Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Bigvince
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 937 times
Has Liked: 700 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bigvince » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:47 pm

claretandy wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:41 pm
It may suit us to have a lower fee as Stoke get 20%, as long as the add-ons are achievable.
If and when any add-on is achieved, Stoke would get a slice of that aswell

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:54 pm

Still, good news about Josh Cullen.
This user liked this post: eastcoastclaret

lrac
Posts: 519
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:51 pm
Been Liked: 106 times
Has Liked: 283 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by lrac » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:55 pm

Charlie Taylor to Leeds.?

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:56 pm

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:54 pm
Still, good news about Josh Cullen.
Done last week wasn’t it? Just awaiting formalities.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:57 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:56 pm
Done last week wasn’t it? Just awaiting formalities.
Reports today suggested medical completed yesterday

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:57 pm

lrac wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:55 pm
Charlie Taylor to Leeds.?
Think this was a made up rumour from a weird Leeds account

joey13
Posts: 7506
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 1231 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by joey13 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:02 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:45 pm
I think the top figure is only if a series of targets are hit
Champions League then

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:03 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:57 pm
Reports today suggested medical completed yesterday
I suspect we are waiting for nothing more than media getting the interviews and pics done

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:04 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:03 pm
I suspect we are waiting for nothing more than media getting the interviews and pics done
In the new kit would be nice :)
This user liked this post: whiffa

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:05 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:04 pm
In the new kit would be nice :)
I suppose I could say the new kit being revealed is getting closer but that's obvious given we are going to have to start playing in it some time soon.
These 2 users liked this post: RVclaret whiffa

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:08 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:03 pm
I suspect we are waiting for nothing more than media getting the interviews and pics done
Don't forget the twitter video reveal, because they set the bar high with the Bastion one...

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:09 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:08 pm
Don't forget the twitter video reveal, because they set the bar high with the Bastion one...
Really?

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:10 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:09 pm
Really?
Wasn’t it like 3m+ views? Reached the entire football twitter audience. Definitely a success.
These 2 users liked this post: whiffa GodIsADeeJay81

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:11 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:10 pm
Wasn’t it like 3m+ views? Reached the entire football twitter audience. Definitely a success.
Maybe

Bullabill
Posts: 918
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:40 am
Been Liked: 307 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bullabill » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:12 pm

Suntan wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:31 pm

I don't think any player has requested to leave, but the players were told that if offers came in for them they would be considered and most likely accepted. I even think we have made it known that no player is 'not for sale' and invited offers from other clubs for any player.
Are you saying that the player has no say in the sale? That he can be just flogged off to whichever club offers a good price?
Doesn't seem right to me.

jedi_master
Posts: 7179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3606 times
Has Liked: 1033 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jedi_master » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:12 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:05 pm
I suppose I could say the new kit being revealed is getting closer but that's obvious given we are going to have to start playing in it some time soon.
I had wondered what was going to happen with the game on Friday, and whether we'd be in the new kit or not.

whiffa
Posts: 1400
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:58 pm
Been Liked: 515 times
Has Liked: 2610 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by whiffa » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:13 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:12 pm
I had wondered what was going to happen with the game on Friday, and whether we'd be in the new kit or not.
Wouldn't surprise me if they're still trying to decide what colour our Home kit should be :lol:

dsr
Posts: 15245
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4579 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dsr » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:14 pm

Bullabill wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:12 pm
Are you saying that the player has no say in the sale? That he can be just flogged off to whichever club offers a good price?
Doesn't seem right to me.
No. The club can accept any offer they want, be it £50m or 50p. It's up to the player whether he wants to go or not. Once a player has signed a contract, his club cannot easily get rid of him (except by paying up the contract in full). If, like Drinkwater at Chelsea, he chooses to sit out his contract, then he can., however much the club would like to sell him, or give him away, or pay him to go.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:15 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:12 pm
I had wondered what was going to happen with the game on Friday, and whether we'd be in the new kit or not.
I suspect we will play in last season’s kit as it stands.

I think it was 2016 at Morecambe when we played a friendly in the new away kit that hadn’t previously been revealed.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16923
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6970 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:15 pm

Bullabill wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:12 pm
Are you saying that the player has no say in the sale? That he can be just flogged off to whichever club offers a good price?
Doesn't seem right to me.
Pretty much. They could of course refuse to sign but they would risk becoming ostracised from the rest of the squad.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:15 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:09 pm
Really?
Yes really, million of views, thousands of retweets and also used to bash Barca's video reveal which was toss by comparison.
People around the world were watching/sharing our video, I spent a bit of time scrolling through the quoted retweets to see who the people were.

They'll also be keeping an eye out for the next one, precisely because it was so good.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16923
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6970 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:16 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:15 pm
I suspect we will play in last season’s kit as it stands.

I think it was 2016 at Morecambe when we played a friendly in the new away kit that hadn’t previously been revealed.
Not that I’m particularly arsed, but what is the hold up with the kit? Is it the shirt sponsorship deal which isn’t in place?

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:17 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:16 pm
Not that I’m particularly arsed, but what is the hold up with the kit? Is it the shirt sponsorship deal which isn’t in place?
Believe so. Think that might be sorted now though.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8159
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 5071 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Colburn_Claret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:18 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:39 pm
I think some people are over-valuing Collins. He’s got potential, but what has he done to suggest he’s worth more than £20-£25m - considering he was signed for £12m less than 20 appearances ago.

And comparisons with other players just don’t really make sense. For example, maybe Ben White is just a better player than Collins, and his transfer fee is reflective of that.
I'm not sure what you were watching last season Bob, but it couldn't have been Collins.
Strength, pace, composure. He played like a veteran, and for somebody only 21 was Outstanding. Imo he will definitely play for a top 6 club, will be worth 60 million of anyones money, but I also understand there is no way we could have achieved that figure right now.
If he wants Premier league football, and it's understandable, then the price was bound to be lower. I'm disappointed for us, pleased for him and as others have said if we use the money to strengthen, then it is probably the best result all round. Only time will give us the answer to that.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16923
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6970 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:21 pm

Colburn_Claret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:18 pm
I'm not sure what you were watching last season Bob, but it couldn't have been Collins.
Strength, pace, composure. He played like a veteran, and for somebody only 21 was Outstanding. Imo he will definitely play for a top 6 club, will be worth 60 million of anyones money, but I also understand there is no way we could have achieved that figure right now.
If he wants Premier league football, and it's understandable, then the price was bound to be lower. I'm disappointed for us, pleased for him and as others have said if we use the money to strengthen, then it is probably the best result all round. Only time will give us the answer to that.
I really wouldn’t say he was outstanding. He was good, I’m not denying that. Was he better than Tarkowski? Because Tarkowski has just signed for the side who finished 16th, and he didn’t command a transfer fee. I just think there’s a whole load of hyperbole on here, more so than ever.

Jamesy
Posts: 2635
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 806 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Nathan Collins £20.5 million.

Post by Jamesy » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:23 pm

As it looks like Collins will be signing for Wolves for 20.5 million as reported in the press what do you all think of the transfer fee?
Yes it’s an 8 million profit in a reasonably short period of time if Stoke didn’t put any sell on clauses in the deal.
Personally I think we have our pants pulled down here. I would have thought he is worth far more in today’s market, more like closer to 30 million?
So currently our CB pairing is big Kev and the loanee from City? Hope Kompany has got someone lined up in the interim?

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:25 pm

We’ve already brought in three central defenders do Collins’s replacement is already here.

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by SalisburyClaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:27 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:15 pm
Yes really, million of views, thousands of retweets and also used to bash Barca's video reveal which was toss by comparison.
People around the world were watching/sharing our video, I spent a bit of time scrolling through the quoted retweets to see who the people were.

They'll also be keeping an eye out for the next one, precisely because it was so good.
Whilst it was certainly successful, you can’t read too much into those figures - autoplay will account for the majority of ‘views’. You can also buy views and Ad Groups heavily influence the number. Retweets is a better metric as it usually means the tweet has actually been viewed.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:27 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:25 pm
We’ve already brought in three central defenders do Collins’s replacement is already here.
Lots of Irish fans were saying McNally is the perfect Collins replacement, they reckon he’ll be in the Prem and their first team before too long.
This user liked this post: It Is What It Is

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:30 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:27 pm
Lots of Irish fans were saying McNally is the perfect Collins replacement, they reckon he’ll be in the Prem and their first team before too long.
I can’t make a comment either way on him. I’ve never seen him play.

Jambo
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:48 am
Been Liked: 211 times
Has Liked: 240 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Jambo » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:31 pm

We will need another centre-back if VK has any plan to use a back three at some point. That means you need five so unless we're counting Long and Thomas or even Lowton who did OK there last season, we are short. I'd also be a bit concerned about the lack of experience in our CBs, coupled with talk of Muric coming in goal. Yes we have the two lads up front plus Cork, but a mix of experience tends to be key and too much youth, especially at the back, is very risky imo

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8159
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 5071 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Colburn_Claret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:33 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:21 pm
I really wouldn’t say he was outstanding. He was good, I’m not denying that. Was he better than Tarkowski? Because Tarkowski has just signed for the side who finished 16th, and he didn’t command a transfer fee. I just think there’s a whole load of hyperbole on here, more so than ever.
I think he's a better footballer than Tarkowski or Mee. He's an excellent defender, but not quite as good as them, yet. He scores goals, carries the ball well, and can play a pass. The most important thing is his age 21, 19 Prem games, starring for RI over the last 6 months. He's miles ahead of where Tarks and Mee were at that age. I'm stunned that Wolves didn't have competition, although there is a limit for someone with his experience, the figure quoted, if true, is having our pants down.

CardyTheClaret
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:22 am
Been Liked: 190 times
Has Liked: 114 times
Location: Barrowford

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CardyTheClaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:33 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:01 pm
Have you forgotten his performances away at Man City and Spurs?
I haven't, but equally I remember him at Brentford away and his ridiculous handball against Newcastle.

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Nathan Collins £20.5 million.

Post by SalisburyClaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:36 pm

Jamesy wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:23 pm
As it looks like Collins will be signing for Wolves for 20.5 million as reported in the press what do you all think of the transfer fee?
Yes it’s an 8 million profit in a reasonably short period of time if Stoke didn’t put any sell on clauses in the deal.
Personally I think we have our pants pulled down here. I would have thought he is worth far more in today’s market, more like closer to 30 million?
So currently our CB pairing is big Kev and the loanee from City? Hope Kompany has got someone lined up in the interim?

It’s a pretty decent fee. He looked very good if a little error prone and let’s not forget he was alongside Tarka who could talk him through games. He certainly has pace and ability and should go far but we can’t turn down £8m profit after a year.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:36 pm

SalisburyClaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:27 pm
Whilst it was certainly successful, you can’t read too much into those figures - autoplay will account for the majority of ‘views’. You can also buy views and Ad Groups heavily influence the number. Retweets is a better metric as it usually means the tweet has actually been viewed.
For it to auto-play, then it has to appear in someone's feed.
For that to happen it needs to be retweeted by someone that person follows.

So a large number of the retweets were by accounts with hundreds of thousands of followers, resulting in the views increasing as it reached their followers etc.

The video was successful because it reached people who wouldn't normally be looking at Burnley FC's twitter account and the only reason they did that time is because of the quality of the video.
That's going to be one of the main targets of the social media team, increase the reach of Burnley FC with these sorts of things.

That's what the likes of Roma do

dsr
Posts: 15245
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4579 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dsr » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:38 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:21 pm
I really wouldn’t say he was outstanding. He was good, I’m not denying that. Was he better than Tarkowski? Because Tarkowski has just signed for the side who finished 16th, and he didn’t command a transfer fee. I just think there’s a whole load of hyperbole on here, more so than ever.
Tarkowski didn't command a transfer fee because he was out of contract, not because he wasn't good enough. So that's a red herring. But to answer the question, no he wasn't better than our 29 year old England international with 194 PL appearances. Few inexperienced 20 year olds are. But he was good enough that there were conversations on here about whether Collins should keep his place if Mee and Tarkowski are both fit, and just to be in the conversation with Mee and Tarkowski means he was pretty darned good.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:38 pm

Colburn_Claret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:33 pm
I think he's a better footballer than Tarkowski or Mee. He's an excellent defender, but not quite as good as them, yet. He scores goals, carries the ball well, and can play a pass. The most important thing is his age 21, 19 Prem games, starring for RI over the last 6 months. He's miles ahead of where Tarks and Mee were at that age. I'm stunned that Wolves didn't have competition, although there is a limit for someone with his experience, the figure quoted, if true, is having our pants down.
At this moment in time, Collins is nowhere near as good as either Tarkowski or Mee, not that I’d expect him to be.

He did extremely well when he came in last season but let’s not kid ourselves, there were a number of mistakes and a couple of poor all round performances. I think he could have gone on to be an outstanding player for us, that we will no never know, but from what I can see we’ve been looking to sell with not enough interest to get the fee up.
These 2 users liked this post: boatshed bill longsidepies

warksclaret
Posts: 6697
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:39 pm

If Collins goes for £20.5 as is being muted, then you need more serious clubs than just Wolves to force the price up. The fact no one else appears to be keen on signing him, despite what we have read in the press for the past 6 weeks, then it makes that figure look like the upper ceiling in todays market. Having said that its making Chris Wood at £25m look very good business.

boyyanno
Posts: 1643
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 516 times
Has Liked: 117 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boyyanno » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:42 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:21 pm
I really wouldn’t say he was outstanding. He was good, I’m not denying that. Was he better than Tarkowski? Because Tarkowski has just signed for the side who finished 16th, and he didn’t command a transfer fee. I just think there’s a whole load of hyperbole on here, more so than ever.
It's important to look at the overall picture in football where players such as Mane go for 30m and players like Darwin Nunez cost 65m. Generally speaking players with high potential are valued over and above players who are established- don't ask me why because it makes little sense but that's generally how the market is.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16923
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6970 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:43 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:38 pm
Tarkowski didn't command a transfer fee because he was out of contract, not because he wasn't good enough. So that's a red herring. But to answer the question, no he wasn't better than our 29 year old England international with 194 PL appearances. Few inexperienced 20 year olds are. But he was good enough that there were conversations on here about whether Collins should keep his place if Mee and Tarkowski are both fit, and just to be in the conversation with Mee and Tarkowski means he was pretty darned good.
My mentioning of Tarks being free is not a red herring, it is to illustrate that any club in the league could have acquired him on a free transfer. Yet the best deal on the table was from a club that only just survived relegation. Tarkowski is a better player than Collins. So again, talks of Collins definitely being a top 6 player worth £60m+ in future is pure hyperbole. This place has gone mad with wild and unsubstantiated claims.
This user liked this post: Middle-agedClaret

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:44 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:25 pm
We’ve already brought in three central defenders do Collins’s replacement is already here.
Been saying this all day Tony. I think the back defensive signings are all done now.

Lowton, Roberts, Egan-Riley, Harwood-Bellis, Kevin Long, Luke McNally, Charlie Taylor, Owen Dodgson

We've got two players for each position.

Now, let's go and get O'Hare and work on that strike force.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16923
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6970 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:44 pm

boyyanno wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:42 pm
It's important to look at the overall picture in football where players such as Mane go for 30m and players like Darwin Nunez cost 65m. Generally speaking players with high potential are valued over and above players who are established- don't ask me why because it makes little sense but that's generally how the market is.
Yeah I get that. Which only goes to reinforce my point that Collins hasn’t shown that he is an outstanding PL player otherwise he would have been sold for a fee far in excess of £20m.

Ilkley claret
Posts: 388
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 107 times
Has Liked: 33 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Ilkley claret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:48 pm

We are waving the white flag, if we aren’t in a position to keep our youngest talent and must be desperate to sell for only £20m.

Ben White is the closest comparison I can think of and he went for £50m

Pathetic from the club and owners all round.

eastcoastclaret
Posts: 441
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:02 am
Been Liked: 114 times
Has Liked: 77 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by eastcoastclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:50 pm

Ilkley claret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:48 pm
We are waving the white flag, if we aren’t in a position to keep our youngest talent and must be desperate to sell for only £20m.

Ben White is the closest comparison I can think of and he went for £50m

Pathetic from the club and owners all round.
How do you know it's £20m?

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:52 pm

Ilkley claret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:48 pm
We are waving the white flag, if we aren’t in a position to keep our youngest talent and must be desperate to sell for only £20m.

Ben White is the closest comparison I can think of and he went for £50m

Pathetic from the club and owners all round.
Ben White had a full season as a first choice centre half for Brighton in the PL and wasn’t part of a relegated team.

You’d be better using Marc Guehi as an example, similar age, similar experience and just as highly rated - he went for a few under 20m with add ons rising to 20m.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7474
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2262 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CoolClaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:53 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:43 pm
My mentioning of Tarks being free is not a red herring, it is to illustrate that any club in the league could have acquired him on a free transfer. Yet the best deal on the table was from a club that only just survived relegation. Tarkowski is a better player than Collins. So again, talks of Collins definitely being a top 6 player worth £60m+ in future is pure hyperbole. This place has gone mad with wild and unsubstantiated claims.
Agreed -

It probably started 2-3 seasons back with folk claiming McNeil could be going for 50 million… The inflated Wood fee hasn’t helped but people have become seriously deluded with transfer fees

fidelcastro
Posts: 7362
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm

It's also worth mentioning that with transfer fees being officially 'undisclosed', there's bound to be stuff we don't here about and the reported fees are, in many cases, speculation and guess work.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:59 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:52 pm
Ben White had a full season as a first choice centre half for Brighton in the PL and wasn’t part of a relegated team.

You’d be better using Marc Guehi as an example, similar age, similar experience and just as highly rated - he went for a few under 20m with add ons rising to 20m.
Slightly similar. Tbf Guehi was only playing championship football. Collins had half a prem season under his belt. I think that automatically makes him worth more. Plus Collins is a full international now. Guehi was only u21 player at the time.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67942
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32558 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:03 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
It's also worth mentioning that with transfer fees being officially 'undisclosed', there's bound to be stuff we don't here about and the reported fees are, in many cases, speculation and guess work.
Hardly guesswork - usually very, very accurate.

dsr
Posts: 15245
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4579 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dsr » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:03 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:52 pm
Ben White had a full season as a first choice centre half for Brighton in the PL and wasn’t part of a relegated team.

You’d be better using Marc Guehi as an example, similar age, similar experience and just as highly rated - he went for a few under 20m with add ons rising to 20m.
Experience-wise, the difference between half a season in the PL and no PL experience at all is quite large. In half a season, a player can prove pretty much beyond doubt (as Collins has just done) that he is good enough to play PL football.

Post Reply