No I haven't.Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:31 pmYou've misunderstood aggi's post you complete spanner.
We'll just have to agree to disagree.
Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
-
RingoMcCartney
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
We'll just have to agree to disagree.
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
RingoMcCartney wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:21 pmif a lever existed that had a sign above it saying, "for perfect response to unprecedented global pandemic. Pull here", and Boris pulled it. If large swathes of the population chose to consider themselves above the law. Even the perfect response would fail.
The lever doesn't even exist.
If such lever did exist Boris would likely argue that we don’t need the lever. He would draw up plans on why we should not pull the lever. He would convince people that not pulling the lever is the right idea. Then six months down the line he would admit that his plans didn’t make sense in the first place
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Ah, he’s taking the ‘double down’ approach on this one. It’s one of plays when made to look a fool. I was expecting claims of being pedantic or being told you’re a troll to be honest.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
RingoMcCartney
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Irrelevant reallyInchy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:43 pmIf such lever did exist Boris would likely argue that we don’t need the lever. He would draw up plans on why we should not pull the lever. He would convince people that not pulling the lever is the right idea. Then six months down the line he would admit that his plans didn’t make sense in the first place
If large swathes of the population chose to consider themselves above the law.
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
It’s called The Cummings Effect I believe.RingoMcCartney wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:45 pmIrrelevant really
If large swathes of the population chose to consider themselves above the law.
Last edited by martin_p on Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 3 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie Zlatan Greenmile
-
RingoMcCartney
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
-
RingoMcCartney
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
-
RingoMcCartney
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
Bye for now Ringophiles!
-
evensteadiereddie
- Posts: 9601
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3150 times
- Has Liked: 10254 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Social gatherings of more than 6 people to be banned
No news on the rampant racism and sexism infecting our schools yet ? Are our white, working-class lads still being held back 