Spurs afer Ings
Spurs afer Ings
According to John Percy from Telegraph
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:12 pm
- Been Liked: 41 times
- Has Liked: 63 times
Re: Spurs afer Ings
I doubt Ings would be reluctant to go in as first alternative to a starting front three, especially given their injury records and the amount of games they'll have this season
-
- Posts: 19169
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3116 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Spurs afer Ings
Whilst Southampton have had cash flow issues - I do not think Spurs have enough to buy Ings at a reasonable market rate- shame as the flow of money would see some come our way
-
- Posts: 11410
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3170 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
- Contact:
Re: Spurs afer Ings
Why would we see the flow of money come our way?Chester Perry wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 2:30 pmWhilst Southampton have had cash flow issues - I do not think Spurs have enough to buy Ings at a reasonable market rate- shame as the flow of money would see some come our way
Did we have a "sell-on-sell-on" clause when we sold him to Liverpool?
-
- Posts: 3937
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1754 times
- Has Liked: 469 times
Re: Spurs afer Ings
We didn't sell him to Liverpool, they had to pay compensation due to his age. I can't see any way that we would be due anything 2 transfers further down the line......
Re: Spurs afer Ings
Yep, my reply was really aimed at the original point of getting some money, not you! Just quoted you as you'd mentioned the sell-on
This user liked this post: wilks_bfc
-
- Posts: 19169
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3116 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Spurs afer Ings
Are you sure https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36165363
The way the the follow through of sell on works means we should have got 20% of the profit Liverpool made on the sale to Southampton - If that deal includes a sell on/add on, then we will get 20% of what Liverpool make on that. In much the same way that Luton profited from the sale of Andre Gray to Watford.
It is part of the trickle through of football - https://www.sportskeeda.com/football/ho ... rred-clubs
This user liked this post: Paul Waine
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Spurs afer Ings
Southampton losing Ings would be a massive blow.
I hope it comes off, although I doubt it with Danny being a Southampton lad
I hope it comes off, although I doubt it with Danny being a Southampton lad
Re: Spurs afer Ings
Not good enough, injury prone and a waste of money.
Re: Spurs afer Ings
Sorry I was being sarcastic, just what some of the regulars used to post everytime his names was mentioned with a move.
The best forward I've seen play for is. Oozes class and was obvious he was going in to big things.
I bet liverpool would love him back, would be ideal as their 4th choice.
This user liked this post: Bigvince
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Spurs afer Ings
He was always good enough, but he was clearly injury prone at Liverpool.
Last season was his chance to prove he's full over those injuries and he is.
Doesn't mean any of us were wrong to say he was injury prone or a risky signing when he left Liverpool.
Last season was his chance to prove he's full over those injuries and he is.
Doesn't mean any of us were wrong to say he was injury prone or a risky signing when he left Liverpool.