Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
Hello fellow Clarets,
I'm currently reading Antony Beevor's excellent "Ardennes 1944" and I find myself wanting to read more about Montgomery. He was certainly a rather difficult person by all accounts. I'd like to read a "balanced" biography if there is one. Apparently Nigel Hamilton is the historian who has written the most books about Monty but, apparently, he is not overly objective about him.
I'd be very grateful to read people's thoughts/recommendations.
Many thanks!
I'm currently reading Antony Beevor's excellent "Ardennes 1944" and I find myself wanting to read more about Montgomery. He was certainly a rather difficult person by all accounts. I'd like to read a "balanced" biography if there is one. Apparently Nigel Hamilton is the historian who has written the most books about Monty but, apparently, he is not overly objective about him.
I'd be very grateful to read people's thoughts/recommendations.
Many thanks!
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
Not a book recommendation but the ‘we have ways of making you talk’ podcast has various Monty episodes. Quite a divisive subject
-
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:41 pm
- Been Liked: 468 times
- Has Liked: 333 times
- Location: Malabo, EG/Chester
- Contact:
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
"Daylight Robbery" by Dominic Frisby.
Looks at taxation through the ages and how taxes have caused major issues throughout history. Interesting views on how taxes will influence our future. Well worth a read and a must for anyone interested in looking after their money/investments.
Looks at taxation through the ages and how taxes have caused major issues throughout history. Interesting views on how taxes will influence our future. Well worth a read and a must for anyone interested in looking after their money/investments.
-
- Posts: 17987
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4073 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
Ive also read Ardennes 44. Very good book, with a wealth of detail.
Remember assorted comments about Monty from various historians, he seemed to have a talent for rubbing people up the wrong way. Patton despised him and I'm sure the feeling was mutual. Bradley, Eisenhower's second in command also didn't get on with him and Ike only tolerated him because he was the senior British commander.
Beevors Stalingrad is also a good read if you haven't seen it yet.
Remember assorted comments about Monty from various historians, he seemed to have a talent for rubbing people up the wrong way. Patton despised him and I'm sure the feeling was mutual. Bradley, Eisenhower's second in command also didn't get on with him and Ike only tolerated him because he was the senior British commander.
Beevors Stalingrad is also a good read if you haven't seen it yet.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 1102 times
- Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
And he wasn't very fond of them either. Their dislike for him was mainly as a result of what they saw as indecisiveness and over attention to saving the lives of as many of his soldiers as possible whilst they were more inclined to be rather 'gung-ho' and overly careless of the lives of the troops and equipment they controlled in his opinion.ElectroClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:13 pmIve also read Ardennes 44. Very good book, with a wealth of detail.
Remember assorted comments about Monty from various historians, he seemed to have a talent for rubbing people up the wrong way. Patton despised him and I'm sure the feeling was mutual. Bradley, Eisenhower's second in command also didn't get on with him and Ike only tolerated him because he was the senior British commander.
Beevors Stalingrad is also a good read if you haven't seen it yet.
Much of that relates to national spirit and upbringing, in my opinion, we Brits, as a small island nation, had always had to consider the tightness of the national finances, low manpower and shortages of equipment/supply whilst the Americans had plentiful quantities of all of those.
-
- Posts: 7213
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2379 times
- Has Liked: 3806 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
I read his Memoirs many years, ago and remember he was a tough bugger with a streak bordering on obstinate. Had a bit of chip I think as he wasn't one of the 'wealthy set' and served in a 'County' Regiment.
I think being 'British' in every sense of the word ensured a natural dislike of him from the US Generalship. They were definitely less in tune with their Soldiers than us.
I think being 'British' in every sense of the word ensured a natural dislike of him from the US Generalship. They were definitely less in tune with their Soldiers than us.
-
- Posts: 9325
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4105 times
- Has Liked: 6588 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
Nowt wrong with obstinate John.... it's a family trait!
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
Have read lots of books, articles on WW2, the Normandy landings and especially the battles in the British, Canadian sections around Caen.bfcmik wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:52 pmAnd he wasn't very fond of them either. Their dislike for him was mainly as a result of what they saw as indecisiveness and over attention to saving the lives of as many of his soldiers as possible whilst they were more inclined to be rather 'gung-ho' and overly careless of the lives of the troops and equipment they controlled in his opinion.
It was decided at the top level that the British with the Canadians would take on the main German armoured divisions ( which was mainly the elite SS divisions) so not to have the US troops and especially the American public demoralised.
This was even kept secret to the main commanders on the ground.
Monty new this, so he probably was justified to be more concerned about his troops.
On a side note the American troops reported constantly engaging Tiger tanks but no Tigers were in the american area for weeks and the first ones engaged were on a train being taken back to be repaired.
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
Thank you everybody.
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
Another reason was the price 'we' paid in blood for the blunders of the WW1 generals. Montgomery didn't want to go down in history in the same way that Haig had. Montgomery always had an eye on posterity.bfcmik wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:52 pmAnd he wasn't very fond of them either. Their dislike for him was mainly as a result of what they saw as indecisiveness and over attention to saving the lives of as many of his soldiers as possible whilst they were more inclined to be rather 'gung-ho' and overly careless of the lives of the troops and equipment they controlled in his opinion.
Much of that relates to national spirit and upbringing, in my opinion, we Brits, as a small island nation, had always had to consider the tightness of the national finances, low manpower and shortages of equipment/supply whilst the Americans had plentiful quantities of all of those.
This user liked this post: bfcmik
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
Another shout here for Beevor's Stalingrad and also his Berlin: The Downfall, 1945.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 1102 times
- Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
I saw a Monty interview with the famous historian Lord Taylor where he describes how his experiences as an officer in the trenches in WW1 affected how he believed tactics needed to move away from using troops as cannon fodder.https://youtu.be/H1dz3pqbRawBilly Balfour wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 4:25 pmAnother reason was the price 'we' paid in blood for the blunders of the WW1 generals. Montgomery didn't want to go down in history in the same way that Haig had. Montgomery always had an eye on posterity.
-
- Posts: 4980
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
- Been Liked: 2341 times
- Has Liked: 1041 times
- Location: Ightenhill,Burnley
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
Having read more books on WW2 than I care to remember, I believe this to be an excellent summary ..... he was socially awkward, to the point of rudeness, but a brilliant General ...bfcmik wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:52 pmAnd he wasn't very fond of them either. Their dislike for him was mainly as a result of what they saw as indecisiveness and over attention to saving the lives of as many of his soldiers as possible whilst they were more inclined to be rather 'gung-ho' and overly careless of the lives of the troops and equipment they controlled in his opinion.
Much of that relates to national spirit and upbringing, in my opinion, we Brits, as a small island nation, had always had to consider the tightness of the national finances, low manpower and shortages of equipment/supply whilst the Americans had plentiful quantities of all of those.
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Book Recommendations: Field Marshall Montgomery
That looks interesting, Mik. Thanks for posting the link. I'll watch it later.bfcmik wrote: ↑Tue Jan 05, 2021 5:03 pmI saw a Monty interview with the famous historian Lord Taylor where he describes how his experiences as an officer in the trenches in WW1 affected how he believed tactics needed to move away from using troops as cannon fodder.https://youtu.be/H1dz3pqbRaw