Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
-
- Posts: 3315
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 699 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Lowton 8
Tarks 7
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Brady 5
Westwood 6
Cork 6
McNeil 4 Chelsea had him well sussed
Wood 5 can't create anything
Vydra 6 how does anyone expect him to latch on to those kind of passes.
Jay 5
JBG 5
In games like that, Dyche has to sometimes let the midfield gamble on going forward rather than keep their shape. Nothing ventured nothing gained.
Lowton 8
Tarks 7
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Brady 5
Westwood 6
Cork 6
McNeil 4 Chelsea had him well sussed
Wood 5 can't create anything
Vydra 6 how does anyone expect him to latch on to those kind of passes.
Jay 5
JBG 5
In games like that, Dyche has to sometimes let the midfield gamble on going forward rather than keep their shape. Nothing ventured nothing gained.
-
- Posts: 3951
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1766 times
- Has Liked: 470 times
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Lowton 7
Tarkowski 7*
Mee 7
Pieters 5
Brady 5
Westwood 4
Cork 4
McNeil 5
Wood 5
Vydra 5
Rodriguez 5
JBG 5
After 3 good recent performances, we revert to type. Absolutely inept in midfield and created nothing all game. Lost count of the number of times Cork dwelled on the ball and was robbed and CHO clearly targeted Pieters as the weak link. Never mind, we have just extended the contracts of 3 of the players culpable for today's non performance.
Lowton 7
Tarkowski 7*
Mee 7
Pieters 5
Brady 5
Westwood 4
Cork 4
McNeil 5
Wood 5
Vydra 5
Rodriguez 5
JBG 5
After 3 good recent performances, we revert to type. Absolutely inept in midfield and created nothing all game. Lost count of the number of times Cork dwelled on the ball and was robbed and CHO clearly targeted Pieters as the weak link. Never mind, we have just extended the contracts of 3 of the players culpable for today's non performance.
This user liked this post: bf2k
-
- Posts: 67807
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32410 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Three wins on the bounce, a really difficult game today, beaten by a very good side. I do love your positivity.Herts Clarets wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:48 pmPope 7
Lowton 7
Tarkowski 7*
Mee 7
Pieters 5
Brady 5
Westwood 4
Cork 4
McNeil 5
Wood 5
Vydra 5
Rodriguez 5
JBG 5
After 3 good recent performances, we revert to type. Absolutely inept in midfield and created nothing all game. Lost count of the number of times Cork dwelled on the ball and was robbed and CHO clearly targeted Pieters as the weak link. Never mind, we have just extended the contracts of 3 of the players culpable for today's non performance.
-
- Posts: 7211
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2378 times
- Has Liked: 3804 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Lowton 7
Tarkowski 7*
Mee 7
Pieters 5
McNeil 5
Westwood 5
Cork 5
Brady 5
Wood 6
Vydra 4
Subs
Rodriguez 4
Gudmundsson 4
Mumbongo 4
Lowton 7
Tarkowski 7*
Mee 7
Pieters 5
McNeil 5
Westwood 5
Cork 5
Brady 5
Wood 6
Vydra 4
Subs
Rodriguez 4
Gudmundsson 4
Mumbongo 4
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Lowton 7
Tarks 8*
Mee 6
Pieters 4
Brady 5
Westwood 6
Cork 5
McNeil 4
Vydra 5
Wood 5
JRod 5
JBG 5
Thought we were lucky to get nil. Bright for 20 mins then ran out of gas
Lowton 7
Tarks 8*
Mee 6
Pieters 4
Brady 5
Westwood 6
Cork 5
McNeil 4
Vydra 5
Wood 5
JRod 5
JBG 5
Thought we were lucky to get nil. Bright for 20 mins then ran out of gas
-
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2416 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Pope 8
Lowton 7
Tarkowski 8 (MOM)
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Brady 5
Westwood 6
Cork 6
McNeil 6
Vydra 5
Wood 5
Rodriguez 5
Gudmundsson 5
Lowton 7
Tarkowski 8 (MOM)
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Brady 5
Westwood 6
Cork 6
McNeil 6
Vydra 5
Wood 5
Rodriguez 5
Gudmundsson 5
-
- Posts: 11114
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1571 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Pope 7 for all of Chelsea’s domination didn’t think they actually threatened Pope too much.
Lowton 7 he’s playing so well at the moment
Tarks 7 top performance
Mee 6 thought he was ok but was slack on the ball a few times
Pieters 5 difficult game. The formation Chelsea played just meant he was isolated 1-1 a lot of the time.
McNeil 6 few good passes but not much else
Cork 6 covered ground well and for 25 minutes we played some great football
Westwood 6 same as above
Brady 6 few slack passes but defended well
Wood 5 struggled
Vydra 5 struggled
Jay 5 struggled
Mumbongo 6 not on long enough but thought he had a few good touches.
Lowton 7 he’s playing so well at the moment
Tarks 7 top performance
Mee 6 thought he was ok but was slack on the ball a few times
Pieters 5 difficult game. The formation Chelsea played just meant he was isolated 1-1 a lot of the time.
McNeil 6 few good passes but not much else
Cork 6 covered ground well and for 25 minutes we played some great football
Westwood 6 same as above
Brady 6 few slack passes but defended well
Wood 5 struggled
Vydra 5 struggled
Jay 5 struggled
Mumbongo 6 not on long enough but thought he had a few good touches.
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:16 pm
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 119 times
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Lowton 7
Pieters 5
Mee 7
Tarkowski 8*
McNeil 4
Brady 5
Cork 5
Westwood 4
Vydra 5
Wood 5
Gudmundsson 5
Rodriguez 5
Lowton 7
Pieters 5
Mee 7
Tarkowski 8*
McNeil 4
Brady 5
Cork 5
Westwood 4
Vydra 5
Wood 5
Gudmundsson 5
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 545
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:42 am
- Been Liked: 184 times
- Has Liked: 602 times
- Location: Dordogne/Fenland
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Pope 6 didn’t have much to do except pick the ball out of the net.
Lowton 7 playing well
Tarkowski 6
Mee 6
Pieters 5 was left in isolation too often by McNeil
Brady 5 non existent
Westwood 5
Cork 5
McNeil 4 hardly in the game and neglected his defensive duty
Vydra 4 very poor service to him
Wood 4 see above
Gudmunsson 4 hardly realised he was on the pitch
Rodriguez 4 ditto
Lowton 7 playing well
Tarkowski 6
Mee 6
Pieters 5 was left in isolation too often by McNeil
Brady 5 non existent
Westwood 5
Cork 5
McNeil 4 hardly in the game and neglected his defensive duty
Vydra 4 very poor service to him
Wood 4 see above
Gudmunsson 4 hardly realised he was on the pitch
Rodriguez 4 ditto
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Lowton 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 6
Pieters 6
Brady 4
Westwood 4
Cork 5
McNeil 4
Vydra 4
Wood 4
Rodriguez 4
Gudmundsson 4
Lowton 7
Tarkowski 7
Mee 6
Pieters 6
Brady 4
Westwood 4
Cork 5
McNeil 4
Vydra 4
Wood 4
Rodriguez 4
Gudmundsson 4
-
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:06 pm
- Been Liked: 76 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
- Location: Upper Brierfield
Re: Chelsea v Burnley - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Lowton 8
Tarkowski 8 mom
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Brady 6
Westwood 5
Cork 6
McNeil 5
Wood 6
Vydra 5
Rodriguez 5
Gudmundsson 5
Lowton 8
Tarkowski 8 mom
Mee 7
Pieters 6
Brady 6
Westwood 5
Cork 6
McNeil 5
Wood 6
Vydra 5
Rodriguez 5
Gudmundsson 5