and we have lost our statistically 2 best strikers (on output) in Wout and Vydra. It's also very likely our highest goalscorer will leave in the near future too.kentonclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:58 amThe major factor in our relegation was a lack of goals. In the bottom 3 lowest scoring teams for successive seasons and it was those teams that went down. The previous season we dodged a bullet only 2 of the lowest scoring sides went down. 2 home games against relegation rivals Norwich and Watford where we kept clean sheets but fired blanks.
Last season in the Championship it was the 3 highest scoring sides that won promotion to the PL.
Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 711 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
We're also now in an easier league, we are looking to bring new talent in, and there is 6 weeks until the close of the window.
This user liked this post: KateR
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Yup plenty of time to address, just key we get it right.Granny WeatherWax wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:10 amWe're also now in an easier league, we are looking to bring new talent in, and there is 6 weeks until the close of the window.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It always seems to get ignored that in the season we finished 7th we were hardly prolific in scoring goals. Arguably one of the lowest ever scoring teams to qualify for Europe.kentonclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:58 amThe major factor in our relegation was a lack of goals. In the bottom 3 lowest scoring teams for successive seasons and it was those teams that went down. The previous season we dodged a bullet only 2 of the lowest scoring sides went down. 2 home games against relegation rivals Norwich and Watford where we kept clean sheets but fired blanks.
Last season in the Championship it was the 3 highest scoring sides that won promotion to the PL.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
All very well saying when the transfer window closes, but there are 21 points to play for before that happens. Forest showed you can recover from a bad start, but with such wholesale changes we want to avoid that. Things are out of our control with Cornet and maybe some other potential outgoings, but we don't want to be scrambling around on deadline day with a fair chunk of the season already played.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 KateR
-
- Posts: 6699
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1706 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
The reason we did well that season was that the defence were outstanding with numerous clean sheets. At times that season only a handful of teams let in less goals.
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 711 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Depends on your expectations I guess, mine arent that we get promoted this season.Jambo wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:17 amAll very well saying when the transfer window closes, but there are 21 points to play for before that happens. Forest showed you can recover from a bad start, but with such wholesale changes we want to avoid that. Things are out of our control with Cornet and maybe some other potential outgoings, but we don't want to be scrambling around on deadline day with a fair chunk of the season already played.
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It might make a difference if he'd been a mainstay of our defence for a number of years, or even for an entire season, but he wasn't and never will be, 47 PL appearances in 6 PL seasons...
He's content being a bench warmer, he isn't going to be our saviour etc.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 983 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
All of the discussion surrounding Bournemouth, and trying to compare our situation to theirs last campaign, overlooks one major factor in that they retained the services of Dominic Solanke who ended up the second highest scorer with 29 goals.
-
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1165 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
We didn't win that season between the 13th of December and the 2nd of March.
I'm not denigrating the achievement at all because we deserved to come 7th but it isn't in any way a model for a successful Championship season.
-
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 983 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Exactly the points you make just confirm what a completely freakish season that turned out to be.
But all of the defensive players that achieved that feat have left the building. I am not expecting us to grind out many hard fought 1-0 wins, especially during the early part of the season.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Things have gone seriously wrong if we aren't expecting promotion, we were far better than Norwich and Watford last season. The parachute payments should be a huge advantage over the rest. If we aren't expecting promotion and buying for that reason, we may aswell pack it in.Granny WeatherWax wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:19 amDepends on your expectations I guess, mine arent that we get promoted this season.
This user liked this post: claret54
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Promotion has to be the target. It gets harder every season you stay down.KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:32 amThings have gone seriously wrong if we aren't expecting promotion, we were far better than Norwich and Watford last season. The parachute payments should be a huge advantage over the rest. If we aren't expecting promotion and buying for that reason, we may aswell pack it in.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Operation lower expectation has been a success it seems. If we don't get promoted, the seasons been a failure.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:33 amPromotion has to be the target. It gets harder every season you stay down.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not a rumour but if anyone needs cheering up today, go and watch the recent video released by the club. Made that young lads day
https://twitter.com/BurnleyOfficial/sta ... J3m2w&s=19
https://twitter.com/BurnleyOfficial/sta ... J3m2w&s=19
These 5 users liked this post: Turfytop DCWat burnleymik Bigvince clive40golf
-
- Posts: 6699
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1706 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
The fact we are looking at Maatsen the Chelsea full back, to me shows how far we have moved in less than 3 months on our player quality and thinking. Taylor was good enough for SD, and several times I heard him suggesting Southgate should be looking at him. Taylor is strong, great on recovery, and a great tackler and blocker. However he, like many Burnley players had a poor season . He is not the finished article and far from the modern full back-poor going forward, very one footed and can only ever go on the outside. He has not scored since being with us, and because of his indifferent deliveries his assists per season have been low, maybe just two last year.Despite poor performances he was always first choice last year.THe same applied to Westwood, Barnes, Wood and at times McNeil, who could all play bad for a number of games but still start next game
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Made me smile when you'd see a "guess the line-up" thread on here, or discussions about who's going to play where. What was the point? Was usually the most obvious thing imaginable for the best part of a decade! Certainly seeming like those threads will be a little more interesting come the end of the month.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I know it’s Alex Crook and he’s not considered reliable but he said Delap is allowed to leave City on loan, and while Southampton have been interested, they may prefer a striker on a permanent.
This would possibly be good news for us if true?
This would possibly be good news for us if true?
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 711 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Disagree, with the amount or player turnover this season is a bedding in one for me.
These 2 users liked this post: It Is What It Is tiger76
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
That Maatsen looks a proper player, I don't think Taylor has progressed at all like I expected him too, absolutely rotten last year. He makes good marauding runs but his end product is usually really poor and he can't drive inside so he's kinda predictable to defend against. Defensively last year he was pants too, just a really really poor season from him, I'd argue I thought Pieters should've been first choice on form.warksclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:36 amThe fact we are looking at Maatsen the Chelsea full back, to me shows how far we have moved in less than 3 months on our player quality and thinking. Taylor was good enough for SD, and several times I heard him suggesting Southgate should be looking at him. Taylor is strong, great on recovery, and a great tackler and blocker. However he, like many Burnley players had a poor season . He is not the finished article and far from the modern full back-poor going forward, very one footed and can only ever go on the outside. He has not scored since being with us, and because of his indifferent deliveries his assists per season have been low, maybe just two last year.Despite poor performances he was always first choice last year.THe same applied to Westwood, Barnes, Wood and at times McNeil, who could all play bad for a number of games but still start next game
These 5 users liked this post: warksclaret CoolClaret MeeActon1 Suntan KateR
-
- Posts: 5918
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1774 times
- Has Liked: 361 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I think I agree with this, I wouldn't say his end product was 'really poor', but I presumed he was going to be a bringing more assists to his game, given the way we played.KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:52 amThat Maatsen looks a proper player, I don't think Taylor has progressed at all like I expected him too, absolutely rotten last year. He makes good marauding runs but his end product is usually really poor and he can't drive inside so he's kinda predictable to defend against. Defensively last year he was pants too, just a really really poor season from him, I'd argue I thought Pieters should've been first choice on form.
-
- Posts: 5799
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
His end product is something he needs to improve on. For the number of times he gets into good positions little often comes from it as his crossing is so inconsistent.claptrappers_union wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:59 amI think I agree with this, I wouldn't say his end product was 'really poor', but I presumed he was going to be a bringing more assists to his game, given the way we played.
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 372 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Fabrizio Romano
"Manchester City are prepared to let Liam Delap leave in the next weeks. Been told Burnley asked for Delap on loan until end of the season, while Southampton are also interested but for permanent move. #MCFC
Final decision to be made in the next days."
Broke yesterday that.
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 372 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
You conveniently leave out that he was absolute pants in the Premier League, scoring 3 goals in 42 games, and he only scored 15 in the Championship the season before last.kentonclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:23 amAll of the discussion surrounding Bournemouth, and trying to compare our situation to theirs last campaign, overlooks one major factor in that they retained the services of Dominic Solanke who ended up the second highest scorer with 29 goals.
They retained him because nobody wanted him, and hot lucky that he came good last season.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Aware of that. Alex added that City just want to loan him, which is new information, hence I added it here.UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:05 amFabrizio Romano
"Manchester City are prepared to let Liam Delap leave in the next weeks. Been told Burnley asked for Delap on loan until end of the season, while Southampton are also interested but for permanent move. #MCFC
Final decision to be made in the next days."
Broke yesterday that.
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 372 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Agree with this. Took Bournemouth two seasons, finished 6th in 20/21 and 2nd in 21/22.Granny WeatherWax wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:47 amDisagree, with the amount or player turnover this season is a bedding in one for me.
They lost a ridiculous 31 players over the course of 20/21 including academy graduates.
-
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:29 pm
- Been Liked: 197 times
- Has Liked: 48 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Looks like a goer!
-
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:29 pm
- Been Liked: 197 times
- Has Liked: 48 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Delap on loan, I mean. Pretty sure City will prefer a loan to potentially increase his value after a successful loan spell.
-
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Taylor is one of those players we could lose in late August. Only takes a serious injury to a LB with a mid to lower PL side and they would see Taylor as a decent option - certainly at the price that Burnley would be likely to let him leave for. So it wouldn't be a surprise if we are looking at a cheap alternative to Taylor.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Let’s hope so - plus the Kompany pull…jackmiggins wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:19 amDelap on loan, I mean. Pretty sure City will prefer a loan to potentially increase his value after a successful loan spell.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Welcome back HibsclaretKRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:52 amThat Maatsen looks a proper player, I don't think Taylor has progressed at all like I expected him too, absolutely rotten last year. He makes good marauding runs but his end product is usually really poor and he can't drive inside so he's kinda predictable to defend against. Defensively last year he was pants too, just a really really poor season from him, I'd argue I thought Pieters should've been first choice on form.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I certainly think he’d do a decent job for us in the Championship. Saying that, I wouldn’t be against him leaving for a decent fee.Ric_C wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:46 amWolves after Brownhill
https://twitter.com/NETOFPL/status/1547 ... 9wIzEF_WWw
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
That's a no mark fpl account.Ric_C wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:46 amWolves after Brownhill
https://twitter.com/NETOFPL/status/1547 ... 9wIzEF_WWw
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 372 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not sure it's a credible source. A Wolves page that didn't even post about the Collins deal.Ric_C wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:46 amWolves after Brownhill
https://twitter.com/NETOFPL/status/1547 ... 9wIzEF_WWw
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
ah ignore it then, just saw they had 24k followers
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
What, exactly, was expected from him?warksclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:15 amThe lack of development in Taylor has been mentioned on here. A player of great potential but someone who has not progressed to what was expected. I for one will be as keen to see what the new management team provide in terms of coaching and player development-I suspect we could see a marked improvement in terms of what was provided by Stone & Woan, though Billy Mercer might be a hard act to follow
Was he expected to be a marauding left back/wing back?
Was he meant to be defensively solid?
Have people's views of him been spoiled after watching full backs like Reece James who had 9 assists last season to Taylor's 3?
Or Robertson who had 10 assists?
There aren't many defenders with more assists than Taylor last season.
He provided the most assists last season out of all of our defenders and was joint top at the club along with Brownhill, Westwood, WW and Vydra.
4th highest passer
Most touches of the ball
5th in minutes played
8th on the dispossessed
4th most chances created, behind McNeil, Brownhill and Westwood.
He often had his best games when the man in front of him was also playing well and last I checked there had been a dip in form of the men in front of him so he had to check his forward runs as a result.
Taylor is a solid performer for us, ratings averaged 6-7 like the rest of the defence and he chipped in with attacking play where he could.
Now the narrative is being switched to how he hasn't developed, isn't good enough etc ...seems a bit harsh when we look at the stats
These 4 users liked this post: clive40golf AfloatinClaret Middle-agedClaret Greenmile
-
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Its amazing how established Burnley players are now instantly downgraded by some on here whenever the possibility of them leaving comes up. Taylor is rubbish, Brownill not good enough, Pope getting old, Ben Mee can't pass a ball etc etc. Then whenever a player that almost no-one has seen play signs for us - they are brilliant, tremendous potential and "exciting".
This user liked this post: spt_claret
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Ric_C wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:46 amWolves after Brownhill
https://twitter.com/NETOFPL/status/1547 ... 9wIzEF_WWw
If this is the case Brownhill will be really pushing for the move as he lives in Cheshire which isn't to far away and he will no doubt double his wage.
All our premier League players will want out if they have taken pay cuts McNeil included
-
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1162 times
- Has Liked: 1079 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
They are the reason they've had to take pay cuts
These 3 users liked this post: randomclaret2 tiger76 Quicknick
-
- Posts: 9012
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2018 times
- Has Liked: 2915 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I like Taylor, but you defence of him here as all about his overlapping… I’d say he is a better wing back than full back. We were clearly targeted on the left because of our weak left. Whether that was because Taylor was too keen to bomb forward, or because no one was doing the covering job is a matter or opinion. He made some fantastic last ditch goal saving interceptions… but mainly because he was out of position earlier in the move and was still getting back.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:58 amWhat, exactly, was expected from him?
Was he expected to be a marauding left back/wing back?
Was he meant to be defensively solid?
Have people's views of him been spoiled after watching full backs like Reece James who had 9 assists last season to Taylor's 3?
Or Robertson who had 10 assists?
There aren't many defenders with more assists than Taylor last season.
He provided the most assists last season out of all of our defenders and was joint top at the club along with Brownhill, Westwood, WW and Vydra.
4th highest passer
Most touches of the ball
5th in minutes played
8th on the dispossessed
4th most chances created, behind McNeil, Brownhill and Westwood.
He often had his best games when the man in front of him was also playing well and last I checked there had been a dip in form of the men in front of him so he had to check his forward runs as a result.
Taylor is a solid performer for us, ratings averaged 6-7 like the rest of the defence and he chipped in with attacking play where he could.
Now the narrative is being switched to how he hasn't developed, isn't good enough etc ...seems a bit harsh when we look at the stats
As I say I like Taylor but as a former left back, the number of times I cringed at our lefts defending last season it is what my abiding memory of last season will be.
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Majority of shots on our goal came down the middle, there's not much difference between attempts from the flankselwaclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:09 pmI like Taylor, but you defence of him here as all about his overlapping… I’d say he is a better wing back than full back. We were clearly targeted on the left because of our weak left. Whether that was because Taylor was too keen to bomb forward, or because no one was doing the covering job is a matter or opinion. He made some fantastic last ditch goal saving interceptions… but mainly because he was out of position earlier in the move and was still getting back.
As I say I like Taylor but as a former left back, the number of times I cringed at our lefts defending last season it is what my abiding memory of last season will be.
Conversely we made more attempts on the oppositions goal from the left flank at 15% than we did from the right flank at 13% but still well below the centre at 72%.
Taylor made 7 more tackles than Lowton last season, commited 4 more fouls and received less cards.
Tarks, followed by Collins, made the most fouls out of our defenders, then Taylor, Pieters and Lowton.
He made the 2nd most tackles, after Tarks, followed by Lowton, Collins and Pieters.
Taylor is being unfairly targeted in my opinion when he's done no worse than the rest of our defenders lasts season and the stats support that view.
-
- Posts: 9012
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2018 times
- Has Liked: 2915 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Interesting take. Does it allow for the central midfield trying to cover the left and so being dis-jointed and out of position? I was brought up understanding you can make statistics say whatever you want… “there are lies, damn lies; then there are statistics”. I prefer the evidence of my own eyes and experience.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:36 pmScreenshot_20220714-122832.png
Majority of shots on our goal came down the middle, there's not much difference between attempts from the flanks
Conversely we made more attempts on the oppositions goal from the left flank at 15% than we did from the right flank at 13% but still well below the centre at 72%.
Taylor made 7 more tackles than Lowton last season, commited 4 more fouls and received less cards.
Tarks, followed by Collins, made the most fouls out of our defenders, then Taylor, Pieters and Lowton.
He made the 2nd most tackles, after Tarks, followed by Lowton, Collins and Pieters.
Taylor is being unfairly targeted in my opinion when he's done no worse than the rest of our defenders lasts season and the stats support that view.
This user liked this post: randomclaret2
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:14 pm
- Been Liked: 127 times
- Has Liked: 44 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
FFS can we not keep it on topic?
Last edited by Oldparkwood on Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 Middle-agedClaret
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Don’t know why club are spending all that money on Backroom staff.We got the best tacticians,Scouts and accountants all on this thread.
These 4 users liked this post: louieollie tiger76 Silkyskills1 longsidepies
-
- Posts: 670
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 196 times
- Has Liked: 407 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
There are a lot of good football tactician historical fans here who submit really interesting posts.
I am not one personally for all that, just put on the shirt, cross the line and play the game as you see it.
Whichever which way the mop flops, so to speak.
Play with 100% passion, commitment and guile for the team and 3 points. Nobody won anything with a pen and paper in their hand...a quick word with a colleague on the pitch is enough!
I am not one personally for all that, just put on the shirt, cross the line and play the game as you see it.
Whichever which way the mop flops, so to speak.
Play with 100% passion, commitment and guile for the team and 3 points. Nobody won anything with a pen and paper in their hand...a quick word with a colleague on the pitch is enough!
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Was the central midfield covering Taylor or the left winger, you left that part out?elwaclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:41 pmInteresting take. Does it allow for the central midfield trying to cover the left and so being dis-jointed and out of position? I was brought up understanding you can make statistics say whatever you want… “there are lies, damn lies; then there are statistics”. I prefer the evidence of my own eyes and experience.
A number of CM's at other clubs slot into the fullback position to provide cover when the said FB is helping the attack, that isn't a unique thing to Burnley.
The stats are the stats, I'm not twisting anything to slate a player who's been a good player for us during his time here, that's just something this forum likes to do from time to time.
These 2 users liked this post: Culmclaret clive40golf
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I recall the Man City game at home, where Taylor was left exposed to both Sterling and Walker who passed around him and both goals came from his side in the first half. At half time Sean Dyche hooked McNeil. That was telling.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:09 pmI like Taylor, but you defence of him here as all about his overlapping… I’d say he is a better wing back than full back. We were clearly targeted on the left because of our weak left. Whether that was because Taylor was too keen to bomb forward, or because no one was doing the covering job is a matter or opinion. He made some fantastic last ditch goal saving interceptions… but mainly because he was out of position earlier in the move and was still getting back.
As I say I like Taylor but as a former left back, the number of times I cringed at our lefts defending last season it is what my abiding memory of last season will be.
This user liked this post: Culmclaret
-
- Posts: 9012
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2018 times
- Has Liked: 2915 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not accusing you are twisting anything… I’m not into the BBB arguments you get on here. Just saying what I saw and took from watching the shape last season. Undoubtably, Dwight’s lack of defensive concentration did not help when it came to him tracking back. Interesting for me one of McNiel’s most solid all round performances was Spurs at home… when Pieters was pecking McNiel throughout, making sure he got back… Pieters managed the left back position, whereas Charlie ‘played’ left back.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:56 pmWas the central midfield covering Taylor or the left winger, you left that part out?
A number of CM's at other clubs slot into the fullback position to provide cover when the said FB is helping the attack, that isn't a unique thing to Burnley.
The stats are the stats, I'm not twisting anything to slate a player who's been a good player for us during his time here, that's just something this forum likes to do from time to time.
-
- Posts: 8569
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2476 times
- Has Liked: 2014 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
The defence weren’t poor last season. The MF in front of them are down a level from what we had then and the strike force were on strike, a shambles.warksclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:18 amThe reason we did well that season was that the defence were outstanding with numerous clean sheets. At times that season only a handful of teams let in less goals.
These 2 users liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81 tiger76