Defour was the catalyst for us to reach Europe.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 3:55 pmYes, it would appear that I was correct inasmuch as I said DD would be a flop. Obviously I didn't know the night club incident would happen. Maybe I just have a thing against drink driving.
But, DD aside we didn't do too well out of Gibson, or the unfortunate Defour.
Dwight McNeil
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Dwight McNeil
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Dwight McNeil
Do you think there are deals in place between player and club where it's basically a case of McNeil earning more, but at the same time, we being able to ask for a higher transfer fee and earning more overall?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:10 pmIt’s excellent news Nonayforever but it’s been dressed up a bit when it’s only one year longer than the deal he was already on. He’s had a very quiet start to the season but I rate Dwight highly and so the longer he’s here, the better. If we do go on to sell him then every year remaining on the contract helps financially.
It’s so hard to believe he’s still only 20.
-
- Posts: 67888
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32533 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Dwight McNeil
Deals are so complex these days but you can bet your bottom dollar that he’s received a significant pay increase. The longer there is remaining on a contract is always a good negotiating tool for the selling club but the player and his representatives could well have got a sell on clause in there.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:15 pmDo you think there are deals in place between player and club where it's basically a case of McNeil earning more, but at the same time, we being able to ask for a higher transfer fee and earning more overall?
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5173 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Dwight McNeil
Any pay rise Dwight has revceived has been well earned over the past 180 months or so.
Very happy to see him signed up on a new contract.
Plenty of work still to be done to get ourselves a set of happy campers from top to bottom at the club but this is something to be welcomed.
Very happy to see him signed up on a new contract.
Plenty of work still to be done to get ourselves a set of happy campers from top to bottom at the club but this is something to be welcomed.
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 605 times
Re: Dwight McNeil
The three I suggested were instead of the one, so that would have taken hin to 2026. A long way from 2028 or 29 that you are implying I said.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:29 pmThat’s exactly what you were suggesting. He’s signed until 2024 with option of another year and you said why not a further three.
For a moderator. you like to stir things.
.
-
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 700 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
Re: Dwight McNeil
As CT has stated, Dwight will have received an increase in salary, plus ( probably) an extension fee, we in return will have negotiated an increased buy out clause in any future transfer plus we know that he is settled ( for the time being ) at Burnley which means we can ( or try ) to build a team of around him.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:15 pmDo you think there are deals in place between player and club where it's basically a case of McNeil earning more, but at the same time, we being able to ask for a higher transfer fee and earning more overall?
-
- Posts: 67888
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32533 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Dwight McNeil
Rather than being offensive I suggest you try to be more clear in what you are posting.Gordaleman wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:47 pmThe three I suggested were instead of the one, so that would have taken hin to 2026. A long way from 2028 or 29 that you are implying I said.
For a moderator. you like to stir things.
.
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 605 times
Re: Dwight McNeil
And I suggest you read what's in my posts, not what you think is in my posts.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:54 pmRather than being offensive I suggest you try to be more clear in what you are posting.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Dwight McNeil
Calm down lads. Calm down. Both on the same team here.
Brilliant news he's signed an extended contract.
Brilliant news he's signed an extended contract.
Re: Dwight McNeil
Some would say he’s been quiet for 20 plus games now and this contract suits him
-
- Posts: 67888
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32533 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 15259
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6758 times
-
- Posts: 9905
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2350 times
- Has Liked: 3181 times
Re: Dwight McNeil
Hi Rowls, 180 months? I make that 15 years.... I know Dwight is good but I don't think he's been in the first team that long.Rowls wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:40 pmAny pay rise Dwight has revceived has been well earned over the past 180 months or so.
Very happy to see him signed up on a new contract.
Plenty of work still to be done to get ourselves a set of happy campers from top to bottom at the club but this is something to be welcomed.
PS: It's a little time since you posted. What does it tell us that no one else seems to have noticed that you typed "180 months?"
-
- Posts: 9905
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2350 times
- Has Liked: 3181 times
Re: Dwight McNeil
Great news to extend Dwight McNeil's contract - and I'm sure he will have got the rewards with a bump in pay.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:10 pmIt’s excellent news Nonayforever but it’s been dressed up a bit when it’s only one year longer than the deal he was already on. He’s had a very quiet start to the season but I rate Dwight highly and so the longer he’s here, the better. If we do go on to sell him then every year remaining on the contract helps financially.
It’s so hard to believe he’s still only 20.
Maybe it has been getting these things sorted that has dragged a little for Dwight these past few weeks.
Good to see the wages saved from not extending Joe Hart and Arron Lennon go towards keeping some of our key players - legs, hearts and minds.
UTC