Annual accounts released
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Annual accounts released
The accounts make interesting reading - along with comparing them with the accounts (not just the numbers) for the previous season.
Note 24. Events after the reporting date, report players in and players out after each the respective reporting dates.
Key Performance Indicators: - 2019/20 - 2018/19 - 2017/18
League position; 10th; 15th; 7th;
FA Cup; 4th round; 4th round; 3rd round;
Carabao Cup; 2nd round; 3rd round; 3rd round;
Average Home league gate: 20,268; 20,534; 20,688;
Wage:Turnover ratio: 70.20%; 62.86%; 58.72%.
Wages adjusted for comparable 12-months period.
The four home games without fans are not counted in calculating the average home league gates. Would these 4 games - Watford, Sheff Utd, L'pool and Norwich have pushed up the season's average? (I'd forgotten that we'd got 2 relegated sides and the Premier League winners in those 4 games).
Of course, I've added the 2017/18 KPIs - taken from the previous season's accounts.
I've not calculated a wage/turnover figure on the basis that covid-19 and no fans never happened. Of course, that would have reduced the 70.20% ratio as the turnover would have been higher.
Note 24. Events after the reporting date, report players in and players out after each the respective reporting dates.
Key Performance Indicators: - 2019/20 - 2018/19 - 2017/18
League position; 10th; 15th; 7th;
FA Cup; 4th round; 4th round; 3rd round;
Carabao Cup; 2nd round; 3rd round; 3rd round;
Average Home league gate: 20,268; 20,534; 20,688;
Wage:Turnover ratio: 70.20%; 62.86%; 58.72%.
Wages adjusted for comparable 12-months period.
The four home games without fans are not counted in calculating the average home league gates. Would these 4 games - Watford, Sheff Utd, L'pool and Norwich have pushed up the season's average? (I'd forgotten that we'd got 2 relegated sides and the Premier League winners in those 4 games).
Of course, I've added the 2017/18 KPIs - taken from the previous season's accounts.
I've not calculated a wage/turnover figure on the basis that covid-19 and no fans never happened. Of course, that would have reduced the 70.20% ratio as the turnover would have been higher.
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Annual accounts released
To be fair I’m including that? If my understanding is correct we would technically only get 15m from a 20m sale of Tarks. Then we have the Chinese rebate to pay circa 7-8m.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 5:46 pmTarks is most likely going to leave.
That's his wages and whatever fee we get for him.
One year left, so circa £20-30 million, maybe.
One would hope our scouting team have targets lined up...
That leaves us 7-8m to play with not taking into account the wages of the three new owners, I imagine they will all be earning 7 figures as a minimum.
Does not leave a lot of money to sign players with. Possibly the plan is to sell Pope and Tarks
Re: Annual accounts released
Same question could be asked of the Vydra signingPaul Waine wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 6:25 pmHi CT, are you suggesting that Mike Garlick was making too many footballing decisions, who the club should sign and who the club should let go? Is that's what's behind Sean Dyche referencing, as reported by Sky Sports today, that Alan Pace will leave all the football decisions to SD? Where did Ben Gibson fit in their relationship? Similar question re Joe Hart?
UTC
But I don't think Garlick signed Crouchy
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Annual accounts released
That's why it's been so important that the club grows its revenue streams, something many people on here cannot seem to grasp.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 7:03 pmTo be fair I’m including that? If my understanding is correct we would technically only get 15m from a 20m sale of Tarks. Then we have the Chinese rebate to pay circa 7-8m.
That leaves us 7-8m to play with not taking into account the wages of the three new owners, I imagine they will all be earning 7 figures as a minimum.
Does not leave a lot of money to sign players with. Possibly the plan is to sell Pope and Tarks
Besides, we don't know what % the club would give Dyche, what cut Brentford get etc.
They may not use the Tarks money to pay the TV rebate amount for example.
Re: Annual accounts released
You can see why the manager gets frustrated. Chairman publicly states we'll lose 50 million so there's no money to spend. Manager saying finances are fine and we need to stretch.
Club breaks even.
Hopefully the new chairman has a bit more integrity.
Club breaks even.
Hopefully the new chairman has a bit more integrity.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Annual accounts released
The four games with no crowds at home were Watford, Sheffield United, Wolves and Brighton.Paul Waine wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 6:48 pmThe four home games without fans are not counted in calculating the average home league gates. Would these 4 games - Watford, Sheff Utd, L'pool and Norwich have pushed up the season's average? (I'd forgotten that we'd got 2 relegated sides and the Premier League winners in those 4 games).
-
- Posts: 10918
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5563 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Didn't the chairman say we could lose £50m if the season didn't finish?
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
he did, more specifically it was IF the season did not finish and there was no indication of when football would return by the end of July - no matter how many times it is pointed out on here there are some who still choose to ignore itTheFamilyCat wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 7:58 pmDidn't the chairman say we could lose £50m if the season didn't finish?
This user liked this post: Grumps
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Yes I just don’t know where else the money will come from? From what I gather there is next to nothing in the coffers and the club will only operate with the funds the club raises.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 7:31 pmThat's why it's been so important that the club grows its revenue streams, something many people on here cannot seem to grasp.
Besides, we don't know what % the club would give Dyche, what cut Brentford get etc.
They may not use the Tarks money to pay the TV rebate amount for example.
Club definitely needs to increase revenue just not sure how they will increase it.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Annual accounts released
I think you might have gathered wrong with the money in the coffersNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 9:59 pmYes I just don’t know where else the money will come from? From what I gather there is next to nothing in the coffers and the club will only operate with the funds the club raises.
Club definitely needs to increase revenue just not sure how they will increase it.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Annual accounts released
I think you might have gathered wrong with the money in the coffersNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 9:59 pmYes I just don’t know where else the money will come from? From what I gather there is next to nothing in the coffers and the club will only operate with the funds the club raises.
Club definitely needs to increase revenue just not sure how they will increase it.
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Annual accounts released
What’s changed Tony? Thought the big news break was that 50m was given to the ex owners as part of the deal?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 10:06 pmI think you might have gathered wrong with the money in the coffers
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Tony it looks like the money at July 31 2020 in the accounts included both the final season monies of 2019/20 and the first TV payment of the current seasonClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 10:06 pmI think you might have gathered wrong with the money in the coffers
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
The story was circa £30m of the £50m - £55m that the club had in the bank at the timeNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 10:08 pmWhat’s changed Tony? Thought the big news break was that 50m was given to the ex owners as part of the deal?
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Hi CT, and thanks. Whoops, yes, I rushed those 4 names. It's funny how memories are distorted when we can't go on games. I remember last season we were the only team to take a point at Liverpool - though this record has changed a little following our victory at Anfield this season. And, I had plans to go to Norwich, the last away game of the original (normal) season.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 7:34 pmThe four games with no crowds at home were Watford, Sheffield United, Wolves and Brighton.
Given these 4 fixtures, I'm more confident in concluding that if these games had been open to fans, our full 19 home game average would have fallen below the previous season.
UTC
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 5:20 pm
- Been Liked: 29 times
- Has Liked: 5 times
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
This was on the thread alreadyclaretgilly wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 11:08 pmhttps://twitter.com/kieranmaguire/statu ... 32960?s=21
Thread here is decent
We will probably have to wait a until Wednesday or Thursday for Swiss Ramble at the earliest as both Sheffield United and West Brom released their accounts before us this weekend
Re: Annual accounts released
That would tie in with Accruals and deferred income increasing by £30m.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 10:12 pmTony it looks like the money at July 31 2020 in the accounts included both the final season monies of 2019/20 and the first TV payment of the current season
This user liked this post: Paul Waine
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Hi CP, do you have other sources that indicate that the first instalment of 2020/21 season tv money was received on or before 31st July by the club? Do you have an estimate of this figure? Is it mentioned somewhere in the MMT thread?Chester Perry wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 10:12 pmTony it looks like the money at July 31 2020 in the accounts included both the final season monies of 2019/20 and the first TV payment of the current season
I notice that Note 16 Creditors Amounts falling due within one year, on page 26 includes "accruals and deferred income" of £56 million, compared with £24 million in the previous accounts - an increase of £32 million.
Also, Note 27 Cash Generated from Group Operations, page 29, shows £41 million contribution to cash generation from increase in creditors.
For those who aren't familiar with accounting terms "accruals" are costs/expenses/liabilities that have been incurred, but have not yet been invoiced by the supplier, thus recognised as an accrual rather than in the trade creditors ledger. And, "deferred income" can refer to money that has been received before it is due. Both these terms - and prepayments on the debtors side - are included in accounts so that income and expenses are always matched to the correct accounting period.
Conclusion: given that creditors have increased by £32 million, it means that at least £32 million of the £80 million cash figure includes money that is not due to any "success" in 2019/20. We would be wrong to think that "we had £80 million cash in the bank... where were the Premier League starters that we could have signed with all the cash?"
UTC
-
- Posts: 12373
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Annual accounts released
We did have £80m in the bank though and at the next accounts we will see what income we have received since and what costs we have incurred.
I assume this time next year we should be able to see what impact (if any) the takeover had with respect to the cash in the bank figure.
I assume this time next year we should be able to see what impact (if any) the takeover had with respect to the cash in the bank figure.
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Paul - I know roughly when the payments are due and that the first payment is the biggest (though it is based on the equal share income not merit/tv appearance income) - it was actually Kieran Maguire who said our cash holding it was around £30m up as a result of the first payment this season.Paul Waine wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 11:41 pmHi CP, do you have other sources that indicate that the first instalment of 2020/21 season tv money was received on or before 31st July by the club? Do you have an estimate of this figure? Is it mentioned somewhere in the MMT thread?
I notice that Note 16 Creditors Amounts falling due within one year, on page 26 includes "accruals and deferred income" of £56 million, compared with £24 million in the previous accounts - an increase of £32 million.
Also, Note 27 Cash Generated from Group Operations, page 29, shows £41 million contribution to cash generation from increase in creditors.
For those who aren't familiar with accounting terms "accruals" are costs/expenses/liabilities that have been incurred, but have not yet been invoiced by the supplier, thus recognised as an accrual rather than in the trade creditors ledger. And, "deferred income" can refer to money that has been received before it is due. Both these terms - and prepayments on the debtors side - are included in accounts so that income and expenses are always matched to the correct accounting period.
Conclusion: given that creditors have increased by £32 million, it means that at least £32 million of the £80 million cash figure includes money that is not due to any "success" in 2019/20. We would be wrong to think that "we had £80 million cash in the bank... where were the Premier League starters that we could have signed with all the cash?"
UTC
Of course if we had not had the pandemic the July 31 cash position would have been £91m - as it include the £10.5m of revenue the club said it had lost.
What these numbers also show is that the club maintained it's policy if budgeting for 17t/16th place finish in the league in relation to turnover.
Last edited by Chester Perry on Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
The cash in the bank is a different accounting approach to the trading deferral of income into the next season. It is standard practice to treat the two differently in this way.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 11:47 pmWe did have £80m in the bank though and at the next accounts we will see what income we have received since and what costs we have incurred.
I assume this time next year we should be able to see what impact (if any) the takeover had with respect to the cash in the bank figure.
The next set of accounts will definitely show the impacts of the takeover including
- the value of the inter-company loan
- the value of the MSD loan and the rate of interest - this loan may also double as as a kind of overdraft facility (in the way West Ham are using theirs) i.e. there is a maximum facility the club can use but they may not necessarily be using it all at any given time. That may account for the different valuation reports we heard in Dec/Jan about the MSD loan. All that would have to be revealed if it was what the agreement entailed.
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Thanks, CP. so Kieran Maguire has indicated BFC has rec'd £30 million tv money on or before 31st July as the first instalment of tv money for 2020/2021. That sounds like a good source and ties back nicely to the £32 million estimate of "deferred income" in the accounts to 31st July 2020.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 11:55 pmPaul - I know roughly when the payments are due and that the first payment is the biggest (though it is based on the equal share income not merit/tv appearance income) - it was actually Kieran Maguire who said our cash holding it was around £30m up as a result of the first payment this season.
Of course if we had not had the pandemic the July 31 cash position would have been £91m - as it include the £10.5m of revenue the club said it had lost.
You say "if we had not had the pandemic" - we'd have had an extra £10.5 million of revenue. But, also, if we'd not had the pandemic the season would have been completed before 30th June and we wouldn't be seeing accounts that include figures that relate to both the 2019/20 season and the 2020/21 season. Instead, we'd have seen accounts to 30th June 2020 and, all other things being equal, we'd have had a cash balance of £50 to £60 million.
I wonder, btw, if we will see the year end switched back to 30th June at some time?
UTC
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
If you wind back to the 31st of June in a normal season we would not have had the £6m - £7m of July costs either.Paul Waine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:26 amThanks, CP. so Kieran Maguire has indicated BFC has rec'd £30 million tv money on or before 31st July as the first instalment of tv money for 2020/2021. That sounds like a good source and ties back nicely to the £32 million estimate of "deferred income" in the accounts to 31st July 2020.
You say "if we had not had the pandemic" - we'd have had an extra £10.5 million of revenue. But, also, if we'd not had the pandemic the season would have been completed before 30th June and we wouldn't be seeing accounts that include figures that relate to both the 2019/20 season and the 2020/21 season. Instead, we'd have seen accounts to 30th June 2020 and, all other things being equal, we'd have had a cash balance of £50 to £60 million.
I wonder, btw, if we will see the year end switched back to 30th June at some time?
UTC
I suspect we will stay at 31st July going forward - that is what Sheffield United and West Brom have indicated, having made the accounting date change for the same reasons as us for last season
Last edited by Chester Perry on Sun Apr 04, 2021 1:21 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Annual accounts released
I think we will have to. we don't want to be playing the early rounds of the Europa League in the wrong financial year, do we.Paul Waine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:26 amI wonder, btw, if we will see the year end switched back to 30th June at some time?
UTC
This user liked this post: Paul Waine
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
In response to the little short lived disagreement which has been removed - my expectations for the next accounts is that we will still have a positive cash holding at the end of this season just reduced substantially, primarily as a result of the inter-company loan
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Annual accounts released
In Leeds latest accounts, it states that 35m in bonus payments for stopping up, they paid 20m promotion bonus, 18.5m in add-ons for stopping up and player appearances.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 2:35 pmI agree
if you take away the PAYE and pension costs the increase is about 50% of the expected place money which seems an incentivised approach (perhaps overly so) - There were some notable new deals that season for Wood and Dwight - was Pope done as well? - plus you would expect Jay to be on a decent wack
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Hi CP, "30 days has September, April, June and November...." thus "30th of June," please.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 1:01 amIf you wind back to the 31st of June in a normal season we would not have had the £6m - £7m of July costs either.
I suspect we will stay at 31st July going forward - that is what Sheffield United and West Brom have indicated, having made the accounting date change for the same reasons as us for last season
What are the July costs, I assume these include players' wages, so it's only a case of putting these wages into the correct period. July is, more usually, pre-season, so players' wages fit into the same accounting period as the tv money received for the new season.
I still can't get my head around the situation with the out of contract players. It appears as though their contracts ended on 30th June and so they were not obliged to play in the 9 end of season games - in June and July. Yet, there were reports the club had to pay them for both the months of June and July.
I hope the club goes back to 30th June year end.
Looking forward to today's game in a little over 2 hours time.
UTC
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Paul Waine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:53 amHi CP, "30 days has September, April, June and November...." thus "30th of June," please.
What are the July costs, I assume these include players' wages, so it's only a case of putting these wages into the correct period. July is, more usually, pre-season, so players' wages fit into the same accounting period as the tv money received for the new season.
I still can't get my head around the situation with the out of contract players. It appears as though their contracts ended on 30th June and so they were not obliged to play in the 9 end of season games - in June and July. Yet, there were reports the club had to pay them for both the months of June and July.
I hope the club goes back to 30th June year end.
Looking forward to today's game in a little over 2 hours time.
UTC
Isn't it the situation that even though contracts expire at June 30, wages are still paid in July ? I'm sure I've seen that somewhere before.
Re: Annual accounts released
That's an interesting disclosure. I wonder why Leeds' auditors deemed it necessary but others don't.claretandy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 8:44 amIn Leeds latest accounts, it states that 35m in bonus payments for stopping up, they paid 20m promotion bonus, 18.5m in add-ons for stopping up and player appearances.
- Attachments
-
- IMG_20210404_104310.jpg (162.89 KiB) Viewed 1940 times
Re: Annual accounts released
There's also a hefty amount of season ticket money for the upcoming season in that cash balance. It also needs to be viewed in the context of our debtors dropping by £15m. I wonder if a lot of the transfer debts become payable in July?Chester Perry wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:05 amThe cash in the bank is a different accounting approach to the trading deferral of income into the next season. It is standard practice to treat the two differently in this way.
The next set of accounts will definitely show the impacts of the takeover including
- the value of the inter-company loan
- the value of the MSD loan and the rate of interest - this loan may also double as as a kind of overdraft facility (in the way West Ham are using theirs) i.e. there is a maximum facility the club can use but they may not necessarily be using it all at any given time. That may account for the different valuation reports we heard in Dec/Jan about the MSD loan. All that would have to be revealed if it was what the agreement entailed.
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Does make you wonder why he chose to say it though, given the season did restart and we didn’t lose £50m???Chester Perry wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 8:04 pmhe did, more specifically it was IF the season did not finish and there was no indication of when football would return by the end of July - no matter how many times it is pointed out on here there are some who still choose to ignore it
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Annual accounts released
He said it before the season restarted though.
We will still be losing money this season, no Matchday revenue, TV rebates and anything we need for Covid related things to allow fan reentry.
Season ticket money for this season is being used for next season so that's going to be a good couple of million lost.
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Totally agree. I think the £55m cash pile from one of the ALK reports (Guardian) looks about right. Cash has grown £15-20m each season for the last three so that would be ballpark right area.Paul Waine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:26 amThanks, CP. so Kieran Maguire has indicated BFC has rec'd £30 million tv money on or before 31st July as the first instalment of tv money for 2020/2021. That sounds like a good source and ties back nicely to the £32 million estimate of "deferred income" in the accounts to 31st July 2020.
You say "if we had not had the pandemic" - we'd have had an extra £10.5 million of revenue. But, also, if we'd not had the pandemic the season would have been completed before 30th June and we wouldn't be seeing accounts that include figures that relate to both the 2019/20 season and the 2020/21 season. Instead, we'd have seen accounts to 30th June 2020 and, all other things being equal, we'd have had a cash balance of £50 to £60 million.
I wonder, btw, if we will see the year end switched back to 30th June at some time?
UTC
-
- Posts: 2602
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Probably being thick here, but the cash statement refers to purchase of intangible assets of c£46m. We bought Brownhill, Jrod (only half paid up-front), BPF and Pieters during the period, which would account for less than half of that number.
What have I missed?
What have I missed?
-
- Posts: 7362
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2220 times
- Has Liked: 2211 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Exciting times.
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
That one is down to a specific legal case that is on going - a player they had on loan last season and were obliged to buy on promotion - the players registration was up end of May their season finished in July and they did not want him, Was in the MMT thread over the summer
Last edited by Chester Perry on Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
That is when you expect them to be paid - The numbers where supposed to be relatively even in and out, though as I commented yesterday, it appears that someone has managed to negotiate an extension in paying to us. Out outgoing payments appear to include around £1m of conditional payments
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
It is, I have posted about that a few times, specifically last summer and those OoC playersclaretandy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:57 amIsn't it the situation that even though contracts expire at June 30, wages are still paid in July ? I'm sure I've seen that somewhere before.
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
I raised that yesterday - £29m plus change on players what is the rest for?scouseclaret wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 11:24 amProbably being thick here, but the cash statement refers to purchase of intangible assets of c£46m. We bought Brownhill, Jrod (only half paid up-front), BPF and Pieters during the period, which would account for less than half of that number.
What have I missed?
Re: Annual accounts released
I've not looked at this specifically but generally agents' fees and signing on fees (including contact renewals) will be in here too.scouseclaret wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 11:24 amProbably being thick here, but the cash statement refers to purchase of intangible assets of c£46m. We bought Brownhill, Jrod (only half paid up-front), BPF and Pieters during the period, which would account for less than half of that number.
What have I missed?
Re: Annual accounts released
Also, having had a quick look that's the cash outgoings. At the end of the previous season we owed £14m on transfers, this season we owed £2m. That £12m will account for a large amount of your difference.
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: Annual accounts released
I know. My point was more why make the statement at all, when so much was up in the air? It was a strange one to say the least.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 10:53 amHe said it before the season restarted though.
We will still be losing money this season, no Matchday revenue, TV rebates and anything we need for Covid related things to allow fan reentry.
Season ticket money for this season is being used for next season so that's going to be a good couple of million lost.
Re: Annual accounts released
Odd if a chairman foists a player on a manager.
He'll be taking training next!
He'll be taking training next!
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Hi scouse, the £46 million is a cash movement item. It doesn't represent the transfer values of the incoming players that you name, but all the cash paid out in the period in respect of those players and other players that were signed in previous periods, where some money was paid out in the 13 months of 2019/20. Plus, I expect it includes agent fees paid out for players transferred into the club and any agent fees paid out on the re-negotiation/extension of player contracts that took place in the period (I'm assuming that agents don't have to wait a long time to receive their fees).scouseclaret wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 11:24 amProbably being thick here, but the cash statement refers to purchase of intangible assets of c£46m. We bought Brownhill, Jrod (only half paid up-front), BPF and Pieters during the period, which would account for less than half of that number.
What have I missed?
UTC
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Annual accounts released
It would be a lot more simpler if they accounts showed, who we've bought, what we've paid, and what's still to pay.
Last edited by claretandy on Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: Annual accounts released
Thing is, in Garlicks case, he was otherwise pretty silent but then issued a statement out-of-the-blue prophesising doom.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:25 pmFans - we demand more noise from the owner.
Chairman/Co owner - ok
Fans - no, not like that, shush.
It was all just very strange that a few weeks after lockdown he was predicting the financial implications. Perhaps made more strange by these results showing the cash pile sat at £80m a few months later.
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Annual accounts released
you mean like they do in Italyclaretandy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:32 pmIt would be a lot more simpler if they accounts showed, who we've bought, what we've paid, and what's still to pay.
surprisingly, given the who owns them. Juventus is the most open in this of all big clubs - In this country only Chesterfield give this information I believe
This user liked this post: claretandy