Professional women!

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by tim_noone » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:06 pm

I look forward to seeing the Ladies in Big Cup Competitions...... :D
These 2 users liked this post: Volvoclaret Bosscat

mikeS
Posts: 1750
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:21 am
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 25 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by mikeS » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:11 pm

Just a thought.
If they go professional, what kind of wages Do they earn?

Inchy
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1334 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Inchy » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:16 pm

mikeS wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:11 pm
Just a thought.
If they go professional, what kind of wages Do they earn?
Quick google search suggests top players in women’s prem earn 200k a year. Most new players start on 20k

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3311
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 988 times
Has Liked: 1660 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: Professional women!

Post by BleedingClaret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:16 pm

Wellsy1882 wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 8:55 am
No issues with it
Its just plain and simply shite

I can’t believe you wrote that
I thought it
But
You wrote it

Rileybobs
Posts: 16853
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Professional women!

Post by Rileybobs » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:18 pm

mikeS wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:11 pm
Just a thought.
If they go professional, what kind of wages Do they earn?
Hopefully for the purpose of gender-equality they are paid the same as our highest-earning male player.
This user liked this post: jrgbfc

Inchy
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1334 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Inchy » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:19 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:18 pm
Hopefully for the purpose of gender-equality they are paid the same as our highest-earning male player.


:lol: No one will bite surely

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3311
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 988 times
Has Liked: 1660 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: Professional women!

Post by BleedingClaret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:23 pm

StTedsOB wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 8:42 am
Disappointing to be still seeing posts like this in 2021.
Whether you follow or like women’s football or not I’m not sure how you can argue that this isn’t anything but a positive move by the club.
The reality will not be equality in any way
From what I know currently it’s local women playing for Burnley women
I would expect it’ll just become a rag tag bunch of semi talented agent backed women being paid an amount that has no link to the revenue they generate.
Shame it doesn’t get to evolve naturally

lewishamclaret
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:34 pm
Been Liked: 29 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by lewishamclaret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:25 pm

It is a fantastic initiative full stop. Well done BFC

Wellsy1882
Posts: 1374
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
Been Liked: 247 times
Has Liked: 90 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Wellsy1882 » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:28 pm

BleedingClaret wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:16 pm
I can’t believe you wrote that
I thought it
But
You wrote it
Why not. Its toss
Open forum for thoughts

Inchy
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1334 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Inchy » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:30 pm

I used to play for Burnley supporters team years ago. We were crap and half cut most of the matches. We were amateur level obviously and no one in their right might would pay to watch us. I’m beginning to wonder if we could reform and ask the club to pay us a salary

CoolClaret
Posts: 7385
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2236 times
Has Liked: 2142 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by CoolClaret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:31 pm

Falcon wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 12:11 pm
[Citation needed]
60 mill loan 10% APR over 10 years by my calculations is a total repayment of 95 million- happy to be corrected mind.

Look, no one is suggesting not having a women's team or having BFC in the community coach girls etc, we're questioning having it as an added expense when women's football in the UK has been proven to run at a loss.

'Increasing exposure' - ********, who watches women's football globally? Next to no one, the market simply isn't there for it right now.

Infact- this will land me in a lot of hate and referred to as a 'caveman' no doubt but I actually think if they want to promote the women's game it should be completely revamped.

Smaller pitches, smaller sized goals, so the focus is more on skill and not power/athleticism, which will allow women to display their skill at a greater rate and offer a different product.. as right now it is clearly inferior... not to mention women actually prefer watching men's football (as you know, it's a better product).

Perhaps even have a bonus point for scoring so many goals to encourage attacking play- im convinced it could be more popular if it was packaged in a different way.

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3311
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 988 times
Has Liked: 1660 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: Professional women!

Post by BleedingClaret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:32 pm

Wellsy1882 wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:28 pm
Why not. Its toss
Open forum for thoughts
Just made me laugh pal
With how precious everybody is about gender etc

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4273
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 1517 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by tarkys_ears » Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:40 pm

Christ!

They'll be letting the Doris's vote next!

Inchy
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1334 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Inchy » Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:11 pm

Can any one answer me this?

Why can an amateur sport which doesn’t offer enough quality to finance its self be deemed as professional because another sport is paying for it?

Does this happen in any other sports?

pushpinpussy
Posts: 2115
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:57 am
Been Liked: 895 times
Has Liked: 134 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by pushpinpussy » Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:32 pm

I blame the parents

aggi
Posts: 8831
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2117 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by aggi » Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:32 pm

Inchy wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:11 pm
Can any one answer me this?

Why can an amateur sport which doesn’t offer enough quality to finance its self be deemed as professional because another sport is paying for it?

Does this happen in any other sports?
You don't really need to look at other sports. The U23 teams can't finance themselves.

In fact, realistically most championship teams don't generate enough revenue to finance themselves.

Elsewhere, county cricket mainly turns a profit due to revenue from international cricket.

Do you really think that the football clubs, not the most philanthropic of businesses, are all running women's teams out of the goodness of their hearts?

Dazzler
Posts: 4421
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:10 am
Been Liked: 881 times
Has Liked: 2332 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Dazzler » Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:47 pm

Inchy wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:11 pm
Can any one answer me this?

Why can an amateur sport which doesn’t offer enough quality to finance its self be deemed as professional because another sport is paying for it?

Does this happen in any other sports?

British Darts Organisation....But it went BUST!!

Inchy
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1334 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Inchy » Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:58 pm

aggi wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:32 pm
You don't really need to look at other sports. The U23 teams can't finance themselves.

In fact, realistically most championship teams don't generate enough revenue to finance themselves.

Elsewhere, county cricket mainly turns a profit due to revenue from international cricket.

Do you really think that the football clubs, not the most philanthropic of businesses, are all running women's teams out of the goodness of their hearts?

Well the u23 example isn’t really the same is it?


Quick online search shows that only one club has made a profit, Everton women’s team. Although admittedly most women’s clubs are classed as small businesses so don’t have to submit their accounts.

If Burnley FC are doing this to the benefit of the men’s team (more fans more money) then it may make sense, but don’t be surprised when the back lash comes when we get rid of the team when we go down

Jamesy
Posts: 2607
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 794 times
Has Liked: 526 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Jamesy » Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:58 pm

karatekid wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 9:52 am
Well they are going to be sharing Barnfield with the men so that could happen sooner than expected 😆😆😍
I doubt it. Don’t lady footballers usually have an anonymous sperm donor to get pregnant?

Jamesy
Posts: 2607
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 794 times
Has Liked: 526 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Jamesy » Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:05 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:18 pm
Hopefully for the purpose of gender-equality they are paid the same as our highest-earning male player.
Yeah and Sky and BT and Amazon will pump circa £130 million pounds a season into our club for women’s football tv rights. That’s the reason the men get paid what they do.
When women’s football attracts crowds of more than a thousand or so paying considerably more than a few quid each to get in and the big TV companies get on board, then the players may earn a decent salary.

superdimitri
Posts: 4955
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1007 times
Has Liked: 725 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by superdimitri » Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:26 pm

Plans for the board members many wives and daughters to play for us? 😂

Bosscat
Posts: 25552
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18215 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Bosscat » Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:31 pm

Wellsy1882 wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:28 pm
Why not. Its toss
Open forum for thoughts
Commenting on a forum regarding womens football and using the word "Toss" ... hmmmm Wellsy some might construe that in another way 🤭🤭🤭

Paul Waine
Posts: 9905
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2350 times
Has Liked: 3178 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Paul Waine » Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:32 pm

Congratulations, Burnley Football Club's women's team.

Good move by Alan Pace and the club.

A hundred years ago the women's game was bigger than the men's game - then, in 1921 the FA banned women's football.

There are some historical details on the FA's website: www.thefa.com/womens-girls-football/history

There's more history in this BBC report: www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-30329606

I'm looking forward to CT's reports on the BFC Women's team. ;)

And, who knows, maybe in a few years time there will be one or two goal scorers ready to "help out" the men's team.

UTC

ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 7040
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2167 times
Has Liked: 3100 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: Professional women!

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:50 pm

Who is in charge of merchandising at the club shop?

Judging by some comments on here we could be making a killing on club branded leather knuckle covers with all the wear and tear they get being dragged along the ground
This user liked this post: Zlatan

aggi
Posts: 8831
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2117 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by aggi » Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:53 pm

Inchy wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:58 pm
Well the u23 example isn’t really the same is it?


Quick online search shows that only one club has made a profit, Everton women’s team. Although admittedly most women’s clubs are classed as small businesses so don’t have to submit their accounts.

If Burnley FC are doing this to the benefit of the men’s team (more fans more money) then it may make sense, but don’t be surprised when the back lash comes when we get rid of the team when we go down
It's a team that isn't able to finance itself but operates as part of a bigger club.

If you're judging whether football teams should survive by whether they make a profit we're going to be losing a lot of clubs.

Again, do you really think that the football clubs, not the most philanthropic of businesses, are all running women's teams out of the goodness of their hearts?

CoolClaret
Posts: 7385
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2236 times
Has Liked: 2142 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by CoolClaret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:13 pm

aggi wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:53 pm
It's a team that isn't able to finance itself but operates as part of a bigger club.

If you're judging whether football teams should survive by whether they make a profit we're going to be losing a lot of clubs.

Again, do you really think that the football clubs, not the most philanthropic of businesses, are all running women's teams out of the goodness of their hearts?
They also pay a lot of wages, women's football could not stand alone as a professional front in this Country - no chance what so ever.

Furthermore, the U23s is a platform for first team players to be able to get back to full fitness or for younger players to play at a higher standard before they either move to the first team or get sold/loaned to another club.

Youth football as a whole is obviously self serving because the players will eventually land in a first team somewhere one day.

Again the 'knuckle dragger' or 'caveman' comments are complete non arguments and are quite frankly ridiculous..

No one is suggesting that women shouldn't be given the opportunity to play football, more concerned that a club of our size with our new debt levels thanks to the new messiah (Alan Pace) should be focusing any resources on a something that won't return a profit? Especially when the first team is in dire need of investment
These 2 users liked this post: Dazzler diamondpocket

Chester Perry
Posts: 19381
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3154 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Chester Perry » Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:35 pm

While people are wondering about whether it is worth paying Kevin Long's wages to support a whole squad, the real question should be, is Gawthorpe really big enough to bring the women's team into - remember at the time of construction the club were prevented from constructing all the pitches that it wanted then, that was 6+ years ago, the club is a different beast now, with a much better staffed and sized academy.

I have no issues with the women's incorporation just intrigued by the complexities of them all being on one very constrained site that on the face of it offers little room for expansion

Loyalclaret
Posts: 2033
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 436 times
Has Liked: 370 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Loyalclaret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:36 pm

They represent Burnley FC - they should be supported to a degree by the club. The fact that until recently that they had to buy their own kit does not sit right with me.

This is not someone 5 aside team with a rip off BFC name but our female football team. Good move by the club.
These 3 users liked this post: ŽižkovClaret GodIsADeeJay81 StTedsOB

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Billy Balfour » Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:43 pm

ŽižkovClaret wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:50 pm
Who is in charge of merchandising at the club shop?

Judging by some comments on here we could be making a killing on club branded leather knuckle covers with all the wear and tear they get being dragged along the ground
Every day is like groundhog day on here - one that is set in the 1950s. Life can be deeply unhappy for insular people: The world moves on while they struggle to do the same.

diamondpocket
Posts: 1367
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
Been Liked: 254 times
Has Liked: 215 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by diamondpocket » Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:47 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 12:04 pm
You're the sort of person who shouts abuse from the top deck of the bus at the people on the pavement to look hard in front of your mates and then hides when the bus stops, in case someone gets on that you've just shouted at.

Good luck in life, I wish you no ill.
You must be the brute force that comes on looking then who takes a comment to heart who usually wants to show off his 'hardness' in front of his mates beating a little kid up like me. Usually a sign of 'smallness' down below that can't be accepted.

Still waiting for the Ben Mee relevance/reply.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14567
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3436 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:48 pm

Sensible move by the club and should be lauded.

Women's soccer in the USA is growing in popularity, to the extent that the Women's World Cup final had higher viewing figures in the US than the men's final the year before.

If Burnleys woman's team can reach the top flight, I've no doubt our owners will push the marketing for them in the US.

StTedsOB
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2021 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by StTedsOB » Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:51 pm

Chester Perry wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:35 pm
While people are wondering about whether it is worth paying Kevin Long's wages to support a whole squad, the real question should be, is Gawthorpe really big enough to bring the women's team into - remember at the time of construction the club were prevented from constructing all the pitches that it wanted then, that was 6+ years ago, the club is a different beast now, with a much better staffed and sized academy.

I have no issues with the women's incorporation just intrigued by the complexities of them all being on one very constrained site that on the face of it offers little room for expansion
I’m surprised that Gawthorpe would not be big enough. How many training pitches are down there ?
It’s fantastic facilities and I was lucky enough to be invited down there when it first opened and part of the talk / tour Sean Dyche gave was to give us a bit of background on all the new pitches and the significant amounts that had been invested for not only the main first team training pitch (exact replica of Turf Moor in size, grass composition etc) but also all the various training pitches which were also big investments. I thought that with this investment in the number and quality of the pitches they would be able to accommodate all our various teams as a minimum. I know some of the younger teams play their actual games on the 4g at Prairie and we know the u23s play their league games elsewhere.
Not questioning your point btw - just surprised that we may have a capacity issue.

dsr
Posts: 15225
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4576 times
Has Liked: 2264 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by dsr » Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:51 pm

Paul Waine wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:32 pm
Congratulations, Burnley Football Club's women's team.

Good move by Alan Pace and the club.

A hundred years ago the women's game was bigger than the men's game - then, in 1921 the FA banned women's football.

There are some historical details on the FA's website: www.thefa.com/womens-girls-football/history

There's more history in this BBC report: www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-30329606

I'm looking forward to CT's reports on the BFC Women's team. ;)

And, who knows, maybe in a few years time there will be one or two goal scorers ready to "help out" the men's team.

UTC
It was never bigger than men's football. There was only ever one match where the gate was over 50,000, and a high proportion of Dick, Kerr's matches were against the same opposition (St Helen's, from memory) because there were so few quality teams.

Elbarad
Posts: 521
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:46 pm
Been Liked: 149 times
Has Liked: 50 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Elbarad » Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:15 pm

It's more enjoyable to watch then women's basketball in the WNBA at least.

StuffyClaret
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:15 am
Been Liked: 144 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by StuffyClaret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:17 pm

Rileybobs wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:18 pm
Hopefully for the purpose of gender-equality they are paid the same as our highest-earning male player.
Jamesy wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:05 pm
Yeah and Sky and BT and Amazon will pump circa £130 million pounds a season into our club for women’s football tv rights. That’s the reason the men get paid what they do.
When women’s football attracts crowds of more than a thousand or so paying considerably more than a few quid each to get in and the big TV companies get on board, then the players may earn a decent salary.
Looks like there's a nibbler :?

Zlatan
Posts: 5458
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2229 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Zlatan » Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:26 pm

diamondpocket wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:47 pm
You must be the brute force that comes on looking then who takes a comment to heart who usually wants to show off his 'hardness' in front of his mates beating a little kid up like me. Usually a sign of 'smallness' down below that can't be accepted.

Still waiting for the Ben Mee relevance/reply.
What does that actually mean? Is it some kind of verbal diarrhoea associated to some kind of keyboard affliction? If so I apologise, it is a horrid affliction to have. As far as "down below", I have no issues in that department, I have children and it appears to have worked as nature designed. Size is not really relevant, unless we're talking intelect, in which case a larger IQ is relevant, but that fact would be lost on you.

Look, you come onto this public forum in a poor attempt to be controversial about Womens Football asking questions like:
diamondpocket wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 8:45 am
I wonder what happens contractually when they get pregnant?
and statements like:
diamondpocket wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:00 am
Hope they've got Creche facilities!
diamondpocket wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 9:36 am
I'm a sports agent and looking at getting into women's footy.
and then when someone (me) questions the integrity of your contribution as they (I) suspect you're trying to be inflammatory you pick up on an autocorrect grammar error and attempt to mock. You deserve my responses since then, and if you fail to understand the relevance regarding Ben Mee becoming a parent when you openly ask a woman about becoming a parent I'm not going to help you out.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7385
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2236 times
Has Liked: 2142 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by CoolClaret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:26 pm

Loyalclaret wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:36 pm
They represent Burnley FC - they should be supported to a degree by the club. The fact that until recently that they had to buy their own kit does not sit right with me.

This is not someone 5 aside team with a rip off BFC name but our female football team. Good move by the club.
Totally agree with that - no question.

Being paid a professional salary for returning nothing? That's where I'm getting a bit concerned

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14567
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3436 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:27 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:26 pm
Totally agree with that - no question.

Being paid a professional salary for returning nothing? That's where I'm getting a bit concerned
Returning nothing?

Sounds like a number of the team from the Bournemouth game need to watch out :lol:

djemba-djemba
Posts: 650
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 6:12 pm
Been Liked: 129 times
Has Liked: 40 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by djemba-djemba » Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:31 pm

Bosscat wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 9:19 am
Had to log in to like this post...

Wellsy correcting spelling 🤣 classic 👍🤭👍
Like you’re ever logged out...

Bosscat
Posts: 25552
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18215 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Bosscat » Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:33 pm

djemba-djemba wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:31 pm
Like you’re ever logged out...
😁

Chester Perry
Posts: 19381
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3154 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Chester Perry » Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:39 pm

StTedsOB wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:51 pm
I’m surprised that Gawthorpe would not be big enough. How many training pitches are down there ?
It’s fantastic facilities and I was lucky enough to be invited down there when it first opened and part of the talk / tour Sean Dyche gave was to give us a bit of background on all the new pitches and the significant amounts that had been invested for not only the main first team training pitch (exact replica of Turf Moor in size, grass composition etc) but also all the various training pitches which were also big investments. I thought that with this investment in the number and quality of the pitches they would be able to accommodate all our various teams as a minimum. I know some of the younger teams play their actual games on the 4g at Prairie and we know the u23s play their league games elsewhere.
Not questioning your point btw - just surprised that we may have a capacity issue.
Most big clubs that integrate the academy and main squads facilities have pitches numbered well into double figures, we fall some way short of that and my understanding is that the club was told that was that. If you want to keep your training pitches in good nick and similarly to the turf then you probably need to rotate them quite heavily I would think.

Then there are the changing facilities to consider, it may be that there is a clear timetable of access and but it you would imagine the best approach would be having a route to the first team structure for the women's academy/team that is current for the existing infrastructure, while there will be an amount of overlap on the medical/analysis/lounge/meeting room and catering side the increased in numbers may also merit further development. Without it you can foresee arguments over access priorities particularly on the medical side

All in all this should not be considered a small undertaking, if you truly want to develop the capability of all the clubs players and teams irrespective of gender.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18064
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3862 times
Has Liked: 2072 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Quickenthetempo » Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:50 pm

Chester Perry wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:39 pm
Most big clubs that integrate the academy and main squads facilities have pitches numbered well into double figures, we fall some way short of that and my understanding is that the club was told that was that. If you want to keep your training pitches in good nick and similarly to the turf then you probably need to rotate them quite heavily I would think.

Then there are the changing facilities to consider, it may be that there is a clear timetable of access and but it you would imagine the best approach would be having a route to the first team structure for the women's academy/team that is current for the existing infrastructure, while there will be an amount of overlap on the medical/analysis/lounge/meeting room and catering side the increased in numbers may also merit further development. Without it you can foresee arguments over access priorities particularly on the medical side

All in all this should not be considered a small undertaking, if you truly want to develop the capability of all the clubs players and teams irrespective of gender.
I was told that Alan Pace had assessors down at Gawthorpe to check the quality of everything but Dyche wouldn't let them over the bridge.
I presume they went back in after Dyche had left?

Bosscat
Posts: 25552
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18215 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Bosscat » Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:56 pm

djemba-djemba wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:31 pm
Like you’re ever logged out...
Like you're ever logged in... 😉

Edd_Claret
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 9 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Edd_Claret » Thu Feb 11, 2021 6:00 pm

This is great news and long overdue

Burnley1989
Posts: 7389
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2293 times
Has Liked: 2166 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Burnley1989 » Thu Feb 11, 2021 6:04 pm

Only read the first page, expected a few disappointing comments but not that many.

I’ve had a female family members play and manage academy football, and I’m really proud of them and how good they were and enjoyed it.

Got a message from my 84 year old Grandad moaning about it earlier, which I sort of expected from men of his age.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by tim_noone » Thu Feb 11, 2021 6:11 pm

Burnley1989 wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 6:04 pm
Only read the first page, expected a few disappointing comments but not that many.

I’ve had a female family members play and manage academy football, and I’m really proud of them and how good they were and enjoyed it.

Got a message from my 84 year old Grandad moaning about it earlier, which I sort of expected from men of his age.
I didnt realise Eversteadyeddie Was 84? Good Effort :D
These 2 users liked this post: Dazzler Bosscat

Dazzler
Posts: 4421
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:10 am
Been Liked: 881 times
Has Liked: 2332 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Dazzler » Thu Feb 11, 2021 6:18 pm

For goodness sake! not one poster seems to be against women playing football, it's the thought of the Women's team having a detrimental effect on financing the Men's team.

diamondpocket
Posts: 1367
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
Been Liked: 254 times
Has Liked: 215 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by diamondpocket » Thu Feb 11, 2021 6:20 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:26 pm
What does that actually mean? Is it some kind of verbal diarrhoea associated to some kind of keyboard affliction? If so I apologise, it is a horrid affliction to have. As far as "down below", I have no issues in that department, I have children and it appears to have worked as nature designed. Size is not really relevant, unless we're talking intelect, in which case a larger IQ is relevant, but that fact would be lost on you.

Look, you come onto this public forum in a poor attempt to be controversial about Womens Football asking questions like:

and statements like:

and then when someone (me) questions the integrity of your contribution as they (I) suspect you're trying to be inflammatory you pick up on an autocorrect grammar error and attempt to mock. You deserve my responses since then, and if you fail to understand the relevance regarding Ben Mee becoming a parent when you openly ask a woman about becoming a parent I'm not going to help you out.
:lol: :lol: you are wrong, alongside many others, in so many ways you just don't get it. I wasn't being controversial at all but it easily proved a point. Look at Jackmiggins' reply for that.

If any of you do do some research on the topic of pregnancy and professional female sport, you will find it is an extremely pertinent and valid discussion point (I've already posted a link that shows some examples of how the situation is in UK footy, even our much loved Chelsea Manager is quoted about a negative aspect). There are many more articles around. The creche thing was in response to a previous reply about mixing the men's & women's squads, which I thought was quite funny and tongue in cheek. Interesting that that wasn't deemed an offensive post. I was just commenting that if both sexes from each team does partake in a bit of mingling then a creche facility would be helpful!! Get it? Both parents at the same club training.............
But as the Chelsea manager quotes, facilities in that area in training centres are lacking to say the least. I wonder if Gawthorpe has a designated area for their employers/parents with children if they need to take them to work in an emergency situation, for DAD'S like Ben Mee or female employees?

I admit I am really thick to see the Ben Mee thing you've created in your head. I have absolutely no issue with professional sportswomen having children nor should they lose pay/contractual discrimination/take time off, etc.. Please do highlight my error of judgement. It is like any other line of work for me & I subsequently tried to say that but you weren't interested in reading or highlighting them I see. Doesn't help your AGENDA.

The fact is the real neanderthals have come out judging everything by its cover because someone used the words 'women, pregnant, contracts, football, etc' in a sentence and immediately thought that it was a sexist, discriminate reply. You interpret it how you want. If I had said I had a daughter being chased by a pro club, would it have made a difference? I suspect it may have.

Poor attempt? I'd say it was pretty successful seeing your knickers and others go up in a twist!

Finally, pointing out a grammar mistake isn't mocking and I wasn't. I'm used to it because I often make mistakes when I don't check what I've written. Some are text errors, others are knowledge errors. If I make an error, I'd like to know even if it is a sensitive subject, as I've seen on here. You wanted to fine comb tooth my posts earlier, go ahead & enjoy yourself, I couldn't care less. Many more harmful things than that.

Enjoy your life, too.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15236
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3156 times
Has Liked: 6744 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by boatshed bill » Thu Feb 11, 2021 6:27 pm

you can get an argument a night on here.
more if you stick around long enough ;)
These 2 users liked this post: Bosscat DomBFC1882

Jacko
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:18 pm
Been Liked: 30 times
Has Liked: 18 times

Re: Professional women!

Post by Jacko » Thu Feb 11, 2021 6:33 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Thu Feb 11, 2021 9:27 am
they could play on the Turf straight after a game, if we have the Saturday 12.30 slot. Keep the kiosks open. Have a family funday in the fan zone area.
I like this idea - I don't see much of a downside to it, where possible; surprises me that it doesn't happen more often.

Strikes me that the biggest challenge for growing the women's game is building that emotional link to teams. The argument about quality being linked to interest doesn't convince me - after all, most people who go to games don't do so because the team they're watching are 'the best'; certainly that's not why I support Burnley - and I don't see it being as simple as, say, 'I'd watch if the goalkeepers were better'. Think the club need to be creative to see if they can provide a bridge between supporters of the men's game to the women's team. On that basis, i think a stronger link between the two is a good thing.

Post Reply