Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Match of the day. Penalty decisions
It makes my blood boil. The Leeds player gets a knock in the penalty area but stays on his feet and it starts a debate in the studio about players going down when touched and that he would have had a penalty if only he’d fallen over. He dint fall over because HE WAS NOT FOULED.
Now, I’ve just seen Sterling jump up in the air to get a penalty and no one seems to mind. No one can say he did not take a dive there.
Now, I’ve just seen Sterling jump up in the air to get a penalty and no one seems to mind. No one can say he did not take a dive there.
These 2 users liked this post: bobinho Bosscat
-
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2416 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Sterling's was a joke - again !
-
- Posts: 17935
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4068 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Sterling cheated. Jumped backwards.
-
- Posts: 2742
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 665 times
- Location: Château d'If
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
when i saw sterling cheat and nobody bat an eyelid i had to immediately turn over.
sick of it now.
sick of it now.
-
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2416 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
I'm sick of it too. Interesting statistic. Most penalties won by a Premier League player.
CHEAT !
And allowed to get away with it time and time again!
CHEAT !
And allowed to get away with it time and time again!
-
- Posts: 3658
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1402 times
- Has Liked: 2692 times
- Location: varied
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
The very term "Penalties WON" grinds my gears.
Almost like you are applauded for cheating.
They should given for Fouls.
Almost like you are applauded for cheating.
They should given for Fouls.
These 6 users liked this post: FactualFrank bobinho DomBFC1882 Rowls Stalbansclaret IanMcL
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Exactly.HunterST_BFC wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:34 amThe very term "Penalties WON" grinds my gears.
Almost like you are applauded for cheating.
They should given for Fouls.
Did I hear one of the pundits say they should be given every time there is contact so that players will stop diving? NO! Hows about just giving them for actual FOULS.
These 2 users liked this post: FactualFrank Rowls
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
I remember Alan Shearer praising players for diving and also remember Iam Wright praising them.
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
- Been Liked: 1124 times
- Has Liked: 301 times
- Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
You use to have to be actually brought down. I’ve just seen the Sterling dive, and that’s all it is a cheating f*#king dive.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
I see that Lineker had another sarcastic pop at SD and Burnley. He seems to get away with it nearly every week.
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
It’s getting to a point that penalty kicks should be gotten rid of. I think they should be replaced with a direct free kick, 25 yards from goal. You can still score if you’ve got the skill but the incentive to cheat would be reduced. Takes the pressure off referees who can then judge infringements in the box in the same way they do across the rest of the field.
-
- Posts: 9600
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3148 times
- Has Liked: 10238 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
They showed the incident where SD thought that under the current contact rules that Westwood should have had a free kick in the build up to their goal.
Cahill and Murphy both thought it wasn’t enough for a foul - and this to context was more in line with their views on the Sterling penalty and that penalties are being wrongly given with not enough contact in their view.
Lineker made a sarcastic comment along the lines “but Sean does not like his players going down ”....knowing full well that Westwood had gone down with little contact.
Issue is Westwood very clearly did not dive.
Was it enough contact for a foul ? Probably not in the world of football many of us have grown up in....but right now all SD was saying is that if these fouls are being given under the current application of the laws then we should have had one....irrespective of whether he thinks it’s the correct application or not.
Cahill and Murphy should have pointed that out that SD was 100% correct and could have still expressed their views that the current laws are wrong.
Lineker was just being an idiot and having what he thought was a clever dig at the hypocrisy of SD....but completely missing the point.
You can see why SD gets frustrated when he is being laughed at for being one of the only managers to take a stance against cheating and diving
Cahill and Murphy both thought it wasn’t enough for a foul - and this to context was more in line with their views on the Sterling penalty and that penalties are being wrongly given with not enough contact in their view.
Lineker made a sarcastic comment along the lines “but Sean does not like his players going down ”....knowing full well that Westwood had gone down with little contact.
Issue is Westwood very clearly did not dive.
Was it enough contact for a foul ? Probably not in the world of football many of us have grown up in....but right now all SD was saying is that if these fouls are being given under the current application of the laws then we should have had one....irrespective of whether he thinks it’s the correct application or not.
Cahill and Murphy should have pointed that out that SD was 100% correct and could have still expressed their views that the current laws are wrong.
Lineker was just being an idiot and having what he thought was a clever dig at the hypocrisy of SD....but completely missing the point.
You can see why SD gets frustrated when he is being laughed at for being one of the only managers to take a stance against cheating and diving
-
- Posts: 17249
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6488 times
- Has Liked: 2911 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
The Sterling penalty...what a joke football has become.
-
- Posts: 8358
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2974 times
- Has Liked: 2075 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Did I nod off or did they not show Dwight's missed chance right at the end ?
No-one likes us, we don't care !!!!
No-one likes us, we don't care !!!!
-
- Posts: 8358
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2974 times
- Has Liked: 2075 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Agreed - how on earth do both legs fling themselves backwards when there is very little
contact at thigh level ?
An utter disgrace, and the sooner the top 6 bugger off to some super league in the sky, the
better it will be for us and football in general in this country.
This user liked this post: Steve1956
-
- Posts: 17249
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6488 times
- Has Liked: 2911 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
If that had happened in Everton's penalty area yesterday to one of our players would we have got a penalty......answers on a postcard please,the game is up!Funkydrummer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 10:24 amAgreed - how on earth do both legs fling themselves backwards when there is very little
contact at thigh level.
An utter disgrace, and the sooner the top 6 bugger off to some super league in the sky, the
better it will be for us and football in general in this country.
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
I’ve said it before. The referee should be allowed to ignore any claims for a foul/penalty if the “victim” has in any way exaggerated, play acted or simply dived, regardless of whether there really has been a foul or not
These 3 users liked this post: RalphCoatesComb beeholeclaret dsr
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Exactly what I have said for years - pretty much since that penalty awarded to Man City when Nick Pope slightly touched Bernardo Silva and he did his impression of one of the extras at the start of Saving Private Ryan !
It’s cheating - full stop...they are trying to deceive the referee.
It would soon cut out most of it if it was brought in. And I know it goes into grey areas and the element of subjectiveness etc but a lot of the times one human being can tell pretty easily when another human being has gone down unnaturally. If you see a lot of the falls it isn’t actually physically possible to fall in the way or direction they have from the contact they have had.
Unfortunately it’s never going to happen - simply because too many teams and managers do it to their advantage now. It’s gone too far to turn back.
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 604 times
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
The only problem with your last sentence is that we would then have a new 'Top six' who would undoubtedly do the same thing and get all the dubious decisions, with TV backing them all the way.Funkydrummer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 10:24 amAgreed - how on earth do both legs fling themselves backwards when there is very little
contact at thigh level ?
An utter disgrace, and the sooner the top 6 bugger off to some super league in the sky, the
better it will be for us and football in general in this country.
Football has become a pantomime.
-
- Posts: 8358
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2974 times
- Has Liked: 2075 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Does your statement not assume that they don't do it currently but will start doing it ?Gordaleman wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 10:57 amThe only problem with your last sentence is that we would then have a new 'Top six' who would undoubtedly do the same thing and get all the dubious decisions, with TV backing them all the way.
Football has become a pantomime.
I don't think the "new top six" will have the same powers of persuasion or indeed the equivalent
quick thinking multi million pound cheating barstewards that are currently infesting the game
at the highest level.
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Yes, it does go into grey areas and involves subjectiveness but I’d rather there was argument over whether a player dived or was genuinely floored than a debate over whether or not there was contact.TVC15 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 10:49 amExactly what I have said for years - pretty much since that penalty awarded to Man City when Nick Pope slightly touched Bernardo Silva and he did his impression of one of the extras at the start of Saving Private Ryan !
It’s cheating - full stop...they are trying to deceive the referee.
It would soon cut out most of it if it was brought in. And I know it goes into grey areas and the element of subjectiveness etc but a lot of the times one human being can tell pretty easily when another human being has gone down unnaturally. If you see a lot of the falls it isn’t actually physically possible to fall in the way or direction they have from the contact they have had.
Unfortunately it’s never going to happen - simply because too many teams and managers do it to their advantage now. It’s gone too far to turn back.
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 381 times
- Has Liked: 320 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
It really is tedious these days. Professional cheats. Sterling has been mastering it for years
-
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:23 pm
- Been Liked: 291 times
- Has Liked: 99 times
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
This is the way the game is. You have to go down, you have to cheat. Don’t hate the player hate the game. One thing we need to do more is go down and cheat. Staying on your feet may win plaudits but going down wins you points and that is what matters. If we stay up because one of our players wins a penalty by diving in the last game of the season you aren’t going to complain are you. This is how the game is. Dyche needs to embrace it and not fight it.
The Leeds player should have gone down, needs to be coached better. These big clubs are coached to go down and they do it well. It is an art and it wins games and points. Deal with it. It ain't changing so if you can’t beat them join them!
The Leeds player should have gone down, needs to be coached better. These big clubs are coached to go down and they do it well. It is an art and it wins games and points. Deal with it. It ain't changing so if you can’t beat them join them!
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Nothelaughingclaret wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:31 pmThis is the way the game is. You have to go down, you have to cheat. Don’t hate the player hate the game. One thing we need to do more is go down and cheat. Staying on your feet may win plaudits but going down wins you points and that is what matters. If we stay up because one of our players wins a penalty by diving in the last game of the season you aren’t going to complain are you. This is how the game is. Dyche needs to embrace it and not fight it.
The Leeds player should have gone down, needs to be coached better. These big clubs are coached to go down and they do it well. It is an art and it wins games and points. Deal with it. It ain't changing so if you can’t beat them join them!
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 604 times
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Re your first sentence, no. I made in clear that that's what already happens.Funkydrummer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:29 amDoes your statement not assume that they don't do it currently but will start doing it ?
I don't think the "new top six" will have the same powers of persuasion or indeed the equivalent
quick thinking multi million pound cheating barstewards that are currently infesting the game
at the highest level.
As to your second point. Once they are the new top six, they will soon learn.
The only real answer to football's current problems is for fans to speak out more instead of just accepting the current situation. Social media could play it's part by helping to arrange demonstrations against aspects of the game that are ruining 'The beautiful game' as Pelé and Stuart Hall used to call it.
Re: Match of the day. Penalty decisions
Referee has it right there. Not enough contact for me. No pen.
(Mostly said when unfavoured teams fail to get a penalty after a player has been hacked down)
Referee has it right there. There was contact. Player had every right 'to go down'. Penalty all day long.
(Must be stated when a favoured team has gained a penalty, when a player throws himself against a defender and goes down or when a defender brushes against him, when getting the ball)
(Mostly said when unfavoured teams fail to get a penalty after a player has been hacked down)
Referee has it right there. There was contact. Player had every right 'to go down'. Penalty all day long.
(Must be stated when a favoured team has gained a penalty, when a player throws himself against a defender and goes down or when a defender brushes against him, when getting the ball)
This user liked this post: LeadBelly