Tarks injury
-
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
- Been Liked: 247 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: Tarks injury
Hes playing
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarks injury
Decent source?
-
- Posts: 13509
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 3833 times
Re: Tarks injury
Sadly, I think you’re probably right. I hate the lies. I’d rather the club just say that due to the speculation surrounding his future he won’t be available until after the window has closed - that’s fair enough.dougcollins wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:30 pmPre-transfer mock injuries are almost always toes.
Not something so you have to prove it, but possibly bad enough to stop you playing.
Toes, the perfect pre-transfer mock injury. Ask Danny Ings.
I doubt very much he’s got a toe injury. Only reason other than he’s leaving is that Sean didn’t want to risk him in a cup game but can’t say he was rested for the PL. We’ll know in a few hours either way.
I can’t see why he’s go West Ham though. Every chance they’d make him look ****. Other issue is that Tarks wouldn’t know who his manager would be - they must be close to sacking Moyes.
I can see him leaving but not to West Ham.
This user liked this post: The Enclosure
Re: Tarks injury
Maybe dyche has told him who his new manager will be
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Tarks injury
A good summary NC, if Tarks leaves I'd hope it's too a much bigger fish than WH, he'd be wasted at a club like that, and also they're likely to be in the dogfight at the bottom, Leicester I could see why he'd be attracted to them, good manager in BR, and they can offer European footy.NewClaret wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 2:53 pmSadly, I think you’re probably right. I hate the lies. I’d rather the club just say that due to the speculation surrounding his future he won’t be available until after the window has closed - that’s fair enough.
I doubt very much he’s got a toe injury. Only reason other than he’s leaving is that Sean didn’t want to risk him in a cup game but can’t say he was rested for the PL. We’ll know in a few hours either way.
I can’t see why he’s go West Ham though. Every chance they’d make him look ****. Other issue is that Tarks wouldn’t know who his manager would be - they must be close to sacking Moyes.
I can see him leaving but not to West Ham.
I just want this resolving ASAP, then we can get on with recruiting a replacement, or maybe that's what's holding up Tarks exit, and we want to source a replacement (Dawson?) before we see Tarks go through the exit door.
You can never be certain in these instances, but if he plays today, the chances are that'll he'll staying for this season at least, if he's well advanced in pursuing a move, I doubt SD would want to select him anyway.
We need players that are 100% committed to the cause, and if that means playing Dunne & Long for a couple of games, then so be it.
Re: Tarks injury
Spurs interested apparently
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5173 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Tarks injury
Do we know when that photo was taken?
Could easily be an old photo. The guy is, after all, advertizing his business with it.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: Tarks injury
How sure are you?
-
- Posts: 13509
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 3833 times
Re: Tarks injury
Agree with everything you say, but we have had a whole pre-season to get Dawson and it doesn’t feel like that should be a hard deal to complete if we thought Tarks was leaving. Let’s say they want £5-8m - not much if you have just got received ~£50m. If we aren’t sure that will be happening, that could be a huge part of the budget when we have other priorities.tiger76 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 3:03 pmA good summary NC, if Tarks leaves I'd hope it's too a much bigger fish than WH, he'd be wasted at a club like that, and also they're likely to be in the dogfight at the bottom, Leicester I could see why he'd be attracted to them, good manager in BR, and they can offer European footy.
I just want this resolving ASAP, then we can get on with recruiting a replacement, or maybe that's what's holding up Tarks exit, and we want to source a replacement (Dawson?) before we see Tarks go through the exit door.
You can never be certain in these instances, but if he plays today, the chances are that'll he'll staying for this season at least, if he's well advanced in pursuing a move, I doubt SD would want to select him anyway.
We need players that are 100% committed to the cause, and if that means playing Dunne & Long for a couple of games, then so be it.
I’d also play him until he’s sold for the precise reason that Garlick hasn’t done the deal on another player. There’s 6pts available in the next two games, which could make the difference between a relegation battle and a comfortable mid-table finish. For me, in our position, we start with the strongest possible team regardless of transfer rumours at the moment.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 13509
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 3833 times
Re: Tarks injury
Not sure Spurs can afford him after their £175m loan plus Bales salary
I can see United coming in with a cash + players deal.
Last edited by NewClaret on Sun Sep 20, 2020 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Tarks injury
Not arsed where he ends up, the amount the club gets for him is the bigger concern.
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: Tarks injury
If theres more than the rumoured clubs after tarks it sounds like he's agent touting him about for a possible move
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Tarks injury
I don't disagree that Tarky in the centre of our defence makes us much stronger, no matter who plays alongside him, however if his mind is not 100% focussed there's a danger that he'll be a liability if selected, and he'll also perhaps have one eye on avoiding injury if a big money move is on the cards.NewClaret wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 3:51 pmAgree with everything you say, but we have had a whole pre-season to get Dawson and it doesn’t feel like that should be a hard deal to complete if we thought Tarks was leaving. Let’s say they want £5-8m - not much if you have just got received ~£50m. If we aren’t sure that will be happening, that could be a huge part of the budget when we have other priorities.
I’d also play him until he’s sold for the precise reason that Garlick hasn’t done the deal on another player. There’s 6pts available in the next two games, which could make the difference between a relegation battle and a comfortable mid-table finish. For me, in our position, we start with the strongest possible team regardless of transfer rumours at the moment.
As to why we haven't closed the Dawson deal, I don't know, unless we need to receive funds before we can buy, I'd have thought Dawson would be a relatively straightforward deal to conclude given Watford's relegation.
Either way we need this resolved one way or the other this week, the window shuts in 15 days, and everybody knows how prolonged our transfer dealings can be, if we need to sell Tarks to fund 3-4 arrivals, then that's what we'll have to do unfortunately, because one way or the other we need to bolster the squad, to at least give Sean a fighting chance of overseeing another survival campaign.
Re: Tarks injury
As I have said before, now is the ideal time to sell him to get maximum value. Burnley don’t need £40m+ players to achieve our target, which is staying in the Premier League. If we can get that sort of fee then selling him makes sense providing the money is reinvested in new players. Problem is that we are leaving it too late to make those signings and expect the new players to gel without any disruption. If you get off to a bad start in the Premier a League then you are immediately chasing your tail and it makes it even more difficult to attract reinforcements come January if you are stuck down at the bottom. So it may be better to hang on to him for now and try to sign a replacement so that we can then move him on in a January with said replacement ready to slot in. Unfortunately, that means spending first, which the Board might not be willing or able to do.
Re: Tarks injury
But the Board did spend first, sadly it did not go well, did it.kaptin1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:08 pmAs I have said before, now is the ideal time to sell him to get maximum value. Burnley don’t need £40m+ players to achieve our target, which is staying in the Premier League. If we can get that sort of fee then selling him makes sense providing the money is reinvested in new players. Problem is that we are leaving it too late to make those signings and expect the new players to gel without any disruption. If you get off to a bad start in the Premier a League then you are immediately chasing your tail and it makes it even more difficult to attract reinforcements come January if you are stuck down at the bottom. So it may be better to hang on to him for now and try to sign a replacement so that we can then move him on in a January with said replacement ready to slot in. Unfortunately, that means spending first, which the Board might not be willing or able to do.
-
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
- Been Liked: 1029 times
- Has Liked: 1521 times
Re: Tarks injury
He's clearly off. We all know that.
Looks how he came, it was always going to be the way he left.
Looks how he came, it was always going to be the way he left.
Re: Tarks injury
Not in the team according to Boden.
-
- Posts: 13509
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 3833 times
Re: Tarks injury
He’s off.
Meltdown.
Meltdown.
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 711 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: Tarks injury
Que message board melt down
Re: Tarks injury
Official line ups announced. No Tarky. It’s a worry!
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1087 times
- Has Liked: 996 times
Re: Tarks injury
And rightly so.
-
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 723 times
Re: Tarks injury
I'm pretty sure it's not a case of 'he's off' it's a case of he has a release clause which might be triggered so we don't want to risk our asset.
When does the window close?
When does the window close?
-
- Posts: 6526
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 982 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Tarks injury
Tarks has dipped his toe into the transfer waters and perhaps a few clubs have taken a nibble.
Who knows but we might have seen him on the pitch in a Burnley shirt for the last time.
We need a decent fee due to 25% sell on clause.
Who knows but we might have seen him on the pitch in a Burnley shirt for the last time.
We need a decent fee due to 25% sell on clause.
Last edited by kentonclaret on Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 468 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Tarks injury
If he’s off than we need investment. Simply getting Dawson as a replacement isn’t good enough.
-
- Posts: 3959
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1774 times
- Has Liked: 470 times
Re: Tarks injury
Now how did it go when I dared to suggest we were an injury or a bid away from starting with Long and Dunne at the back v Leicester. And I quote:
"And I think you must be the only person thinking we will start the season with Long & Dunne"
"And I think you must be the only person thinking we will start the season with Long & Dunne"
This user liked this post: Blackburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Tarks injury
Maybe check your sources next time.
Re: Tarks injury
Yes, but current bids are nearly £20m short of the alleged figure and we have a shortage of central defenders, so I doubt it. I didn’t want to believe it but I’m starting to worry he may be refusing to play.Claretmatt4 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:02 pmI'm pretty sure it's not a case of 'he's off' it's a case of he has a release clause which might be triggered so we don't want to risk our asset.
When does the window close?
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarks injury
We won't get £50m for him. I'd have thought about £35m plus add-ons. If the club is in negotiation they will of course protect their asset.
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 294 times
- Has Liked: 92 times
Re: Tarks injury
Sounds like CT ?Herts Clarets wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:04 pmNow how did it go when I dared to suggest we were an injury or a bid away from starting with Long and Dunne at the back v Leicester. And I quote:
"And I think you must be the only person thinking we will start the season with Long & Dunne"
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Tarks injury
I honestly think that if the board sell Tarkowski, it could be one of the final straws that breaks the camels back and Dyche could be off.
-
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 3:39 am
- Been Liked: 68 times
- Has Liked: 9 times
Re: Tarks injury
Just seen team on tv. He’s not in the team. Long and Dunne.
-
- Posts: 16893
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6963 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarks injury
Dyche has said before that he won’t stand in the way of players looking to further their career.ClaretAndJew wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:11 pmI honestly think that if the board sell Tarkowski, it could be one of the final straws that breaks the camels back and Dyche could be off.
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1087 times
- Has Liked: 996 times
Re: Tarks injury
I don’t mind him being sold, just not to a ‘rival’ in the 10 or so teams battling relegation. If he goes to a top 7 team then do be it, but the Hammers!?
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5660 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Tarks injury
it really is an incredibly weak effort from Garlick, white flag well and truly raised
-
- Posts: 4406
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1259 times
- Has Liked: 1368 times
Re: Tarks injury
So come on Long and Dunne!
Mee is Burnley, Tarkowski is Tarkowski
Mee is Burnley, Tarkowski is Tarkowski
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Tarks injury
Absolutely, but you have to question this "furthering career" idea if he goes to West Ham or similar.
The apparent fractured relationship with the board already, it could put it on eggshells. Dyche want's Tarkowski here.
-
- Posts: 16893
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6963 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarks injury
Yes West Ham would be a joke of a move, apart from the obvious financial gain. Leicester on the other hand would be step up.ClaretAndJew wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:14 pmAbsolutely, but you have to question this "furthering career" idea if he goes to West Ham or similar.
The apparent fractured relationship with the board already, it could put it on eggshells. Dyche want's Tarkowski here.
Re: Tarks injury
The one thing that frustrates me is Gibson being offloaded to Norwich,why can't 2 grown men get together and sort the problem out like men do, it stinks of cutting off your nose to spite your face,there is a bloody good player in there
-
- Posts: 3959
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1774 times
- Has Liked: 470 times
-
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
- Been Liked: 247 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: Tarks injury
Yeah.
Hes playin in his garden with his kid
-
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 660 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Tarks injury
It’s just a pity that Gibson turned out to be such a tosser. A very expensive one at that.
-
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
- Been Liked: 247 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: Tarks injury
Dyche is making a statement to the board.
Look who im putting out to play
Spend
Look who im putting out to play
Spend
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Tarks injury
Who else has he got to play?
Re: Tarks injury
It will have been a shock to Sean, that Tarks wasn’t available after you assured him that he would playWellsy1882 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:31 pmDyche is making a statement to the board.
Look who im putting out to play
Spend
Re: Tarks injury
Really I like to see another professional sportsman keep positive after being left out for so longdermotdermot wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:31 pmIt’s just a pity that Gibson turned out to be such a tosser. A very expensive one at that.
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:16 pm
- Been Liked: 85 times
- Has Liked: 267 times