ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ClaretTony
Posts: 67789
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32408 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:15 pm

Not good news but not as bad as we thought

See link
https://www.uptheclarets.com/gudmundsso ... -as-feared
These 4 users liked this post: BOYSIE31 Bcap1959 kentonclaret ecc

summitclaret
Posts: 3916
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 833 times
Has Liked: 1324 times
Location: burnley

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by summitclaret » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:18 pm

Well that's a bit better news. Really feel for Johan.

Conroysleftfoot
Posts: 2127
Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 352 times
Has Liked: 294 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by Conroysleftfoot » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:21 pm

Hope he gets back soon, he does have some rotten luck.

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3181 times
Has Liked: 1865 times
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by wilks_bfc » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:21 pm

It probably helped that his own foot was off the ground

If it had been planted, there would have been no "give" and done more damage
This user liked this post: Quicknick

ClaretTony
Posts: 67789
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32408 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:22 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:21 pm
It probably helped that his own foot was off the ground

If it had been planted, there would have been no "give" and done more damage
Would have been very serious I think had his leg been planted.



Some other good news too - Ashley Barnes to play in both u23 games next week (Monday and Friday)
This user liked this post: Quicknick

warksclaret
Posts: 6679
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1696 times
Has Liked: 789 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by warksclaret » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:22 pm

I would not expect anybody from the club putting a recovery period on this, but for the more medically minded on here what is the norm for a medial ligament in terms ofrecovery time

ClaretTony
Posts: 67789
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32408 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:23 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:22 pm
I would not expect anybody from the club putting a recovery period on this, but for the more medically minded on here what is the norm for a medial ligament in terms ofrecovery time
Well I've no idea but I have to say I was fearing the worst last night when I saw it again.

claretblue
Posts: 6418
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
Been Liked: 1835 times
Has Liked: 962 times
Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by claretblue » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:24 pm

If its a a sprained MCL:

Recovery times differ depending on the severity of the injury: A minor, or grade 1, MCL tear can take from a few days to a week and a half to heal sufficiently for you to return to normal activities, including sports. A grade 2 tear can take from two to four weeks to heal.

KateR
Posts: 4146
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:46 pm
Been Liked: 1019 times
Has Liked: 6172 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by KateR » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:25 pm

two pieces of good news in a row Tony, that's nice :)

joey13
Posts: 7505
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 1230 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by joey13 » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:29 pm

Better news ,he does have some bad luck

Wellsy1882
Posts: 1374
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
Been Liked: 247 times
Has Liked: 90 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by Wellsy1882 » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:29 pm

May see him in december

ClaretAndBlue94
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 10:34 am
Been Liked: 62 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ClaretAndBlue94 » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:30 pm

claretblue wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:24 pm
If its a a sprained MCL:

Recovery times differ depending on the severity of the injury: A minor, or grade 1, MCL tear can take from a few days to a week and a half to heal sufficiently for you to return to normal activities, including sports. A grade 2 tear can take from two to four weeks to heal.
This is hopeful. I always assumed these type of injuries took much longer to heal.

JohnDearyMe
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
Been Liked: 667 times
Has Liked: 2048 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by JohnDearyMe » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:31 pm

claretblue wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:24 pm
If its a a sprained MCL:

Recovery times differ depending on the severity of the injury: A minor, or grade 1, MCL tear can take from a few days to a week and a half to heal sufficiently for you to return to normal activities, including sports. A grade 2 tear can take from two to four weeks to heal.
Those sort of timescales would be very positive. Any news on whether the Sheff Utd defender will be subject to any retrospective action? Did Dyche mention him in his interview?

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by MACCA » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:31 pm

Medial ligament recovery is 6 to 8 weeks. Not sure if that's longer with professionals that put a lot of strain on that area though.

Id guess any 1st team football before December would be a bonus.

warksclaret
Posts: 6679
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1696 times
Has Liked: 789 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by warksclaret » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:33 pm

Must support Kate R-Tony you are doing a great job in lifting us in these difficult times. The news on Ashley and Johan keeps our spirits alive. Lets hope Ben is not far behind and that we pick up no new injuries or suspensions

claretblue
Posts: 6418
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
Been Liked: 1835 times
Has Liked: 962 times
Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by claretblue » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:36 pm

JohnDearyMe wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:31 pm
Any news on whether the Sheff Utd defender will be subject to any retrospective action? Did Dyche mention him in his interview?
I doubt anything retrospective...that's only if the match officials hadn't seen an incident - they saw the tackle but (unbelievably) determined 'no foul'! :shock:
This user liked this post: JohnDearyMe

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17935
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4068 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ElectroClaret » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:42 pm

MACCA wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:31 pm

Id guess any 1st team football before December would be a bonus.
Reckon that'd be about right, let's hope sooner.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67789
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32408 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:49 pm

JohnDearyMe wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:31 pm
Those sort of timescales would be very positive. Any news on whether the Sheff Utd defender will be subject to any retrospective action? Did Dyche mention him in his interview?
There can't be any retrospective action. The referee saw it and didn't deem it worthy of a card. They can only take retrospective action if the officials haven't seen it.
This user liked this post: JohnDearyMe

summitclaret
Posts: 3916
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 833 times
Has Liked: 1324 times
Location: burnley

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by summitclaret » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:51 pm

Maybe Sean would have been better telling Garlick that JBG could be out for ages. That could actually be true anyway as I assume that we are still looking for rs wide man and the price will only go up now.

Silkyskills1
Posts: 5870
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1695 times
Has Liked: 2531 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by Silkyskills1 » Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:59 pm

Perhaps a word with the assistant regarding an eye test or different career path. Much better news than I feared last night. Must be very frustrating for him and nothing to do, of course, with his fitness levels recently. Nearly 24 hours on and that challenge makes me see red, as it should have done for the assailant. Disgraceful.
This user liked this post: clitheroeclaret3

jrgbfc
Posts: 8499
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2106 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by jrgbfc » Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:01 pm

I wouldn't pay too much attention to our injury bulletins. Dyche seems to make it up as he goes along.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10164
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4185 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:04 pm

jrgbfc wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:01 pm
I wouldn't pay too much attention to our injury bulletins. Dyche seems to make it up as he goes along.
:D :D is there anything about the club that doesn't upset you

jrgbfc
Posts: 8499
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2106 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by jrgbfc » Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:09 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:04 pm
:D :D is there anything about the club that doesn't upset you
Doesn't upset me in the slightest my coastal friend, I've learnt to just ignore it, like I do your bizarre obsession with me.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10164
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4185 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:13 pm

jrgbfc wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:09 pm
Doesn't upset me in the slightest my coastal friend, I've learnt to just ignore it, like I do your bizarre obsession with me.
Trying to help someone who seems upset most of his time on here isn't an obsession. Still you have had some form of conversation now so at least it is progress.

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by martin_p » Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:43 pm

I think the real good news from that story is that Ashley Barnes is now under 23 :-)
These 4 users liked this post: bobinho Foulthrow Quicknick Zlatan

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10164
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4185 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:43 pm

martin_p wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:43 pm
I think the real good news from that story is that Ashley Barnes is now under 23 :-)

Don't let the new hair fool you, he is 25
This user liked this post: Quicknick

The Enclosure
Posts: 4486
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
Been Liked: 990 times
Has Liked: 3266 times
Location: Burnley

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by The Enclosure » Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:52 pm

JohnDearyMe wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:31 pm
Those sort of timescales would be very positive. Any news on whether the Sheff Utd defender will be subject to any retrospective action? Did Dyche mention him in his interview?
Yes.Dyche said in his day it was just a strong tackle and would have probably been a yellow card.Today however, the way things are it should have been a straight red.
I agree 100% with that, the guy should have gone and if we would have had VAR last night it would definitely have been a red card.
This user liked this post: JohnDearyMe

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 10969
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5185 times
Has Liked: 803 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:53 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:42 pm
Reckon that'd be about right, let's hope sooner.
December 2022 with our Guddy though.

kentonclaret
Posts: 6505
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 977 times
Has Liked: 204 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by kentonclaret » Fri Sep 18, 2020 5:46 pm

When he recovers he'll be like a new signing along with Ashley. :lol:

Rileybobs
Posts: 16844
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by Rileybobs » Fri Sep 18, 2020 7:12 pm

I damaged my medial ligament fairly badly a couple of weeks ago playing football. The doc told me it would be about 6 weeks to recover. I'd like to think that an athlete like JBG could be back in full training in 4 weeks and ready to play again in 6. Here's hoping, I was certainly expecting worse.

NewClaret
Posts: 13442
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 3808 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by NewClaret » Fri Sep 18, 2020 7:41 pm

I was out last night so didn’t see the challenge. Could only find one clip of it online and the angle I saw looked like he tripped, slipped and his momentum took him in to JBG. Not a red for me on that one viewing.

Also didn’t think it would be as serious as some feared. Hopefully the caution we’ve shown in bringing him back will pay off, although given how cautious we are with players returning from injury it wouldn’t surprise me to see him out for 6 months :lol:

ecc
Posts: 4234
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 1407 times
Has Liked: 1278 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ecc » Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:20 pm

Relief, great relief. He really does deserve better luck. It will be great to see Barnsey back as well.

UTC

Stayingup
Posts: 5603
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 921 times
Has Liked: 2751 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by Stayingup » Fri Sep 18, 2020 9:03 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:49 pm
There can't be any retrospective action. The referee saw it and didn't deem it worthy of a card. They can only take retrospective action if the officials haven't seen it.
Tierney again.

Remember the penalty he didn't give at Huddersfield. The only one in the ground who thought it wasn't a penalty when the keeper tapped Hendricks ankle?
Dyche asked Tierney after why he didn't give a penalty. He said he thought he lost his footing. Yes he did when the keeper took his foot away from under him.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67789
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32408 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Sep 18, 2020 9:09 pm

Stayingup wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 9:03 pm
Tierney again.

Remember the penalty he didn't give at Huddersfield. The only one in the ground who thought it wasn't a penalty when the keeper tapped Hendricks ankle?
Dyche asked Tierney after why he didn't give a penalty. He said he thought he lost his footing. Yes he did when the keeper took his foot away from under him.
Stood there shouting ‘No contact’ time and again at Jeff Hendrick. Awful decision. He’s another shocker of a referee.

dougcollins
Posts: 6698
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 1816 times
Has Liked: 1796 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by dougcollins » Fri Sep 18, 2020 9:31 pm

The incident at Huddersfield was the first thing I thought of.

Perhaps he suffers an occasional sight affliction that only manifests when we're playing?

Bullabill
Posts: 915
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:40 am
Been Liked: 302 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by Bullabill » Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:43 pm

How do we know that the officials saw the incident? No free kick was given - did they say after the match that they'd seen it?

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by tiger76 » Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:56 pm

Pleasing to heat that Guddy won't be out as long as feared, and both Ash and Ben might be available soon, add that trio to our matchday squad, and we'll look an awful lot stronger, still need a couple of additions though just to give the squad some depth.

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3311
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 988 times
Has Liked: 1660 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by BleedingClaret » Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:39 am

We shouldn’t really complain, as it’s the same for every club we’ve lost JBG for a couple of months from our 15 man squad and Man City have lost Aguero for a similar period of time from their 50 man squad.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67789
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32408 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ClaretTony » Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:43 am

BleedingClaret wrote:
Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:39 am
We shouldn’t really complain, as it’s the same for every club we’ve lost JBG for a couple of months from our 15 man squad and Man City have lost Aguero for a similar period of time from their 50 man squad.
That just about sums it up

Burnley1989
Posts: 7389
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2293 times
Has Liked: 2166 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by Burnley1989 » Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:04 am

NewClaret wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 7:41 pm
I was out last night so didn’t see the challenge. Could only find one clip of it online and the angle I saw looked like he tripped, slipped and his momentum took him in to JBG. Not a red for me on that one viewing.
I think you may be on your own with that mate
These 2 users liked this post: randomclaret2 Leisure

ClaretTony
Posts: 67789
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32408 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ClaretTony » Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:47 am

Bullabill wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:43 pm
How do we know that the officials saw the incident? No free kick was given - did they say after the match that they'd seen it?
I've just watched this back and some observations that I hadn't picked up on at the time.

1. The assistant could not be better positioned, he's looking straight at it and he doesn't even threaten to wave his flag.
2. The referee eventually re-started the game with a throw in so therefore no foul seen by him either.

There is no way on earth that the assistant will say he hasn't seen the incident, it is impossible for him not to have done. It's just clear that they've completely got it wrong.

and

3. The game was held up for just over four and a half minutes. Under normal circumstances in a game I would expect there to be two minutes to be added on at the end of the half with a goal having been scored. That would suggest there should probably have been six or seven minutes added in total. Tierney added three minutes so apart from him and the assistant not being able to see the obvious, he's not very good at timekeeping either.
This user liked this post: Leisure

clitheroeclaret3
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2020 4:27 pm
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 282 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by clitheroeclaret3 » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:02 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:49 pm
There can't be any retrospective action. The referee saw it and didn't deem it worthy of a card. They can only take retrospective action if the officials haven't seen it.
Wonder what the logic is with these decisions? So the referee makes a complete ballsup so thats compounded by not rectifying afterwards!
Linesmen are a waste of time nowadays, scared to make a decision on their own it seems.

So, from my 1st viewing on tv, top of Longside, that tackle looked really reckless, how can these buffoons not see it from a few yards away?

williamjblazkowicz
Posts: 380
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 6:21 pm
Been Liked: 176 times
Has Liked: 8 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by williamjblazkowicz » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:12 am

He's a quality player when fit but he's just not fit often enough, sadly. Hopefully he'll be back sooner rather than later.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67789
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32408 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ClaretTony » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:13 am

Couple of pics here show how far away the assistant is from the incident. He never wavered, no suggestion of any movement of his left arm. How on earth does he not even see it as a foul?

Assistant Ref Position 1.jpg
Assistant Ref Position 1.jpg (47.38 KiB) Viewed 1996 times
Assistant Ref Position 2.jpg
Assistant Ref Position 2.jpg (21.95 KiB) Viewed 1996 times

Leisure
Posts: 18573
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3787 times
Has Liked: 12479 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by Leisure » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:15 am

williamjblazkowicz wrote:
Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:12 am
He's a quality player when fit but he's just not fit often enough, sadly. Hopefully he'll be back sooner rather than later.
His latest injury is nothing to do with him not being fit often enough!

williamjblazkowicz
Posts: 380
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 6:21 pm
Been Liked: 176 times
Has Liked: 8 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by williamjblazkowicz » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:16 am

Leisure wrote:
Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:15 am
His latest injury is nothing to do with him not being fit often enough!
Is he fit to play at the moment?

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by FactualFrank » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:17 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:13 am
Couple of pics here show how far away the assistant is from the incident. He never wavered, no suggestion of any movement of his left arm. How on earth does he not even see it as a foul?
Looks like the player saw #kickitout and thought it meant JBG's legs.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67789
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32408 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by ClaretTony » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:18 am

If the assistant doesn't even see that as a foul then I'll question how on earth he's ever got into a position to the run the line at any level of football. That's not a mistake, just a total lack of understanding of the game.

gtclaret
Posts: 1350
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 118 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by gtclaret » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:19 am

A lot of hope on here for JBG. Unfortunately there are many occasions with all athletes when the body just can't cope any longer with the vigorous demands. I fear this is another example. Even if this injury clears fairly quickly, there's another just waiting to happen. I said at the start of the season that both Brady and JBG will not be available for selection within one month. JBG lasted 10 minutes, will shall see about Brady

NewClaret
Posts: 13442
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 3808 times

Re: ARTICLE: Guðmundsson injury not as bad as feared

Post by NewClaret » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:24 am

Burnley1989 wrote:
Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:04 am
I think you may be on your own with that mate
Yes, would need to see it again. View I saw was from behind, albeit all the commentary seemed to be adamant it was a red.
This user liked this post: Burnley1989

Post Reply