Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:51 am
Be interesting to see what a current report would look like I think its fair to say
I know its anecdotal, but one post is from someone who sent his kids there, and he's full of praise for it
I do think there is a lot of scope for a more modern? (maybe not the right word) approach to teaching primary school kids, and it can be difficult for some members of the older generations to accept (for reference, my kids are Y10 and Y8 and a lot of what they are taught is things we never were, but are essential to dealing with the difficulties and opportunities of modern life)
More modern does not equal better.
In fact, for generations now we've know that what are considered traditional teaching method are significantly superior to newer ideas like "child-centred learning".
This is borne out by test after test and result after result and yet many of these inferior teaching methods persist. Why? is the big question.
Traditional teaching methods work because the teacher has the knowledge and it is they who should instruct the children to impart this knowledge. Take something fairly easy for us to understand: Pythagorus' theorum. A child of 12 should be able to grasp the concept. Yet mankind was on the planet for hundreds of thousands of years before anybody formulated this theory. What chance would a 12 year old child have of working out the theory for themselves in a "discovery based learning environment"? Zero is the correct answer to this question. But if the teacher
teaches the children the theorum they will all know it.
When we had lots of state grammar schools educating their pupils with these traditional methods the proportion and total of working class children attending good universities soared.
When we had comprehensive schools teaching with ideas based around wrong-headed modern ideas like "child-centred learning" the number of working class children attending good universities fell dramatically, as a proportion and as a total.
Many new Free Schools have reverted to teaching by proven, traditional methods (they are open to new ideas but use techniques that are proven in schools, not pure "theory") and guess what? They have started sending working class children from the poorest areas to the best universities once again.
I strongly recommend this book:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tiger-Teachers ... 191290621X
Here's a Guardian article on the school in question:
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2 ... of%2022%25.
The article refers to the school as "controversial". I think the adjective they were looking for is 'exceptional': (from the article)
"Compared with other non-selective state schools, Michaela’s results rank among the best in the country. More than half (54%) of all grades were level 7 or above (equivalent to the old-style A and A*), which was more than twice the national average of 22%. Nearly one in five (18%) of all grades were 9s, compared with 4.5% nationally, and in maths, one in four results were level 9."
Here's a video from their Youtube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmlUc4zTKyg
I truly believe all (state) schools in the country should be run along the same principles and with the same methods. If I ever make millions of pounds I will build and fund a state school in Burnley that looks to replicate everything this school is achieving for working class, inner-city kids in London.