Should West Ham have had a penalty?
-
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 120 times
- Has Liked: 10 times
Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Im listening to these so called experts and Refs who are banging on about how West ham should have had a Penalty on Saturday when Dawson got kicked in the Burnley Penalty area- My opinion is that Dawson should have been booked for cheating, He clearly lifted his leg into the Burnley Player who was kicking the ball out and was therefore going to follow through. He was looking for that and was laughing after the incident as if he knew exactly what he was up to.... what do fellow Clarets think?
These 4 users liked this post: Stayingup MT03ALG Rumpelstiltskin SouthLondonexile
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:37 pm
- Been Liked: 50 times
- Has Liked: 10 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Yes, thought the same myself, it was as much a foul on Mcneil as it was on Dawson,just a coming together, glad the officials got something right.
-
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 343 times
- Has Liked: 195 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
As much as I can see that Dawson doesn’t follow the ball and moves across McNeil clearly looking for the pen unfortunately McNeil obliges and throws his foot out!! For me it probably should have been a pen based on the rules but football is in an awful state of it is given
-
- Posts: 12370
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
1. Wasn't a penalty (but could have easily been given)
2. Wasn't cheating by Dawson (only the most biased Burnley fan would come to this conclusion)
3. Had it happened against us a lot on here would have been screaming for a penalty and you'd probably be calling the ref a cheat and not our player
4. Had it happened against us some on here would have accepted it wasn't a penalty but would have been certain the ref would have given it at the other end to West Ham
5. As the decision went our way it has not been a talking point at all and Im sure next time people are totting up in their heads about all the decisions that went against us they will not consider this and some of the other close calls that went our way this season when they conclude all the big decisions go against us
2. Wasn't cheating by Dawson (only the most biased Burnley fan would come to this conclusion)
3. Had it happened against us a lot on here would have been screaming for a penalty and you'd probably be calling the ref a cheat and not our player
4. Had it happened against us some on here would have accepted it wasn't a penalty but would have been certain the ref would have given it at the other end to West Ham
5. As the decision went our way it has not been a talking point at all and Im sure next time people are totting up in their heads about all the decisions that went against us they will not consider this and some of the other close calls that went our way this season when they conclude all the big decisions go against us
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:37 pm
- Been Liked: 50 times
- Has Liked: 10 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Just in addition to that I know Barnes it not like he was but he would have known how to deal with Dawsons challenges.
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5173 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
I think it was a penalty.
But I also think the shoulder barge on Ben Mee was a penalty too.
But I also think the shoulder barge on Ben Mee was a penalty too.
-
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 343 times
- Has Liked: 195 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Mon Dec 13, 2021 3:55 pm1. Wasn't a penalty (but could have easily been given)
2. Wasn't cheating by Dawson (only the most biased Burnley fan would come to this conclusion)
3. Had it happened against us a lot on here would have been screaming for a penalty and you'd probably be calling the ref a cheat and not our player
4. Had it happened against us some on here would have accepted it wasn't a penalty but would have been certain the ref would have given it at the other end to West Ham
5. As the decision went our way it has not been a talking point at all and Im sure next time people are totting up in their heads about all the decisions that went against us they will not consider this and some of the other close calls that went our way this season when they conclude all the big decisions go against us
That is what a Football fan tends to do devils it’s that tribal thing
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
That looked like a shove in his back from where we sit. Certainly wasn't shoulder to ahoulder
-
- Posts: 5543
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2340 times
- Has Liked: 1405 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
It was a penalty. Anyone who thinks otherwise must be wearing their claret specs
-
- Posts: 15260
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6759 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
I thought Dawson made no attempt to play the ball, it looked like obstruction to me.
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Stonewall penalty. Take the claret tinted specs of haha.
-
- Posts: 5095
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1357 times
- Has Liked: 2939 times
- Location: 'Turf
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
My initial thought when I saw it yesterday was a nailed on penalty.
MOTD 2 confirmed this for me this morning.
MOTD 2 confirmed this for me this morning.
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
The referee and VAR were wearing claret specs?gandhisflipflop wrote: ↑Mon Dec 13, 2021 4:03 pmIt was a penalty. Anyone who thinks otherwise must be wearing their claret specs
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:48 pm
- Been Liked: 140 times
- Has Liked: 54 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
It was 70/30 a penalty for me. Looked stonewall at first look, but there is a good angle which makes it look like Dawson was searching for contact more than the ball (but he could argue he was trying to protect the ball). Fact is Dwight kicked him.
I don't think there would have been as many complaints as you imagine if it was given, but I agree we would have definitely wanted a penalty for that..
I don't think there would have been as many complaints as you imagine if it was given, but I agree we would have definitely wanted a penalty for that..
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
They certainly were - clear pen
As just about every other person questioned (other than Claret supporters) saw it as well
Having said that, we have been on the wrong end of more pen decisions than in our favour
Imagine if that had been our player fouled in similar circumstances
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
The only point I'd like to raise is consistency.
Why did VAR look at that incident but not the one involving Tim Krul?
Why did VAR look at that incident but not the one involving Tim Krul?
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2416 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
We got away with one there
-
- Posts: 15260
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6759 times
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Dawson jumped into McNeil, made no attempt to play the ball. If McNeil wasn't there he would still be nowhere near the ball and should be booked for dangerous play.
No Claret-tinted anything, no shred of doubt at all.
Obviously, we were lucky with VAR seeing how decisions have been going this year.
No Claret-tinted anything, no shred of doubt at all.
Obviously, we were lucky with VAR seeing how decisions have been going this year.
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
The McNeil "foul" on Dawson was as intentional as Dawson booting Pope in the face. If we are talking about yellows and reds then Dawson could easily have gone for dangerous play. As it was the award of both would have been bullshit - let's have it right though, had it been Salah or Bruno Fernandez going down in another game it would have been a pen.
-
- Posts: 15260
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6759 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
i'm surprised it wasn't given, and you are most likely right about SalahVegas Claret wrote: ↑Mon Dec 13, 2021 4:29 pmThe McNeil "foul" on Dawson was as intentional as Dawson booting Pope in the face. If we are talking about yellows and reds then Dawson could easily have gone for dangerous play. As it was the award of both would have been bullshit - let's have it right though, had it been Salah or Bruno Fernandez going down in another game it would have been a pen.
-
- Posts: 8996
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2013 times
- Has Liked: 2913 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
I thought they’d give a penalty from VAR for sure. I am glad that both referee and VAR surprisingly agreed with me: that Dawson dived between Dwight and the ball with no intention of challenging for the ball but only to draw the penalty. I was expecting a penalty but thinking if I was referee Dawson would have been booked for unsportsmanlike behaviour.
-
- Posts: 828
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:03 pm
- Been Liked: 299 times
- Has Liked: 441 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
McNeil was just about to play the ball (not a wild slash) and Dawson hurled himself into McNeil and ensured that his leg made contact with McNeil has he brought his left leg forwards. I dont think McNeil saw him coming and he certainly didnt "foul" him. It was though a collision and it couldve been given either way. If it was Salah or Bernado Silva the ref would've immediately pointed to the spot and been backed up by VAR. Did any one else have a clear view of Vydra when he turned his man with back to goal and went down. I thought we might've had a penalty but it was all waived away. I was in JHU so didnt have a clear view (maybe someone in the JMU mightve seen it more clearly)?
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
I thought it was a penalty in real time
And on replay it was a stone wall penalty.
Mc Neill took Dawsons legs completely …
Rash tackle by mcNeill
And on replay it was a stone wall penalty.
Mc Neill took Dawsons legs completely …
Rash tackle by mcNeill
-
- Posts: 3784
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1831 times
- Has Liked: 2633 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
I thought that he just slipped ---typical of his luck recently.beeholeclaret wrote: ↑Mon Dec 13, 2021 5:01 pmMcNeil was just about to play the ball (not a wild slash) and Dawson hurled himself into McNeil and ensured that his leg made contact with McNeil has he brought his left leg forwards. I dont think McNeil saw him coming and he certainly didnt "foul" him. It was though a collision and it couldve been given either way. If it was Salah or Bernado Silva the ref would've immediately pointed to the spot and been backed up by VAR. Did any one else have a clear view of Vydra when he turned his man with back to goal and went down. I thought we might've had a penalty but it was all waived away. I was in JHU so didnt have a clear view (maybe someone in the JMU mightve seen it more clearly)?
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Wasn’t at the game.
But watched it on Ref watch this morning.
Have to say it looked a certain pen.
But watched it on Ref watch this morning.
Have to say it looked a certain pen.
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
What nonsense. Just say I am blinded by my bias and be done with it.SalisburyClaret wrote: ↑Mon Dec 13, 2021 4:25 pmDawson jumped into McNeil, made no attempt to play the ball. If McNeil wasn't there he would still be nowhere near the ball and should be booked for dangerous play.
No Claret-tinted anything, no shred of doubt at all.
Obviously, we were lucky with VAR seeing how decisions have been going this year.
McNeil went to clear the ball and kicked the player. That is a penalty every day of the week. Thankfully they are so inept they messed it up
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Dawson stepped across Mcneil to shield the ball out for a corner. No idea how that is considered cheating?
It's probably a penalty, we were fortunate, I think Dawson not having control of the ball went against him and for us.
It's probably a penalty, we were fortunate, I think Dawson not having control of the ball went against him and for us.
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Dawson ought to have been booked esrlier for persistent fouling and then again for simulation.and sent off
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
I don't know how this still confuses people but...
VAR look at everything, if the ball remains in play you just aren't told they're looking. The game was halted for VAR to check because the ball was out of play. Do you not remember the Bournemouth goal on the turf which was pulled back for a Burnley penalty for handball? VAR was checking while the game was continuing because the ball hadn't gone dead.
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
That's exactly why you're not a referee then, Dawson didn't throw himself into Mcneil for a penalty, he got his body between Mcneil and ball to allow the ball to run out for another West Ham corner kick.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Mon Dec 13, 2021 4:39 pmI thought they’d give a penalty from VAR for sure. I am glad that both referee and VAR surprisingly agreed with me: that Dawson dived between Dwight and the ball with no intention of challenging for the ball but only to draw the penalty. I was expecting a penalty but thinking if I was referee Dawson would have been booked for unsportsmanlike behaviour.
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
I ahould have added the foul on Ben Mee was nailed on!!!
Neither were given so its a moot point.
-
- Posts: 8996
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2013 times
- Has Liked: 2913 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
He was unbalanced he was going over before he was kicked, because that is all he wanted… as for your personal comment, you simply confirm you are a self opinionated numpty, pretty much as I already suspected. YOU are not the oracle you are a nob.
-
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1702 times
- Has Liked: 790 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Could have gone either way-our luck was in, as it was at Wolves when if Traore had shot one inch lower we would have lost 1-0. Makes up for a lot of bad luck this season.They say luck evens out over a season
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 15260
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6759 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
It's never given though, defenders these days get away with murder shielding the ball to run out of play for goal kicks.
-
- Posts: 15260
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6759 times
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
When something is 100% obvious- then bias doesn’t matter either wayNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 13, 2021 5:21 pmWhat nonsense. Just say I am blinded by my bias and be done with it.
McNeil went to clear the ball and kicked the player. That is a penalty every day of the week. Thankfully they are so inept they messed it up
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Yes they should, but for once we were on the right end of a VAR decision thankfully,
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 15260
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6759 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Didn't Dawson kick Nick Pope in the mouth?
Nothing for that either.
Nothing for that either.
This user liked this post: SalisburyClaret
-
- Posts: 9473
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 779 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Yes without a shadow it goes against the belief that we are 1s always hard done by & never get any luck.
-
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6963 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
I thought it was a penalty in real time and it looked even more clear when I watched it back yesterday evening. It’s one of those decisions which would almost certainly have stood had the ref pointed to the spot.
One of the only times I can remember us being on the ‘right’ side of a bad VAR call this season which was refreshing.
One of the only times I can remember us being on the ‘right’ side of a bad VAR call this season which was refreshing.
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 429 times
- Has Liked: 4570 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Agree 100%thelifeofbrian wrote: ↑Mon Dec 13, 2021 3:49 pmIm listening to these so called experts and Refs who are banging on about how West ham should have had a Penalty on Saturday when Dawson got kicked in the Burnley Penalty area- My opinion is that Dawson should have been booked for cheating, He clearly lifted his leg into the Burnley Player who was kicking the ball out and was therefore going to follow through. He was looking for that and was laughing after the incident as if he knew exactly what he was up to.... what do fellow Clarets think?
-
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2899 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
If McNeil had come into contact with Dawson foot rather than his calf the Dawson would have got a red card - 2 feet off the floor, out of control and a studs first contact.
In essence the position would be don’t tackle, wait until the player goes to kick the ball and just put your leg in front of the ball.
In essence the position would be don’t tackle, wait until the player goes to kick the ball and just put your leg in front of the ball.
-
- Posts: 4444
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1165 times
- Has Liked: 1300 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
When I saw it in real time, albeit from Longside upper tier, I thought Dawson was trying it on. But I watched the replays on one of concourse tv’s at halftime and I reckon we got away with one.
-
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 298 times
- Has Liked: 781 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
What is a penalty today. that is the problem. It used to be denying a goal scoring opportunity.
Why in the 70's and 80's did you see free kicks in the box? Now they were exciting or opposite
Why in the 70's and 80's did you see free kicks in the box? Now they were exciting or opposite
-
- Posts: 15260
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6759 times
Re: Should West Ham have had a penalty?
Any Deliberate foul in the penalty area.Wokingclaret wrote: ↑Mon Dec 13, 2021 10:32 pmWhat is a penalty today. that is the problem. It used to be denying a goal scoring opportunity.
Why in the 70's and 80's did you see free kicks in the box? Now they were exciting or opposite
From memory: obstruction and or possibly ball to hand when no deliberate attempt was made to handle (however it's a long time since I played
This user liked this post: Wokingclaret