Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
-
- Posts: 67868
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32527 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Please leave ratings for all players who have played 20 mins or more.
Scoring is from 3 to 10 as follows:
10 - Out of this World
9 - Excellent
8 - Very Good
7 -Good
6 - Average
5 - Below Par
4 - Poor
3 - Abysmal
Scoring is from 3 to 10 as follows:
10 - Out of this World
9 - Excellent
8 - Very Good
7 -Good
6 - Average
5 - Below Par
4 - Poor
3 - Abysmal
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 6
Cork 5
McNeil 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 5
Cornet 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 6
Cork 5
McNeil 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 5
Cornet 7
-
- Posts: 67868
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32527 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 5
Cornet 5
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 5
Cornet 5
-
- Posts: 10321
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3340 times
- Has Liked: 1959 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Westwood 5
Cork 4
McNeil 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 5
Cornet 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Westwood 5
Cork 4
McNeil 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 5
Cornet 7
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 6
Roberts 3
Long 6
Tarks 7
Taylor 6
Westwood 5
Cork 5
Lennon 4
Brownhill 6
Mc neil 3
WW 3
Cornet 7
Bored of watching these games
Roberts 3
Long 6
Tarks 7
Taylor 6
Westwood 5
Cork 5
Lennon 4
Brownhill 6
Mc neil 3
WW 3
Cornet 7
Bored of watching these games
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
-
- Posts: 7440
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2248 times
- Has Liked: 2159 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 4
Weghorst 4
Cornet 6
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 4
Weghorst 4
Cornet 6
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Easiest ratings of the season I think. Not much in many of the performances, just a general apathetic performance that seems to becoming all too common.
Pope 6
Roberts 5
Taylor 5
Long 6
Tarks 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 5
Cork 5
Brownhill 5
McNeil 5
WW 5
Cornet6
Jay 6
Pope 6
Roberts 5
Taylor 5
Long 6
Tarks 6
Lennon 5
Westwood 5
Cork 5
Brownhill 5
McNeil 5
WW 5
Cornet6
Jay 6
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope - 8*
Roberts - 5
Tarks - 7
Long - 7
Taylor - 6
Lennon - 5
Brownhill - 6
Westwood - 5
Cork - 7
McNeil - 5
Weghorst - 5
Cornet - 5
Men against boys. The positive is we only got beat by 2.
Roberts - 5
Tarks - 7
Long - 7
Taylor - 6
Lennon - 5
Brownhill - 6
Westwood - 5
Cork - 7
McNeil - 5
Weghorst - 5
Cornet - 5
Men against boys. The positive is we only got beat by 2.
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
5 for the lot. A bunch of players going through the motions absolute garbage. Pressing and tackling seem to be a thing of the past.
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7 Could do nothing about the goals, a few smart saves
Roberts 6 ok
Long 7 did very well, probably MOTM
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
Mission accomplished you feel, we set up not to take a hammering, and at 2-0 early on we did well to avoid another thrashing.
I felt City wasn't too bothered about putting us to the sword, it had a pre season friendly/training session feel about it, so we probably caught them at a good time
Roberts 6 ok
Long 7 did very well, probably MOTM
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
Mission accomplished you feel, we set up not to take a hammering, and at 2-0 early on we did well to avoid another thrashing.
I felt City wasn't too bothered about putting us to the sword, it had a pre season friendly/training session feel about it, so we probably caught them at a good time
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 3
Long 4
Tarks 5
Taylor 4
Lennon 4
Cork 5
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4 free kick at end summed it up
McNeil 5
WW 4 inc 1 for the elbow
Cornet 6
Team 4
Dyche 3. Playing 1 up front just made it way too easy for City. Wrong line up and tactics again
Roberts 3
Long 4
Tarks 5
Taylor 4
Lennon 4
Cork 5
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4 free kick at end summed it up
McNeil 5
WW 4 inc 1 for the elbow
Cornet 6
Team 4
Dyche 3. Playing 1 up front just made it way too easy for City. Wrong line up and tactics again
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:34 pm
- Been Liked: 59 times
- Has Liked: 579 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 4
Taylor 3
Tarkowski 4
Long 3
Westwood 3
Cork 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 6
Lennon 4
McNeill 3
Cornet 5
Roberts 4
Taylor 3
Tarkowski 4
Long 3
Westwood 3
Cork 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 6
Lennon 4
McNeill 3
Cornet 5
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:34 pm
- Been Liked: 59 times
- Has Liked: 579 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Brilliant game management from them, they have Atletico Madrid on Tuesday and never broke sweat. They just passed the ball around us. At times our players looked scared to challenge them. They probably won’t have an easier more perfect pre-Champions League fixture.MACCA wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:48 pmPope 7 Could do nothing about the goals, a few smart saves
Roberts 6 ok
Long 7 did very well, probably MOTM
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
Mission accomplished you feel, we set up not to take a hammering, and at 2-0 early on we did well to avoid another thrashing.
I felt City wasn't too bothered about putting us to the sword, it had a pre season friendly/training session feel about it, so we probably caught them at a good time
These 2 users liked this post: BOYSIE31 tiger76
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Rest 5
McNeil 4
We can't live with that quality, but we put as much effort in as I have with my Marks.
Rest 5
McNeil 4
We can't live with that quality, but we put as much effort in as I have with my Marks.
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Agreed, it's like we had shaken hands at a 2-0 score line, they looked like a bunch of older kids playing at being interested with a game v year 7s.BLH_Claret wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:07 pmBrilliant game management from them, they have Atletico Madrid on Tuesday and never broke sweat. They just passed the ball around us. At times our players looked scared to challenge them. They probably won’t have an easier more perfect pre-Champions League fixture.
It was so pedestrianised and easy for them.
Genuinely Sean Dyche, Billy Mercer and Ian Woan could have played in that City back 5 today and thed have still won.
These 3 users liked this post: BLH_Claret bfcjg tiger76
-
- Posts: 4443
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1161 times
- Has Liked: 1298 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 4
Long 7
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 4
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 5
Cornet 7
Roberts 4
Long 7
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 4
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 5
Cornet 7
-
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2307 times
- Has Liked: 2172 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Crazy that one poster gives Long MOM and you have a 3, just shows how differently some people watch a gameBLH_Claret wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:03 pmPope 7
Roberts 4
Taylor 3
Tarkowski 4
Long 3
Westwood 3
Cork 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 6
Lennon 4
McNeill 3
Cornet 5
-
- Posts: 7353
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2219 times
- Has Liked: 2210 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
Brownhill 5
McNeil 4
Weghorst 5
Cornet 6
Rodriguez 5
Roberts 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
Brownhill 5
McNeil 4
Weghorst 5
Cornet 6
Rodriguez 5
-
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:04 pm
- Been Liked: 49 times
- Has Liked: 467 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 7
Lennon 7
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 6
McNeil 6
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 7
Lennon 7
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 6
McNeil 6
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
-
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:09 pm
- Been Liked: 70 times
- Has Liked: 89 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Quite simply you stop McNeil you stop Burnley.
Pope 6
Defence 5
Midfield 5
Weghorst 4
I know Weghorst is the most recent love child of this board but he’s not premier league quality. We have signed a 30 odd year old Peter crouch for 13m.
Pope 6
Defence 5
Midfield 5
Weghorst 4
I know Weghorst is the most recent love child of this board but he’s not premier league quality. We have signed a 30 odd year old Peter crouch for 13m.
-
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2307 times
- Has Liked: 2172 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Hard to score players against that level of class, you can only really score their effort
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:34 pm
- Been Liked: 59 times
- Has Liked: 579 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
I like to think that Kevin Long’s MoM was the footballing equivalent of a sympathy F**k. But each to their own.Burnley1989 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:14 pmCrazy that one poster gives Long MOM and you have a 3, just shows how differently some people watch a game
-
- Posts: 7440
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2248 times
- Has Liked: 2159 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about on basically ever topic - it’s actually incredibly sadNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:18 pmQuite simply you stop McNeil you stop Burnley.
Pope 6
Defence 5
Midfield 5
Weghorst 4
I know Weghorst is the most recent love child of this board but he’s not premier league quality. We have signed a 30 odd year old Peter crouch for 13m.
-
- Posts: 7353
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2219 times
- Has Liked: 2210 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Thankfully he doesn't attend games. Imagine being sat next to that buffoon.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:23 pmYou don’t have a clue what you’re talking about on basically ever topic - it’s actually incredibly sad
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Sure I don’tCoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:23 pmYou don’t have a clue what you’re talking about on basically ever topic - it’s actually incredibly sad
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
I was there today. Incredibly sad you feel the need to post this every time.fidelcastro wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:25 pmThankfully he doesn't attend games. Imagine being sat next to that buffoon.
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Weghorst is not 30 odd years old.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:18 pmQuite simply you stop McNeil you stop Burnley.
Pope 6
Defence 5
Midfield 5
Weghorst 4
I know Weghorst is the most recent love child of this board but he’s not premier league quality. We have signed a 30 odd year old Peter crouch for 13m.
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7* Some excellent saves
Roberts 5
Long 7 looked assured
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 5 kept the shape
Brownhill 5
Cork 5
Westwood 6
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
Roberts 5
Long 7 looked assured
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 5 kept the shape
Brownhill 5
Cork 5
Westwood 6
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
-
- Posts: 7353
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2219 times
- Has Liked: 2210 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Were you now? Did we play hoofball?Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:26 pmI was there today. Incredibly sad you feel the need to post this every time.
-
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2416 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7 (MOM)
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 7
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7 (MOM)
Taylor 6
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 6
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 7
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Depends what you class as hoofball. I would say at least a quarter of our passes were long balls.
In my opinion it was hoof ball yes. Hence my low marks.
-
- Posts: 7353
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2219 times
- Has Liked: 2210 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
I give up.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:30 pmDepends what you class as hoofball. I would say at least a quarter of our passes were long balls.
In my opinion it was hoof ball yes. Hence my low marks.
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
I don’t get you?
Did you think we played football on the ground today?
-
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 400 times
- Has Liked: 68 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
After the first 20 minutes I really just wanted to leave. But second half I felt we picked up the pace a bit, tried to find ways through, and at least made the last 45 less of a drag than the first 45.
BUT people have to be a bit realistic here. That city team is about as good as it gets. In the world. Like the best in the world….
Pope- 7 decent performance and a few good saves
Roberts- 5 really is naive at times. Wasted a really good opportunity to either shoot or put in a decent ball. I think I’d probably start Lowton.
Long - 6 didn’t do much wrong. Hard to judge him too harshly. He is what he is. A back up to a back up at this level.
Tarks - 7. Decent and strong as ever.
Taylor- 6. A few decent runs forward. Doesn’t have the reliability factor and footballing intelligence of Pieters.
Lennon- 8. I’ve really liked him this year. He’s properly committed and if we are going to perform a miracle, the rest of the squad need to look at him and his effort levels.
Cork- 6. Thought he did ok. He is committed.
Westwood- 5, really poor first half. Not too bad in the second.
Brownhill- 7. Think he’s been a lot better in 2022. Wasn’t his best game, but the quality of the opposition is another level.
McNeil- 4. Really poor today and no suppose to see him hooked
Weghorst - 6. Puts it about. Thought he was unlucky to get the card and I also think that changed his game a bit. Think there’s a lot more to come this season for him.
Subs:
Cornet- 6. Looked reasonably bright and energetic
Jay rod- 6. Didn’t massively impact the game but found space and got a half decent shot away
BUT people have to be a bit realistic here. That city team is about as good as it gets. In the world. Like the best in the world….
Pope- 7 decent performance and a few good saves
Roberts- 5 really is naive at times. Wasted a really good opportunity to either shoot or put in a decent ball. I think I’d probably start Lowton.
Long - 6 didn’t do much wrong. Hard to judge him too harshly. He is what he is. A back up to a back up at this level.
Tarks - 7. Decent and strong as ever.
Taylor- 6. A few decent runs forward. Doesn’t have the reliability factor and footballing intelligence of Pieters.
Lennon- 8. I’ve really liked him this year. He’s properly committed and if we are going to perform a miracle, the rest of the squad need to look at him and his effort levels.
Cork- 6. Thought he did ok. He is committed.
Westwood- 5, really poor first half. Not too bad in the second.
Brownhill- 7. Think he’s been a lot better in 2022. Wasn’t his best game, but the quality of the opposition is another level.
McNeil- 4. Really poor today and no suppose to see him hooked
Weghorst - 6. Puts it about. Thought he was unlucky to get the card and I also think that changed his game a bit. Think there’s a lot more to come this season for him.
Subs:
Cornet- 6. Looked reasonably bright and energetic
Jay rod- 6. Didn’t massively impact the game but found space and got a half decent shot away
This user liked this post: longsidepies
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 4
Weghorst 5
Cornet 6
Rodriguez 6
Thought Corky did his stuff well.
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 4
Weghorst 5
Cornet 6
Rodriguez 6
Thought Corky did his stuff well.
-
- Posts: 6645
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2004 times
- Has Liked: 3346 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7 (some excellent keeping, but -1 for shitty kicking yet again!)
Roberts 6
Tarks 7
Long 8
Taylor 6 (cost us the second goal)
Westwood 6
Cork 7
Brownhill 7
McNeil 5
Lennon 7
Wout 5
Cornet 7
Jay 6
Barnes N/A
Difficult to mark because at half time the scores would have been way, way lower, but tbf we did far better second half and defended much better and even made several half decent, half chances. Today was an irrelevance really unless we got beaten by 7 or 8 which we didn't and it's really all about Wednesday and next Sunday, so let's see where we are after that. The worry is that if Kevin Long has been possibly our best player, how on earth can we hope to turn things around!!
Roberts 6
Tarks 7
Long 8
Taylor 6 (cost us the second goal)
Westwood 6
Cork 7
Brownhill 7
McNeil 5
Lennon 7
Wout 5
Cornet 7
Jay 6
Barnes N/A
Difficult to mark because at half time the scores would have been way, way lower, but tbf we did far better second half and defended much better and even made several half decent, half chances. Today was an irrelevance really unless we got beaten by 7 or 8 which we didn't and it's really all about Wednesday and next Sunday, so let's see where we are after that. The worry is that if Kevin Long has been possibly our best player, how on earth can we hope to turn things around!!
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
From tv
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarks 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 4
Cork 4
Brownhill 6
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 7
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 6
Tarks 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 5
Westwood 4
Cork 4
Brownhill 6
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 7
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 1102 times
- Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 3 (-4 for terrible distribution, time-wasting and play total hoofball)
Roberts 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Westwood 6
Cork 7
McNeil 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 6 (not a lot you can do when every pass is coming from 3 miles high, maybe should have done better with that 1st header though)
Cornet 7
Not even lots of huff and puff today. The 2nd half was much better than the 1st but still pretty crap.
Roberts 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Westwood 6
Cork 7
McNeil 5
Brownhill 5
Weghorst 6 (not a lot you can do when every pass is coming from 3 miles high, maybe should have done better with that 1st header though)
Cornet 7
Not even lots of huff and puff today. The 2nd half was much better than the 1st but still pretty crap.
-
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:25 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 4
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Westwood 5
Cork 6
Brownhill 6
McNeil 4
Weghorst 5
Cornet 6
Roberts 4
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Westwood 5
Cork 6
Brownhill 6
McNeil 4
Weghorst 5
Cornet 6
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 8
Roberts 6
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 8
Brownhill 7
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 7
Roberts 6
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 6
Lennon 8
Brownhill 7
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 7
-
- Posts: 7213
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2379 times
- Has Liked: 3806 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 8*
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 8
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
Roberts 5
Long 7
Tarkowski 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 8
Brownhill 6
Cork 7
Westwood 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 6
Cornet 6
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Amazed people are giving Cork and Taylor 7 (good). Did people not watch the goals? absolutely shocking stuff from the pair of them.
This user liked this post: BLH_Claret
-
- Posts: 5876
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1695 times
- Has Liked: 2534 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Have to agree with you SHP. This is a league everyone, apparently, is striving to be a part of. I can't believe that anyone with a Claret persuasion gained anything from that; apart from keeping it down to two. The future looks bleak for 'the best league in the world' unless you are backed by multi millionaires at the least. A real sad indictment of what used to be a game.Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:48 pm5 for the lot. A bunch of players going through the motions absolute garbage. Pressing and tackling seem to be a thing of the past.
-
- Posts: 4069
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1507 times
- Has Liked: 580 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Just blocking you now. You’re not interested in healthy debate - you’re just a gobshite troll who doesn’t have a clue what they’re talking about.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 6:18 pmQuite simply you stop McNeil you stop Burnley.
Pope 6
Defence 5
Midfield 5
Weghorst 4
I know Weghorst is the most recent love child of this board but he’s not premier league quality. We have signed a 30 odd year old Peter crouch for 13m.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 16745
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3770 times
- Has Liked: 7569 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Pope 7
Roberts 5
Long 7 **
Tarks 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Westwood 4
Cork 6
Brownhill 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 5
Cornet 6
Roberts 5
Long 7 **
Tarks 7
Taylor 5
Lennon 6
Westwood 4
Cork 6
Brownhill 5
McNeil 5
Weghorst 5
Cornet 6
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Name calling again. What have I said there that in your opinion makes me a gobshite troll?Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Sun Apr 03, 2022 12:59 amJust blocking you now. You’re not interested in healthy debate - you’re just a gobshite troll who doesn’t have a clue what they’re talking about.
-
- Posts: 5726
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2833 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: Burnley v Manchester City - Player Ratings
Routine unfortunately- City have our number like money other team and it showed.
Pope - 8 - couple of smart saves and handled well, no chance with either goal.
Roberts - 6 - actually thought he stuck at Grealish pretty well but his use of the ball isn’t up to scratch in any area of the pitch, and he made a mess of two golden opportunities to create a chance or even score himself.
Taylor - 5 - used the ball nicely but never got to grips with Sterling’s canny positioning high and wide on the right, so ended up close to neither him nor anyone else. Both goals resulted from that and so did several other chances.
Long - 6 - rarely convincing but ultimately let no one down.
Tarkowski - 7 - solid enough individually but I’m not sure the organisation of the defensive unit was what it needed to be today.
Cork - 5 - tidy enough but neither screened the back 4 nor pressed to squeeze up in the first half and way off Gundogan for the second.
Westwood- 5 - better in the second half but offered very little before the break and his instinct to step out of the bank of 5 before the first goal was fatal because it suddenly made KDB McNeil’s man.
Brownhill - 6 - unlucky with the early header and showed more purpose/understanding of his role than most of his colleagues.
Lennon - 6 a few nice touches and one good early cross but gave Cancelo too much space.
McNeil - 5 - no worse than anyone else in that insipid first half but we hadn’t a clue how to deal with Sterling’s position and that of Gundogan and KDB targeting their inside right channel and in not knowing whether to stick or twist, he utterly failed to do either - and didn’t influence either goal when he otherwise might.
Weghorst - 4 - just not a feature on the game and after a lively first few games he seems a bit disillusioned with life leading the line on his own for Burnley. Given he doesn’t run the channels and looks at his best laying the ball up early rather than waiting for support it looks increasingly like he needs a partner going beyond him and without that he’s an ineffective focal point.
Cornet - 5 - clearly given more licence than McNeil to play higher but not much of an influence.
Rodriguez- 6 - added a far better focal point to our attack.
We’ve sort of watched this game before against City, but not quite with this passive a Burnley team. We’ve always struggled against City because unique amongst the top teams, they always keep at least one of their front 3 high and wide as the main source of width, rather than encouraging the wide forwards to attack inside and relying on the full backs for width. The latter we manage better because we can keep the back 4 narrow against the front 3 whilst the wingers manage the overlapping full backs. Against City we’ve previously seen Mahrez play high and wide and cause us problems.
On this occasion it was Sterling, and at no point did we work out how to manage it. If Taylor went to him, it opened up a massive gap between him and Tarkowski; if he didn’t McNeil was caught between playing as a genuinely auxiliary left back or pressing onto Walker.
But this wasn’t helped by the set up, which appeared to involve a genuine, flat, midfield 5. Brownhill appeared to have marginally more freedom to get forwards but when City had the ball it was striking that the 3 central midfielders were flat, so as a result neither applied pressure or filled in the gaps that KDB and Gundogan so clinically exploited. In the second half the solution appeared to be more like what seemed obvious in the first place- Cork dropped deeper, allowing him to fill those inside gaps (almost creating a back 5 at times) and Taylor to get closer to Sterling, giving Cornet more freedom to play higher. By that point though it was far too late and the game had turned into a training session.
Pope - 8 - couple of smart saves and handled well, no chance with either goal.
Roberts - 6 - actually thought he stuck at Grealish pretty well but his use of the ball isn’t up to scratch in any area of the pitch, and he made a mess of two golden opportunities to create a chance or even score himself.
Taylor - 5 - used the ball nicely but never got to grips with Sterling’s canny positioning high and wide on the right, so ended up close to neither him nor anyone else. Both goals resulted from that and so did several other chances.
Long - 6 - rarely convincing but ultimately let no one down.
Tarkowski - 7 - solid enough individually but I’m not sure the organisation of the defensive unit was what it needed to be today.
Cork - 5 - tidy enough but neither screened the back 4 nor pressed to squeeze up in the first half and way off Gundogan for the second.
Westwood- 5 - better in the second half but offered very little before the break and his instinct to step out of the bank of 5 before the first goal was fatal because it suddenly made KDB McNeil’s man.
Brownhill - 6 - unlucky with the early header and showed more purpose/understanding of his role than most of his colleagues.
Lennon - 6 a few nice touches and one good early cross but gave Cancelo too much space.
McNeil - 5 - no worse than anyone else in that insipid first half but we hadn’t a clue how to deal with Sterling’s position and that of Gundogan and KDB targeting their inside right channel and in not knowing whether to stick or twist, he utterly failed to do either - and didn’t influence either goal when he otherwise might.
Weghorst - 4 - just not a feature on the game and after a lively first few games he seems a bit disillusioned with life leading the line on his own for Burnley. Given he doesn’t run the channels and looks at his best laying the ball up early rather than waiting for support it looks increasingly like he needs a partner going beyond him and without that he’s an ineffective focal point.
Cornet - 5 - clearly given more licence than McNeil to play higher but not much of an influence.
Rodriguez- 6 - added a far better focal point to our attack.
We’ve sort of watched this game before against City, but not quite with this passive a Burnley team. We’ve always struggled against City because unique amongst the top teams, they always keep at least one of their front 3 high and wide as the main source of width, rather than encouraging the wide forwards to attack inside and relying on the full backs for width. The latter we manage better because we can keep the back 4 narrow against the front 3 whilst the wingers manage the overlapping full backs. Against City we’ve previously seen Mahrez play high and wide and cause us problems.
On this occasion it was Sterling, and at no point did we work out how to manage it. If Taylor went to him, it opened up a massive gap between him and Tarkowski; if he didn’t McNeil was caught between playing as a genuinely auxiliary left back or pressing onto Walker.
But this wasn’t helped by the set up, which appeared to involve a genuine, flat, midfield 5. Brownhill appeared to have marginally more freedom to get forwards but when City had the ball it was striking that the 3 central midfielders were flat, so as a result neither applied pressure or filled in the gaps that KDB and Gundogan so clinically exploited. In the second half the solution appeared to be more like what seemed obvious in the first place- Cork dropped deeper, allowing him to fill those inside gaps (almost creating a back 5 at times) and Taylor to get closer to Sterling, giving Cornet more freedom to play higher. By that point though it was far too late and the game had turned into a training session.