The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Why isn't this been dscussed?
Particularly from the camera behind the goal / towards the BL-Beehole corner. Shows clearly that Vyrda is tripped as he goes to shoot.
The claim for an Arsenal handball penalty is subjective. The penalty against Vydra is clear-cut: He is tripped as he goes to shoot.
Does anyone have the footage of it?
Particularly from the camera behind the goal / towards the BL-Beehole corner. Shows clearly that Vyrda is tripped as he goes to shoot.
The claim for an Arsenal handball penalty is subjective. The penalty against Vydra is clear-cut: He is tripped as he goes to shoot.
Does anyone have the footage of it?
-
- Posts: 16726
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3766 times
- Has Liked: 7554 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
With you here, Rowls.
I reckoned at the time he was clipped.
Should have been a pen.
I reckoned at the time he was clipped.
Should have been a pen.
-
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:23 am
- Been Liked: 495 times
- Has Liked: 219 times
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Vyds kicked the opponent’s foot - no pen.
These 4 users liked this post: JohnMac Burnley1989 RalphCoatesComb Stalbansclaret
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Never a penalty.
This user liked this post: Burnley1989
-
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 429 times
- Has Liked: 4555 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
It was NOT in the Burnley penalty area therefore NO penalty !!
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
As for the handball. Also think that should’ve been a penalty against us.
But then equally we should’ve got the one v wba.
Overall the ref had an excellent game IMO.
But then equally we should’ve got the one v wba.
Overall the ref had an excellent game IMO.
This user liked this post: NewClaret
-
- Posts: 5084
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 635 times
- Location: Tibet
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
No pen move on
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Vydra was aiming to kick the ball. The Arsenal player was behind him. So it's impossible that it happened as you describe it.
-
- Posts: 67762
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32390 times
- Has Liked: 5270 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
PGMOL explanation is that Pieters was too close to his opponent - not sure what their explanation was for the pen we should have got against West Brom.cricketfieldclarets wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:11 pmAs for the handball. Also think that should’ve been a penalty against us.
But then equally we should’ve got the one v wba.
Don't think we should have had a penalty for Vyds, don't think they should have had a penalty for that either. And thankfully, they shouldn't have had one when they were given one.
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
It wasn't even shown after the game. If somebody has the footage of it from the camera angle that captures it properly it is a CLEAR penalty and one that VAR should have easily picked up on.
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Why are we discussing a possible Burnley penalty?
Pure fantasy!
Pure fantasy!
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
It definitely deserved some analysis after the game at least as it was a big moment in the game. Saka didnt get the ball and affected Vydra's ability to get a clean strike.
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
This is exactly what I saw and if it was Saka who tripped Vydra then it is a clear cut penalty.
I don't think this one is even up for debate. It is clear cut.
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1004 times
- Has Liked: 905 times
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
He put his foot across to block his swing. Apart from Pieters on Jimenez, last year, these are very rarely given. Even though the blocker hasn’t got control of the ball.
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
No penalty on Vydra for me.
-
- Posts: 16844
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6950 times
- Has Liked: 1479 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Vydra kicked Saka. Never a penalty although looked one in real time.
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
They are "rarely given".huw.Y.WattfromWare wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:21 pmHe put his foot across to block his swing. Apart from Pieters on Jimenez, last year, these are very rarely given. Even though the blocker hasn’t got control of the ball.
This is a red herring. It's either a foul or not a foul.
The rarity of these offences being properly enforced is neither here nor there. It's a foul.
What we really need is footage of the incident.
It would at very least add a little bit of context to all this Arsenal whingeing and the monopolizing of the post-match talk which is apparently all about a penalty decision which is, at best, subjective.
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
I really don't know how people can be saying that Vydra kicked Saka when Vydra is clearly aiming to kick the ball and Saka is behind him.
Are you claiming that Vydra tried deliberately back heel Saka mere milliseconds before taking a shot on goal?
-
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:28 am
- Been Liked: 103 times
- Has Liked: 44 times
- Location: Leyland
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Never a pen on Vydra. Vydra kicked the back of Saka’s foot in the process of shooting
-
- Posts: 16844
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6950 times
- Has Liked: 1479 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
No. Saka’s foot was between Vydra’s foot and the ball. Vydra went to kick the ball and in doing so kicked Saka’s foot.
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2491 times
- Has Liked: 1477 times
- Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
No penalty for me..
-
- Posts: 6636
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2004 times
- Has Liked: 3335 times
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Not a pen unfortunately, I have to agree. But a shame the way it played out because with proper contact on the ball he could well have scored a great goal.
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Leyland Claret wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:31 pmNever a pen on Vydra. Vydra kicked the back of Saka’s foot in the process of shooting
Here's the relevant law:
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-go ... misconductFA Webstie wrote:A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences against an opponent in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force:
charges
jumps at
kicks or attempts to kick
pushes
strikes or attempts to strike (including head-butt)
tackles or challenges
TRIPS or attempts to trip
A trip, as you can see above, is clearly defined as a foul by the laws of the game.
Saka was trying to win the ball. I do not believe he won the ball.
The way you're using the verb 'to kick' is strange. It is also neither here nor there in this context. No player was kicked during the foul (not unless anyone is trying to claim against all credibility that Vydra deliberately attempted to "kick" Saka with a crafty and calculated back-heel at the same time as to execute a shot on goal). Vydra was tripped by Saka's unsuccessful attempt to win the ball. This is self evident. It's obvious. Vydra ends up in a pile on the floor. He is tripped.
There are only a limited number of ways you can possibly believe it wasn't a foul: You either have to complete a set of mental gymnastics so improbable and bizarre (see above paragraph) that they defy logic, reason and credibility. Or you wilfully ignore the definitions and create a scenario that avoids the rules altogether. Or else you aren't aware of the law. Or don't understand law as it is written down
Unless Saka got a toe to the ball, it's a clear foul. Vydra is tripped. A trip is a foul. A foul in the penalty box is a penalty.
Last edited by Rowls on Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
It's a no from me, Kicked Saka's foot as he swung forward to kick the ball.
-
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:23 am
- Been Liked: 495 times
- Has Liked: 219 times
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Rowls wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:44 pmHere's the relevant law:
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-go ... misconduct
A trip, as you can see above, is clearly defined as a foul by the laws of the game.
Saka was trying to win the ball. I do not believe he won the ball.
The way you're using the verb 'to kick' is strange. It is also neither here nor there in this context. No player was kicked during the foul (not unless anyone is trying to claim against all credibility that Vydra deliberately attempted to "kick" Saka with a crafty and calculated back-heel at the same time as to execute a shot on goal). Vydra was tripped by Saka's unsuccessful attempt to win the ball. This is self evident. It's obvious. Vydra ends up in a pile on the floor. He is tripped.
No pen - look in the papers tomorrow.
Last edited by IWOODLOVETT on Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
No pen for me
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
This is actually when are where he was tripped.claretandy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:47 pmIt's a no from me, Kicked Saka's foot as he swung forward to kick the ball.
It's a clear free kick as described in law 12.
A free kick shall be awarded if a player trips an opponent.
-
- Posts: 16844
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6950 times
- Has Liked: 1479 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
You can use as many words as you like, it doesn’t make you right. Saka didn’t trip Vydra.Rowls wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:44 pmHere's the relevant law:
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-go ... misconduct
A trip, as you can see above, is clearly defined as a foul by the laws of the game.
Saka was trying to win the ball. I do not believe he won the ball.
The way you're using the verb 'to kick' is strange. It is also neither here nor there in this context. No player was kicked during the foul (not unless anyone is trying to claim against all credibility that Vydra deliberately attempted to "kick" Saka with a crafty and calculated back-heel at the same time as to execute a shot on goal). Vydra was tripped by Saka's unsuccessful attempt to win the ball. This is self evident. It's obvious. Vydra ends up in a pile on the floor. He is tripped.
There are only a limited number of ways you can possibly believe it wasn't a foul: You either have to complete a set of mental gymnastics so improbable and bizarre (see above paragraph) that they defy logic, reason and credibility. Or you wilfully ignore the definitions and create a scenario that avoids the rules altogether. Or else you aren't aware of the law. Or don't understand law as it is written down
Unless Saka got a toe to the ball, it's a clear foul. Vydra is tripped. A trip is a foul. A foul in the penalty box is a penalty.
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Only if it's careless, reckless or with excessive force.Rowls wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:44 pmHere's the relevant law:
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-go ... misconduct
A trip, as you can see above, is clearly defined as a foul by the laws of the game.
Saka was trying to win the ball. I do not believe he won the ball.
The way you're using the verb 'to kick' is strange. It is also neither here nor there in this context. No player was kicked during the foul (not unless anyone is trying to claim against all credibility that Vydra deliberately attempted to "kick" Saka with a crafty and calculated back-heel at the same time as to execute a shot on goal). Vydra was tripped by Saka's unsuccessful attempt to win the ball. This is self evident. It's obvious. Vydra ends up in a pile on the floor. He is tripped.
There are only a limited number of ways you can possibly believe it wasn't a foul: You either have to complete a set of mental gymnastics so improbable and bizarre (see above paragraph) that they defy logic, reason and credibility. Or you wilfully ignore the definitions and create a scenario that avoids the rules altogether. Or else you aren't aware of the law. Or don't understand law as it is written down
Unless Saka got a toe to the ball, it's a clear foul. Vydra is tripped. A trip is a foul. A foul in the penalty box is a penalty.
I'd like to see it again.
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
That's not what the law says I'm afraid.
The bit about "careless, reckless or excessive force" is distinct from the offence of tripping.
Edit - sorry, I'm istaken here.
It's clearly under the definition here of "careless" in that it is not a deliberate foul.
But it is still clearly a foul because Saka clearly trips Vydra.
The idea that this is somehow not a free kick is just a miscomprehension that has apparently gathered momentum. You don't need to know anything about the sport to understand this - you only have to been able to read and comprehend English to an adult degree and understand the rule in question.
All these people saying it's not a penalty "for them" simply don't appear to understand how clear cut and well defined the rule is here.
If a player is tripped it is a foul.
Last edited by Rowls on Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:23 am
- Been Liked: 495 times
- Has Liked: 219 times
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1004 times
- Has Liked: 905 times
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
The grey area is control of the ball. To me if you are not playing the ball just stopping the opponent it should be a pen. but they are so rarely given I wasn’t surprised.
-
- Posts: 3012
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 833 times
- Has Liked: 1630 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
No penalty at either end for me
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Yes there is a slight grey area here.huw.Y.WattfromWare wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:54 pmThe grey area is control of the ball. To me if you are not playing the ball just stopping the opponent it should be a pen. but they are so rarely given I wasn’t surprised.
So then we can look at whether Saka had control of the ball or won the ball during the incident.
He did not have control of the ball.
He did not win the ball.
Ergo, it is a foul.
This user liked this post: huw.Y.WattfromWare
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Never a pen for me. Didn't think it was in real time or when I saw the reply. I thought the Pieters one was at that time.
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
All these people saying it's not a penalty "for them" simply don't appear to understand how clear cut and well defined the rule is here.
If a player is tripped it is a foul.
If a player is tripped it is a foul.
-
- Posts: 13240
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
The even sadder thing is that had Vydra gone down screaming then it might have been given.
We'd have benefitted from having the crowd in there today.
We'd have benefitted from having the crowd in there today.
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Never in a million years a penalty and not a trip. A trip in this scenario suggests that Saka intended to trip Vydra, which wasn’t the case.
Saka was committing no offence in the position that he was in. It was simply unfortunate that Vydra caught Saka’s leg when going for the shot.
A penalty for that would be condoning the strikers that leave their leg out intentionally to try and cheat a penalty.
I can see why Vydra claimed but a penalty it was not.
Saka was committing no offence in the position that he was in. It was simply unfortunate that Vydra caught Saka’s leg when going for the shot.
A penalty for that would be condoning the strikers that leave their leg out intentionally to try and cheat a penalty.
I can see why Vydra claimed but a penalty it was not.
Last edited by DCWat on Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Saka put his foot/leg in the arc of Vydra’s swing of his leg to prevent him getting a clear contact on the ball. It’s an old pro’s trick, which refs rarely pick up and that’s why they do it regularly. It’s a penalty.
-
- Posts: 12359
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5209 times
- Has Liked: 920 times
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Never a pen and will be surprised if it even makes the highlights as it was such a nothing incident
Good thread though
Good thread though
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1004 times
- Has Liked: 905 times
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
A few minutes later Lacazette kicks Pieters foot and Pieters gets booked.
Lacazette did squeal 3 times like a stuck pig though
Lacazette did squeal 3 times like a stuck pig though
This user liked this post: ClaretPope
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
Vydra kicked the back of Saka'a foot
No pen
I'm surprised he didn't get sent off for the malicious challenge but he clearly can't scream as loud as Lacazette
Move on !
No pen
I'm surprised he didn't get sent off for the malicious challenge but he clearly can't scream as loud as Lacazette
Move on !
-
- Posts: 3307
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 986 times
- Has Liked: 1659 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Re: The Penalty Incident when Vydra was Fouled
To me this is like a lot of incidents these days your instinct is they’re not a foul but you also know that they are given especially to the Harry Kane level of playerRowls wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:08 pmWhy isn't this been dscussed?
Particularly from the camera behind the goal / towards the BL-Beehole corner. Shows clearly that Vyrda is tripped as he goes to shoot.
The claim for an Arsenal handball penalty is subjective. The penalty against Vydra is clear-cut: He is tripped as he goes to shoot.
Does anyone have the footage of it?
If you can initiate contact with someone’s foot to get a decision what’s the different here
I just looked and thought seen them given, but not for us!