MOTD

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
No Ney Never
Posts: 2643
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:31 pm
Been Liked: 895 times
Has Liked: 328 times

MOTD

Post by No Ney Never » Sat Mar 13, 2021 10:52 pm

To be fair, that was a decent focus on how well we played..........makes a change!
These 2 users liked this post: Wile E Coyote MT03ALG

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8525
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 2889 times
Has Liked: 1763 times

Re: MOTD

Post by Wile E Coyote » Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:00 pm

agreed, no ex gunners on mumbling or shoulder shrugging when asked to comment, breath of fresh air tonight.

Vino blanco
Posts: 5363
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 1904 times
Has Liked: 1978 times

Re: MOTD

Post by Vino blanco » Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:02 pm

I'm not used to hearing words like excellent and fabulous being used about us on the tele.

RingoMcCartney
Posts: 10318
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 2636 times
Has Liked: 2798 times

Re: MOTD

Post by RingoMcCartney » Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:03 pm

First time in many, many moons that we've had a fair crack of the whip.

See you all in 3 years time the next time we do.
These 2 users liked this post: Bosscat MT03ALG

Bosscat
Posts: 25530
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8485 times
Has Liked: 18201 times

Re: MOTD

Post by Bosscat » Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:04 pm

She-Rah and Jug-ears were very complimentary but.... How could they not be, it was one of our best team performances in ages 😁

BOYSIE31
Posts: 2357
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:46 pm
Been Liked: 264 times
Has Liked: 1112 times

Re: MOTD

Post by BOYSIE31 » Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:06 pm

Their report matched my ratings 😉

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8525
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 2889 times
Has Liked: 1763 times

Re: MOTD

Post by Wile E Coyote » Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:13 pm

I dont like chelsea, I think when we were newly promoted and played them their attacking style was a thing of beauty. this lot look ordinary by comparison.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: MOTD

Post by tiger76 » Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:41 pm

If we play well, as we did today we'll rightly get praised, but we can't expect the pundits to give us credit when we are poor.

I generally find Shearer is pretty fair when he's discussing us despite his Blackburn links, and he gets why we play the way we do.

Having not seen the full game, what caught my ears was the lavish praise both Brownhill & Westwood received, and it must have been a long time since we dominated the midfield in such a fashion, and that even includes many of our Championship games.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

houseboy
Posts: 7065
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2238 times
Has Liked: 1617 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: MOTD

Post by houseboy » Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:24 am

Excellent report on us from MOTD but then to be fair the ex bar steward does usually sing our praises. I think Shearer is a genuine football man and but for his obvious link I think he is excellent and better than most pundits.
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret

Chester Perry
Posts: 19349
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3146 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: MOTD

Post by Chester Perry » Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:26 am

This user liked this post: cockneyclaret

Tribesmen
Posts: 5084
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1180 times
Has Liked: 635 times
Location: Tibet

Re: MOTD

Post by Tribesmen » Sun Mar 14, 2021 8:04 am

Just watching MOTD again , hey as you do

Foulthrow
Posts: 2283
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:48 am
Been Liked: 699 times
Has Liked: 1518 times

Re: MOTD

Post by Foulthrow » Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:03 am

How come are XG came up at 0.79 (or whatever it was) when we could have comfortably scored 3 or 4?

djemba-djemba
Posts: 650
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 6:12 pm
Been Liked: 129 times
Has Liked: 40 times

Re: MOTD

Post by djemba-djemba » Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:06 am

They are generally pretty fair.

Most weeks there’s not much to praise.

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: MOTD

Post by duncandisorderly » Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:30 am

Foulthrow wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:03 am
How come are XG came up at 0.79 (or whatever it was) when we could have comfortably scored 3 or 4?
I've only seen the 3 minute highlights, but all the Burnley chances on there would have gone down as difficult chances. They'd all have been excellent goals, but there wasn't an instance where you'd expect us to score but didn't.

JBG hitting the post, Mee hitting the bar, Woods goal and McNeils goal would all have had a very low Xg. The fact two of them went in doesn't change that.
This user liked this post: Foulthrow

Ric_C
Posts: 2067
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 752 times
Has Liked: 122 times

Re: MOTD

Post by Ric_C » Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:40 am

Good coverage last night, however when showing the analysis, it would have been nice to include some of that in the overall game highlights. Shearer is always complimentary about us (I think he secretly likes us lol).

Conversely, I couldn't believe how much of the Leeds v Chelsea 0-0 they showed, bit strange that.

Hopefully this is a starting point to playing more football on the deck, as the players look a lot more comfortable as a unit when we do this.

I fully agree with Shearer that Dwight should score more goals, he needs to back himself more.

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11490
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3181 times
Has Liked: 1864 times
Contact:

Re: MOTD

Post by wilks_bfc » Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:53 am

duncandisorderly wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:30 am
I've only seen the 3 minute highlights, but all the Burnley chances on there would have gone down as difficult chances. They'd all have been excellent goals, but there wasn't an instance where you'd expect us to score but didn't.

JBG hitting the post, Mee hitting the bar, Woods goal and McNeils goal would all have had a very low Xg. The fact two of them went in doesn't change that.
Got to admit I’ve not taken much notice of Xg before but I thought it was based on the stats of previous games not the game being played

expoultryboy
Posts: 1614
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
Been Liked: 341 times
Has Liked: 474 times

Re: MOTD

Post by expoultryboy » Sun Mar 14, 2021 10:13 am

Unfortunately I'm beginning to like Shearer . I feel very ashamed of this , and need to apologise to all at Utc ! I couldn't understand why 2 of our penalty appeals weren't shown or the other one not even discussed .

Rileybobs
Posts: 16827
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6947 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: Leeds

Re: MOTD

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:05 pm

duncandisorderly wrote:
Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:30 am
I've only seen the 3 minute highlights, but all the Burnley chances on there would have gone down as difficult chances. They'd all have been excellent goals, but there wasn't an instance where you'd expect us to score but didn't.

JBG hitting the post, Mee hitting the bar, Woods goal and McNeils goal would all have had a very low Xg. The fact two of them went in doesn't change that.
Spoke about this on another thread but I’d have had Vydra’s chance down as a 50/50.

Belial
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 320 times
Location: On a crazy train

Re: MOTD

Post by Belial » Sun Mar 14, 2021 3:36 pm

I'm with the others above... how was our XG only 0.75 (Mee, Vydra, Wood's attempts surely decent) and Everton's 1.70... aside from the DCL missed header I can't think of any other 'clearer' chances than ours

Post Reply