Why was Roberts so cheap

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
NewClaret
Posts: 13493
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3109 times
Has Liked: 3827 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by NewClaret » Thu Sep 02, 2021 9:32 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Thu Sep 02, 2021 11:35 am
Precisely! and if Christie is so good how come no other PL teams were interested in signing him, especially considering the modest fee, he ended up at Bournemouth, which tells you a lot.
I read that Southampton & Palace were also interested. Here’s Christie’s words so suggests it was a mixture of style/speaking to Parker/some historic link. I reckon he just didn’t believe in himself to play in the Prem or Bournemouth were so desperate to get it over the line that they agreed to some silly clauses we wouldn’t.

“Throughout my whole career I’ve always wanted to try my hand down in England and I’m really excited to join a team who’s going for promotion, going out to win games and achieve success," he said.

"I’m used to that at Celtic so hopefully I can help bring that to Bournemouth.

“The attraction was a bit of everything. It sounds a bit crazy but I’ve actually had an affection for Bournemouth for years now.

"Believe it not Bournemouth put a bid in for me back in my Inverness days as a really young player. You could say I’ve looked out for the club for a good few years now.

“As soon as I heard the club were an option, I managed to speak to Scott Parker and with the way he spoke, he’s a big encouragement in terms of the brand of football and the way his teams play.

“From watching what he did with Fulham and then seeing him come to Bournemouth I think I’m taking a big step in the right direction.

“The whole feeling of it was right and even though I did have a couple of other options this was the one that I was just desperate to get over the line."

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by tiger76 » Thu Sep 02, 2021 9:42 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Thu Sep 02, 2021 9:32 pm
I read that Southampton & Palace were also interested. Here’s Christie’s words so suggests it was a mixture of style/speaking to Parker/some historic link. I reckon he just didn’t believe in himself to play in the Prem or Bournemouth were so desperate to get it over the line that they agreed to some silly clauses we wouldn’t.

“Throughout my whole career I’ve always wanted to try my hand down in England and I’m really excited to join a team who’s going for promotion, going out to win games and achieve success," he said.

"I’m used to that at Celtic so hopefully I can help bring that to Bournemouth.

“The attraction was a bit of everything. It sounds a bit crazy but I’ve actually had an affection for Bournemouth for years now.

"Believe it not Bournemouth put a bid in for me back in my Inverness days as a really young player. You could say I’ve looked out for the club for a good few years now.

“As soon as I heard the club were an option, I managed to speak to Scott Parker and with the way he spoke, he’s a big encouragement in terms of the brand of football and the way his teams play.

“From watching what he did with Fulham and then seeing him come to Bournemouth I think I’m taking a big step in the right direction.

“The whole feeling of it was right and even though I did have a couple of other options this was the one that I was just desperate to get over the line."
It does beg the question though what happens if Bournemouth win promotion to the PL, there's often many reasons why players choose a certain club, and contrary to popular belief it's not always about the money.

I'll follow his Bournemouth career with interest that's for sure, but if he wasn't totally committed to Burnley then I'm glad we didn't sign him, we only want guys who buy into our methods.

I will also add it's an awful lot easier to play attractive football in the Championship, and many managers and teams have found it a harsh lesson when they attempt the same methods in the PL, as Norwich & Fulham have aptly demonstrated recently.
This user liked this post: beddie

boatshed bill
Posts: 15258
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6758 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by boatshed bill » Thu Sep 02, 2021 9:46 pm

If we just forget it's Burnley:
He may have seen it as a promotion challenge likely to result in PL next season v a relegation battle.

djemba-djemba
Posts: 650
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 6:12 pm
Been Liked: 129 times
Has Liked: 40 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by djemba-djemba » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:53 am

Jakubclaret wrote:
Thu Sep 02, 2021 12:19 pm
It's quite humorous to think that 2.5m would be spent without some sort of reassurances on current health.
What did we spend on Defour?

Herts Clarets
Posts: 3957
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
Been Liked: 1770 times
Has Liked: 470 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Herts Clarets » Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:20 am

Don't know if anyone saw The One Show yesterday evening, but they had a feature on a bloke in South Wales who had set up a football boot exchange programme. I think the premise behind it is when a child grows out of football boots, they donate them to the programme who then distribute to children who want to play football but are struggling to pay for boots. Michael Sheen arrived on a motorcycle disguised as a courier delivery chap and made the bloke open the package. It was a Golden Boot in recognition of the work he had done, at which point Sheen remove his crash helmet to reveal his identity. They then introduced Swansea and Wales footballer Connor Roberts to say a few words as this guy was a Swansea season ticket holder.

Seems we have signed a good sort, in keeping with the Dyche way.
These 3 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie Bosscat Juan Tanamera

CardyTheClaret
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:22 am
Been Liked: 190 times
Has Liked: 114 times
Location: Barrowford

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by CardyTheClaret » Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:31 am

fidelcastro wrote:
Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:26 pm
Really? Given that we already have four senior strikers, it would amaze me.
Because none of our current forward line have any blistering pace. Lots of Lyon supporters on Twitter were suggesting he is a good option up front.

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9600
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3148 times
Has Liked: 10254 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by evensteadiereddie » Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:49 am

A good spot that, Herts.

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3155
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 836 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:29 am

CardyTheClaret wrote:
Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:31 am
Because none of our current forward line have any blistering pace. Lots of Lyon supporters on Twitter were suggesting he is a good option up front.
This.

Gordaleman
Posts: 3982
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 855 times
Has Liked: 605 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Gordaleman » Fri Sep 03, 2021 10:30 am

fidelcastro wrote:
Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:26 pm
Really? Given that we already have four senior strikers, it would amaze me.
Prepare to be amazed then. Having seen more responses to my post, it seems several people agree with me.

fidelcastro
Posts: 7361
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by fidelcastro » Fri Sep 03, 2021 3:17 pm

Gordaleman wrote:
Fri Sep 03, 2021 10:30 am
Prepare to be amazed then. Having seen more responses to my post, it seems several people agree with me.
And I'll bet there will be even more that don't.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67879
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32530 times
Has Liked: 5277 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Sep 03, 2021 3:32 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Thu Sep 02, 2021 9:16 pm
Whereas if we now target that position for January, we may end up with a 10 that is a level above what we have/could convert.
Hopefully won’t be targeting much in Jan. Not the window to be doing much if any business.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7449
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2254 times
Has Liked: 2166 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by CoolClaret » Fri Sep 03, 2021 4:13 pm

Ric_C wrote:
Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:27 pm
I've been banging the drum for years that fullbacks are crucial to the way Sean Dyche sets us up. Mainly from an attacking point of view.

Say it quietly, we may have found our Trippier replacement.
Yep - totally agree… A great signing

Gordaleman
Posts: 3982
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 855 times
Has Liked: 605 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Gordaleman » Fri Sep 03, 2021 6:52 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Fri Sep 03, 2021 3:17 pm
And I'll bet there will be even more that don't.
You would lose your bet. Try reading through the posts since my original post.

Anyway, it hardly matters what you or I think. Time will tell and Sean will decide.

Iloveyoubrady
Posts: 1852
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:30 am
Been Liked: 300 times
Has Liked: 28 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Iloveyoubrady » Fri Sep 03, 2021 6:56 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Sep 03, 2021 3:32 pm
Hopefully won’t be targeting much in Jan. Not the window to be doing much if any business.
It is possible to get the odd very good deal with players contracts out in the summer, but yes - the average deal must be a lot more costly than in summer. Let’s hope we don’t need to sign anyone then.

DCWat
Posts: 9334
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4143 times
Has Liked: 3606 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by DCWat » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:01 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Sep 03, 2021 3:32 pm
Hopefully won’t be targeting much in Jan. Not the window to be doing much if any business.
I agree with that, perhaps the main caveats being that we’re still playing catch up from previous windows and look to have a big job in the summer.

The odd signing in January, if it’s not silly money of course, might help us out a bit come the summer window.

NewClaret
Posts: 13493
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3109 times
Has Liked: 3827 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by NewClaret » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:16 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Sep 03, 2021 3:32 pm
Hopefully won’t be targeting much in Jan. Not the window to be doing much if any business.
Hopefully we don’t need anything in January, CT!

I was thinking more loan deals…

AfloatinClaret
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
Been Liked: 562 times
Has Liked: 1411 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by AfloatinClaret » Sat Sep 04, 2021 2:00 pm

DCWat wrote:
Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:01 pm
The odd signing in January, if it’s not silly money of course, might help us out a bit come the summer window.
It strikes me that there are likely to be more League Clubs than usual who having by then conceded that they're not in the promotion races will be looking to cash in on one or two of their better players?

timshorts
Posts: 2546
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:52 pm
Been Liked: 413 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by timshorts » Sat Sep 04, 2021 7:50 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Thu Sep 02, 2021 10:50 am
SD is very loyal, but the minute Lowts is injured or misses a game he will get his chance. Then he will probably take some moving and make it his position. Of course he might also play RM

Another option could be
Collins Tarks Mee
Roberts Westwood McNeil Brownhill Taylor
Wood Cornet

That would be some team
Yep, that's what I had in mind on the other thread, with vyds to come in off the bench.

Stalbansclaret
Posts: 2509
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 2976 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Stalbansclaret » Wed Sep 08, 2021 6:51 am

AfloatinClaret wrote:
Sat Sep 04, 2021 2:00 pm
It strikes me that there are likely to be more League Clubs than usual who having by then conceded that they're not in the promotion races will be looking to cash in on one or two of their better players?
Pwehaps but nowadays so many clubs stay in contention for the play-offs deep into the season.

kentonclaret
Posts: 6522
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 982 times
Has Liked: 205 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by kentonclaret » Wed Sep 08, 2021 8:35 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Sep 03, 2021 3:32 pm
Hopefully won’t be targeting much in Jan. Not the window to be doing much if any business.

The January 2022 Transfer Window thread will probably struggle to reach 100 pages :lol:
This user liked this post: ClaretTony

djemba-djemba
Posts: 650
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 6:12 pm
Been Liked: 129 times
Has Liked: 40 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by djemba-djemba » Wed Sep 08, 2021 8:48 am

kentonclaret wrote:
Wed Sep 08, 2021 8:35 am
The January 2022 Transfer Window thread will probably struggle to reach 100 pages :lol:
When is that thread starting? I have a very early rumour for that one!

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10168
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Wed Sep 08, 2021 8:49 am

djemba-djemba wrote:
Wed Sep 08, 2021 8:48 am
When is that thread starting? I have a very early rumour for that one!
If we lose on Monday night then about 5 minutes after full time, it will be in full swing.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:06 am

Iloveyoubrady wrote:
Fri Sep 03, 2021 6:56 pm
It is possible to get the odd very good deal with players contracts out in the summer, but yes - the average deal must be a lot more costly than in summer. Let’s hope we don’t need to sign anyone then.
I gave three key examples where three January signings made instant impacts for us. Fox, Barton and Brady all scoring debut free kicks after signing in January. But for some reason Tony deleted it. Wonder why!?

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by tim_noone » Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:13 am

cricketfieldclarets wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:06 am
I gave three key examples where three January signings made instant impacts for us. Fox, Barton and Brady all scoring debut free kicks after signing in January. But for some reason Tony deleted it. Wonder why!?
Because your not the Fount of all Knowledge.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67879
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32530 times
Has Liked: 5277 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:24 am

cricketfieldclarets wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:06 am
I gave three key examples where three January signings made instant impacts for us. Fox, Barton and Brady all scoring debut free kicks after signing in January. But for some reason Tony deleted it. Wonder why!?
No, Tony didn't delete it, no one did. But you again wish to disrupt the board. Wonder why?

ClaretTony
Posts: 67879
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32530 times
Has Liked: 5277 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:24 am

tim_noone wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:13 am
Because your not the Fount of all Knowledge.
Any reason for that post other than trying to join in with causing trouble on this board?

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:32 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:24 am
No, Tony didn't delete it, no one did. But you again wish to disrupt the board. Wonder why?
So where did it go?

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by tim_noone » Thu Sep 09, 2021 11:27 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:24 am
Any reason for that post other than trying to join in with causing trouble on this board?
Trouble??

CardyTheClaret
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:22 am
Been Liked: 190 times
Has Liked: 114 times
Location: Barrowford

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by CardyTheClaret » Sat Oct 23, 2021 3:21 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:26 pm
Really? Given that we already have four senior strikers, it would amaze me.
Re Cornet playing up front……Bump 🙂

Rileybobs
Posts: 16891
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6962 times
Has Liked: 1483 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 23, 2021 3:51 pm

CardyTheClaret wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 3:21 pm
Re Cornet playing up front……Bump 🙂
Cornet isn’t playing up front.

fidelcastro
Posts: 7361
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Oct 23, 2021 3:53 pm

CardyTheClaret wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 3:21 pm
Re Cornet playing up front……Bump 🙂
Is wide left classed as up front now?

Bore off.

CardyTheClaret
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:22 am
Been Liked: 190 times
Has Liked: 114 times
Location: Barrowford

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by CardyTheClaret » Sat Oct 23, 2021 3:58 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 3:53 pm
Is wide left classed as up front now?

Bore off.
Didn’t look wide left to me when he was nodding that one in.

superdimitri
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1007 times
Has Liked: 725 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by superdimitri » Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:00 pm

Cornet was playing up top at the start. Mostly left wing though. Brownhill, Cornet and McNeil swap around.

fidelcastro
Posts: 7361
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:01 pm

CardyTheClaret wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 3:58 pm
Didn’t look wide left to me when he was nodding that one in.
It still doesn't mean he's playing as a striker, because he isn't!

The problems down their right are largely coming from him not tracking back.

CardyTheClaret
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:22 am
Been Liked: 190 times
Has Liked: 114 times
Location: Barrowford

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by CardyTheClaret » Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:02 pm

The point further up the thread was about was he capable of…I think you must admit now that he is.

fidelcastro
Posts: 7361
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:04 pm

CardyTheClaret wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:02 pm
The point further up the thread was about was he capable of…I think you must admit now that he is.
See my post above.

Perhaps he should if he's the kind of wide player who doesn't track back.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by RVclaret » Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:05 pm

Surprised Dyche didn’t recognise Cornet was struggling to track Livramento and get him to swap wings with Dwight.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12369
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:14 pm

Dyche has gone to 4-4-2 with McNeil left and Brownhill right. Not sure who that player upfront with Wood is as surely Dyche wouldnt play Cornet as striker would he?

CardyTheClaret
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:22 am
Been Liked: 190 times
Has Liked: 114 times
Location: Barrowford

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by CardyTheClaret » Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:16 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:01 pm
It still doesn't mean he's playing as a striker, because he isn't!

The problems down their right are largely coming from him not tracking back.
Ahem….go on, you can say it.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6973
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1489 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sat Oct 23, 2021 5:03 pm

The real question was why wasn't he starting wide right in today's must win game?

Rileybobs
Posts: 16891
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6962 times
Has Liked: 1483 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 23, 2021 7:23 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 5:03 pm
The real question was why wasn't he starting wide right in today's must win game?
The main reason is because he isn’t back to the required fitness level.

ClaretAL
Posts: 2573
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 1045 times
Has Liked: 819 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by ClaretAL » Sat Oct 23, 2021 7:30 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 7:23 pm
The main reason is because he isn’t back to the required fitness level.
Every player interview I have seen state the step UP ton international level is a big step from club football, so I think Connor has more than proved his fitness with the 2 games he put in recently, so i can only presume Dyche doesn't think he offers anything better than what he currently has in the squad. I struggle to understand this when we have Lennon and Bardo on the bench for his positions and the age that they are at, preferred over Roberts, let alon the pace of Lowton is a concern, but that just my opinion :)

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by SalisburyClaret » Sat Oct 23, 2021 7:44 pm

He’s coming back from injury and there’s no obvious place for him in the side. Would be an good option from the bench though

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Oct 23, 2021 7:48 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 5:03 pm
The real question was why wasn't he starting wide right in today's must win game?
Because he’s a 25 year old right back that’s never even played a premier league game?

Rileybobs
Posts: 16891
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6962 times
Has Liked: 1483 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:23 pm

ClaretAL wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 7:30 pm
Every player interview I have seen state the step UP ton international level is a big step from club football, so I think Connor has more than proved his fitness with the 2 games he put in recently, so i can only presume Dyche doesn't think he offers anything better than what he currently has in the squad. I struggle to understand this when we have Lennon and Bardo on the bench for his positions and the age that they are at, preferred over Roberts, let alon the pace of Lowton is a concern, but that just my opinion :)
Dyche has said that he wants Roberts to have a couple of friendlies to get him up to match speed and to develop his understanding of the way that we play. He wouldn’t have signed Roberts if he didn’t think that he offers better than what we’ve got.

ClaretAL
Posts: 2573
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 1045 times
Has Liked: 819 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by ClaretAL » Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:29 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:23 pm
Dyche has said that he wants Roberts to have a couple of friendlies to get him up to match speed and to develop his understanding of the way that we play. He wouldn’t have signed Roberts if he didn’t think that he offers better than what we’ve got.
I understand that but yet he believes in Cornet who doesn't get our "framework" either

Rileybobs
Posts: 16891
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6962 times
Has Liked: 1483 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:32 pm

ClaretAL wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:29 pm
I understand that but yet he believes in Cornet who doesn't get our "framework" either
Cornet wasn’t injured when he signed for us. And he plays in a position where we are crying out for somebody, whereas Roberts doesn’t. Lowton got an assist today.

ClaretAL
Posts: 2573
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 1045 times
Has Liked: 819 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by ClaretAL » Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:39 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:32 pm
Cornet wasn’t injured when he signed for us. And he plays in a position where we are crying out for somebody, whereas Roberts doesn’t. Lowton got an assist today.
I do get your point, but we need to disagree on this one mate. Roberts is fit enough and to play well in international matched that are a step above club matches. We are crying out for a winger, right hand side preferably, but Cornet wont/cant track back so he is nether. We all know that Lowton has a lack of pace that has cost us, but going forward he is good, however Roberts has a far superior crossing and thro win ability, but more importantly he is younger and quicker.

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by KRBFC » Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:05 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:01 pm
It still doesn't mean he's playing as a striker, because he isn't!

The problems down their right are largely coming from him not tracking back.
He was quite clearly playing central in the 2nd half with Mcneil on the left and Brownhill on the right. You'd genuinely argue black is white though so I'm not surprised

fidelcastro
Posts: 7361
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Why was Roberts so cheap

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:08 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:05 pm
He was quite clearly playing central in the 2nd half with Mcneil on the left and Brownhill on the right. You'd genuinely argue black is white though so I'm not surprised
If you bother to note the time, you'll notice I made the post about about him not tracking back based on his first half performance. Yes he was moved more centrally in the second half, before being moved wide again later in the game. However, don't let the facts get in the way.

Post Reply