Jesus. When I can't view a game there are a few people's scores I look to get a reflection on how the game went. I'm glad I kept the 15 quid in my bank
Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
-
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 336 times
- Has Liked: 1516 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Because I couldn't see it, and I certainly wasn't going to listen to the club commentary, I just switched off altogether although did keep up with the score.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:32 pmI think 5L or talksport covered it if you are opposed to the PPV or don’t stream.
-
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:33 pm
- Been Liked: 384 times
- Has Liked: 236 times
- Location: Skipton
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Lowton 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 6
Stephens 4
McNeil 6
Wood 6
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 6
Brady 6
Lowton 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 6
Stephens 4
McNeil 6
Wood 6
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 6
Brady 6
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:42 pm
- Been Liked: 181 times
- Has Liked: 33 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
I'll miss them!Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:41 pmNo ratings from me, I watched the game but cant be bothered giving any scores. This post is just to let you know I wont be posting any ratings like any of you give a sh*t
-
- Posts: 1726
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 494 times
- Has Liked: 162 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Unable to give a marking as I didn’t watch, as I refuse to PPV on principal. I think the sooner we get this opening period out of our systems the better.
-
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2416 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 5
Long 5
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4
Rodriguez 5
Lowton 5
Long 5
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Sproggy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:35 pmPope 5
Lowton 5
Long 5
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 6
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Wood 4
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Miserable. Barnes and Wood isn't working. Brownhill wide doesn't work. Jay on the left and Dwight on the right doesn't work. Tarkowski on the left of 2 doesn't work.?
Do you work?
-
- Posts: 4447
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1165 times
- Has Liked: 1303 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
I did not see it but instead listened to BBC 5 Live commentary. So no marks from me...
Thankfully
Thankfully
-
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 382 times
- Has Liked: 321 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5 poor on 1st and kicking
Lowton 4 lazy
Long 6
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 5
Brownhill 5
Westwood 5
Stephens 3 atrocious
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4 trying to do nothing but win fouls all game is tedious
Rodriguez 5
Lowton 4 lazy
Long 6
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 5
Brownhill 5
Westwood 5
Stephens 3 atrocious
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4 trying to do nothing but win fouls all game is tedious
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 10:31 am
- Been Liked: 11 times
- Has Liked: 13 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5 Kicking all over the place
Lowton 4 Can distribute the ball but that's it
Long 5
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 4
Brownhill 6 Tried
Westwood 5 Minus one for 3rd but tried
Stephens N/A Cant rate that. Very slow, got pushed higher up??? Looked a bit fitter than before but surely a direct swap out, JBG for Brady was better
McNeil 4 Huge fan, but needs a game off
Wood 4 If he's not scoring goals, would consider dropping
Barnes 5 Had our two best moments, doesn't say much however
Rodriguez 5 Would have been better in the hole, just got shoved out wide
Brady 4 Didn't even try to effect it. I would like to see him start over McNeil next, give him something to work with
We learnt nothing from our two games with Chelsea from last season. Mount ran things in front of the back four again and we had to get taught a footballing lesson to implement changes. I'd be tempted to go with Vydra, Jay Rod and Brady for the next game for Wood, Barnes and McNeil, at the very least to take a shot at different options and more of a passing style of play.
Lowton 4 Can distribute the ball but that's it
Long 5
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 4
Brownhill 6 Tried
Westwood 5 Minus one for 3rd but tried
Stephens N/A Cant rate that. Very slow, got pushed higher up??? Looked a bit fitter than before but surely a direct swap out, JBG for Brady was better
McNeil 4 Huge fan, but needs a game off
Wood 4 If he's not scoring goals, would consider dropping
Barnes 5 Had our two best moments, doesn't say much however
Rodriguez 5 Would have been better in the hole, just got shoved out wide
Brady 4 Didn't even try to effect it. I would like to see him start over McNeil next, give him something to work with
We learnt nothing from our two games with Chelsea from last season. Mount ran things in front of the back four again and we had to get taught a footballing lesson to implement changes. I'd be tempted to go with Vydra, Jay Rod and Brady for the next game for Wood, Barnes and McNeil, at the very least to take a shot at different options and more of a passing style of play.
This user liked this post: Wo Didi
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
I know, I was jesting.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:07 pmMACCA - despite the fact that we clearly haven't played very well, although everyone on TV is waxing lyrical about Chelsea, I don't feel lucky but I've made the decision not to watch PPV games but donate to the foodbank so I'll be missing quite a few more.
Hopefully the 1 good thing to come out of the PPV situation is that a lot of foodbanks from the premier league towns and cities are getting a big boost.
This user liked this post: ClaretTony
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
The takeover groups must be lowering their offers after that abject performance, cannot be bothered marking individual players 4 for them all, Stephens 3.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5 - not sure what he was doing for first goal.
Lowton 5 gets in good positions going forward but his crossing gets progressively worse each season.
Taylor 6 good few last ditch tackles but as above
Tarkowski 6 did ok
Long 6 as above but need Mee back.
Westwood 5 continually picked the wrong option missing Cork.
Stephens 4 woeful again
Brownhill 5 ineffective pointless when pushed out wide
Barnes 4 should be 4th choice now don’t understand why we are starting with him.
Wood 4 offered nothing today.
McNeil 4 poor yet again.
Lowton 5 gets in good positions going forward but his crossing gets progressively worse each season.
Taylor 6 good few last ditch tackles but as above
Tarkowski 6 did ok
Long 6 as above but need Mee back.
Westwood 5 continually picked the wrong option missing Cork.
Stephens 4 woeful again
Brownhill 5 ineffective pointless when pushed out wide
Barnes 4 should be 4th choice now don’t understand why we are starting with him.
Wood 4 offered nothing today.
McNeil 4 poor yet again.
-
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 440 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 4
Lowton 4
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4
Rodriguez 4
Horrible performance. We could still be playing now and we still wouldn't have mustered a shot on target. We look completely bereft of creativity, quality, confidence.
That said, Chelsea were very good. Two massive games against Brighton and Palace now. We have to find a win in at least one of those.
Lowton 4
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4
Rodriguez 4
Horrible performance. We could still be playing now and we still wouldn't have mustered a shot on target. We look completely bereft of creativity, quality, confidence.
That said, Chelsea were very good. Two massive games against Brighton and Palace now. We have to find a win in at least one of those.
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Will have to post mine again as obviously been deleted
Pope 4
Lowton 4
Taylor 5
Long 6
Tarks 6
Westwood 3
Brownhill 3
Mc Neil 3
Stephens 3
Barnes 3
Wood 3
Jay 3
Awful no fight nothing - a Chelsea fan messaged me to say have we gone soft as they expect a battle and a hard game.
Hopeless
Pope 4
Lowton 4
Taylor 5
Long 6
Tarks 6
Westwood 3
Brownhill 3
Mc Neil 3
Stephens 3
Barnes 3
Wood 3
Jay 3
Awful no fight nothing - a Chelsea fan messaged me to say have we gone soft as they expect a battle and a hard game.
Hopeless
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Not going to rate either. Turgid performance with few positives. McNeill needs a rest. Polite way of saying he needs dropping.
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Have you considered PPV and making a donation ? Or is it that you are just opposed to PPV
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
I have read all your comments on this postClaretTony wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:52 pmHave you considered reading my comments on this and what I’ve done in the last week?
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
No - you look at the top of the thread, that explains how you rate. And you don't abuse other posters either, that's why you were given a warning.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:47 pmactually, I gave them both 2 for effort, remind me next week to ask you first what numbers I'm allowed to give
-
- Posts: 30717
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11060 times
- Has Liked: 5663 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
say what Tony ?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Nov 04, 2020 3:21 pmNo - you look at the top of the thread, that explains how you rate. And you don't abuse other posters either, that's why you were given a warning.