Tarkowski

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
KRBFC
Posts: 10324
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 1910 times
Has Liked: 702 times

Tarkowski

Post by KRBFC » Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:04 am

How about he keeps his mouth shut instead of telling everyone how desperate he is to leave and instead learns to pass to his own team mates maybe?

I don’t know why he thinks he’s some ball playing Pirlo type, he’s an absolute donkey with the ball at his feet.

tim_noone
Posts: 15651
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4041 times
Has Liked: 13950 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by tim_noone » Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:11 am

KRBFC wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:04 am
How about he keeps his mouth shut instead of telling everyone how desperate he is to leave and instead learns to pass to his own team mates maybe?

I don’t know why he thinks he’s some ball playing Pirlo type, he’s an absolute donkey with the ball at his feet.
By all accounts on here..... If Maguire's worth £80million tarks is worth £40 million dont be silly.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 3803
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 1731 times
Has Liked: 53 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Sun Nov 29, 2020 6:43 am

Anyone else remember their first shandy

More lemonade next time
These 9 users liked this post: Woodleyclaret FactualFrank DomBFC1882 Zlatan evensteadiereddie Stayingup bfcjg Bosscat MT03ALG

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 3992
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 799 times
Has Liked: 1037 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sun Nov 29, 2020 6:51 am

At fault for one goal, but the lack of challenges by our powderpuff midfield didn't do our back four any favours
The constantly drifting inside by our two full backs allowed City to play down the flanks at will leading to three goals.

jtv
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:59 pm
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 313 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by jtv » Sun Nov 29, 2020 7:14 am

4th and 5th goals started off with aimless clearances by Tarks as well.
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud

MACCA
Posts: 13341
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 3577 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by MACCA » Sun Nov 29, 2020 7:30 am

Its Man City away, if anything the last few seasons has told us, it's that regardless of personnel, tactics, formations we usually get a good thumping.

They usually get 4 or 5, they usually deserve 6 or 7.

It was absolutely another free hit where even the most deluded of fans expected nothing.

Just to add, that starting 11, and subsequent bench SHOULD be getting walloped at most grounds in the premier league.
The manager has been asked to work with 1 hand tied behind his back... again

SD is working with about 14 fit senior pros and a couple that cant even really be classed as even premier league players.
This user liked this post: DomBFC1882

Zenwisdom
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2016 1:48 pm
Been Liked: 3 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Zenwisdom » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:14 am

Don’t think he will be knocking on Southgates door
any time soon he needs to wake up and don’t pass to the opposition . He just average defender nothing else .
Does not help when your fullbacks mark fresh air making
Everyone else look vulnerable against a top side .

Longsidebogs
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 5:38 pm
Been Liked: 52 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Longsidebogs » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:15 am

Tarkowski is no longer interested in playing for Burnley and we need to get rid as soon as possible. He seems to think he can’t get in the England team because he plays for Burnley. In reality it’s because when he did appear for England he was s*** in both games. He actually thinks he’s better than he is. He has become toxic. Get Long in and bench Tarks.

Steve1956
Posts: 11575
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 4239 times
Has Liked: 2064 times
Location: Fife

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:24 am

From Hero to Zero....its the Burnley way.😏
These 3 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie IanMcL MT03ALG

DomBFC1882
Posts: 935
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 2:21 pm
Been Liked: 269 times
Has Liked: 1788 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by DomBFC1882 » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:26 am

Longsidebogs wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:15 am
Tarkowski is no longer interested in playing for Burnley and we need to get rid as soon as possible. He seems to think he can’t get in the England team because he plays for Burnley. In reality it’s because when he did appear for England he was s*** in both games. He actually thinks he’s better than he is. He has become toxic. Get Long in and bench Tarks.
🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

FactualFrank
Posts: 25451
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6927 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Tarkowski

Post by FactualFrank » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:38 am

Longsidebogs wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:15 am
Tarkowski is no longer interested in playing for Burnley and we need to get rid as soon as possible. He seems to think he can’t get in the England team because he plays for Burnley. In reality it’s because when he did appear for England he was s*** in both games. He actually thinks he’s better than he is. He has become toxic. Get Long in and bench Tarks.
If he has no interest in playing for Burnley then he's hardly going to purposely be lazy and put in crap performances.

He wants himself in the shop window to attract as many other clubs as possible.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 3923
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1273 times
Has Liked: 566 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:45 am

He’s a good defender but really didn’t understand the need for him or his agent to publicly declare he wants to leave. Those conversations and thoughts should be kept in house. For as poor as his pass was for the first goal I thought he was superb on Monday night against Palace and played well at Brighton.
These 2 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie Stayingup

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 11280
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 2517 times
Has Liked: 1376 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:54 am

Steve-Harpers-perm wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:45 am
He’s a good defender but really didn’t understand the need for him or his agent to publicly declare he wants to leave. Those conversations and thoughts should be kept in house. For as poor as his pass was for the first goal I thought he was superb on Monday night against Palace and played well at Brighton.
They should be, but it will ensure he moves in January. Same with Vydra, he has kept his head down but tried to move in the last 3 windows but Dyche won't allow him. So his agents goes public and the fans will put pressure on for their player to be sold.
This thread starting is an example.
This user liked this post: Steve-Harpers-perm

Steve1956
Posts: 11575
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 4239 times
Has Liked: 2064 times
Location: Fife

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:56 am

I dont get all the hate coming Tarkowski's way,he has been Magnificent for us,you cant blame him wanting the best for himself and his family,there isn't a poster on here who wouldn't do exactly the same thing it they were given a chance to better themselves
These 2 users liked this post: IanMcL Vino blanco

jrgbfc
Posts: 5370
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 1334 times
Has Liked: 167 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by jrgbfc » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:57 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:54 am
They should be, but it will ensure he moves in January. Same with Vydra, he has kept his head down but tried to move in the last 3 windows but Dyche won't allow him. So his agents goes public and the fans will put pressure on for their player to be sold.
This thread starting is an example.
That's a good point, keeping his head down and doing the right thing hasn't exactly done Vydra any favours has it. He'd be better doing a Gibson and getting his move, it's a short career and they have to look out for number 1.

FactualFrank
Posts: 25451
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6927 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Tarkowski

Post by FactualFrank » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:58 am

I thought Vydra had come out and said he's pleased to have signed a new contract, saying he's happy, gets on well with the players and is going to continue fighting for his place?

jrgbfc
Posts: 5370
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 1334 times
Has Liked: 167 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by jrgbfc » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:02 am

The only quotes I've seen were from his agent suggesting he wants out. Don't really blame him tbh.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 11280
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 2517 times
Has Liked: 1376 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:02 am

FactualFrank wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:58 am
I thought Vydra had come out and said he's pleased to have signed a new contract, saying he's happy, gets on well with the players and is going to continue fighting for his place?
He might of, it was his agent on Twitter that said he wants to leave. It can be found in the new contract thread.
He has given a few interviews back in his homeland telling of the moves he had blocked by Burnley.

Blyclaret
Posts: 509
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 112 times
Has Liked: 2 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Blyclaret » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:03 am

Tarks is a busted flush with Burnley
He needs to move on

FactualFrank
Posts: 25451
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6927 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Tarkowski

Post by FactualFrank » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:05 am

jrgbfc wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:02 am
The only quotes I've seen were from his agent suggesting he wants out. Don't really blame him tbh.
Fair enough, guess they have to be more believable.

jrgbfc
Posts: 5370
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 1334 times
Has Liked: 167 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by jrgbfc » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:08 am

FactualFrank wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:05 am
Fair enough, guess they have to be more believable.
Tbf I'd be amazed if Vydra was happy. He's probably worked out that under Dyche no matter what he does he'll always be 4th choice. Unless he's like Kevin Long and happy to pick up a good wage and not play.

CFS
Posts: 1471
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:46 am
Been Liked: 200 times
Has Liked: 75 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by CFS » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:13 am

FactualFrank wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:38 am
If he has no interest in playing for Burnley then he's hardly going to purposely be lazy and put in crap performances.

He wants himself in the shop window to attract as many other clubs as possible.
Not as many teams as possible. Just one of the 4 champions League teams he wants.

Claret Till I Die
Posts: 898
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 8:31 am
Been Liked: 570 times
Has Liked: 581 times
Location: Worsthorne

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Claret Till I Die » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:17 am

FactualFrank wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:58 am
I thought Vydra had come out and said he's pleased to have signed a new contract, saying he's happy, gets on well with the players and is going to continue fighting for his place?

Vydra hasn't signed a new contract though.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 3992
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 799 times
Has Liked: 1037 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:22 am

Vydra signed a 1 yr extension last week

Spijed
Posts: 12561
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2156 times
Has Liked: 937 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Spijed » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:24 am

tim_noone wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:11 am
By all accounts on here..... If Maguire's worth £80million tarks is worth £40 million dont be silly.
Is Maquire twice the player Tarkowski is?

Is he much better?

taio
Posts: 6511
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 1901 times
Has Liked: 155 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by taio » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:26 am

Spijed wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:24 am
Is Maquire twice the player Tarkowski is?

Is he much better?
That's not how the market works.

claretandy
Posts: 2837
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 575 times
Has Liked: 202 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by claretandy » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:28 am

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:22 am
Vydra signed a 1 yr extension last week
Not true, the club triggered a 1 year extension in their favour.
This user liked this post: Claret Till I Die

TVC15
Posts: 8221
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3316 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by TVC15 » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:35 am

Spijed wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:24 am
Is Maquire twice the player Tarkowski is?

Is he much better?
As said not really how it works as nobody would argue Maguire is better than VVD just because he cost more.

Do I think Maguire is worth £80m ? No - do I think he’s better than Tarks ? Definitely yes and other than a few Burnley fans I’m not sure who else would disagree.

Tarks had a pretty shocking game yesterday but I still think for Burnley he’s a very good player. To us he probably is worth £30m or £40m.
I not so sure he is worth that to another team who might not have to defend as much as us. His distribution is poor and he does not have great pace either. He doesn’t look comfortable coming out with the ball and given his height and strength in the air he is nowhere near as prolific or dangerous as people like Maguire, VVD or even the likes of Zouma, Keane, etc in the opposition box.

jrgbfc
Posts: 5370
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 1334 times
Has Liked: 167 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by jrgbfc » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:44 am

With West Ham showing signs of improvement they may be a decent move for him. I don't think he's good enough to play for an established top 6 or 7 side.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 3923
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1273 times
Has Liked: 566 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:46 am

He’s already proven himself good enough to be part of a team that’s finished 7th and 10th in recent seasons!

pushpinpussy
Posts: 1462
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:57 am
Been Liked: 550 times
Has Liked: 73 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by pushpinpussy » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:47 am

we would miss Mee more than this over rated prima donna. looks very heavy for me this season.

taio
Posts: 6511
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 1901 times
Has Liked: 155 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by taio » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:49 am

He had a poor game yesterday along with others. In previous games including the last one he's played well. Players have off days. That's all.

Stayingup
Posts: 2735
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 457 times
Has Liked: 988 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Stayingup » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:54 am

Steve1956 wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:56 am
I dont get all the hate coming Tarkowski's way,he has been Magnificent for us,you cant blame him wanting the best for himself and his family,there isn't a poster on here who wouldn't do exactly the same thing it they were given a chance to better themselves
Very true he's been fantastic for us. He, Mee and Pope have kept us in contention in many games. That is without much protection from a weak midfield.

I recall the Tarks v Keane thread. He wasn't so bad then.
Regarding his passing, yesterday who was he going to pass too. Fact is this is our weakest team in a long time and its looking like we might pay the price.

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 1503
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 384 times
Has Liked: 144 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Jakubs Tash » Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:54 am

Tarkowski is a superb centre half. He might have had a poor game yesterday but it sounds like he wasn’t on his own.

Drop Tarkowski? Bring Long in? Give your heads a wobble.

Pope, Mee and Tarkowski are our Holy Trinity. If we stay up all 3 of them will be a big reason for this.
These 4 users liked this post: BurnleyFC Steve-Harpers-perm DCWat Stayingup

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 7216
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 2416 times
Has Liked: 1432 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Wile E Coyote » Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:17 am

if we had beaten city there would be no words of criticism at all, no one suggesting he cant be bothered, or can't pass.
it was one game against a team that batter us by the same margin as regular as christmas. give the lad a break.

ksrclaret
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 1190 times
Has Liked: 294 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by ksrclaret » Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:21 am

I've got to say, given the reputation he arrived with from Brentford, I've been less than impressed with Tarkowski's ability on the ball. I think his passing is rank bad at times, playing balls that Ben Mee would get absolute pelters for.

On the other hand though, his actual defending ability has been a revelation on the whole which is probably why he's been such a huge success at Burnley. We value and require good defenders way more than ball playing skills from the back.

I think he'll probably go in January, and I think it might well be best for all concerned if he does after his comments the other week. I certainly don't see him just walking into another side's back four though, unless it's Fulham.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 593 times
Has Liked: 402 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by BurnleyFC » Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:21 am

Even though he’s had a relatively poor start to the season, Tarkowski is still an excellent defender, and now his talisman and captain is back alongside him I’d imagine he’ll start to regain last season’s form.

He only said what most of the fans are thinking anyway. He’s as ****** off with the abysmal lack of investment in the first time as we are, and who can blame him?

FCBurnley
Posts: 4845
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 1062 times
Has Liked: 589 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by FCBurnley » Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:34 am

From many thousands of miles away it would seem to me that the club is in total free fall. When Chairman and Manager don’t get on then it leads to situations like Tarks. Last season he was a giant. This season he just wants away. Others will be the same. If Dyche gets a decent offer he will be gone too. Even Garlick wants out. We are in a mess

FactualFrank
Posts: 25451
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6927 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Tarkowski

Post by FactualFrank » Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:37 am

FCBurnley wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:34 am
From many thousands of miles away it would seem to me that the club is in total free fall. When Chairman and Manager don’t get on then it leads to situations like Tarks. Last season he was a giant. This season he just wants away. Others will be the same. If Dyche gets a decent offer he will be gone too. Even Garlick wants out. We are in a mess
Could easily turn that on its head and say a new takeover next month could be a huge boost, with players and manager happy to stay.

Elizabeth
Posts: 1196
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 397 times
Has Liked: 392 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Elizabeth » Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:33 pm

Unfair for people to single out Tarkowski yesterday and equally unfair to reference his decision not to sign a new contract as evidence as to why he didn't play well.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 11280
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 2517 times
Has Liked: 1376 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:40 pm

pushpinpussy wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:47 am
we would miss Mee more than this over rated prima donna. looks very heavy for me this season.
Mee was just as bad yesterday. Especially for the 2nd goal.

IanMcL
Posts: 19651
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 4045 times
Has Liked: 4661 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by IanMcL » Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:43 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:33 pm
Unfair for people to single out Tarkowski yesterday and equally unfair to reference his decision not to sign a new contract as evidence as to why he didn't play well.
Sensible post

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 6662
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 3368 times
Has Liked: 91 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:49 pm

FCBurnley wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:34 am
From many thousands of miles away it would seem to me that the club is in total free fall. When Chairman and Manager don’t get on then it leads to situations like Tarks. Last season he was a giant. This season he just wants away. Others will be the same. If Dyche gets a decent offer he will be gone too. Even Garlick wants out. We are in a mess
I'm pretty sure that if he wanted away that much he would've made it happen.

DCWat
Posts: 5264
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 2030 times
Has Liked: 1834 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by DCWat » Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:53 pm

FCBurnley wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:34 am
From many thousands of miles away it would seem to me that the club is in total free fall. When Chairman and Manager don’t get on then it leads to situations like Tarks. Last season he was a giant. This season he just wants away. Others will be the same. If Dyche gets a decent offer he will be gone too. Even Garlick wants out. We are in a mess
There’s some real twisting of the current goings on there.

As FF said, you could just as easily put a more positive spin on things, particularly where the takeover is concerned.

If Tarkowski thinks his career is better suited at a bigger club, that’s not going to change even, if Garlick and Dyche are best mates. Where the Tarkowski situation has more likely caused issue, is between Garlick and Dyche themselves.

Dyche may well be much happier if the new owners are more willing / able to back him in the market.

bobinho
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 2324 times
Has Liked: 3627 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tarkowski

Post by bobinho » Sun Nov 29, 2020 1:42 pm

tim_noone wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:11 am
By all accounts on here..... If Maguire's worth £80million tarks is worth £40 million dont be silly.
And they are quite wrong. No way is Maguire twice as good as Tarks... so it should be more like £60m for Tarks, because Maguire IS better, but not by much.

As it is, after what’s been said, we’d be lucky to get £20m now for Tarks.

Vino blanco
Posts: 3592
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 1207 times
Has Liked: 923 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Vino blanco » Sun Nov 29, 2020 1:58 pm

He, and the rest of the defence, would have performed better yesterday if they had had a midfield in front of them who knew what they were doing, especially helping out by doing their defensive jobs properly. Our current midfield is poor, although I do believe it is partly the manager's tactics, he doesn't seem to believe in playing forward through the midfield of any more.
Regarding Tarks' future, I think he will be gone in January and it might be better for all concerned: he has however been absolutely magnificent for us in a claret shirt and will remain one of my favorite all time central defenders at Turf Moor.

JohnMac
Posts: 5412
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 1816 times
Has Liked: 2877 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Tarkowski

Post by JohnMac » Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:16 pm

He isn't interested in renewing his contract at Burnley, nothing more, nothing less.

We had 11 players yesterday struggling to match the opposition in physicality, speed of thought and speed of movement. All 11 lost that battle yet none gave up on purpose.

More a case of being outclassed than not interested yesterday. He will continue to play to the best of his ability which like most players can fluctuate.
This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46

Burnley1989
Posts: 2914
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 915 times
Has Liked: 1030 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Burnley1989 » Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:18 pm

JohnMac wrote:
Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:16 pm
He isn't interested in renewing his contract at Burnley, nothing more, nothing less.

We had 11 players yesterday struggling to match the opposition in physicality, speed of thought and speed of movement. All 11 lost that battle yet none gave up on purpose.

More a case of being outclassed than not interested yesterday. He will continue to play to the best of his ability which like most players can fluctuate.
My thoughts as well
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 3992
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 799 times
Has Liked: 1037 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:26 pm

Spot on JohnMac

Post Reply