 people but we can cram 200+ people into schools and colleges?
Right on Boris
Right on Boris
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
People should not be asked to wear a mask it should be mandatory whenever away from home. As long as of course they do not have severe asthma or similarZlatan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:54 amThe thing is, anyone with a genuine health issue is most likely to be concerned about their health and actually won’t try and go to a shop. The advice being given is to get someone else to do your shopping. Granted, there will be a small minority who are unable to do that, but the local Covid support groups are still running and doing errands for people with health issues.
Bottom line. Wear a mask when asked to and wear it properly.
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 482 times
- Has Liked: 2292 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Manchester authorities just reiterated to students the need to curtail and be sensible about socialising.
The poor luvvies are going to have to concentrate on studying. Well out of order!
The poor luvvies are going to have to concentrate on studying. Well out of order!
This user liked this post: gandhisflipflop
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
I know. We are pretty rudderless.Red Fox Rocks Socks wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:36 amThat’s a simple and easy solution that you and I can come up with in 30 seconds and agree on. The question is why can’t the powers that be as this would instantly make it the easiest thing in the world to enforce??????
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Because it’s not as simple as that. It’d have to be something that wasn’t easily forgeable to be worth the paper it’s written on which means it would have to be designed, produced and then a system of application and delivery designed. It’d all cost money which probably wouldn’t be justified for the number of people trying to get out of wearing a face mask in this way.Red Fox Rocks Socks wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:36 amThat’s a simple and easy solution that you and I can come up with in 30 seconds and agree on. The question is why can’t the powers that be as this would instantly make it the easiest thing in the world to enforce??????
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Does anyone know why gatherings of 6 are banned but schools of 300+ are open? The whole covid thing has been a complete hypocritical mess.
I must admit I laughed when they said people shouldn’t leave their home but child minders can work and go house to house.
I must admit I laughed when they said people shouldn’t leave their home but child minders can work and go house to house.
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:02 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Or you could have it sent to your phone which everyone always has.martin_p wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 11:47 amBecause it’s not as simple as that. It’d have to be something that wasn’t easily forgeable to be worth the paper it’s written on which means it would have to be designed, produced and then a system of application and delivery designed. It’d all cost money which probably wouldn’t be justified for the number of people trying to get out of wearing a face mask in this way.
Or you could have a letter in the post.
Or you could go to your Drs who could provide letter headed paper.
If you want to make a fake of any of these good luck to you but I’m guessing most people couldn’t be arsed and would fall on line
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
It still costs time and money. Besides, wearing face masks isn’t currently the law so until that changes it’d be pointless anyway.Red Fox Rocks Socks wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 11:59 amOr you could have it sent to your phone which everyone always has.
Or you could have a letter in the post.
Or you could go to your Drs who could provide letter headed paper.
If you want to make a fake of any of these good luck to you but I’m guessing most people couldn’t be arsed and would fall on line
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Bonus.....they'll miss the soul night crowds attended by Fossils and elderly arthritic Farts attempting Back Drops....and yawn the Vertigo Spinners.basil6345789 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 11:25 amManchester authorities just reiterated to students the need to curtail and be sensible about socialising.
The poor luvvies are going to have to concentrate on studying. Well out of order!
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Agree that it should be mandatory - the exception is a fallacy, wearing a mask does not affect anyone with Asthma or similar - there is a perceived issue but not a real issue.
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:02 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Ok, fair enough. Shops just shouldn’t let people in without one then.Red Fox Rocks Socks wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:08 pmhttps://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... e-your-own
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Zlatan- apologies if misunderstood you - i took "Agree that it should be mandatory - the exception is a fallacy, wearing a mask does not affect anyone with Asthma or similar - there is a perceived issue but not a real issue." to indicate that you believed that it wasnt mandatory to wear a covering ...
perhaps you were suggesting that there shouldnt be exceptions -
perhaps you were suggesting that there shouldnt be exceptions -
This user liked this post: Zlatan
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:02 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
-
- Posts: 8527
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
if pubs remain open doesn't it make a mockery of the new guidelines?
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Looks like there will still be 3,000 people at the horseracing at Doncaster today and potentially 6,000 at the weekend.
-
- Posts: 7312
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3964 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Wile E Coyote wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:34 pmif pubs remain open doesn't it make a mockery of the new guidelines?
Yes, along with all the other places where people can mix "freely" without even having any requirement to wear face coverings.
-
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2307 times
- Has Liked: 2172 times