I'm not convinced either way, but telling Gucci they can't sell their **** in Moscow doesn't seem to be slowing him downLancasterclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:35 pmI think upping the anti plays into what he wants
Us reacting to him doing shitty things keeps us on the right side of proportional and doesn't allow him to claim with any justification that he's reacting to provocation
Russia Invades
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: Russia Invades
UK Sanctions now apply to EVERYONE in both houses of the Duma. Clear indications now that war has turned - Putin appealing for outside mercenaries - DOUBLING of weaponry that is already causing such problems from EU countries.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:37 pmas maybe, but those sanctions aren't going to immediately affect the thinking of those sitting around the table with him though. We've offered nothing back (that I'm aware of) in terms of being aggressive in a retaliatory action (which to me would be the way to make his generals and decision makes pay more attention in the immediate term). Very fine line to tread obviously, but if Putin wins we are heading to an even darker place imho
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
Re: Russia Invades
This whole tip toeing scared of what Putin thinks, the weak west. It's quite obvious Putin will justify his actions as retaliation anyway, so why we're quite concerned about that makes zero sense.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:35 pmI think upping the anti plays into what he wants
Us reacting to him doing shitty things keeps us on the right side of proportional and doesn't allow him to claim with any justification that he's reacting to provocation
Re: Russia Invades
to even consider the numbers of Russians v Ukrainians tells me you've no idea, there's no chance the Russians outnumber the Ukrainians. The Russians are a mess, old equipment, getting wiped out with drone strikes, convoy's stuck, their tanks are taking an absolute hammering. It's considerably easier to defend (with more numbers) than it is to takeover.AlargeClaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:41 pmYou seriously think the UKR’s hardware volume is on a par with Russia’s ?. I’ve no idea the volume or battle readiness of Russia ‘s Air Force ( we only get the west’s view) but if it’s even half cocked , the mere notion of defending a city with absolute no control of the skies , doesn’t bare thinking about
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
that's my take on Putin, the more cornered the cat the more it hits out. Glad I'm not the one making these decisions though
Re: Russia Invades
Israel getting involved:
"New: Israeli Prime Minister Bennett told Ukraine President Zelensky he should take Putin's proposal to end war, a senior Ukrainian official said. "Bennett wants us to surrender but we have no intention of doing this", he said."
https://twitter.com/BarakRavid/status/1 ... 3902291971
MODERATOR - Sorry for Hijacking post for message to H - keeping an eye on it.
"New: Israeli Prime Minister Bennett told Ukraine President Zelensky he should take Putin's proposal to end war, a senior Ukrainian official said. "Bennett wants us to surrender but we have no intention of doing this", he said."
https://twitter.com/BarakRavid/status/1 ... 3902291971
MODERATOR - Sorry for Hijacking post for message to H - keeping an eye on it.
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
that's embarrassingSpijed wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:53 pmIsrael getting involved:
"New: Israeli Prime Minister Bennett told Ukraine President Zelensky he should take Putin's proposal to end war, a senior Ukrainian official said. "Bennett wants us to surrender but we have no intention of doing this", he said."
https://twitter.com/BarakRavid/status/1 ... 3902291971
-
- Posts: 4651
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 3194 times
Re: Russia Invades
and he needs to be aware, so are we.Taffy on the wing wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:58 pmYes, but he's crazy enough and desperate enough to do it!
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
let's just get back to posting the info lads
-
- Posts: 4651
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 3194 times
Re: Russia Invades
Israel cares about its own interests ......end of.......Butt out!
MODERATOR Posters, Please be aware I have seen this post, and have left because of Historical precedents.
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
new Sushko tweet..............
https://twitter.com/igorsushko/status/1 ... 9VwLRZjGUw
https://twitter.com/igorsushko/status/1 ... 9VwLRZjGUw
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Russia Invades
I know, I swing from thinking they can win to it’s not looking so good.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:24 pmI suspect not. Not this time. All reliable reports are suggesting not only is Ukraine now on top, but Putin’s need to appeal for troops from outside Russia almost certainly tells a bigger story.
I live in hope they can prevail. In fact I will pray for them. Poor people.
This user liked this post: elwaclaret
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
I think President Biden is being very clear here
https://twitter.com/KevinRothrock/statu ... 5091618816
https://twitter.com/KevinRothrock/statu ... 5091618816
This user liked this post: longsidepies
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
this, this is what bugs me more than anything
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
https://twitter.com/MaximAlyukov/status ... 3012658177
Potentially more good news
(if read the following threads it basically says this wouldn't be done spontaneously, and is almost certainly with Russian Presidency approval)
Be interesting to see where this ends up
Potentially more good news
(if read the following threads it basically says this wouldn't be done spontaneously, and is almost certainly with Russian Presidency approval)
Be interesting to see where this ends up
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
More from the expert on tyre damage and logistics
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status ... 6905927681
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status ... 6905927681
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: Russia Invades
Dr Caddock-Adams - as Putin allowed for the fact Syrians might find life in Ukraine a little cold?
https://twitter.com/militaryhistori/sta ... 05408?s=21
https://twitter.com/militaryhistori/sta ... 05408?s=21
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Russia Invades
Don't know if it's previously posted but just been said on TV that the Russians have lost another top general who was on the front line. Reporter said it was highly unusual for a third , I think it was , senior Commander in such circumstances.
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: Russia Invades
See Lancaster’s earlier post. Commander in the East -and some thoughts (I think)RingoMcCartney wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 7:09 pmDon't know if it's previously posted but just been said on TV that the Russians have lost another top general who was on the front line. Reporter said it was highly unusual for a third , I think it was , senior Commander in such circumstances.
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: Russia Invades
May well have been posted already, but another sign that Russians have no idea how to fight. Infantry advancing in line, on a road, while under fire - at times you have to feel for the grunts.
https://twitter.com/elintnews/status/15 ... 48226?s=21
https://twitter.com/elintnews/status/15 ... 48226?s=21
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2491 times
- Has Liked: 1477 times
- Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates
Re: Russia Invades
Belarus to invade Ukraine soon according to reports.
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
...
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot 2022-03-11 11.35.42 AM.png (1.24 MiB) Viewed 2451 times
Re: Russia Invades
Tens of thousands of innocent human beings (both civilians and ‘soldiers’) will die over the next few weeks. May their souls rest in peace.
‘We (NATO) did far too little far too late’ will be the historical lesson learned.
‘We (NATO) did far too little far too late’ will be the historical lesson learned.
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 11:43 am
- Been Liked: 224 times
- Has Liked: 587 times
Re: Russia Invades
Is Putins grip at home struggling now....Reading between the lines on some of the news today I hope and think it may be
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Russia Invades
Stuff like this will get the thread locked again, please refrain.KRBFC wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 7:52 pmif Belarus joins the invasion of Ukraine, we should invade Belarus and turn it into territory of England.
People should never forget the role Belarus have played in this to date, that absolute scumbag rat Lukashenko should be captured and hung live on TV for the world to celebrate.
These 2 users liked this post: Cubanforever KRBFC
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
...
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot 2022-03-11 12.07.30 PM.png (68.63 KiB) Viewed 2310 times
Re: Russia Invades
Lukashenko is guilty, like Putin but has largely been given a free pass, he should be held responsible and face consequences for his cowardly actions. I will however not debate this further to prevent the topic being deleted.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 7:58 pmtake a break mate, although your point is valid the last part is in pretty bad taste and you've contributed well to the thread up to now.
Moderator - Your sensible posts are as welcome as anyones.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
I was just about to post that, crazyLancasterclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:22 pmAmbush as close range
https://twitter.com/Arslon_Xudosi/statu ... 4748850181
-
- Posts: 4651
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 3194 times
Re: Russia Invades
Who would want to be in a Tank these days?.......sitting ducks.
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
it's truly bizarre indeedTaffy on the wing wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:41 pmWho would want to be in a Tank these days?.......sitting ducks.
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: Russia Invades
I’m finding hard to understand such levels of incompetence.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:22 pmAmbush as close range
https://twitter.com/Arslon_Xudosi/statu ... 4748850181
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Russia Invades
There has been a lot of talk of bad tactics, but again I would say this is too. Those anti tank missiles are just as effective from much further away. Gives you more chance to escape, get a second missile off.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:22 pmAmbush as close range
https://twitter.com/Arslon_Xudosi/statu ... 4748850181
Very brave , but maybe not so clever.
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: Russia Invades
New York Times: Biden confident America rally through any hardships brought on by Sanctions
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1502 ... 68453?s=21
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1502 ... 68453?s=21
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: Russia Invades
A few on here were discussing Russia using Crypto earlier this week…
https://twitter.com/reutersuk/status/15 ... 00290?s=21
https://twitter.com/reutersuk/status/15 ... 00290?s=21
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: Russia Invades
OTHER NEWS : India ‘accidentally’ fire on Pakistan. Pakistan warns if they prove otherwise there will be repercussions.
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1502 ... 03943?s=21
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1502 ... 03943?s=21
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Russia Invades
as you suggest.... https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1502 ... KtQEgcccpwLowbankclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:51 pmThere has been a lot of talk of bad tactics, but again I would say this is too. Those anti tank missiles are just as effective from much further away. Gives you more chance to escape, get a second missile off.
Very brave , but maybe not so clever.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
2nd video down, someone does get a 2nd missile off, and it hits the only tank that managed to fire backLowbankclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:51 pmThere has been a lot of talk of bad tactics, but again I would say this is too. Those anti tank missiles are just as effective from much further away. Gives you more chance to escape, get a second missile off.
Very brave , but maybe not so clever.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
Ukraine has 80% of its combat aircraft operational
That, plus the SAM umbrella is why Russian aircraft can't control the skies
https://twitter.com/beverstine/status/1 ... 9032285191
That, plus the SAM umbrella is why Russian aircraft can't control the skies
https://twitter.com/beverstine/status/1 ... 9032285191
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
Informative thread on where we are now, how desperate Russia is, and how dangerous that might be for an escalation
https://twitter.com/BrynnTannehill/stat ... 4448787459
https://twitter.com/BrynnTannehill/stat ... 4448787459
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
Even the American military assessment had Russia winning in two to three days
https://twitter.com/PhillipsPOBrien/sta ... 0439337988
Pretty sure all the armies of the world will be absolutely reshaping how they deal with, well, everything after this
https://twitter.com/PhillipsPOBrien/sta ... 0439337988
Pretty sure all the armies of the world will be absolutely reshaping how they deal with, well, everything after this
This user liked this post: Jellybean
Re: Russia Invades
It's good this thread is being cleaned up because it was turning a bit Friday-Night. There are/were posts suggesting NATO militery intervention, for calling a nuclear bluff, for overthrowing a govt by force etc. Unless someone can convince me of the flaws in the following points, it's best to temper your emotions and remain calm, because hysteria leads to bad decision making. So in a sincere answer to some of the points raised (which appear to have been deleted, but I'll address them anyway)...
1. NATO is a mutual defence organisation. It's not a mutual offense pact, it's a mutual defence pact. It concerns itself with the security of its members, not those members' neighbours. An argument can be made for Ukrainian security and Polish security being associated with and necessary to one another, but in practical terms they are not. There's a reason why NATO leaders have continually reaffirmed their commitment to defending NATO territory should any NATO ally be invaded: it contains to the Ukraine the conflict which has been made inevitable by one man only — Putin. A battlefield intervention by NATO on behalf of a non-member state is guaranteed to be interpreted by so-called "natural enemies" (more than just Russia) as NATO overstepping its self-imposed boundaries and acting as an aggressor. This is not a sentimental position to take, it would be a political necessity for Russia to interpret such a battlefield intervention by NATO on behalf of a non-member as being a recalibration of NATO policy. For the duty he ostensibly has to the security of his country (not that Putin really seems to care for that, but it's convenient for him to pretend to) no Russian leader, no matter who it is, would have political wiggle room to assume otherwise. Every player in the game knows this, which is why intervention is off the table. Note the very important difference between an offensive mobilisation abroad and a defensive mobilisation at home. Moral cases can be made left and right for "doing something" (tell me what, then) but this leads to my second point...
2. Nuclear war. A few assumptions which I assume are held to be true by everyone: Putin is in a corner with only the slightest room to back down; Putin has zero regard for human life, even Russian ones; Putin, it is assumed, has surrounded himself with servants who will carry out his every command; Russia can and will escalate to nuclear war if Putin feels as though he has no escape. (Hitler threw child soldiers at his enemies by the end. Don't think Putin isn't capable of similar such horrors). This is a not a bluff any sane person would call. Despite the horrors we're seeing, which our so-called inaction is argued by some to be allowing it to happen, the people who will suffer the most from nuclear war are the Ukrainians. When people demand we call his bluff, know that it's the Ukrainians who will bear the biggest cost if we end up miscalculating. You're being cheap with other people's lives by being so cavalier. The kind of NATO intervention some on here want to see would be interpreted by Russians as presenting an existential threat to their nation, and the first place to be turned to glass by Russian nukes would be Kyiv. I said it right at the beginning on this war and I stand by it, you defeat Putin by arming Ukraine to the teeth and squeezing Russia so hard economically and politically that the Russians, either the military, the establishment, the wealthy, the common people themselves or a combination of all, solve this problem for us. Which leads to...
3. Regime change. Assassination is impossible. Take that off the table. But no leader, no matter how tyrannical or despotic, can survive without the support of the army and the police. A significant NATO presence in the Ukraine would inevitably spook both, and they along with common Russian citizens would naturally rally around Putin and the flag. Just imagine if the shoe was on the other foot. You believe your govt is full of $hit and that the so-called enemy is nowhere near the threat the govt make them out to be. But you're living under a dictator, so you keep your head down, do as you're told etc. Now the so-called enemy crosses borders it said it never would cross and has weapons aimed at you. It's human nature at that point to rally around the $hit govt, because it turns out they might not have been lying after all. Indeed, this is how Putin has accumulated power over the years, by inflating (lying about) the threat we pose to Russia. NATO intervention in Ukraine validates his rhetoric, legitimises his dictatorial rule, strengthens his power base, puts the world at severe risk of nuclear war, and most importantly, exposes the possibility for him to completely unload on Ukraine with nuclear weapons in an act of paranoid madness. Helping the Ukrainians fight this one on their own with all the support we can give them — political and economic support, weapons, intelligence — while isolating Russia from the world, alienating Putin and his enablers and letting him bear the consequences of this invasion alone, will see him relegated to obscurity. Anything else more interventionist is far too dangerous for everyone, especially Ukraine.
All of what we're witnessing is beyond horrible, no doubt, but some of you really need to calm down a bit. When you say "do more" or wring your hands about us "doing nothing" you need to understand that that "more" you want us to do most likely will be more fatal. The images you're seeing are understandably giving you a bloodthirst, but you're not thinking straight. We could have had this exact conversation during all other proxy wars fought in the last seventy years. We never fire on Russians, they never fire on us. We're all still here able to talk about it because of this very principle.
1. NATO is a mutual defence organisation. It's not a mutual offense pact, it's a mutual defence pact. It concerns itself with the security of its members, not those members' neighbours. An argument can be made for Ukrainian security and Polish security being associated with and necessary to one another, but in practical terms they are not. There's a reason why NATO leaders have continually reaffirmed their commitment to defending NATO territory should any NATO ally be invaded: it contains to the Ukraine the conflict which has been made inevitable by one man only — Putin. A battlefield intervention by NATO on behalf of a non-member state is guaranteed to be interpreted by so-called "natural enemies" (more than just Russia) as NATO overstepping its self-imposed boundaries and acting as an aggressor. This is not a sentimental position to take, it would be a political necessity for Russia to interpret such a battlefield intervention by NATO on behalf of a non-member as being a recalibration of NATO policy. For the duty he ostensibly has to the security of his country (not that Putin really seems to care for that, but it's convenient for him to pretend to) no Russian leader, no matter who it is, would have political wiggle room to assume otherwise. Every player in the game knows this, which is why intervention is off the table. Note the very important difference between an offensive mobilisation abroad and a defensive mobilisation at home. Moral cases can be made left and right for "doing something" (tell me what, then) but this leads to my second point...
2. Nuclear war. A few assumptions which I assume are held to be true by everyone: Putin is in a corner with only the slightest room to back down; Putin has zero regard for human life, even Russian ones; Putin, it is assumed, has surrounded himself with servants who will carry out his every command; Russia can and will escalate to nuclear war if Putin feels as though he has no escape. (Hitler threw child soldiers at his enemies by the end. Don't think Putin isn't capable of similar such horrors). This is a not a bluff any sane person would call. Despite the horrors we're seeing, which our so-called inaction is argued by some to be allowing it to happen, the people who will suffer the most from nuclear war are the Ukrainians. When people demand we call his bluff, know that it's the Ukrainians who will bear the biggest cost if we end up miscalculating. You're being cheap with other people's lives by being so cavalier. The kind of NATO intervention some on here want to see would be interpreted by Russians as presenting an existential threat to their nation, and the first place to be turned to glass by Russian nukes would be Kyiv. I said it right at the beginning on this war and I stand by it, you defeat Putin by arming Ukraine to the teeth and squeezing Russia so hard economically and politically that the Russians, either the military, the establishment, the wealthy, the common people themselves or a combination of all, solve this problem for us. Which leads to...
3. Regime change. Assassination is impossible. Take that off the table. But no leader, no matter how tyrannical or despotic, can survive without the support of the army and the police. A significant NATO presence in the Ukraine would inevitably spook both, and they along with common Russian citizens would naturally rally around Putin and the flag. Just imagine if the shoe was on the other foot. You believe your govt is full of $hit and that the so-called enemy is nowhere near the threat the govt make them out to be. But you're living under a dictator, so you keep your head down, do as you're told etc. Now the so-called enemy crosses borders it said it never would cross and has weapons aimed at you. It's human nature at that point to rally around the $hit govt, because it turns out they might not have been lying after all. Indeed, this is how Putin has accumulated power over the years, by inflating (lying about) the threat we pose to Russia. NATO intervention in Ukraine validates his rhetoric, legitimises his dictatorial rule, strengthens his power base, puts the world at severe risk of nuclear war, and most importantly, exposes the possibility for him to completely unload on Ukraine with nuclear weapons in an act of paranoid madness. Helping the Ukrainians fight this one on their own with all the support we can give them — political and economic support, weapons, intelligence — while isolating Russia from the world, alienating Putin and his enablers and letting him bear the consequences of this invasion alone, will see him relegated to obscurity. Anything else more interventionist is far too dangerous for everyone, especially Ukraine.
All of what we're witnessing is beyond horrible, no doubt, but some of you really need to calm down a bit. When you say "do more" or wring your hands about us "doing nothing" you need to understand that that "more" you want us to do most likely will be more fatal. The images you're seeing are understandably giving you a bloodthirst, but you're not thinking straight. We could have had this exact conversation during all other proxy wars fought in the last seventy years. We never fire on Russians, they never fire on us. We're all still here able to talk about it because of this very principle.
These 10 users liked this post: Lancasterclaret Cubanforever GodIsADeeJay81 Taffy on the wing The Enclosure fatboy47 longsidepies DCWat morpheus2 Greenmile
Re: Russia Invades
What exactly is the punishment for Russian soldiers turning around and heading home?
They're just sat waiting to die in vehicles, taking an absolute battering.
They're just sat waiting to die in vehicles, taking an absolute battering.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Russia Invades
It is well worth saying that Russia can't win
If it absolutely keeps attacking Ukraine to try to disprove that, then the damage itself suffers is worse
We don't need to intervene
President Biden has it absolutely right
https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1502353759455821833
If it absolutely keeps attacking Ukraine to try to disprove that, then the damage itself suffers is worse
We don't need to intervene
President Biden has it absolutely right
https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1502353759455821833
Last edited by Lancasterclaret on Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Russia Invades
Potentially the comeback for deserting would mean action taken against their families.
It's a rock and a hard place for them really.
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: Russia Invades
One or two… far better to hand themselves to the Ukrainians are claim they were caught. If they all did it Putin is cooked from within.