Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Bardsley 6 least worst player
Lowton 3
Mee 4
Tarkowski 3
Stephens 5 would have been 6 but faded.
Westwood 3
Brownhill 3
Lennon 4
Rodriguez 4
Wood 3
Cork 3
Bardsley 6 least worst player
Lowton 3
Mee 4
Tarkowski 3
Stephens 5 would have been 6 but faded.
Westwood 3
Brownhill 3
Lennon 4
Rodriguez 4
Wood 3
Cork 3
-
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:01 pm
- Been Liked: 220 times
- Has Liked: 33 times
-
- Posts: 17266
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6490 times
- Has Liked: 2916 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
We really should have a weekly ratings vote for posters on here for their weekly contribution to support and encouragement to the team, you my friend would be lucky to get any points...I find your witch hunt against Josh Brownhill absolutely disgustingNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:45 pmPope 6
Bardsley 6
Tarks 5
Mee 5
Lowton 4
Stephens 6 can actually pass a football
Westwood 5
Cork 4 slow and looked old
Brownhill 3 there’s hope for any footballer out there
Jay 6 good goal
Wood 3 completely ineffective
Lennon 6 I think he was the only player I thought gave everything today
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
It is a bit odd though.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 3:16 pmNo - the ratings rules have been in place since we started them around 2005. No need to change them.
We're effectively giving marks out of 7.
Also ludicrous that somebody getting sent off in the first minute would have to be awarded a 3/10 by default.
This user liked this post: FCBurnley
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
It would be ludicrous which is why it couldn't happenwhat_no_pies wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:48 pmAlso ludicrous that somebody getting sent off in the first minute would have to be awarded a 3/10 by default.
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
I don't follow Tony. Quite clearly a sending off in the first minute can happen. Have I misunderstood what you're trying to say?
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Now then, let me think. Does the first minute come before the twentieth minute? And there's your answer.what_no_pies wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:53 pmI don't follow Tony. Quite clearly a sending off in the first minute can happen. Have I misunderstood what you're trying to say?
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
???? I'm more confused than ever nowClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:54 pmNow then, let me think. Does the first minute come before the twentieth minute? And there's your answer.
Ah well, needn't split hairs over something so trivial in any case.
Hope you're feeling better soon Tony.
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Top line on every player rating thread reads: "Please leave ratings for all players who have played 20 mins or more."what_no_pies wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:57 pm???? I'm more confused than ever now
Ah well, needn't split hairs over something so trivial in any case.
Hope you're feeling better soon Tony.
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Ah, just clicked. They have to play 20 minutes, right? In which case (playing Devils advocate) what if somebody gives the ball away 100% of the time, doesn't make a single challenge then gets sent off in the 20th?
No need to answer that. I know it's a 0/10 performance.
No need to answer that. I know it's a 0/10 performance.
-
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 343 times
- Has Liked: 195 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
I think a player has to play 20 minutes to get a rating so in your example the player wouldn’t get a rating. Now someone who played 21 minutes and got sent off would score a 3 thoughwhat_no_pies wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:57 pm???? I'm more confused than ever now
Ah well, needn't split hairs over something so trivial in any case.
Hope you're feeling better soon Tony.
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
I like the player ratings, and to be fair the 3/10 minimum probably does ensure the ratings are a bit more realistic. There's undoubtedly a very rare performance where a 3 is undeserved though.
Not sure that was today but we're getting close recently. Worrying indeed.
Not sure that was today but we're getting close recently. Worrying indeed.
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
At least a minimum 3 score stops a certain poster giving Josh Brownhill a 1 every game
This user liked this post: ClaretTony
-
- Posts: 2212
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:03 pm
- Been Liked: 935 times
- Has Liked: 608 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Pope 6 - One good save, nowt much else to do except pick the ball out of the net twice
Lowton 5 -Not easy being a right footed left back..
Tarks 4 - Cheers Tarks, enjoy your move..
Mee 6
Bardsley 6 Slowing down but professional as ever
Brownhill 5 Not easy being a right footed left midfielder..
Westwood 5
Stephens 7
Lennon 6
Jayrod 7
Wood 5 - Couldn't get on the end of any of the endless long balls fired up to him..
Lowton 5 -Not easy being a right footed left back..
Tarks 4 - Cheers Tarks, enjoy your move..
Mee 6
Bardsley 6 Slowing down but professional as ever
Brownhill 5 Not easy being a right footed left midfielder..
Westwood 5
Stephens 7
Lennon 6
Jayrod 7
Wood 5 - Couldn't get on the end of any of the endless long balls fired up to him..
This user liked this post: frankinwales
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
I haven’t even given Brownhill the lowest rating. Take your claret tinted glasses and complain at them.
I’m sorry but he’s not a footballer. He’s an athlete. Gets a nose bleed anytime the ball goes near him. Made to look silly by midfielders from the league below today.
This user liked this post: BOYSIE31
-
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Bardsley 6
Lowton 5
Mee 5
Tarkowski 4
Stephens 7
Westwood 6
Brownhill 5
Lennon 6
Rodriguez 6
Wood 5
Cork 5
Bardsley 6
Lowton 5
Mee 5
Tarkowski 4
Stephens 7
Westwood 6
Brownhill 5
Lennon 6
Rodriguez 6
Wood 5
Cork 5
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 10:31 am
- Been Liked: 11 times
- Has Liked: 13 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Pope 5 - Relatively untested
Barnsley 6 - Set a good standard for the rest of the team early with no nonsense approach
Tarks 4 - Can't allow for many more individual errors without being dropped
Mee 5 - Not a leader sadly. A good, solid old school defender but we need a Carlisle or Davis right now.
Lowton 5 - Square peg, round hole
Lennon 6 - Movement was good in 1st, passenger second
Stephens 6 - Passing good in 1st, bambi on ice as he tired
Westwood 5 - Assist was a hit and hope, set pieces are no longer effective
Brownhill 4 - Square peg, round hole
Wood 3 - May as well rested him
Rodriguez 6 - Some glimpses of movement and touch
Cork 3 - Pointless
Truth is we tried surviving 45 minutes, when we should have been testing and untested keeper. No ambition to play young players or excite the paying support. Another extremely forgettable cup tie. Should be free to attend going forwards.
Barnsley 6 - Set a good standard for the rest of the team early with no nonsense approach
Tarks 4 - Can't allow for many more individual errors without being dropped
Mee 5 - Not a leader sadly. A good, solid old school defender but we need a Carlisle or Davis right now.
Lowton 5 - Square peg, round hole
Lennon 6 - Movement was good in 1st, passenger second
Stephens 6 - Passing good in 1st, bambi on ice as he tired
Westwood 5 - Assist was a hit and hope, set pieces are no longer effective
Brownhill 4 - Square peg, round hole
Wood 3 - May as well rested him
Rodriguez 6 - Some glimpses of movement and touch
Cork 3 - Pointless
Truth is we tried surviving 45 minutes, when we should have been testing and untested keeper. No ambition to play young players or excite the paying support. Another extremely forgettable cup tie. Should be free to attend going forwards.
-
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:09 pm
- Been Liked: 70 times
- Has Liked: 89 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Bardsley 7
Mee 4
Tarkowski 3
Lowton 4
Westwood 4
Brownhill 4
Lennon 5
Stephens 6
Jay Rod 6
Wood 3
Cork 3
Bardsley 7
Mee 4
Tarkowski 3
Lowton 4
Westwood 4
Brownhill 4
Lennon 5
Stephens 6
Jay Rod 6
Wood 3
Cork 3
-
- Posts: 6973
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1489 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
A genius stroke playing Pope and Brownhill both not fully recovered from Covid and it showed
Jayrod was the only player I'd keep for next week .Hopefully all the missing players return along with Dodgson who looked promising in his short cameo role.
Jayrod was the only player I'd keep for next week .Hopefully all the missing players return along with Dodgson who looked promising in his short cameo role.
-
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:30 pm
- Been Liked: 78 times
- Has Liked: 93 times
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Pope 5
Bardsley 6
Tarkowski 4
Mee 5
Lowton 4
Lennon 4
Westwood 5
Stephens 5
Brownhill 5
Wood 5
Jay 6
Cork 4
**** poor stuff
Bardsley 6
Tarkowski 4
Mee 5
Lowton 4
Lennon 4
Westwood 5
Stephens 5
Brownhill 5
Wood 5
Jay 6
Cork 4
**** poor stuff
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Should we also have a team and manager ratings ? I often find that my individual scores don’t always follow what I think of the team or managers performance.
I enjoy doing the ratings. It is great way to express your thoughts ( and frustrations ) and being able to mark the Manager ( which sometimes I do) and the team as a whole would improve the experience
I enjoy doing the ratings. It is great way to express your thoughts ( and frustrations ) and being able to mark the Manager ( which sometimes I do) and the team as a whole would improve the experience
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Bardsley 6
Rest 3
He was doubley better than all. And barely plays
Stephens 5
Rest 3
He was doubley better than all. And barely plays
Stephens 5
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Thanks for the 24 hour ban
Pope 4
Bardsley 6
Tarks 3
Mee 3
Lowton 3
Brownhill 3
Stephens 2
Lennon 3
Westwood 2
Wood 2
Jay 4
Just awful but I warned everyone for the last 3 seasons where this team was heading
Pope 4
Bardsley 6
Tarks 3
Mee 3
Lowton 3
Brownhill 3
Stephens 2
Lennon 3
Westwood 2
Wood 2
Jay 4
Just awful but I warned everyone for the last 3 seasons where this team was heading
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
Please remind me how many assists or goals mr brownhill has ?
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
That's a valid point, but you could equally apply that to any of our midfielders bar Westwood perhaps, and most of his assists are no doubt set plays.
Hence why we need at least one creative CM through the door in this window.
Brownhill had a decent goal ratio for Bristol City, so he clearly does have a goal in him, but he's not shown any sign of hitting the target for us in the PL.
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
-
- Posts: 17266
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6490 times
- Has Liked: 2916 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
8
Give it a rest...you know what I meant.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:16 pmChris wood last 50 appearances in the league. 15 goals, 3 assists.
Brownhill last 50 appearances in the league. 1 assist.
Clearly not one less than Wood
Re: Burnley v Huddersfield - Player Ratings
How a Sunday national journo saw it writing for both papers
Mail on Sunday / Sunday Times
Pope. 5.
Lowton. 4
Tarkowski. 3
Mee 3
Bardsley. 3
Lennon. 5
Stephens. 4
Westwood. 4
Brownhill. 4
Rodriguez. 6
Wood. 5
Cork. 5
Dodgson. -
Embarrassing for a PL set up. Rare that 3's are awarded.
Mail on Sunday / Sunday Times
Pope. 5.
Lowton. 4
Tarkowski. 3
Mee 3
Bardsley. 3
Lennon. 5
Stephens. 4
Westwood. 4
Brownhill. 4
Rodriguez. 6
Wood. 5
Cork. 5
Dodgson. -
Embarrassing for a PL set up. Rare that 3's are awarded.