51 years
-
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:18 am
- Been Liked: 596 times
- Has Liked: 194 times
51 years
Ready for the flak........but why oh why does the club give A Campbell the platform he gets.....
Hopefully if there is a takeover that,ll be the end of him...
Hopefully if there is a takeover that,ll be the end of him...
This user liked this post: Boss Hogg
Re: 51 years
Not an attack so no need to take cover, but I for one found his latest book "Living Better" very helpful. On the couple of occasions I've been near him at a match he's been OK too. His life outside football is just that.
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
- Been Liked: 1110 times
- Has Liked: 301 times
- Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Re: 51 years
Deleted
Last edited by RammyClaret61 on Sun Oct 11, 2020 3:29 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
- Been Liked: 1110 times
- Has Liked: 301 times
- Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Re: 51 years
Jimmymaccer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:33 amReady for the flak........but why oh why does the club give A Campbell the platform he gets.....
Hopefully if there is a takeover that,ll be the end of him...
There are a lot more odious Clarets on this forum than Campbell.
These 6 users liked this post: Bosscat The Enclosure BertiesBeehole FactualFrank Buxtonclaret IanMcL
-
- Posts: 6942
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1485 times
- Has Liked: 1846 times
Re: 51 years
I have always found him to be reasonable on the odd time I've talked to him
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
Pretty sure that no one on here has contributed to the deaths of hundreds of thousands, the displacement of millions and the destabilising of an entire region.RammyClaret61 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 3:28 amThere are a lot more odious Clarets on this forum than Campbell.
These 7 users liked this post: Boss Hogg HahaYeah Murger Vino blanco bobinho Jakubclaret LordBob
-
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2320 times
- Has Liked: 2696 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: 51 years
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 7:57 amPretty sure that no one on here has contributed to the deaths of hundreds of thousands, the displacement of millions and the destabilising of an entire region.
I'm not. Far from it.
We have a choice who we hand over the controls to...and us plebs simply love a good warmonger.. the Maggies and the Blairs....or the Trumps.
Re: 51 years
What has the Anglo-French stitch up of the Middle East after the dissolution of the Ottoman empire post 1918 got to do with Alistair Campbell not to mention the carve up of Palestine after the second world war?GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 7:57 amPretty sure that no one on here has contributed to the deaths of hundreds of thousands, the displacement of millions and the destabilising of an entire region.
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
Those have nothing to do with him, as you well know.
However to claim that there are worse people on here than Campbell is just laughable.
-
- Posts: 15226
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3154 times
- Has Liked: 6742 times
Re: 51 years
Nothing personal,
I just hope he's a better narrator than he is a co-commentator
I just hope he's a better narrator than he is a co-commentator
Re: 51 years
Me too ....Woodleyclaret wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 7:39 amI have always found him to be reasonable on the odd time I've talked to him
We sat almost next to each other at Portsmouth quite a few years ago ... I had been sat near him for about 20 minutes at Fratton park before I realised exactly why I recognised him ...
We walked back to the station together for the Train back up to Waterloo. We chatted about all things BFC, and he was just a normal everyday Claret fan not the uber-political ****hole you would expect at all.
Several times since, I have seen him at away games, and he nods and acknowledges me
-
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2378 times
- Has Liked: 3801 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: 51 years
Always found him to be a passionate Claret and never covers any other topics during match day conversations.
Any of us at a football match could be sat near a drug pusher, thief, child abuser et al.
Any of us at a football match could be sat near a drug pusher, thief, child abuser et al.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
I know for a fact that many thieves and drug pushers attend football games
-
- Posts: 9290
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4092 times
- Has Liked: 6568 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: 51 years
Gotta admire your optimism....Somebody like Campbell will end up being the new boards (If this ever happens) mouthpiece. He will do what he’s good at, and ‘spin’ himself into a really good position. I’m sure there will be plenty who reckon he’s good as far as being around the club is concerned, but because of who he is and what he’s done in the past, I’d be inclined to distrust him entirely.Jimmymaccer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:33 amReady for the flak........but why oh why does the club give A Campbell the platform he gets.....
Hopefully if there is a takeover that,ll be the end of him...
Put it this way, if he shook my hand I’d count my fingers as he was leaving.
-
- Posts: 4486
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
- Been Liked: 990 times
- Has Liked: 3266 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: 51 years
Always came across as very pleasant to me, whenever i have passed him going to the Turf he always smiled and nodded or said hello.
He is certainly no fool and has held down a couple of high profile jobs.
He is certainly no fool and has held down a couple of high profile jobs.
-
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2320 times
- Has Liked: 2696 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: 51 years
Standard definition of warmonger..
"" a person who encourages or promotes aggression towards other countries or groups""
You'd seriously contend that neither Trump or Thatcher did this?
If so you're turning into Ringo. Keep it real Rowls.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
Are you referring to the miners who'd been striking for over a decade along with the support of other unions?
Re: 51 years
A better definition is someone who wants to start a war, or starts a war. I despise Trump but there are many, many more world leaders who have fitted that definition than Trump.
-
- Posts: 13236
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5155 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: 51 years
OK, take that definition and give me an example of Margaret Thatcher or Donald Trump promoting aggression.
-
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2320 times
- Has Liked: 2696 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: 51 years
My pigeons/ chess alarm just went off.
Re: 51 years
Thatcher orderd the sinking of the General Belgrano when it was outside the exclusion zone steaming away from the Falklands. If this was not an act of aggression then I don't know what is.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: 51 years
He's a Claret and a passionate one too. Not really arsed about the rest because it's been done to death on here, by the same people too.
These 3 users liked this post: Buxtonclaret Quicknick aclaretinstevenage
-
- Posts: 16721
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3766 times
- Has Liked: 7547 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: 51 years
I don't like a lot of the stuff he was involved in with Blair.
But on the couple of times I've had a few words with him, he's been fine. Loved his enthusiasm of all things Claret, which is shared.
But on the couple of times I've had a few words with him, he's been fine. Loved his enthusiasm of all things Claret, which is shared.
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1004 times
- Has Liked: 905 times
Re: 51 years
Blair was the leader and had the love-in with GWB to facilitate his post parliamentary position in the USA. Campbell was his spin doctor who spun whatever he was given and very successfully. To blame Campbell for Americas hatred of anything that isn’t to America's advantage is a bit far fetched.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
He doesn't get blamed for that though.huw.Y.WattfromWare wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 4:35 pmBlair was the leader and had the love-in with GWB to facilitate his post parliamentary position in the USA. Campbell was his spin doctor who spun whatever he was given and very successfully. To blame Campbell for Americas hatred of anything that isn’t to America's advantage is a bit far fetched.
Campbell rightly gets blamed for the sexed up dossier that was used to help the lies told by Blair and take us into Iraq under false pretences.
This user liked this post: bobinho
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
" hi, is that the Argentine president...its Maggie here,look, Iam really struggling in the polls, any chance you can invade the Falklands...we'll kill a load of your soldiers and it'll get me re elected.....thanks"
These 3 users liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81 Rowls Quicknick
Re: 51 years
Now that is a conspiracy theory and a half Ian
These 2 users liked this post: Rowls Quicknick
-
- Posts: 15226
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3154 times
- Has Liked: 6742 times
Re: 51 years
Thatcher declared war on the Northern working class.
These 2 users liked this post: IanMcL Pimlico_Claret
-
- Posts: 9290
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4092 times
- Has Liked: 6568 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: 51 years
Someone’s hacked your account.... hopefully....
These 2 users liked this post: Rowls Quicknick
Re: 51 years
Thatcher’s government weakened the Falklands enough to embolden the Argentine government to attack. I don’t think she did this purposely, as taking the islands back was by no means a guarantied thing, but it remains her failure.
Turning the police on the miners showed a willingness to employ violence for her political purpose. Calling fellow citizens “the enemy within” was using charged and inflammatory language, much like the government still do now:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... s-rhetoric
Turning the police on the miners showed a willingness to employ violence for her political purpose. Calling fellow citizens “the enemy within” was using charged and inflammatory language, much like the government still do now:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... s-rhetoric
Re: 51 years
I wish she was in charge now...there would be no mixed, or poor messages for sure.AndrewJB wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 6:52 pmThatcher’s government weakened the Falklands enough to embolden the Argentine government to attack. I don’t think she did this purposely, as taking the islands back was by no means a guarantied thing, but it remains her failure.
Turning the police on the miners showed a willingness to employ violence for her political purpose. Calling fellow citizens “the enemy within” was using charged and inflammatory language, much like the government still do now:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... s-rhetoric
-
- Posts: 13236
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5155 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: 51 years
Some real poor fishing and some dreadful "I was fishing" excuses popping up here.
Have yourself a fun time, folks.
Have yourself a fun time, folks.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
The miners had been striking for nearly 2 decades...AndrewJB wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 6:52 pmThatcher’s government weakened the Falklands enough to embolden the Argentine government to attack. I don’t think she did this purposely, as taking the islands back was by no means a guarantied thing, but it remains her failure.
Turning the police on the miners showed a willingness to employ violence for her political purpose. Calling fellow citizens “the enemy within” was using charged and inflammatory language, much like the government still do now:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... s-rhetoric
What would you suggest the best way to stop militant unions to be?
-
- Posts: 6942
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1485 times
- Has Liked: 1846 times
Re: 51 years
Interesting it started with Campbell and ended up with Marmite Thatcher
These 2 users liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81 boatshed bill
Re: 51 years
Politics aside he has always talked about Burnley FC and our fans very positively and has contributed more than most in improving the profile of the club.
Away from football he has also done a lot for men’s mental health and talked openly about his own problems and his coping mechanisms etc.
And I get that in his case it’s very difficult to put politics aside but I do think in the 2 above areas he has made really positive contributions.
Away from football he has also done a lot for men’s mental health and talked openly about his own problems and his coping mechanisms etc.
And I get that in his case it’s very difficult to put politics aside but I do think in the 2 above areas he has made really positive contributions.
Re: 51 years
You more or less have it!
If Argentina had been really serious, there is no way British forces could have retaken a wee island, so far from home. Just had to make it look good.
-
- Posts: 9457
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1183 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: 51 years
He’s got hell of a lot of repentance to make up for.TVC15 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 7:49 pmPolitics aside he has always talked about Burnley FC and our fans very positively and has contributed more than most in improving the profile of the club.
Away from football he has also done a lot for men’s mental health and talked openly about his own problems and his coping mechanisms etc.
And I get that in his case it’s very difficult to put politics aside but I do think in the 2 above areas he has made really positive contributions.
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
You're really bored tonight aren't you?
The Argies were ill-equipped and ill prepared to firstly invade Argentina and secondly defend it from the British army retaking it.
I think the Argie armed forces were only given a few hours notice to prepare.
Our armed forces were better trained, equipped and more professional and clearly didn't **** about.
My dad was in the army back then and he said the squaddies were queueing up to get deployed there.
Its clear you don't like Maggie but your drivel is just hilarious tonight.
This user liked this post: Quicknick
-
- Posts: 6683
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1812 times
- Has Liked: 1792 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: 51 years
Always makes me laugh when any northerner supports the tories, but particularly Thatcher.
You do know she ****** the north up the arse, don't you?
You do know she ****** the north up the arse, don't you?
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... d-economicdougcollins wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 10:25 pmAlways makes me laugh when any northerner supports the tories, but particularly Thatcher.
You do know she ****** the north up the arse, don't you?
Well balanced article here, showing that the North was neglected by both Maggie and Blair, but issues were there prior to Maggie taking charge.
Re: 51 years
The Argentinians didn’t expect Britain to attempt retaking the islands. Why else would they also invade South Georgia? A place Argentina never claimed, and beyond the range of their airforce to defend.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:36 pmYou're really bored tonight aren't you?
The Argies were ill-equipped and ill prepared to firstly invade Argentina and secondly defend it from the British army retaking it.
I think the Argie armed forces were only given a few hours notice to prepare.
Our armed forces were better trained, equipped and more professional and clearly didn't **** about.
My dad was in the army back then and he said the squaddies were queueing up to get deployed there.
Its clear you don't like Maggie but your drivel is just hilarious tonight.
Us winning was no foregone conclusion. It wasn’t a simple task at all, with the success hinging on us not losing too many ships. Had the islands been properly defended in the first place no invasion would have taken place. That was the real failure, but just as they’ve always done in power, the Tories were too busy cutting spending and cutting taxes for the rich.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/dec ... -falklands
Re: 51 years
What Thatcher did in the north was ideological. A wise and good government could have achieved the same results of managing the decline of coal, and industry by having a plan of replacing them, but Thatcher left it all to the free market. If you walk into a town dependent on a particular industry and tell them it’s closing down, of course you’ll have strife. But if you go into that town and say “we need to diversify here, because we’re too dependent on this industry” then you’ve started a conversation.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 10:48 pmhttps://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... d-economic
Well balanced article here, showing that the North was neglected by both Maggie and Blair, but issues were there prior to Maggie taking charge.
Blair largely continued Thatcher’s Neo liberal economic policies. He didn’t re-empower the unions, nor tax the rich more, nor regulate the banks properly (which led to the financial crisis), nor stick to the promised ethical foreign policy (look up who voted for and against the Iraq War).
Now, what is the current government doing to benefit the north? Northern Powerhouse - okay, some local autonomy, which has been trodden all over with the pandemic. What else? Levelling up money, that the minister in charge has already dipped into to help his own constituency (which falls outside the top 100 most needy areas)? Setting up a PPE factory? They’ve wasted that money on two-Bob companies unable to actually provide it. Track and trace? With a budget of £12.3 Billion you’d think it might provide jobs in the north. But it all went to private companies who ran an excel spreadsheet badly. What are they doing for the north?
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
Maybe, just maybe, consider the damage done to the countries economy in the 70's by the militant unions.AndrewJB wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 10:58 pmThe Argentinians didn’t expect Britain to attempt retaking the islands. Why else would they also invade South Georgia? A place Argentina never claimed, and beyond the range of their airforce to defend.
Us winning was no foregone conclusion. It wasn’t a simple task at all, with the success hinging on us not losing too many ships. Had the islands been properly defended in the first place no invasion would have taken place. That was the real failure, but just as they’ve always done in power, the Tories were too busy cutting spending and cutting taxes for the rich.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/dec ... -falklands
-
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: 51 years
Labour closed more mines than Maggie ever did, but that is never really discussed...AndrewJB wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:47 pmWhat Thatcher did in the north was ideological. A wise and good government could have achieved the same results of managing the decline of coal, and industry by having a plan of replacing them, but Thatcher left it all to the free market. If you walk into a town dependent on a particular industry and tell them it’s closing down, of course you’ll have strife. But if you go into that town and say “we need to diversify here, because we’re too dependent on this industry” then you’ve started a conversation.
Blair largely continued Thatcher’s Neo liberal economic policies. He didn’t re-empower the unions, nor tax the rich more, nor regulate the banks properly (which led to the financial crisis), nor stick to the promised ethical foreign policy (look up who voted for and against the Iraq War).
Now, what is the current government doing to benefit the north? Northern Powerhouse - okay, some local autonomy, which has been trodden all over with the pandemic. What else? Levelling up money, that the minister in charge has already dipped into to help his own constituency (which falls outside the top 100 most needy areas)? Setting up a PPE factory? They’ve wasted that money on two-Bob companies unable to actually provide it. Track and trace? With a budget of £12.3 Billion you’d think it might provide jobs in the north. But it all went to private companies who ran an excel spreadsheet badly. What are they doing for the north?
We seem to both agree that Labour under Blair carried on the stitch up of the North yet people seemingly still vote for Labour cos of what Maggie did
As for the North, it became reliant on EU handouts, meaning successive London orientated governments didn't need to bother lifting much of a finger.
The interesting times will start now we are out of the EU and for the first time in decades a London based government will have to look after the whole country.
Re: 51 years
Militant unions? Why didn’t you reply to my other post that dealt with that subject? The post in which I pointed out that she wrecked the economy and lives of many people and places by killing their jobs and offering them nothing to replace it?GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 12:24 amMaybe, just maybe, consider the damage done to the countries economy in the 70's by the militant unions.
You blame the unions, who were looking out for their members. Yet thatcher planned and fought a war against them.
As for the Falklands War, she wasted lots of money and lives fighting to take them back, when her own cuts lost them. Where is the sense in that?