Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
KRBFC
Posts: 18150
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:07 am

kentonclaret wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:58 am
The major factor in our relegation was a lack of goals. In the bottom 3 lowest scoring teams for successive seasons and it was those teams that went down. The previous season we dodged a bullet only 2 of the lowest scoring sides went down. 2 home games against relegation rivals Norwich and Watford where we kept clean sheets but fired blanks.

Last season in the Championship it was the 3 highest scoring sides that won promotion to the PL.
and we have lost our statistically 2 best strikers (on output) in Wout and Vydra. It's also very likely our highest goalscorer will leave in the near future too.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2787
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 711 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:10 am

KRBFC wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:07 am
and we have lost our statistically 2 best strikers (on output) in Wout and Vydra. It's also very likely our highest goalscorer will leave in the near future too.
We're also now in an easier league, we are looking to bring new talent in, and there is 6 weeks until the close of the window.
This user liked this post: KateR

KRBFC
Posts: 18150
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:11 am

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:10 am
We're also now in an easier league, we are looking to bring new talent in, and there is 6 weeks until the close of the window.
Yup plenty of time to address, just key we get it right.

Spijed
Posts: 17125
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Spijed » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:13 am

kentonclaret wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:58 am
The major factor in our relegation was a lack of goals. In the bottom 3 lowest scoring teams for successive seasons and it was those teams that went down. The previous season we dodged a bullet only 2 of the lowest scoring sides went down. 2 home games against relegation rivals Norwich and Watford where we kept clean sheets but fired blanks.

Last season in the Championship it was the 3 highest scoring sides that won promotion to the PL.
It always seems to get ignored that in the season we finished 7th we were hardly prolific in scoring goals. Arguably one of the lowest ever scoring teams to qualify for Europe.

Jambo
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:48 am
Been Liked: 211 times
Has Liked: 240 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Jambo » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:17 am

All very well saying when the transfer window closes, but there are 21 points to play for before that happens. Forest showed you can recover from a bad start, but with such wholesale changes we want to avoid that. Things are out of our control with Cornet and maybe some other potential outgoings, but we don't want to be scrambling around on deadline day with a fair chunk of the season already played.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 KateR

warksclaret
Posts: 6699
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1706 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:18 am

The reason we did well that season was that the defence were outstanding with numerous clean sheets. At times that season only a handful of teams let in less goals.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2787
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 711 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:19 am

Jambo wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:17 am
All very well saying when the transfer window closes, but there are 21 points to play for before that happens. Forest showed you can recover from a bad start, but with such wholesale changes we want to avoid that. Things are out of our control with Cornet and maybe some other potential outgoings, but we don't want to be scrambling around on deadline day with a fair chunk of the season already played.
Depends on your expectations I guess, mine arent that we get promoted this season.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:20 am

dsr wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:48 am
But Kevin Long has a lot more experience at this level than Virgil Van Dijk. I suppose it might make a difference if you consider PL experience is any use at this level?
It might make a difference if he'd been a mainstay of our defence for a number of years, or even for an entire season, but he wasn't and never will be, 47 PL appearances in 6 PL seasons...
He's content being a bench warmer, he isn't going to be our saviour etc.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

kentonclaret
Posts: 6539
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 983 times
Has Liked: 205 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by kentonclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:23 am

KRBFC wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:07 am
and we have lost our statistically 2 best strikers (on output) in Wout and Vydra. It's also very likely our highest goalscorer will leave in the near future too.
All of the discussion surrounding Bournemouth, and trying to compare our situation to theirs last campaign, overlooks one major factor in that they retained the services of Dominic Solanke who ended up the second highest scorer with 29 goals.

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2116
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1165 times
Has Liked: 94 times
Location: your mum

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by daveisaclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:23 am

Spijed wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:13 am
It always seems to get ignored that in the season we finished 7th we were hardly prolific in scoring goals. Arguably one of the lowest ever scoring teams to qualify for Europe.
We didn't win that season between the 13th of December and the 2nd of March.

I'm not denigrating the achievement at all because we deserved to come 7th but it isn't in any way a model for a successful Championship season.

kentonclaret
Posts: 6539
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 983 times
Has Liked: 205 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by kentonclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:30 am

Spijed wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:13 am
It always seems to get ignored that in the season we finished 7th we were hardly prolific in scoring goals. Arguably one of the lowest ever scoring teams to qualify for Europe.

Exactly the points you make just confirm what a completely freakish season that turned out to be.

But all of the defensive players that achieved that feat have left the building. I am not expecting us to grind out many hard fought 1-0 wins, especially during the early part of the season.

KRBFC
Posts: 18150
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:32 am

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:19 am
Depends on your expectations I guess, mine arent that we get promoted this season.
Things have gone seriously wrong if we aren't expecting promotion, we were far better than Norwich and Watford last season. The parachute payments should be a huge advantage over the rest. If we aren't expecting promotion and buying for that reason, we may aswell pack it in.
This user liked this post: claret54

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11123
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1576 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:33 am

KRBFC wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:32 am
Things have gone seriously wrong if we aren't expecting promotion, we were far better than Norwich and Watford last season. The parachute payments should be a huge advantage over the rest. If we aren't expecting promotion and buying for that reason, we may aswell pack it in.
Promotion has to be the target. It gets harder every season you stay down.

KRBFC
Posts: 18150
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:35 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:33 am
Promotion has to be the target. It gets harder every season you stay down.
Operation lower expectation has been a success it seems. If we don't get promoted, the seasons been a failure.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11123
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1576 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:36 am

Not a rumour but if anyone needs cheering up today, go and watch the recent video released by the club. Made that young lads day

https://twitter.com/BurnleyOfficial/sta ... J3m2w&s=19
These 5 users liked this post: Turfytop DCWat burnleymik Bigvince clive40golf

warksclaret
Posts: 6699
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1706 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:36 am

The fact we are looking at Maatsen the Chelsea full back, to me shows how far we have moved in less than 3 months on our player quality and thinking. Taylor was good enough for SD, and several times I heard him suggesting Southgate should be looking at him. Taylor is strong, great on recovery, and a great tackler and blocker. However he, like many Burnley players had a poor season . He is not the finished article and far from the modern full back-poor going forward, very one footed and can only ever go on the outside. He has not scored since being with us, and because of his indifferent deliveries his assists per season have been low, maybe just two last year.Despite poor performances he was always first choice last year.THe same applied to Westwood, Barnes, Wood and at times McNeil, who could all play bad for a number of games but still start next game

Pickles
Posts: 3618
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:10 pm
Been Liked: 1393 times
Has Liked: 1228 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Pickles » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:42 am

Made me smile when you'd see a "guess the line-up" thread on here, or discussions about who's going to play where. What was the point? Was usually the most obvious thing imaginable for the best part of a decade! Certainly seeming like those threads will be a little more interesting come the end of the month.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:44 am

I know it’s Alex Crook and he’s not considered reliable but he said Delap is allowed to leave City on loan, and while Southampton have been interested, they may prefer a striker on a permanent.

This would possibly be good news for us if true?

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2787
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 711 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:47 am

KRBFC wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:35 am
Operation lower expectation has been a success it seems. If we don't get promoted, the seasons been a failure.
Disagree, with the amount or player turnover this season is a bedding in one for me.
These 2 users liked this post: It Is What It Is tiger76

KRBFC
Posts: 18150
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:52 am

warksclaret wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:36 am
The fact we are looking at Maatsen the Chelsea full back, to me shows how far we have moved in less than 3 months on our player quality and thinking. Taylor was good enough for SD, and several times I heard him suggesting Southgate should be looking at him. Taylor is strong, great on recovery, and a great tackler and blocker. However he, like many Burnley players had a poor season . He is not the finished article and far from the modern full back-poor going forward, very one footed and can only ever go on the outside. He has not scored since being with us, and because of his indifferent deliveries his assists per season have been low, maybe just two last year.Despite poor performances he was always first choice last year.THe same applied to Westwood, Barnes, Wood and at times McNeil, who could all play bad for a number of games but still start next game
That Maatsen looks a proper player, I don't think Taylor has progressed at all like I expected him too, absolutely rotten last year. He makes good marauding runs but his end product is usually really poor and he can't drive inside so he's kinda predictable to defend against. Defensively last year he was pants too, just a really really poor season from him, I'd argue I thought Pieters should've been first choice on form.
These 5 users liked this post: warksclaret CoolClaret MeeActon1 Suntan KateR

claptrappers_union
Posts: 5918
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1774 times
Has Liked: 361 times
Location: The Banana Stand

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claptrappers_union » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:59 am

KRBFC wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:52 am
That Maatsen looks a proper player, I don't think Taylor has progressed at all like I expected him too, absolutely rotten last year. He makes good marauding runs but his end product is usually really poor and he can't drive inside so he's kinda predictable to defend against. Defensively last year he was pants too, just a really really poor season from him, I'd argue I thought Pieters should've been first choice on form.
I think I agree with this, I wouldn't say his end product was 'really poor', but I presumed he was going to be a bringing more assists to his game, given the way we played.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1884 times
Has Liked: 841 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:03 am

claptrappers_union wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:59 am
I think I agree with this, I wouldn't say his end product was 'really poor', but I presumed he was going to be a bringing more assists to his game, given the way we played.
His end product is something he needs to improve on. For the number of times he gets into good positions little often comes from it as his crossing is so inconsistent.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:05 am

RVclaret wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:44 am
I know it’s Alex Crook and he’s not considered reliable but he said Delap is allowed to leave City on loan, and while Southampton have been interested, they may prefer a striker on a permanent.

This would possibly be good news for us if true?
Fabrizio Romano

"Manchester City are prepared to let Liam Delap leave in the next weeks. Been told Burnley asked for Delap on loan until end of the season, while Southampton are also interested but for permanent move. 🔵 #MCFC

Final decision to be made in the next days."

Broke yesterday that.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:07 am

kentonclaret wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:23 am
All of the discussion surrounding Bournemouth, and trying to compare our situation to theirs last campaign, overlooks one major factor in that they retained the services of Dominic Solanke who ended up the second highest scorer with 29 goals.
You conveniently leave out that he was absolute pants in the Premier League, scoring 3 goals in 42 games, and he only scored 15 in the Championship the season before last.

They retained him because nobody wanted him, and hot lucky that he came good last season.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:10 am

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:05 am
Fabrizio Romano

"Manchester City are prepared to let Liam Delap leave in the next weeks. Been told Burnley asked for Delap on loan until end of the season, while Southampton are also interested but for permanent move. 🔵 #MCFC

Final decision to be made in the next days."

Broke yesterday that.
Aware of that. Alex added that City just want to loan him, which is new information, hence I added it here.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:12 am

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:47 am
Disagree, with the amount or player turnover this season is a bedding in one for me.
Agree with this. Took Bournemouth two seasons, finished 6th in 20/21 and 2nd in 21/22.

They lost a ridiculous 31 players over the course of 20/21 including academy graduates.

jackmiggins
Posts: 797
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:29 pm
Been Liked: 197 times
Has Liked: 48 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jackmiggins » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:16 am

Looks like a goer!

jackmiggins
Posts: 797
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:29 pm
Been Liked: 197 times
Has Liked: 48 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jackmiggins » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:19 am

Delap on loan, I mean. Pretty sure City will prefer a loan to potentially increase his value after a successful loan spell.

forzagranata
Posts: 714
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 442 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by forzagranata » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:22 am

Taylor is one of those players we could lose in late August. Only takes a serious injury to a LB with a mid to lower PL side and they would see Taylor as a decent option - certainly at the price that Burnley would be likely to let him leave for. So it wouldn't be a surprise if we are looking at a cheap alternative to Taylor.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:24 am

jackmiggins wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:19 am
Delap on loan, I mean. Pretty sure City will prefer a loan to potentially increase his value after a successful loan spell.
Let’s hope so - plus the Kompany pull…

Ric_C
Posts: 2081
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 756 times
Has Liked: 122 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Ric_C » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:46 am


Mala591
Posts: 1889
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:02 pm
Been Liked: 685 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Mala591 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:48 am

KRBFC wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:52 am
That Maatsen looks a proper player, I don't think Taylor has progressed at all like I expected him too, absolutely rotten last year. He makes good marauding runs but his end product is usually really poor and he can't drive inside so he's kinda predictable to defend against. Defensively last year he was pants too, just a really really poor season from him, I'd argue I thought Pieters should've been first choice on form.
Welcome back Hibsclaret

DCWat
Posts: 9336
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4143 times
Has Liked: 3606 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by DCWat » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:49 am

Ric_C wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:46 am
Wolves after Brownhill

https://twitter.com/NETOFPL/status/1547 ... 9wIzEF_WWw
I certainly think he’d do a decent job for us in the Championship. Saying that, I wouldn’t be against him leaving for a decent fee.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretandy » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:49 am

Ric_C wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:46 am
Wolves after Brownhill

https://twitter.com/NETOFPL/status/1547 ... 9wIzEF_WWw
That's a no mark fpl account.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:50 am

Ric_C wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:46 am
Wolves after Brownhill

https://twitter.com/NETOFPL/status/1547 ... 9wIzEF_WWw
Not sure it's a credible source. A Wolves page that didn't even post about the Collins deal.

Ric_C
Posts: 2081
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 756 times
Has Liked: 122 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Ric_C » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:54 am

ah ignore it then, just saw they had 24k followers

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:58 am

warksclaret wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:15 am
The lack of development in Taylor has been mentioned on here. A player of great potential but someone who has not progressed to what was expected. I for one will be as keen to see what the new management team provide in terms of coaching and player development-I suspect we could see a marked improvement in terms of what was provided by Stone & Woan, though Billy Mercer might be a hard act to follow
What, exactly, was expected from him?
Was he expected to be a marauding left back/wing back?
Was he meant to be defensively solid?
Have people's views of him been spoiled after watching full backs like Reece James who had 9 assists last season to Taylor's 3?
Or Robertson who had 10 assists?
There aren't many defenders with more assists than Taylor last season.

He provided the most assists last season out of all of our defenders and was joint top at the club along with Brownhill, Westwood, WW and Vydra.
4th highest passer
Most touches of the ball
5th in minutes played
8th on the dispossessed
4th most chances created, behind McNeil, Brownhill and Westwood.

He often had his best games when the man in front of him was also playing well and last I checked there had been a dip in form of the men in front of him so he had to check his forward runs as a result.

Taylor is a solid performer for us, ratings averaged 6-7 like the rest of the defence and he chipped in with attacking play where he could.

Now the narrative is being switched to how he hasn't developed, isn't good enough etc ...seems a bit harsh when we look at the stats 🤔
These 4 users liked this post: clive40golf AfloatinClaret Middle-agedClaret Greenmile

forzagranata
Posts: 714
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 442 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by forzagranata » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:02 pm

Its amazing how established Burnley players are now instantly downgraded by some on here whenever the possibility of them leaving comes up. Taylor is rubbish, Brownill not good enough, Pope getting old, Ben Mee can't pass a ball etc etc. Then whenever a player that almost no-one has seen play signs for us - they are brilliant, tremendous potential and "exciting".
This user liked this post: spt_claret

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Top Claret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:02 pm

Ric_C wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:46 am
Wolves after Brownhill

https://twitter.com/NETOFPL/status/1547 ... 9wIzEF_WWw

If this is the case Brownhill will be really pushing for the move as he lives in Cheshire which isn't to far away and he will no doubt double his wage.

All our premier League players will want out if they have taken pay cuts McNeil included

AGENT_CLARET
Posts: 3149
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
Been Liked: 1162 times
Has Liked: 1079 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by AGENT_CLARET » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:06 pm

They are the reason they've had to take pay cuts
These 3 users liked this post: randomclaret2 tiger76 Quicknick

elwaclaret
Posts: 9012
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2018 times
Has Liked: 2915 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by elwaclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:09 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:58 am
What, exactly, was expected from him?
Was he expected to be a marauding left back/wing back?
Was he meant to be defensively solid?
Have people's views of him been spoiled after watching full backs like Reece James who had 9 assists last season to Taylor's 3?
Or Robertson who had 10 assists?
There aren't many defenders with more assists than Taylor last season.

He provided the most assists last season out of all of our defenders and was joint top at the club along with Brownhill, Westwood, WW and Vydra.
4th highest passer
Most touches of the ball
5th in minutes played
8th on the dispossessed
4th most chances created, behind McNeil, Brownhill and Westwood.

He often had his best games when the man in front of him was also playing well and last I checked there had been a dip in form of the men in front of him so he had to check his forward runs as a result.

Taylor is a solid performer for us, ratings averaged 6-7 like the rest of the defence and he chipped in with attacking play where he could.

Now the narrative is being switched to how he hasn't developed, isn't good enough etc ...seems a bit harsh when we look at the stats 🤔
I like Taylor, but you defence of him here as all about his overlapping… I’d say he is a better wing back than full back. We were clearly targeted on the left because of our weak left. Whether that was because Taylor was too keen to bomb forward, or because no one was doing the covering job is a matter or opinion. He made some fantastic last ditch goal saving interceptions… but mainly because he was out of position earlier in the move and was still getting back.

As I say I like Taylor but as a former left back, the number of times I cringed at our lefts defending last season it is what my abiding memory of last season will be.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:36 pm

elwaclaret wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:09 pm
I like Taylor, but you defence of him here as all about his overlapping… I’d say he is a better wing back than full back. We were clearly targeted on the left because of our weak left. Whether that was because Taylor was too keen to bomb forward, or because no one was doing the covering job is a matter or opinion. He made some fantastic last ditch goal saving interceptions… but mainly because he was out of position earlier in the move and was still getting back.

As I say I like Taylor but as a former left back, the number of times I cringed at our lefts defending last season it is what my abiding memory of last season will be.
Screenshot_20220714-122832.png
Screenshot_20220714-122832.png (200.65 KiB) Viewed 2119 times
Majority of shots on our goal came down the middle, there's not much difference between attempts from the flanks
Conversely we made more attempts on the oppositions goal from the left flank at 15% than we did from the right flank at 13% but still well below the centre at 72%.

Taylor made 7 more tackles than Lowton last season, commited 4 more fouls and received less cards.

Tarks, followed by Collins, made the most fouls out of our defenders, then Taylor, Pieters and Lowton.

He made the 2nd most tackles, after Tarks, followed by Lowton, Collins and Pieters.

Taylor is being unfairly targeted in my opinion when he's done no worse than the rest of our defenders lasts season and the stats support that view.

elwaclaret
Posts: 9012
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2018 times
Has Liked: 2915 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by elwaclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:41 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:36 pm
Screenshot_20220714-122832.png

Majority of shots on our goal came down the middle, there's not much difference between attempts from the flanks
Conversely we made more attempts on the oppositions goal from the left flank at 15% than we did from the right flank at 13% but still well below the centre at 72%.

Taylor made 7 more tackles than Lowton last season, commited 4 more fouls and received less cards.

Tarks, followed by Collins, made the most fouls out of our defenders, then Taylor, Pieters and Lowton.

He made the 2nd most tackles, after Tarks, followed by Lowton, Collins and Pieters.

Taylor is being unfairly targeted in my opinion when he's done no worse than the rest of our defenders lasts season and the stats support that view.
Interesting take. Does it allow for the central midfield trying to cover the left and so being dis-jointed and out of position? I was brought up understanding you can make statistics say whatever you want… “there are lies, damn lies; then there are statistics”. I prefer the evidence of my own eyes and experience.
This user liked this post: randomclaret2

Oldparkwood
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:14 pm
Been Liked: 127 times
Has Liked: 44 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Oldparkwood » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:52 pm

FFS can we not keep it on topic?
Last edited by Oldparkwood on Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 Middle-agedClaret

Tinribs
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:04 am
Been Liked: 281 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Tinribs » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:53 pm

Don’t know why club are spending all that money on Backroom staff.We got the best tacticians,Scouts and accountants all on this thread.
These 4 users liked this post: louieollie tiger76 Silkyskills1 longsidepies

It Is What It Is
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:21 pm
Been Liked: 196 times
Has Liked: 407 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by It Is What It Is » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:53 pm

There are a lot of good football tactician historical fans here who submit really interesting posts.
I am not one personally for all that, just put on the shirt, cross the line and play the game as you see it.
Whichever which way the mop flops, so to speak.
Play with 100% passion, commitment and guile for the team and 3 points. Nobody won anything with a pen and paper in their hand...a quick word with a colleague on the pitch is enough!

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:56 pm

elwaclaret wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:41 pm
Interesting take. Does it allow for the central midfield trying to cover the left and so being dis-jointed and out of position? I was brought up understanding you can make statistics say whatever you want… “there are lies, damn lies; then there are statistics”. I prefer the evidence of my own eyes and experience.
Was the central midfield covering Taylor or the left winger, you left that part out?
A number of CM's at other clubs slot into the fullback position to provide cover when the said FB is helping the attack, that isn't a unique thing to Burnley.

The stats are the stats, I'm not twisting anything to slate a player who's been a good player for us during his time here, that's just something this forum likes to do from time to time.
These 2 users liked this post: Culmclaret clive40golf

Stayingup
Posts: 5617
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 924 times
Has Liked: 2757 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Stayingup » Thu Jul 14, 2022 1:01 pm

elwaclaret wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:09 pm
I like Taylor, but you defence of him here as all about his overlapping… I’d say he is a better wing back than full back. We were clearly targeted on the left because of our weak left. Whether that was because Taylor was too keen to bomb forward, or because no one was doing the covering job is a matter or opinion. He made some fantastic last ditch goal saving interceptions… but mainly because he was out of position earlier in the move and was still getting back.

As I say I like Taylor but as a former left back, the number of times I cringed at our lefts defending last season it is what my abiding memory of last season will be.
I recall the Man City game at home, where Taylor was left exposed to both Sterling and Walker who passed around him and both goals came from his side in the first half. At half time Sean Dyche hooked McNeil. That was telling.
This user liked this post: Culmclaret

elwaclaret
Posts: 9012
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2018 times
Has Liked: 2915 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by elwaclaret » Thu Jul 14, 2022 1:01 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:56 pm
Was the central midfield covering Taylor or the left winger, you left that part out?
A number of CM's at other clubs slot into the fullback position to provide cover when the said FB is helping the attack, that isn't a unique thing to Burnley.

The stats are the stats, I'm not twisting anything to slate a player who's been a good player for us during his time here, that's just something this forum likes to do from time to time.
Not accusing you are twisting anything… I’m not into the BBB arguments you get on here. Just saying what I saw and took from watching the shape last season. Undoubtably, Dwight’s lack of defensive concentration did not help when it came to him tracking back. Interesting for me one of McNiel’s most solid all round performances was Spurs at home… when Pieters was pecking McNiel throughout, making sure he got back… Pieters managed the left back position, whereas Charlie ‘played’ left back.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8569
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2476 times
Has Liked: 2014 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Tricky Trevor » Thu Jul 14, 2022 1:02 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:18 am
The reason we did well that season was that the defence were outstanding with numerous clean sheets. At times that season only a handful of teams let in less goals.
The defence weren’t poor last season. The MF in front of them are down a level from what we had then and the strike force were on strike, a shambles.
These 2 users liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81 tiger76

Post Reply