Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ClaretTony
Posts: 67868
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32527 times
Has Liked: 5276 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by ClaretTony » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:18 pm

Please leave ratings for all players who have played 20 mins or more.


Scoring is from 3 to 10 as follows:

10 - Out of this World
9 - Excellent
8 - Very Good
7 -Good
6 - Average
5 - Below Par
4 - Poor
3 - Abysmal

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by RVclaret » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:41 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 6
Cork 5
McNeil 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 5

Cornet 7

ClaretTony
Posts: 67868
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32527 times
Has Liked: 5276 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by ClaretTony » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:43 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 5

Cornet 5

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10321
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3340 times
Has Liked: 1959 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:43 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Westwood 5
Cork 4
McNeil 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 5

Cornet 7

BOYSIE31
Posts: 2357
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:46 pm
Been Liked: 264 times
Has Liked: 1112 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by BOYSIE31 » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:44 pm

Pope 6
Roberts 3
Long 6
Tarks 7
Taylor 6
Westwood 5
Cork 5
Lennon 4
Brownhill 6
Mc neil 3
WW 3

Cornet 7

Bored of watching these games

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by taio » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:45 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6

Cornet 6

CoolClaret
Posts: 7440
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2248 times
Has Liked: 2159 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by CoolClaret » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:46 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 4
Weghorst 4

Cornet 6

KlyBfc
Posts: 964
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:38 pm
Been Liked: 214 times
Has Liked: 129 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by KlyBfc » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:47 pm

Easiest ratings of the season I think. Not much in many of the performances, just a general apathetic performance that seems to becoming all too common.
Pope 6
Roberts 5
Taylor 5
Long 6
Tarks 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 5
Cork 5
Brownhill 5
McNeil 5
WW 5

Cornet6
Jay 6

Luppy
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 2:46 pm
Been Liked: 56 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Luppy » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:47 pm

Pope - 8*

Roberts - 5
Tarks - 7
Long - 7
Taylor - 6

Lennon - 5
Brownhill - 6
Westwood - 5
Cork - 7
McNeil - 5

Weghorst - 5

Cornet - 5

Men against boys. The positive is we only got beat by 2.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5792
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1884 times
Has Liked: 841 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:48 pm

5 for the lot. A bunch of players going through the motions absolute garbage. Pressing and tackling seem to be a thing of the past.

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by MACCA » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:48 pm

Pope 7 Could do nothing about the goals, a few smart saves
Roberts 6 ok
Long 7 did very well, probably MOTM
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6

Cornet 6

Mission accomplished you feel, we set up not to take a hammering, and at 2-0 early on we did well to avoid another thrashing.
I felt City wasn't too bothered about putting us to the sword, it had a pre season friendly/training session feel about it, so we probably caught them at a good time

FCBurnley
Posts: 9848
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2000 times
Has Liked: 1145 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by FCBurnley » Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:50 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 3
Long 4
Tarks 5
Taylor 4
Lennon 4
Cork 5
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4 free kick at end summed it up
McNeil 5
WW 4 inc 1 for the elbow

Cornet 6

Team 4

Dyche 3. Playing 1 up front just made it way too easy for City. Wrong line up and tactics again

BLH_Claret
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:34 pm
Been Liked: 59 times
Has Liked: 579 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by BLH_Claret » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:03 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 4
Taylor 3
Tarkowski 4
Long 3
Westwood 3
Cork 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 6
Lennon 4
McNeill 3

Cornet 5

BLH_Claret
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:34 pm
Been Liked: 59 times
Has Liked: 579 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by BLH_Claret » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:07 pm

MACCA wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:48 pm
Pope 7 Could do nothing about the goals, a few smart saves
Roberts 6 ok
Long 7 did very well, probably MOTM
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6

Cornet 6

Mission accomplished you feel, we set up not to take a hammering, and at 2-0 early on we did well to avoid another thrashing.
I felt City wasn't too bothered about putting us to the sword, it had a pre season friendly/training session feel about it, so we probably caught them at a good time
Brilliant game management from them, they have Atletico Madrid on Tuesday and never broke sweat. They just passed the ball around us. At times our players looked scared to challenge them. They probably won’t have an easier more perfect pre-Champions League fixture.
These 2 users liked this post: BOYSIE31 tiger76

bfcjg
Posts: 13336
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5080 times
Has Liked: 6883 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by bfcjg » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:09 pm

Pope 7
Rest 5
McNeil 4

We can't live with that quality, but we put as much effort in as I have with my Marks.

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by MACCA » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:12 pm

BLH_Claret wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:07 pm
Brilliant game management from them, they have Atletico Madrid on Tuesday and never broke sweat. They just passed the ball around us. At times our players looked scared to challenge them. They probably won’t have an easier more perfect pre-Champions League fixture.
Agreed, it's like we had shaken hands at a 2-0 score line, they looked like a bunch of older kids playing at being interested with a game v year 7s.
It was so pedestrianised and easy for them.

Genuinely Sean Dyche, Billy Mercer and Ian Woan could have played in that City back 5 today and thed have still won.
These 3 users liked this post: BLH_Claret bfcjg tiger76

Cirrus_Minor
Posts: 4443
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 1161 times
Has Liked: 1298 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Cirrus_Minor » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:12 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 4
Long 7
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 4
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 5

Cornet 7

Burnley1989
Posts: 7400
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2307 times
Has Liked: 2172 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Burnley1989 » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:14 pm

BLH_Claret wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:03 pm
Pope 7
Roberts 4
Taylor 3
Tarkowski 4
Long 3
Westwood 3
Cork 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 6
Lennon 4
McNeill 3

Cornet 5
Crazy that one poster gives Long MOM and you have a 3, just shows how differently some people watch a game

fidelcastro
Posts: 7353
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2219 times
Has Liked: 2210 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:15 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
Brownhill 5
McNeil 4
Weghorst 5

Cornet 6
Rodriguez 5

PhiladelphiaChris
Posts: 411
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:04 pm
Been Liked: 49 times
Has Liked: 467 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by PhiladelphiaChris » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:15 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 7
Lennon 7
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 6
McNeil 6
Weghorst 6

Cornet 6

maidenover
Posts: 553
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:09 pm
Been Liked: 70 times
Has Liked: 89 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by maidenover » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:16 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6

Cornet 6

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:18 pm

Quite simply you stop McNeil you stop Burnley.

Pope 6
Defence 5
Midfield 5
Weghorst 4

I know Weghorst is the most recent love child of this board but he’s not premier league quality. We have signed a 30 odd year old Peter crouch for 13m.

Burnley1989
Posts: 7400
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2307 times
Has Liked: 2172 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Burnley1989 » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:20 pm

Hard to score players against that level of class, you can only really score their effort

BLH_Claret
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:34 pm
Been Liked: 59 times
Has Liked: 579 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by BLH_Claret » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:20 pm

Burnley1989 wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:14 pm
Crazy that one poster gives Long MOM and you have a 3, just shows how differently some people watch a game
I like to think that Kevin Long’s MoM was the footballing equivalent of a sympathy F**k. But each to their own.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7440
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2248 times
Has Liked: 2159 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by CoolClaret » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:23 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:18 pm
Quite simply you stop McNeil you stop Burnley.

Pope 6
Defence 5
Midfield 5
Weghorst 4

I know Weghorst is the most recent love child of this board but he’s not premier league quality. We have signed a 30 odd year old Peter crouch for 13m.
You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about on basically ever topic - it’s actually incredibly sad

fidelcastro
Posts: 7353
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2219 times
Has Liked: 2210 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:25 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:23 pm
You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about on basically ever topic - it’s actually incredibly sad
Thankfully he doesn't attend games. Imagine being sat next to that buffoon.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:25 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:23 pm
You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about on basically ever topic - it’s actually incredibly sad
Sure I don’t 👍

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:26 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:25 pm
Thankfully he doesn't attend games. Imagine being sat next to that buffoon.
I was there today. Incredibly sad you feel the need to post this every time.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by taio » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:27 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:18 pm
Quite simply you stop McNeil you stop Burnley.

Pope 6
Defence 5
Midfield 5
Weghorst 4

I know Weghorst is the most recent love child of this board but he’s not premier league quality. We have signed a 30 odd year old Peter crouch for 13m.
Weghorst is not 30 odd years old.

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by SalisburyClaret » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:28 pm

Pope 7* Some excellent saves
Roberts 5
Long 7 looked assured
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 5 kept the shape
Brownhill 5
Cork 5
Westwood 6
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6

Cornet 6

fidelcastro
Posts: 7353
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2219 times
Has Liked: 2210 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:28 pm

;)
Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:26 pm
I was there today. Incredibly sad you feel the need to post this every time.
Were you now? Did we play hoofball? :roll:

RalphCoatesComb
Posts: 8050
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
Been Liked: 2416 times
Has Liked: 2115 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by RalphCoatesComb » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:28 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7 (MOM)
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6

Cornet 7

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:29 pm

taio wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:27 pm
Weghorst is not 30 odd years old.
Sorry you are right.

A 29 year old Peter crouch.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:30 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:28 pm
;)

Were you now? Did we play hoofball? :roll:
Depends what you class as hoofball. I would say at least a quarter of our passes were long balls.

In my opinion it was hoof ball yes. Hence my low marks.

fidelcastro
Posts: 7353
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2219 times
Has Liked: 2210 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:31 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:30 pm
Depends what you class as hoofball. I would say at least a quarter of our passes were long balls.

In my opinion it was hoof ball yes. Hence my low marks.
I give up.

:roll:

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:34 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:31 pm
I give up.

:roll:
I don’t get you?

Did you think we played football on the ground today?

Indecisive
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 8:21 pm
Been Liked: 400 times
Has Liked: 68 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Indecisive » Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:48 pm

After the first 20 minutes I really just wanted to leave. But second half I felt we picked up the pace a bit, tried to find ways through, and at least made the last 45 less of a drag than the first 45.

BUT people have to be a bit realistic here. That city team is about as good as it gets. In the world. Like the best in the world….


Pope- 7 decent performance and a few good saves
Roberts- 5 really is naive at times. Wasted a really good opportunity to either shoot or put in a decent ball. I think I’d probably start Lowton.
Long - 6 didn’t do much wrong. Hard to judge him too harshly. He is what he is. A back up to a back up at this level.
Tarks - 7. Decent and strong as ever.
Taylor- 6. A few decent runs forward. Doesn’t have the reliability factor and footballing intelligence of Pieters.
Lennon- 8. I’ve really liked him this year. He’s properly committed and if we are going to perform a miracle, the rest of the squad need to look at him and his effort levels.
Cork- 6. Thought he did ok. He is committed.
Westwood- 5, really poor first half. Not too bad in the second.
Brownhill- 7. Think he’s been a lot better in 2022. Wasn’t his best game, but the quality of the opposition is another level.
McNeil- 4. Really poor today and no suppose to see him hooked
Weghorst - 6. Puts it about. Thought he was unlucky to get the card and I also think that changed his game a bit. Think there’s a lot more to come this season for him.

Subs:
Cornet- 6. Looked reasonably bright and energetic
Jay rod- 6. Didn’t massively impact the game but found space and got a half decent shot away
This user liked this post: longsidepies

IanMcL
Posts: 30391
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6384 times
Has Liked: 8726 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by IanMcL » Sat Apr 02, 2022 7:19 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 4
Weghorst 5

Cornet 6
Rodriguez 6

Thought Corky did his stuff well.

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6645
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2004 times
Has Liked: 3346 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Dark Cloud » Sat Apr 02, 2022 7:29 pm

Pope 7 (some excellent keeping, but -1 for shitty kicking yet again!)
Roberts 6
Tarks 7
Long 8
Taylor 6 (cost us the second goal)
Westwood 6
Cork 7
Brownhill 7
McNeil 5
Lennon 7
Wout 5

Cornet 7
Jay 6
Barnes N/A

Difficult to mark because at half time the scores would have been way, way lower, but tbf we did far better second half and defended much better and even made several half decent, half chances. Today was an irrelevance really unless we got beaten by 7 or 8 which we didn't and it's really all about Wednesday and next Sunday, so let's see where we are after that. The worry is that if Kevin Long has been possibly our best player, how on earth can we hope to turn things around!!

Vino blanco
Posts: 5367
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 1904 times
Has Liked: 1980 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Vino blanco » Sat Apr 02, 2022 7:54 pm

From tv
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarks 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 4
Cork 4
Brownhill 6
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 7

bfcmik
Posts: 3623
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
Been Liked: 895 times
Has Liked: 1102 times
Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by bfcmik » Sat Apr 02, 2022 8:33 pm

Pope 3 (-4 for terrible distribution, time-wasting and play total hoofball)
Roberts 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Westwood 6
Cork 7
McNeil 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 6 (not a lot you can do when every pass is coming from 3 miles high, maybe should have done better with that 1st header though)

Cornet 7

Not even lots of huff and puff today. The 2nd half was much better than the 1st but still pretty crap.

Beagleheart
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:25 am
Been Liked: 22 times
Has Liked: 35 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Beagleheart » Sat Apr 02, 2022 8:56 pm

Pope 7
Roberts 4
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Westwood 5
Cork 6
Brownhill 6
McNeil 4
Weghorst 5

Cornet 6

Claret
Posts: 1218
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 400 times
Has Liked: 655 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Claret » Sat Apr 02, 2022 9:19 pm

Pope 8
Roberts 6
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 8
Brownhill 7
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6

Cornet 7

JohnMac
Posts: 7213
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2379 times
Has Liked: 3806 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by JohnMac » Sat Apr 02, 2022 9:34 pm

Pope 8*
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 8
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6

Cornet 6

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by KRBFC » Sat Apr 02, 2022 9:43 pm

Amazed people are giving Cork and Taylor 7 (good). Did people not watch the goals? absolutely shocking stuff from the pair of them.
This user liked this post: BLH_Claret

Silkyskills1
Posts: 5876
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1695 times
Has Liked: 2534 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Silkyskills1 » Sat Apr 02, 2022 10:44 pm

Steve-Harpers-perm wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:48 pm
5 for the lot. A bunch of players going through the motions absolute garbage. Pressing and tackling seem to be a thing of the past.
Have to agree with you SHP. This is a league everyone, apparently, is striving to be a part of. I can't believe that anyone with a Claret persuasion gained anything from that; apart from keeping it down to two. The future looks bleak for 'the best league in the world' unless you are backed by multi millionaires at the least. A real sad indictment of what used to be a game.

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4069
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1507 times
Has Liked: 580 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Swizzlestick » Sun Apr 03, 2022 12:59 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:18 pm
Quite simply you stop McNeil you stop Burnley.

Pope 6
Defence 5
Midfield 5
Weghorst 4

I know Weghorst is the most recent love child of this board but he’s not premier league quality. We have signed a 30 odd year old Peter crouch for 13m.
Just blocking you now. You’re not interested in healthy debate - you’re just a gobshite troll who doesn’t have a clue what they’re talking about.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 16745
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 3770 times
Has Liked: 7569 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Buxtonclaret » Sun Apr 03, 2022 1:39 am

Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7 **
Tarks 7
Taylor 5

Lennon 6
Westwood 4
Cork 6
Brownhill 5

McNeil 5
Weghorst 5

Cornet 6

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:29 am

Swizzlestick wrote:
Sun Apr 03, 2022 12:59 am
Just blocking you now. You’re not interested in healthy debate - you’re just a gobshite troll who doesn’t have a clue what they’re talking about.
Name calling again. What have I said there that in your opinion makes me a gobshite troll?

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings

Post by claretspice » Sun Apr 03, 2022 10:37 am

Routine unfortunately- City have our number like money other team and it showed.

Pope - 8 - couple of smart saves and handled well, no chance with either goal.

Roberts - 6 - actually thought he stuck at Grealish pretty well but his use of the ball isn’t up to scratch in any area of the pitch, and he made a mess of two golden opportunities to create a chance or even score himself.

Taylor - 5 - used the ball nicely but never got to grips with Sterling’s canny positioning high and wide on the right, so ended up close to neither him nor anyone else. Both goals resulted from that and so did several other chances.

Long - 6 - rarely convincing but ultimately let no one down.

Tarkowski - 7 - solid enough individually but I’m not sure the organisation of the defensive unit was what it needed to be today.

Cork - 5 - tidy enough but neither screened the back 4 nor pressed to squeeze up in the first half and way off Gundogan for the second.

Westwood- 5 - better in the second half but offered very little before the break and his instinct to step out of the bank of 5 before the first goal was fatal because it suddenly made KDB McNeil’s man.

Brownhill - 6 - unlucky with the early header and showed more purpose/understanding of his role than most of his colleagues.

Lennon - 6 a few nice touches and one good early cross but gave Cancelo too much space.

McNeil - 5 - no worse than anyone else in that insipid first half but we hadn’t a clue how to deal with Sterling’s position and that of Gundogan and KDB targeting their inside right channel and in not knowing whether to stick or twist, he utterly failed to do either - and didn’t influence either goal when he otherwise might.

Weghorst - 4 - just not a feature on the game and after a lively first few games he seems a bit disillusioned with life leading the line on his own for Burnley. Given he doesn’t run the channels and looks at his best laying the ball up early rather than waiting for support it looks increasingly like he needs a partner going beyond him and without that he’s an ineffective focal point.

Cornet - 5 - clearly given more licence than McNeil to play higher but not much of an influence.

Rodriguez- 6 - added a far better focal point to our attack.

We’ve sort of watched this game before against City, but not quite with this passive a Burnley team. We’ve always struggled against City because unique amongst the top teams, they always keep at least one of their front 3 high and wide as the main source of width, rather than encouraging the wide forwards to attack inside and relying on the full backs for width. The latter we manage better because we can keep the back 4 narrow against the front 3 whilst the wingers manage the overlapping full backs. Against City we’ve previously seen Mahrez play high and wide and cause us problems.

On this occasion it was Sterling, and at no point did we work out how to manage it. If Taylor went to him, it opened up a massive gap between him and Tarkowski; if he didn’t McNeil was caught between playing as a genuinely auxiliary left back or pressing onto Walker.

But this wasn’t helped by the set up, which appeared to involve a genuine, flat, midfield 5. Brownhill appeared to have marginally more freedom to get forwards but when City had the ball it was striking that the 3 central midfielders were flat, so as a result neither applied pressure or filled in the gaps that KDB and Gundogan so clinically exploited. In the second half the solution appeared to be more like what seemed obvious in the first place- Cork dropped deeper, allowing him to fill those inside gaps (almost creating a back 5 at times) and Taylor to get closer to Sterling, giving Cornet more freedom to play higher. By that point though it was far too late and the game had turned into a training session.

Post Reply