Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
-
- Posts: 67953
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32572 times
- Has Liked: 5285 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Please leave ratings for all players who have played 20 mins or more.
Scoring is from 3 to 10 as follows:
10 - Out of this World
9 - Excellent
8 - Very Good
7 -Good
6 - Average
5 - Below Par
4 - Poor
3 - Abysmal
Scoring is from 3 to 10 as follows:
10 - Out of this World
9 - Excellent
8 - Very Good
7 -Good
6 - Average
5 - Below Par
4 - Poor
3 - Abysmal
-
- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 4
Lowton 4
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 3
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Wood 3
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Lowton 4
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 3
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Wood 3
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
-
- Posts: 67953
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32572 times
- Has Liked: 5285 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
No ratings from me today - unable to watch the game.
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 5
Brownhill 6
Stephens 4
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Barnes 5
Wood 5
subs-
Rodriguez 6
Brady n/a
Lowton 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 5
Brownhill 6
Stephens 4
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Barnes 5
Wood 5
subs-
Rodriguez 6
Brady n/a
-
- Posts: 2746
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
- Been Liked: 668 times
- Has Liked: 2056 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 4
Lowton 4
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 3
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Very very poor. I've already written off being able to attend a game this season and now I'm already beginning to write off our chances of staying up at this early stage. Fingers crossed Dyche can turn this around.
Lowton 4
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 3
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Very very poor. I've already written off being able to attend a game this season and now I'm already beginning to write off our chances of staying up at this early stage. Fingers crossed Dyche can turn this around.
-
- Posts: 3960
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1774 times
- Has Liked: 470 times
-
- Posts: 1376
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
- Been Liked: 278 times
- Has Liked: 3308 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 8
Lowton 9
Long 9
Tarkowski 10
Taylor 8
Brownhill 9
Stephens 3
Westwood 9
McNeil 8
Barnes 10
Wood 9
subs-
Rodriguez 8
Brady n/a
Lowton 9
Long 9
Tarkowski 10
Taylor 8
Brownhill 9
Stephens 3
Westwood 9
McNeil 8
Barnes 10
Wood 9
subs-
Rodriguez 8
Brady n/a
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 23 times
- Has Liked: 30 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 3
Taylor 4
Tarks 5
Long 4
Lowton 4
McNeil - by far his worse performance 3
Westwood - 3
Brownhill - 4
Stephens - laughable decision to start him 3
Barnes - 3 time for Jay Rod to start.
Wood - 3
Jay Rod - 4
Taylor 4
Tarks 5
Long 4
Lowton 4
McNeil - by far his worse performance 3
Westwood - 3
Brownhill - 4
Stephens - laughable decision to start him 3
Barnes - 3 time for Jay Rod to start.
Wood - 3
Jay Rod - 4
-
- Posts: 30730
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11062 times
- Has Liked: 5667 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 3
Lowton 3
Long 4
Tarkowski 3
Taylor 3
Brownhill 7
Westwood 7
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
I've marked up Brownhill and Westwood just because of the effort put in. There are others I wish I could have marked lower than 3
Not remotely close to being a cohesive football team, defenders that can't defend, wingers that can't cross or just throw themselves on the floor and give up, midfielder than can't be arsed running. Reminds me very much of watching West Ham last season. It will take a remarkable upturn in form for us to stay up this season, sadly I just don't see it happening because our lack of quality is there for all to see.
Lowton 3
Long 4
Tarkowski 3
Taylor 3
Brownhill 7
Westwood 7
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
I've marked up Brownhill and Westwood just because of the effort put in. There are others I wish I could have marked lower than 3
Not remotely close to being a cohesive football team, defenders that can't defend, wingers that can't cross or just throw themselves on the floor and give up, midfielder than can't be arsed running. Reminds me very much of watching West Ham last season. It will take a remarkable upturn in form for us to stay up this season, sadly I just don't see it happening because our lack of quality is there for all to see.
Last edited by Vegas Claret on Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Team 3
Management team 3
Board -10
Management team 3
Board -10
This user liked this post: Wo Didi
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 4 poor for the 1st, nothing else he could do for the rest
Lowton 4
Long 5
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3 horrible display,
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Really worrying times
No home goals in 3, and if truth be told not really a chance created never ends well.
Like SD, I envisaged these current issues 2 years ago, but hey ho.
Feel sorry for him, but like all emergencies, theyll be someone somewhere making a load of cash out of this...
Lowton 4
Long 5
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3 horrible display,
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Really worrying times
No home goals in 3, and if truth be told not really a chance created never ends well.
Like SD, I envisaged these current issues 2 years ago, but hey ho.
Feel sorry for him, but like all emergencies, theyll be someone somewhere making a load of cash out of this...
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
You lucky so and so
-
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:28 am
- Been Liked: 103 times
- Has Liked: 44 times
- Location: Leyland
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Very easy for me today
Tarky - 4
All the rest - 3
Regardless of the opposition that is one of the worst performances by a Burnley team in a very long time. I think Dyche hooking Stephens at half time speaks volumes and nobody comes out of that game with the slightest bit of respect.
Minimum 4 points out of the next 2 games
Tarky - 4
All the rest - 3
Regardless of the opposition that is one of the worst performances by a Burnley team in a very long time. I think Dyche hooking Stephens at half time speaks volumes and nobody comes out of that game with the slightest bit of respect.
Minimum 4 points out of the next 2 games
-
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 641 times
- Has Liked: 674 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 3 not good atm
Lowton 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 4
Brownhill 5 meh
Stephens n/a not a footballer
Westwood 5
McNeil 4 not able to get involved
Barnes 3 desperately bad
Wood 3 was he playing?
subs-
Rodriguez 4 meh
Lowton 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 4
Brownhill 5 meh
Stephens n/a not a footballer
Westwood 5
McNeil 4 not able to get involved
Barnes 3 desperately bad
Wood 3 was he playing?
subs-
Rodriguez 4 meh
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 7
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Brownhill 7
Westwood 5
Stephens 3
McNeil 6
Wood 5
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 5
Lowton 7
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Brownhill 7
Westwood 5
Stephens 3
McNeil 6
Wood 5
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 641 times
- Has Liked: 674 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Can we just accept that Stephens is a 3 whenever he plays?
-
- Posts: 67953
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32572 times
- Has Liked: 5285 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
MACCA - despite the fact that we clearly haven't played very well, although everyone on TV is waxing lyrical about Chelsea, I don't feel lucky but I've made the decision not to watch PPV games but donate to the foodbank so I'll be missing quite a few more.
These 5 users liked this post: ksrclaret paulatky spadesclaret boatshed bill Vino blanco
-
- Posts: 6699
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1705 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 4
Tarks 5
Long 5
Taylor 4
Brownhill 5
McNeil 4-just cannot see what role he is playing
Stephens 3
Westwood 5
Barnes 5
Wood 4
Lowton 4
Tarks 5
Long 5
Taylor 4
Brownhill 5
McNeil 4-just cannot see what role he is playing
Stephens 3
Westwood 5
Barnes 5
Wood 4
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 23 times
- Has Liked: 30 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
7 for Westwood. Give me a break, he basically got an assist for their 3rd.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:04 pmPope 3
Lowton 3
Long 4
Tarkowski 3
Taylor 3
Brownhill 7
Westwood 7
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
I've marked up Brownhill and Westwood just because of the effort put in. There are others I wish I could have marked lower than 3
Not remotely close to being a cohesive football team, defenders that can't defend, wingers that can't cross or just throw themselves on the floor and give up, midfielder than can't be arsed running. Reminds me very much of watching West Ham last season. It will take a remarkable upturn in form for us to stay up this season, sadly I just don't see it happening because our lack of quality is there for all to see.
-
- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Can you not report people’s posts just because you disagree with the rating please? It’s hard enough trawling through complaints at the best of times.firebfcfire wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:10 pm7 for Westwood. Give me a break, he basically got an assist for their 3rd.
This user liked this post: The Enclosure
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 23 times
- Has Liked: 30 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Sorry I pressed that instead of quote.
This user liked this post: MDWat
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 3
Lowton 3
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 5
Brownhill 3
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Wood 3
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Lowton 3
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 5
Brownhill 3
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Wood 3
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:57 pm
- Been Liked: 117 times
- Has Liked: 303 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
All 3 except 4 for Josh!!
-
- Posts: 4970
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1009 times
- Has Liked: 726 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 4
Lowton 6
Long 5
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 5
Wood 5
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 5
Lowton 6
Long 5
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 5
Wood 5
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 30730
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11062 times
- Has Liked: 5667 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
did you even read what I put ? Muppetfirebfcfire wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:10 pm7 for Westwood. Give me a break, he basically got an assist for their 3rd.
-
- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
No probs, thanks for that. Easy done!
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 4
Long 5
Tarks 5
Taylor 4
Brownhill 4
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Barnes 4
Wood 4
JRod 4
Lowton 4
Long 5
Tarks 5
Taylor 4
Brownhill 4
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Barnes 4
Wood 4
JRod 4
-
- Posts: 7181
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3606 times
- Has Liked: 1033 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope - 4 - No idea what on Earth he was doing for that first goal and his kicking was poor, again.
Lowton - 4 - Tried his best but simply outclassed.
Tarkowski - 3- Totally at fault for the Zouma goal and generally looked sloppy and a million miles away from what we had become accustomed to.
Long - 4 - Same as Lowton, watching him attempt to keep up with Werner made me feel sorry for him.
Taylor 5 - Didn’t have the chance to get forward as much as he’d usually like but didn’t let the side down.
Brownhill - 6 - Energetic, full of effort abd sadly alone in doing so. My ‘Man of the match’.
Westwood - 5 - Not terrible, but poor set pieces unfortunately which is something we rely on from him, particularly when we’re creating bugger all from open play.
Stephens - 3 - Would give him lower if the scoring permitted it. I never like to discuss new signings early doors, but unfortunately you’d have to be struggling with sight to not see just how poorly Stephens was today. He barely touched the ball (and when he did, invariably lost it or passed it to a Chelsea player). He looks so slow, so out of his comfort zone (I.e, a three man midfield?) and sadly doesn’t track play or look particularly bothered at trying to win it back. A million pounds looks a lot of money right now.
McNeil - 5 - Tried to get it down and play but had no time on the ball really to influence.
Barnes - 4 - Totally ineffective and you have to wonder if the old tactic of smashing it at Barnes to fall over and win a foul in the opposition half has been well and truly found out.
Wood - 4 - Barely touched the ball but I can’t blame him for that.
Subs didn’t change anything - I’ll give Rodriguez a 5 for again just trying to get it in the deck.
Lowton - 4 - Tried his best but simply outclassed.
Tarkowski - 3- Totally at fault for the Zouma goal and generally looked sloppy and a million miles away from what we had become accustomed to.
Long - 4 - Same as Lowton, watching him attempt to keep up with Werner made me feel sorry for him.
Taylor 5 - Didn’t have the chance to get forward as much as he’d usually like but didn’t let the side down.
Brownhill - 6 - Energetic, full of effort abd sadly alone in doing so. My ‘Man of the match’.
Westwood - 5 - Not terrible, but poor set pieces unfortunately which is something we rely on from him, particularly when we’re creating bugger all from open play.
Stephens - 3 - Would give him lower if the scoring permitted it. I never like to discuss new signings early doors, but unfortunately you’d have to be struggling with sight to not see just how poorly Stephens was today. He barely touched the ball (and when he did, invariably lost it or passed it to a Chelsea player). He looks so slow, so out of his comfort zone (I.e, a three man midfield?) and sadly doesn’t track play or look particularly bothered at trying to win it back. A million pounds looks a lot of money right now.
McNeil - 5 - Tried to get it down and play but had no time on the ball really to influence.
Barnes - 4 - Totally ineffective and you have to wonder if the old tactic of smashing it at Barnes to fall over and win a foul in the opposition half has been well and truly found out.
Wood - 4 - Barely touched the ball but I can’t blame him for that.
Subs didn’t change anything - I’ll give Rodriguez a 5 for again just trying to get it in the deck.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 23 times
- Has Liked: 30 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
For effort. Can't give someone 4 more marks for effort. Don't make me laugh. He was terrible love to see his passing statistics.
-
- Posts: 1797
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:28 am
- Been Liked: 567 times
- Has Liked: 684 times
- Location: Franks shed
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
I’ve always fancied watching the game off my tits as well.cockneyclaret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 4:58 pmPope 8
Lowton 9
Long 9
Tarkowski 10
Taylor 8
Brownhill 9
Stephens 3
Westwood 9
McNeil 8
Barnes 10
Wood 9
subs-
Rodriguez 8
Brady n/a
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1641 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 6
Tarkowski 6
Long 5
Taylor 6
Brownhill 5
Stephens 5
Westwood 5
MacNeil 4
Barnes 4
Wood 5
Rodriguez 5
Lowton 6
Tarkowski 6
Long 5
Taylor 6
Brownhill 5
Stephens 5
Westwood 5
MacNeil 4
Barnes 4
Wood 5
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 16767
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3778 times
- Has Liked: 7578 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 4
Lowton 5
Long 6
Tarks 4
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 6
Very, very unpleasant watch.
Lowton 5
Long 6
Tarks 4
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 6
Very, very unpleasant watch.
-
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1040 times
- Has Liked: 2041 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
This ain't gonna be pretty, but after that shambles what do you expect. We had perhaps a 5 minute spell at the start of each half but that was that. It was utter tripe.
We have become a team of nothingness, we don't do anything, we don't attack, defend, keep it tight,show any passion, drive, nastiness
Pope 5
Lowton 3
Long 3
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 5
Brownhill 5
Stephens 3
Westwood 4
McNeil 4
Barnes 3
Wood 4
subs-
Rodriguez 5
Brady n/a
We have become a team of nothingness, we don't do anything, we don't attack, defend, keep it tight,show any passion, drive, nastiness
Pope 5
Lowton 3
Long 3
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 5
Brownhill 5
Stephens 3
Westwood 4
McNeil 4
Barnes 3
Wood 4
subs-
Rodriguez 5
Brady n/a
-
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:04 pm
- Been Liked: 49 times
- Has Liked: 470 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 7
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 5
Stephens 3
McNeil 6
Wood 5
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 6
Lowton 7
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 5
Stephens 3
McNeil 6
Wood 5
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 6
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
It was Chelsea....
Outclassed, yes. Still there.
Pope 5
Lowton 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Brownhill 7
Westwood 5
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 5
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 5
Outclassed, yes. Still there.
Pope 5
Lowton 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Brownhill 7
Westwood 5
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 5
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 30730
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11062 times
- Has Liked: 5667 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
actually, I gave them both 2 for effort, remind me next week to ask you first what numbers I'm allowed to givefirebfcfire wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:19 pmFor effort. Can't give someone 4 more marks for effort. Don't make me laugh. He was terrible love to see his passing statistics.
These 2 users liked this post: firebfcfire jedi_master
-
- Posts: 9326
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 4
Lowton 4
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4
Rodriguez 4
Really poor!
Lowton 4
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4
Rodriguez 4
Really poor!
-
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:09 pm
- Been Liked: 70 times
- Has Liked: 89 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 6
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Brownhill 7
Westwood 6
Stephens 3
McNeil 6
Wood 4
Barnes 4
Rodriguez 5
Lowton 6
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Brownhill 7
Westwood 6
Stephens 3
McNeil 6
Wood 4
Barnes 4
Rodriguez 5
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
You jammy swine!
-
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:02 pm
- Been Liked: 23 times
- Has Liked: 6 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Chelsea were very, very good but even so.
Pope. 5. One mistake and poor distribution
Lowton. 6. Did okay
Tarks. 6. Some crucial interventions
Long. 6. Solid enough
Taylor. 6. Pinned back.
Brown hill. 6. Worked hard
Stephens. 3. Terrible
Westwood. 4. Terrible mistake for 3rd goal
McNeil. 4. Never got going
Barnes. 4. Ineffective again
Wood. 4. Not in the game.
Rodriguez. 4. Made no difference.
Pope. 5. One mistake and poor distribution
Lowton. 6. Did okay
Tarks. 6. Some crucial interventions
Long. 6. Solid enough
Taylor. 6. Pinned back.
Brown hill. 6. Worked hard
Stephens. 3. Terrible
Westwood. 4. Terrible mistake for 3rd goal
McNeil. 4. Never got going
Barnes. 4. Ineffective again
Wood. 4. Not in the game.
Rodriguez. 4. Made no difference.
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 5
Long 5
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 6
Wood 4
Barnes 5
Jay 4
Got to give some credit to Chelsea who played well but the lack of fight was alarming. Few options when we have the ball and too slow to punish their slack touches on the ball. When we are off it looks terrible and we were well off today. One step forward versus Spurs and two back today.
Lowton 5
Long 5
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 3
McNeil 6
Wood 4
Barnes 5
Jay 4
Got to give some credit to Chelsea who played well but the lack of fight was alarming. Few options when we have the ball and too slow to punish their slack touches on the ball. When we are off it looks terrible and we were well off today. One step forward versus Spurs and two back today.
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
You should be tied to a chair and made to watch a replay of the whole game
-
- Posts: 13273
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5178 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Poor fare today.
I’ll hold back from posting marks today. Might do tomorrow.
I’ll hold back from posting marks today. Might do tomorrow.
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Difficult to rate that one. We shouldn't be accommodating a place for Stephens by shifting Brownhill to the right. If Brady isn't fit he should not be on the bench.
We are desperate for Mee to be back, hopefully provide some motivation for the team as that was so flat.
On to the next game.
We are desperate for Mee to be back, hopefully provide some motivation for the team as that was so flat.
On to the next game.
-
- Posts: 67953
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32572 times
- Has Liked: 5285 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
I made the decision to donate my £14.95 to the foodbank rather than pay. I think everyone on this board knows how much I love going to football, how much I love watching Burnley and how much it hurts when we play badly, lose or both. As bad as it was today, and judging from the comments I've picked up it wasn't very good, I really missed it.
-
- Posts: 6659
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2007 times
- Has Liked: 3354 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Once we signed Brady, the rules should have been amended to allow for scores less than 3, otherwise it's impossible! (IMO)
-
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1188 times
- Has Liked: 780 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
I think 5L or talksport covered it if you are opposed to the PPV or don’t stream.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:28 pmI made the decision to donate my £14.95 to the foodbank rather than pay. I think everyone on this board knows how much I love going to football, how much I love watching Burnley and how much it hurts when we play badly, lose or both. As bad as it was today, and judging from the comments I've picked up it wasn't very good, I really missed it.
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope: 4
Lowton: 4
Long: 5
Tarkowski: 5
Taylor: 5
Brownhill: 6*
Westwood: 3 (-1)
Stephens: [redacted]
McNeil: 4
Wood: 4
Barnes: 4
Lowton: 4
Long: 5
Tarkowski: 5
Taylor: 5
Brownhill: 6*
Westwood: 3 (-1)
Stephens: [redacted]
McNeil: 4
Wood: 4
Barnes: 4
-
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 122 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Jammy sod CT
Re: Burnley v Chelsea - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 5
Long 5
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 6
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Wood 4
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Miserable. Barnes and Wood isn't working. Brownhill wide doesn't work. Jay on the left and Dwight on the right doesn't work. Tarkowski on the left of 2 doesn't work. Add into that players miles off the pace and you end up with that tripe. Stephens looking like value for money though. I hope that's knocked £20 million off Magic Mike's windfall.
Lowton 5
Long 5
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 6
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Wood 4
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Miserable. Barnes and Wood isn't working. Brownhill wide doesn't work. Jay on the left and Dwight on the right doesn't work. Tarkowski on the left of 2 doesn't work. Add into that players miles off the pace and you end up with that tripe. Stephens looking like value for money though. I hope that's knocked £20 million off Magic Mike's windfall.