Why don’t we have more utility players?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Mala591
Posts: 1887
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:02 pm
Been Liked: 681 times
Has Liked: 428 times

Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by Mala591 » Fri Feb 19, 2021 12:50 pm

The right side of midfield problem is back!

SD has unsuccessfully (imo) tried Pieters, Brownhill is definitely better in central midfield, Rodriguez does seem to have utility/adaptability skills but would that extend to right midfield, has Lowton ever played there?

I presume Brownhill and Lowton have been practicing their right sided link play this week and I’m sure SD will choose this option. If it isn’t working then I’d be tempted to try Rodriguez on the right.

What would YOU do?

ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 6962
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2145 times
Has Liked: 3063 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 12:52 pm

He joined Newcastle
These 6 users liked this post: Zlatan ClaretTony GodIsADeeJay81 Mala591 tiger76 Colburn_Claret

Silkyskills1
Posts: 5841
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1678 times
Has Liked: 2513 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by Silkyskills1 » Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:19 pm

In answer to the question how many would you like to see? The right side of midfield has been a problem for so long now that it shouldn't require utility players to play there. Not much choice for filling that position tomorrow, though. Brownhill seems favourite.

Chester Perry
Posts: 19170
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3116 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by Chester Perry » Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:27 pm

Being a utility player is seen as career destroying particularly for those with International ambitions, the game has got incredibly specialised and if you play multiple roles you do not have the opportunity to truly develop your expertise and can make you open to being easily replaced by specialists.

Having said that Pep is famous for taking a player and re-inventing his specialism

huw.Y.WattfromWare
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 1004 times
Has Liked: 905 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by huw.Y.WattfromWare » Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:28 pm

Even Lowton in front of Bardsley is an option. Whatever problems we have the results keep coming.
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:38 pm

I think Vydra has played on the right side whilst in the championship.

ksrclaret
Posts: 6810
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2490 times
Has Liked: 761 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by ksrclaret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:38 pm

I used to love the old fashioned utility players. In the days where everyone had smaller squads, it was essential to have a handful of players who could deputise in a number of different positions. They were the glue that held teams together during the harsh winter months. I always remember our visit to Bramall Lane in Coyle's promotion season where we had Elliott at right back, Jordan at centre back, Alexander at left back, and still came away with a 3-2 victory up against James Beattie and Billy Sharp.

The game seems to have changed though and you don't often see it anymore, or if you do I'm just not noticing it as much. As for our right midfield problem, surely it's Josh Brownhill.

ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 6962
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2145 times
Has Liked: 3063 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:45 pm

This is why a fit Phil Jones would make sense as a signing, just not on the wings. Lingard is a good example of a more attacking utility player, and has settled in well at West Ham.

Maybe we could have gone harder for Snodgrass, but how much do you get into a bidding war for a 33yr old?

This really is where we need to be scouting rather than doing the transfer equivalent of emptying drip trays

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12345
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5202 times
Has Liked: 920 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by Devils_Advocate » Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:55 pm

If you split positions in to Full Back, Centre Back, Wide Midfield, Centre Midfield & Forward most Premier league teams will have at least 5 players for each position.

Its unlikely that you are gonna get 4 players injured for a particular position and therefore the need for utility players just isnt there anymore compared to the days you might have had a first team squad of 18 players.

Nevertheless you get players who can naturally cover different positions and provided they are good enough in every position on merit they are good players to have.

ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 6962
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2145 times
Has Liked: 3063 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 2:00 pm

A player who can cover, in FM terms, DRL WBRL and MRL, with possibly DC DM and MC is bloody gold dust

TheClaret
Posts: 49
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:35 pm
Been Liked: 8 times
Has Liked: 39 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by TheClaret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 2:01 pm

I’d say it's laziness by the coaching staff. If your a good footballer you can play any position within reason. Just needs a good few sessions on the training pitch.

The Enclosure
Posts: 4486
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
Been Liked: 990 times
Has Liked: 3266 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by The Enclosure » Fri Feb 19, 2021 2:12 pm

i really do think Lowts in front of Bards is a good option as a stop gap measure

Spike
Posts: 2682
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 595 times
Has Liked: 1225 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by Spike » Fri Feb 19, 2021 2:12 pm

ŽižkovClaret wrote:
Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:45 pm
This is why a fit Phil Jones would make sense as a signing, just not on the wings. Lingard is a good example of a more attacking utility player, and has settled in well at West Ham.

Maybe we could have gone harder for Snodgrass, but how much do you get into a bidding war for a 33yr old?

This really is where we need to be scouting rather than doing the transfer equivalent of emptying drip trays
We are short of players because of injury why would we risk getting another treatment room regular like Jones

brexit
Posts: 1481
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:20 am
Been Liked: 234 times
Has Liked: 58 times
Location: on the gravy train in strasbourg

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by brexit » Fri Feb 19, 2021 2:35 pm

4-3-3 would seem to be the solution

warksclaret
Posts: 6594
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1676 times
Has Liked: 754 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by warksclaret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 2:39 pm

Gone are those days-Peter Noble being one of our best ever utility players

As for outside our club Paul Madeley of Leeds (played in about 8 positions)

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30275
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10917 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by Vegas Claret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 2:41 pm

both Mourinhio and Guardiola have long banged on about having specialist players for each position, there is a good reason for that obviously - although it hasn't stopped Pep playing midfielders in defence or up front !

superdimitri
Posts: 4936
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1005 times
Has Liked: 725 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by superdimitri » Fri Feb 19, 2021 3:52 pm

Bring back Graham Branch and David Edgar!

To play in the system we have with very strict tactics for each role it's no easy feat. Pieters did really well considering..

People will mention things like Barnes, Rodriguez or Vydra on the wing but they are far more suited to play in those positions in a 443, not a 442.

Rowls
Posts: 13163
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5065 times
Has Liked: 5124 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by Rowls » Fri Feb 19, 2021 4:08 pm

David Edgar ... *shudders*

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8069
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3060 times
Has Liked: 5023 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by Colburn_Claret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 4:11 pm

Jay is an option.
His turn and cross for Barnes the other night was sublime.
He played out wide for Saints, although the other wing, and might suit it better than Brownhill.
I like Brownhill, but he is better in the middle, and both Jack and Westy are playing well together at the minute.

For West Brom I would set up like City do against us. McNeil and Jay getting their boots white from the touchline. Stretch their defence and make more room for Barnes and Vyds to operate. It also opens gaps for Charlie and Lowton to run into.

EarbyClaret
Posts: 1376
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
Been Liked: 498 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by EarbyClaret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 4:18 pm

Paul Madeley was the player who immediately came into my mind too - in are era when shirt numbers were 1-11 every week I think he wore them all - have a distant memory of him subbing for an injured Gary Sprake - or that could just be my age

Graham Branch is our nearest modern equivalent

I'd be tempted to play Jay on the right tomorrow and pair Vydra with Barnes but as this is a must not lose rather than a must win game assume it will be Brownhill and we'll try and keep it tight

bfcmik
Posts: 3594
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
Been Liked: 891 times
Has Liked: 1100 times
Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by bfcmik » Fri Feb 19, 2021 4:28 pm

To those saying that either Jay or Vyds could play right side of midfield need to remember that our framework (if that is still the 'in' word) requires much more of a defensive mindset to the role than would be natural for either of them. Of the players available the only real options are Brownhill in front of Lowton or Lowton in front of Bardsley
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

beeholeclaret
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:03 pm
Been Liked: 288 times
Has Liked: 407 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by beeholeclaret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:14 pm

Peter Noble (mentioned above) was one of the best utility players. Played at right back for one season before being used as an emergency striker. He was top scorer in Division one at one stage in 1973-74 season. From memory he scored hat-tricks against Newcastle, Middlesbrough and 4 against Norwich during his time playing up front. Another name not mentioned too often these days is "Billy Ingham" who played in many positions for Burnley including full back, midfield and up front. To be fair in the 1972-73 promotion season he made the number 12 shirt his own.
Last edited by beeholeclaret on Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15108
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3139 times
Has Liked: 6682 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:22 pm

Arthur Bellamy? I think he was one.

superdimitri
Posts: 4936
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1005 times
Has Liked: 725 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by superdimitri » Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:24 pm

bfcmik wrote:
Fri Feb 19, 2021 4:28 pm
To those saying that either Jay or Vyds could play right side of midfield need to remember that our framework (if that is still the 'in' word) requires much more of a defensive mindset to the role than would be natural for either of them. Of the players available the only real options are Brownhill in front of Lowton or Lowton in front of Bardsley
Yep, namely what I mentioned above. They usually play out wide as inside forwards in a 433 setup, with players supporting them both in the middle, and at the back.
Its not the same role as Dyche asks for our wingers...and I guess that's generally why he rarely plays our strikers there.

claretfern
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:36 am
Been Liked: 137 times
Has Liked: 1262 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by claretfern » Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:36 pm

[quote=beeholeclaret post_id=1506667 Another name not mentioned too often these days is "Billy Ingham" who played in many positions for Burnley including full back, midfield and up front. To be fair in the 1972-73 promotion season he made the number 12 shirt his own.
[/quote]
Interesting, when looking back at CT's latest review of the 1972/3 season on here, where the latest game has Billy Ingham deputising for Paul Fletcher in attack yet (an admittedly young) Ray Hankin was on the bench.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15108
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3139 times
Has Liked: 6682 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:40 pm

claretfern wrote:
Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:36 pm
[quote=beeholeclaret post_id=1506667 Another name not mentioned too often these days is "Billy Ingham" who played in many positions for Burnley including full back, midfield and up front. To be fair in the 1972-73 promotion season he made the number 12 shirt his own.
Interesting, when looking back at CT's latest review of the 1972/3 season on here, where the latest game has Billy Ingham deputising for Paul Fletcher in attack yet (an admittedly young) Ray Hankin was on the bench.
[/quote]

I think the heyday for utility players was when the one substitute rule first came in. you couldn't do better than have a truly versaile player on the bench.

Chester Perry
Posts: 19170
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3116 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by Chester Perry » Fri Feb 19, 2021 6:57 pm

didn't Andy Farrell play in every position and wear every matchday number at some point except No 1 though he did play in goal too on occasion - or is my mind playing tricks

warksclaret
Posts: 6594
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1676 times
Has Liked: 754 times

Re: Why don’t we have more utility players?

Post by warksclaret » Fri Feb 19, 2021 7:07 pm

beeholeclaret wrote:
Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:14 pm
Peter Noble (mentioned above) was one of best utility players. Played at right back for one season before being used as an emergency striker. He was top scorer in Division one at one stage in 1973-74 season. From memory he scored hat-tracks against Newcastle, Middlesbrough and 4 against Norwich during his time playing up front. Another name not mentioned too often these days is "Billy Ingham" who played in many positions for Burnley including full back, midfield and up front. To be fair in the 1972-73 promotion season he made the number 12 shirt his own.
Fully agree-I mentioned Peter Noble in an earlier post. His last phase was midfield and he was exceptional at full back, midfield and striker

The other one is Martin Dobson-signed from Bolton as a striker on a FREE, became for me the best all round midfielder I have seen in a BFC shirt. Then played centre half, and eventually sweeper

Post Reply