Vyds to sign contract extension

[NRC]

has to be Garlick or Rigg. And it could very well have been Garlick - it could be that he buys the player but then laments "he's not the same player anymore"

[GodIsADeeJay81]

Nice work.

See that goal or assist every 2.3 matches is actually pretty decent.

I’ve always thought with Vydra, while he’s never going to be prolific, he brings a lot of value to the team’s overall play. Goal or assist every 2.3 games in the Prem, imagine in the Champ (if he can get fit and firing again).

His goal record in the championship is actually pretty good

[Sleeping Cat]

Who do you think wanted him here so badly then? We chased him over 2 seasons.

I ruled out Garlick getting him behind Dyche's back because I sat next to the chairman in the away end at WBA (Barnes overhead kick game) and he wasn't impressed with JayRod at at all, saying he wasn't the same player anymore.
I told him, it was hard for him, in the fact WBA looked like a club just waiting to be relegated.

Maybe the other board members wanted him if you think sentimental?

He was always suggested by the board to Dyche, but he was only ever Luke warm to it. I don't think it's a coincidence the Jay signed a new deal soon after Dyche left.

[claretonthecoast1882]

He was always suggested by the board to Dyche, but he was only ever Luke warm to it. I don't think it's a coincidence the Jay signed a new deal soon after Dyche left.

It was more to do with Woan leaving than Dyche

[Raconteur]

Exactly what did happen

If this is correct. It makes the whole situation worse.
Not playing a player out of spite!

[ClaretTony]

If this is correct. It makes the whole situation worse.
Not playing a player out of spite!

I think you’ve put 2 & 2 together and not got 4. Who has even suggested a player was not playing for that reason. You’ve completely misunderstood and misinterpreted the post.

[Raconteur]

I think you’ve put 2 & 2 together and not got 4. Who has even suggested a player was not playing for that reason. You’ve completely misunderstood and misinterpreted the post.

You may be correct.

I am no longer messing around with facts. I am going to do if, buts and maybe's and pass them off as absolutes!

[rob63]

You may be correct.

I am no longer messing around with facts. I am going to do if, buts and maybe's and pass them off as absolutes!

You're getting the hang of this board then?